Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Kosher Salt]

A guy who posts his asshole on the internet and sounds like Scott Thompson tries to say he's a better person than Rackets who actually takes his surrogate father role seriously.

That combined with the "I'm a preacher" thing (seriously everything he says is delivered with a preachy air to it) is a really bizarre combo. It makes it really hard to take anything he says seriously.

 

[Polyboros2]

PPP is the worst, he's has absolutely no entertaining value in and of himself, and I think he's only liked by haters of somewhat popular e-celebs cause they're aren't many people who rag on them.

 

[Horus]

I don’t think PPP understands what a joke is sometimes, and really takes things way too literally.
it was pretty clear when he thought that the most important thing to Nick in the world is video games, and then when de doesn’t get Dick’s jokes on Twitter.

I have come to the conclusion that Dick should relaunch TBPITU with PPP, or Maddox restarts The Best Debate with PPP.

I had that exact thought about PPP and Masterson. Listening to them argue about some random topic, with a bit of audience interaction, would be pretty entertaining.

Both guys would need to tone down their hate for each other bit, and at least be able to shake hands and enter into a stable business agreement though...which honestly would be harder for PPP.

 

[Comfyman]

2:55:10

I'm hesitant to say it should be banned legally. I just think the people who made it should maybe find a hangman's noose.

Hello, Based Department?

 

[Secret Asshole]

It's a divisive topic because it could go either way.

I agree with what you said because, as you say, no real children are abused. and maybe pedos can get their rocks off to that instead of actual CSAM, which might cut down the market, meaning fewer victims.

That said, I disagree as well. The problem is mentally-ill people might find it to be a "gateway drug" that leads to children being abused, even if they aren't physically doing it themselves and are "just" downloading actual CSAM, which then creates a market.

It's not a simple subject to discuss either, because of the subject matter someone is bound to get angry, either because they think the other person is paedophile, or because they're being called a paedophile. I'm curious if there's actually been any studies done regarding this, and if there were what the results ended up being.

I've actually talked about this topic A LOT and I know I get a lot of shit for it. I did my thesis in Forensic psych on Pedophiles. So I know a fair bit about them. There's absolutely no such thing as a gateway drug. Nor is there such a thing as gateway porn. For example, you can see this with another dangerous fetish: Cannabalistic fetishes. People with a cannibalism fetish who want to act it out have always had it, but they will frequently engage in fantasy roleplays. These roleplays only serve to hunt for victims to push them to the edge. Its much like grooming with pedophiles.

Pedophilia is a very specific mental disorder that occurs from birth or extremely traumatizing abuse during childhood. It cannot be acquired. Pedophiles will always offend. They will always seek out children. The mentality of a pedophile is to destroy the innocence of a child. They are predators through and through. Its why they just don't collect lolicon or small-breated porn stars or go after petite women. Because they're not actually children and loli doesn't look like actual kids at all. Innocence is a big component of pedophilia. So is misinterpreting child-like behaviors as sexual. Its a disease that alters your normal perspective. It isn't as simple as 'attraction to children'. It completely distorts your world view. A pedophile is a predatory psychopath who will bend the world to suit their urges. Their behavioral patterns are extremely complex and they will do anything to throw you off.

For example, there was a slate article where this pedophile talked about how he was babysitting a ballerina and then had to go to the bathroom to masturbate because he got so turned on. Their brains don't need any inspiration. Its just right there. This is a very big misnomer. You don't become a pedophlie. Pedophiles worm their way into the homes of families with children. Sometimes gender doesn't even matter, its the child-like traits. It cannot be thought of as a sexual preference, because they're wholly aroused by pre-pubescent features and by in large, its difficult to distinguish young male and female children because of a lack of secondary sexual characteristics.

There are a lot of conflicts over what influence actual child porn does, never mind simulated child porn. The fact is, we just don't know. There's a lack of information. Usually, the idea falls into one of three perspectives:

1. Child Porn Increases the likelihood of sexual victimization
2. Child Porn Decreases the likelihood of sexual victimization
3. No correlation between child porn and sexual victimization, or not enough data.

My position is generally 3. There's no correlation. You're a pedophile, you're after kids. Period. You're going to go after child porn because you want kids. It holds no influence either way (and should obviously still be illegal, no shit). Positions 1 & 2 come from the fact that research has shown pornography decreases the incidence of rape. But male sexual desire and frustration is a completely different beast than the pathology of a pedophile. But research for child porn itself has been shown for 1 & 2 as well. Its highly conflicting. Plus you have to rely on actual pedos, which makes everything suspect.

Not to mention any studies with pedophiles, you're already talking to convicted pedophiles, who are notoriously manipulative sociopaths, so good data is hard to find. But I find it highly unlikely that unreaslistic, highly stylized depictions that are drawings that don't look like children at all would fuel pedophilia. It just doesn't make sense to me and how compulsive they are. If pedophiles do look at loli, its for a short time before they move onto actual child porn. And if loli didn't exist, they'd just go for real child porn. Its not a stop-gap or preventive or something that would really matter either way in the long run. I've never actually heard of a pedophile just stopping at drawings. You can't hold back this pathology. Reproduction is a strong urge, much stronger. And when your brain is damaged in this fashion, you are not getting around this compulsion. That's why you see pedophiles with huge libraries of child porn, because of this intense compulsion.

tl;dr Pedophilia is extremely complicated and they'd just abuse kids anyway if the drawings didn't exist.

Also, Digibro is 100% a pedophile. His fantasy would be if they didn't age, but they do. Meaning he's thinking of an actual child, not a fictional one. So yes, Digibro is indefensible. His talk of disposing them once they aged out is basically screaming he's a pedophile and his fantasy is more grounded in reality than just some 2D shit. I'd pin him as a dangerous individual.

 

[5t3n0g0ph3r]

Not sure if he's streaming tonight, but Nick streamed gameplay of theHunter: Call of the Wild a few days ago:

 

[HTTP Error 404]

If lolicon/shotcon/other degenerate shit lead to child abuse, Japan would be a living fucking nightmare for children. It's not. QED, it doesn't lead to child abuse.

 

[AnOminous]

Also, Digibro is 100% a pedophile. His fantasy would be if they didn't age, but they do. Meaning he's thinking of an actual child, not a fictional one. So yes, Digibro is indefensible. His talk of disposing them once they aged out is basically screaming he's a pedophile and his fantasy is more grounded in reality than just some 2D shit. I'd pin him as a dangerous individual.

Digi is one of those guys who'd kidnap a child and keep them for years then murder them, or keep them in an underground dungeon like famous Australian Josef Fritzl to produce more children. Luckily he's low functioning enough he's admitted this shit repeatedly in public so if any kids disappear anywhere remotely connected to him he's prime suspect #1.

 

[TheClappening]

The mentality of a pedophile is to destroy the innocence of a child.
...
But I find it highly unlikely that unreaslistic, highly stylized depictions that are drawings that don't look like children at all would fuel pedophilia.

It's also how they're depicted.

If loli-chan is getting railed it's invariably "Harder oneechan! Harder!" Past the stylistic art, they generally don't act like a real child, either.

If a real girl is getting raped, there's no words, just bloodcurdling screams of pain and fear,

 

[Secret Asshole]

It's also how they're depicted.

If loli-chan is getting railed it's invariably "Harder oneechan! Harder!" Past the stylistic art, they generally don't act like a real child, either.

If a real girl is getting raped, there's no words, just bloodcurdling screams of pain and fear,

People kind of forget about that part as well. Just how horrifying CP actual is compared to a drawing. So yeah.

 

[Jarolleon]

Had a very low opinion of PPP and Masterson during that one trainwreck stream. Had never watched either of them before, and I didn't care much for Masterson's attitude and PPP's anti-Dick sperging.

PPP's not so bad once Nick steered him away from his Masterson hate. He's got interesting opinions, and he agrees with Nick enough (e.g. religion and loli) that they have common ground, but disagrees enough that they can have a discussion instead of some onstream circlejerk.

PPP's roomate(?) randomly snarking things is also moderately funny/

Surfer reminds me of a mildly retarded guy who was one of my dad's tenants a few years ago. He hosted backyard wrestling tournaments, loved Spiderman, lived off the tugboat and talked in the same way.

 

[TheClappening]

The grifter is shedding again.

 

[quickthrowaway]

EZPZ has a good chemistry with Nick. He came with a relevant and amusing piece of litigation. I'd call him a great guest it's too bad he's one of the chosen.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

So we out here defending pedophiles? Anime is a mistake. If you get your kicks on cartoons/drawings/videos decepitng a child you're a pedophile. Simple as that. Some of you guys being suspect to stick it up to "PuhPuHpUh".

If you want to watch anime porn children should NEVER be the first thing that should be up in your mind. I have more respect for someone who get off to Mia Khalifa than depiction of children. Some of you guys defending loli are probably going to slowly defend pedophila in a few decades. Pedophiles need therapy or a bullet, not a gateway from Chinese cartoons/drawing enabling their twisted fantasy.

 

[5t3n0g0ph3r]

EZPZ has a good chemistry with Nick. He came with a relevant and amusing piece of litigation. I'd call him a great guest it's too bad he's one of the chosen.

The stream from last night:

2 years in the making, folks.

 

[Secret Asshole]

So we out here defending pedophiles? Anime is a mistake. If you get your kicks on cartoons/drawings/videos decepitng a child you're a pedophile. Simple as that. Some of you guys being suspect so to stick it up to "PuhPuHpUh".

If you want to watch anime porn children should NEVER be the first thing that should be up in your mind. I have more respect for someone who get off to Mia Khalifa than deceptions of children. Some of you guys defending loli are probably going to slowly defend pedophila in a few decades. Pedophiles need therapy or a bullet, not a gateway from Chinese cartoons/drawing enabling their twisted fantasy.

That's your opinion, not to mention pedophilia is defined as sexual fantasies of real, actual children. If that's your opinion, ok. I disagree, but I don't really care. And I will NEVER defend pedophiles or child pornography. I've been down that rabbit hole for academic research. The reason I say that loli isn't child porn is because the reality of child porn is so much more fucking horrifying and you're doing it a disservice. Frankly, going after drawings is a waste of resources compared to what is actually out there. Every second spent on fiction is a second you could be using to bust down the doors of actual sex slavers and child murderers who produce this content. Its a waste of fucking time to go after drawings. All pedophiles will seek out real child pornography. All pedophiles will offend. Loli being there doesn't matter. Loli doesn't fund the criminal gangs that people in the third world sell their children to. Loli doesn't fund the child porn rings and the producers. Loli doesn't have children used in child porn ending up dead. Call it degenerate, call it disgusting, I don't care. But to actively prosecute it is a waste of time and resources which are already stretched too thin. You're not protecting children, you're enforcing what you find disgusting. Before loli even existed, pedophiles shared magazines, photos and shit through the mail. They didn't need drawings to fuel their fantasies. And by in large, they don't.

There's no such thing as a gateway. I don't know how many times I need to say it. There are no gateway drugs. There's no gateway porn. Pedophiles who have never touched loli or child pornography will look at children playing in the playground and misinterpret normal childhood behavior as sexual. A pedophile was babysitting a ballerina and just by watching her he got so aroused he had to go to the bathroom and masturbate. I don't think he needed much of anything to fuel his fantasies except his fucked up brain and his eyes.

Pedophilia is a broken brain, legitimate fucked up state, viewing the world and sexuality through an extremely twisted lens. Its not a fetish, its not a preference, its an incurable, dangerous mental illness akin to sociopathy, You either have it from extreme trauma as a child or are born with it or are a natural sociopath and serial rapist. You cannot become a pedophile from looking at drawings. Its fucking impossible. Its why I disagree on calling those people pedophiles. Because we're talking about a serious mental defect that influences your entire outlook. Your life revolves around it. Pedophilies frequently have huge amounts of CP because they are obsessed with it. They are manipulative and work their way into homes, sometimes becoming family friends for years before they even think to offend because they are that obsessive. You're constantly going to places where children are, looking for targets. Its why I can't agree with the stance of fictional characters = pedophile. Its so much more complex and just viewing something that isn't real isn't enough evidence for me to make a judgement call. I've read too much horrifying shit on actual pedophiles and internet shit-flinging doesn't cut it for me. And I'm not a mind reader, I don't know what is going through their head. But yes, if you view actual, real CP you are a pedophile. Shit that doesn't exist, not so much.

And like I said, Digibro is a pedophile. That's because of the sexual fantasy he described.

EDIT:
I also don't give a shit what PPP said. Today's hero is tomorrow's lolcow, so I don't really care. Been there, done that. Not to mention a hardcore baptist is so far from my views its utterly pointless to dunk on him or refute him. And I don't care if you find loli degenerate, disgusting or whatever. My opinion lines with Dankula's on the topic. Its really weird. Same with the ageplay fetish people have. That fetish is more involved than drawings and it doesn't make people child molesters. But its really fucking weird. But we're going into the realm of opinion, which I could care less about.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

If people can get their kicks off of cartoon child rape what makes you guys think it won't progress to the real thing. Porn acceleration is real, you get desensitized from something and you search for more bizarre shit to feed your growing addiction, same with loli, when weirdos get bored of the 2d 300-year-old dragon maid they'll eventually venture out for the real stuff and God forbid progress to harming actual children. As a society, we shouldn't even test the waters with loli. Moral fagging about the safety of children is basic common sense.

And I will NEVER defend pedophiles or child pornography.

You are defending loli...and it's usually pedophiles who watched anime that are watching loli and could be seen as child pornography from the doss test/obsencity laws, Like any normal person who hears digi's or any loli fan explanation of loli will get their ass whooped.

The reason I say that loli isn't child porn is that the reality of child porn is so much more fucking horrifying and you're doing it a disservice.

Not really, if you have a sexual fantasy of children, real or not is pretty disgusting. If it's horrifying you wouldn't be a loli defender or taking the stance on loli you have.

Every second spent on fiction is a second you could be used to bust down the doors of actual sex slavers and child murderers who produce this content. Its a waste of fucking time to go after drawings.

Who's to say we can't do both? I agree those who produce the real thing should be top priority but we can't just forget about people jerking off and drawing cartoon kids being abused.

You're not protecting children, you're enforcing what you find disgusting.

A normal person wouldn't be dying on the hill of little children being fucked, 2d, or 3d. I have little sibling and cousins...so defending a product that has my little siblings/cousins of that age being used as sexual material is disgusting dude.

There's no such thing as a gateway. I don't know how many times I need to say it. There are no gateway drugs. There's no gateway porn. Pedophiles who have never touched loli or child pornography will look at children playing in the playground and misinterpret normal childhood behavior as sexual. A pedophile was babysitting a ballerina and just by watching her he got so aroused he had to go to the bathroom and masturbate. I don't think he needed much of anything to fuel his fantasies except his fucked up brain and his eyes.

In this day and age with high speed internet and accessibility of anime/hentai people who watch porn or loli usually get desensitized to the stuff they watch and have to find more bizarre things to get their hit. If you are okay with kids being abused in fiction you'll probably soften up your stance on the real deal. Like with homosexuality and seeing how we have pedos getting turned on to cuties, we shouldn't really encourage people to partake in that stuff. Even null, generous jersh has said that he started seeing a trend of loli watchers progressing to the real thing. The word gateway drug could be explained better.

Pedophilia is a broken brain, legitimate fucked up state, viewing the world, and sexuality through an extremely twisted lens. It's not a fetish, it's not a preference, its an incurable, dangerous mental illness akin to sociopathy,

If it is then why should we accept drawing form? It's just giving pedophiles an alternative, we should never give pedophiles alternatives to get their kicks off.

You either have it from extreme trauma as a child or are born with it or are a natural sociopath and serial rapist

and I feel bad for those who were victims and became the thing that ruined their innocence and life. I believe they should get therapy and a support system. But it's fucks like digi who sees no shame in his pedophila he should eat a bullet.

You cannot become a pedophile from looking at drawings. Its fucking impossible. Its why I disagree on calling those people pedophiles. Because we're talking about a serious mental defect that influences your entire outlook.

But it should raise concern, if you have a son/brother/sister would you be okay with him watching animated child porn? Like you can say they not pedophiles but I hope you wouldn't even let your younger siblings be around them. I'm just not going to take the risk if someone watches that stuff.

Its why I can't agree with the stance of fictional characters = pedophile.

If you play the audio of digi saying

"I like watching little girls getting f****" (censored because I dont want to be in the watchlist) and "I have to defend this stuff and I'm in the front lines" with a straight face....99.9% of people will call him or anyone who describes loli as a pedophile or a danger around children.

But yes, if you view actual, real CP you are a pedophile. Shit that doesn't exist, not so much.

If you watch anything that involves a child being sexually abused in a pornographic manner you're a pedophile or someone who should be investigated to see if you're watching the real thing.


Because most of these loli enthusiasts will 9 times out of 10 got real cp.

 

[Secret Asshole]

If people can get their kicks off of cartoon child rape what makes you guys think it won't progress to the real thing. Porn acceleration is real, you get desensitized from something and you search for more bizarre shit to feed your growing addiction, same with loli, when weirdos get bored of the 2d 300-year-old dragon maid they'll eventually venture out for the real stuff and God forbid progress to harming actual children. As a society, we shouldn't even test the waters with loli. Moral fagging about the safety of children is basic common sense.

Desensitization is a myth. Its the same with violence or other fetishes. Blowing people's limbs apart in videogames won't make you any less sickened by it when you see it in real life. Just like investigators of child porn, they don't get desensitized to it, there's huge turn over. That's fantasy. The real thing is something else, and much more horrifying.

When we start exploring our sexuality, it is true we do test our limits. But for some, people's limits stay at some point. If you get off on taboo, then yeah, you're going to go more and more extreme. But others just stay at vanilla and stick to it, no matter how much porn they watch. Others start off as vanilla but have a very specific fetish and stick to it. These fetishes are generally always present as we develop sexual fetishes in child hood.

This is a misnomer anti-porn advocates have been using for decades. Its also been used to link pornography with rape. Its not a new argument.

You are defending loli...and it's usually pedophiles who watched anime that are watching loli and could be seen as child pornography from the doss test/obsencity laws, Like any normal person who hears digi's or any loli fan explanation of loli will get their ass whooped.

Obscenity Laws are trash and serve no purpose except to tick boxes on prosecutor's resume. And the Dost test is based on actual, real children. It isn't based on a drawings. Also it is old as FUCK. Most analysis of child porn is done by computer these days. All child porn collected by federal authorities is given a hash and a code, and checked against a massive database. This is used primarily to: 1) Establish if it is child porn and 2) To identify new victims of child pornography.

And yeah, if you're stupid enough, any extreme fetish would get your ass beat. I'm not analyzing why they like what they like or what makes people like it. It could range from the art style to the taboo aspect to not thinking of them as children, who knows. I'm not speculating on that because I haven't researched it, nor have I asked people who consume it. Digibro is a pedophile because his fantasy ticks a lot of the boxes of a pedophile: Incest, disposing of someone who has aged out, the child aging. He didn't say he was a vampire count in love with a succubus demon. He literally was keeping a 9 year old in a basement and then would dispose of them when they got too old.

I'm just explaining how it is different as well as actual pedophilia.

Not really, if you have a sexual fantasy of children, real or not is pretty disgusting. If it's horrifying you wouldn't be a loli defender or taking the stance on loli you have.

People have cannibalistic fetishes, rape fetishes, mutilation fetishes...there are tons of horrifying fetishes out there. If someone has an anime fetish, I'm less horrified by that. Its weird and fucked, sure. But they aren't imaging taking a kid from the park and fucking them, or going to the toilet and masturbating when they're babysitting. They're not equally disturbing to me. I'm sorry I'm not horrified by fake anime fantasies of degenerate weebs. Because it doesn't even come close to the real thing.

Who's to say we can't do both? I agree those who produce the real thing should be top priority but we can't just forget about people jerking off and drawing cartoon kids being abused.

Because resources aren't infinite and it is pointless to go after people whom you have no evidence will escalate to actual child porn. Sure, if they're already on tor or the dark web, then yeah, obviously they should be watched. But if they're just browsing google and shit, it is a waste. Also, cartoon kids can't be abused because they do not exist in reality.

A normal person wouldn't be dying on the hill of little children being fucked, 2d, or 3d. I have little sibling and cousins...so defending a product that has my little siblings/cousins of that age being used as sexual material is disgusting dude.

If they were actually used to produce 2D or 3D drawings/images, that'd be child pornography and the person who would do it would be a pedophile. You don't have to worry about that being legal, because it isn't. Nor am I defending that. Same with deepfakes. All of that is illegal and people would have the book thrown at them, so you can sleep easy. Well, maybe not easy. Just make sure they don't take any dance or art classes anytime soon with male instructors.

Again, this shit doesn't look like real kids. I'm not dying on this hill. I don't care if you agree with me or not. I know what I've read, I know what I've researched. You're free to find it disgusting, but it really doesn't have anything to do with your relatives unless someone is using them for their sick fantasies.

In this day and age with high speed internet and accessibility of anime/hentai people who watch porn or loli usually get dsensitized to the stuff they watch and have to find more bizarre things to get their hit. If you are okay with kids being abused in fiction you'll probably soften up your stance on the real deal. Like with homosexuality and seeing how we have pedos getting turned on to cuties, we shouldn't really encourage people to partake in that stuff. Even null, generous jersh has said that he started seeing a trend of loli watchers progressing to the real thing. The word gateway drug could be explained better.

They don't. I've been on the internet for centuries and I have no need to delve into more degenerate porn. And why don't pedophiles go for porn stars that look like children? They exist. They're much more real than anime. Because they're not real kids. Its quite a leap since most people can distinguish fantasy from reality. Like loli and CP are completely different animals here. The reality of CP cannot be understanded with how mentally disturbing it is. You'd have to be autistic to make that leap or an actual pedophile.

Again, desensitization is a myth. It just sounds like it makes sense but it doesn't. We don't have to encourage people. I'm not putting up banners for lolicon and waving flags. What fucking weirdos do is none of my business. Josh ran a small chan, which are fucking notorious for pedophiles to hang out on and share images. You really think people who just want loli would risk coming there and having that shit on their PC? There are literally thousands of sites with no risk of seeing a single image of CP. Small chans are notorious of being hotbeds of CP which is why most people avoid them. Not to mention glow in the darks love using small chans as honeypots for easy arrests.

If it is then why should we accept drawing form? It's just giving pedophiles an alternative, we should never give pedophiles alternatives to get their kicks off.

Because as I explained before, pedophilia is a distortion of the world view. Nothing will influence them. They will always offend. They will always seek out real children. They will hunt discord for vulnerable kids to try and get nudes. They won't amass collections of lolicon, they amass collections of real kids getting abused.

And again, to reiterate a point, drawings aren't real and don't influence pedophiles in any way. They need no help in their fantasies. And I'm not even going into the more extreme views (which I don't agree with) that actual child pornography could reduce the rates of molestation, which some people have made. But like I said in my first post, we don't even know the effects of actual child pornography on molestation rates, let alone drawings. Child porn is illegal because it harms children, promotes criminal enterprise and encourages all sorts of bad shit. Loli does none of these things.

and I feel bad for those who were victims and became the thing that ruined their innocence and life. I believe they should get therapy and a support system. But it's fucks like digi who sees no shame in his pedophila he should eat a bullet.

And I agree with you. The problem is that therapy for pedophiles is notoriously hard, because who the fuck is going to say? "Oh yeah, I want to fuck children." Psychiatrists also have a legal obligation to report sexual fantasies of actual minors that pedophiles are close to, which makes it pretty hard to treat them. Though I was reading about a drug awhile ago, when given, eliminated pedophilic tendencies. It wasn't hormonal, it was an anti-schizophrenic drug. I'll have to see if I can find it.

But it should raise concern, if you have a son/brother/sister would you be okay with him watching animated child porn? Like you can say they not pedophiles but I hope you wouldn't even let your younger siblings be around them. I'm just not going to take the risk if someone watches that stuff.

I mean, anyone who openly talks to me about their fucked up fetishes I will have massive concerns about. Like if someone confessed to me they had a cannibalism fetish, I'd probably watch myself around them. Or a rape fetish who admired my SO. It shows a lack of self control and problems with them controlling their impulses. Just like I'd kick someone in the balls if someone called my sister a cute loli. That's beyond the fucking pale. I'm not an idiot.

If you play the audio of digi saying

"Iblike watching little girls getting f****" (censored because I dont want to be in the watchlist) and "I have to defend this stuff and I'm in the front lines" with a straight face....99.9% of people will call him or anyone who describes loli as a pedophile or a danger around children.

I mean, come on, do you seriously see me saying that or remotely agreeing with it? That is very far from what I'm saying. Most people who have extreme fetishes shouldn't be proud of them, shouldn't discuss them in public and should keep their mouths shut. Someone who says that is a pedophile, obviously. But like I said, I already believed he was a pedophile from the audio played before. I'm not defending that sick fuck.

If you watch anything that involves a child being sexually abused in a pornographic manner you're a pedophile or someone who should be investigated to see if you're watching the real thing.


Because most of these loli enthusiasts will 9 times out of 10 got real cp.

I just disagree. We don't have any evidence for either of those things. We don't even have the data. So its just the realm of opinion we're entering. There's sadly very limited and very little good research on pedophiles. Its like trying to research sociopaths. So we'll just have to agree to disagree on this.

 

[Captain Manning]

Also, Digibro is 100% a pedophile

No fucking shit.

If I might interrupt the shameless sucking of Nick's cock by the moe* defending weeb brigade for just one moment:

PPP's takedown of Digibro on Nick's show was actually superior than Josh's on Dick's because PPP actually mentioned (and played) the "cabin in the woods" audio. PPP gets mad props from me here. He might be a rotund Canadian with a propensity to sperg, but when you're right, you're right. He is undeniably correct about Digi and Dick (and Nick too, but I'll get into Nick's dishonesty some other time).

Basically even if, arguendo, we say that Digi's affinity for lolicon isn't dispositive of the need to remove him from society, he has flat out said his biggest fantasy is to commit a combination of statutory rape/incest, and then group suicide. You don't even need the Dame Pasos clip of the Dick Show now. That admission to Mumkey Jones is the smoking gun in isolation.

I respectfully disagree with some of Secret Asshole's arguments regarding virtual CP but, as they say, "time and place." This ain't it. Interesting though it is, Digi perhaps isn't the proper case study to do a deep dive on that subject.

---

* https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moe_(slang)

I have been an anime fan since the 80s. This is one of the biggest cancers killing anime IMO.

 

[Secret Asshole]

No fucking shit.

If I might interrupt the shameless sucking of Nick's cock by the moe* defending weeb brigade for just one moment:

PPP's takedown of Digibro on Nick's show was actually superior than Josh's on Dick's because PPP actually mentioned (and played) the "cabin in the woods" audio. PPP gets mad props from me here. He might be a rotund Canadian with a propensity to sperg, but when you're right, you're right. He is undeniably correct about Digi and Dick (and Nick too, but I'll get into Nick's dishonesty some other time).

Basically even if, arguendo, we say that Digi's affinity for lolicon isn't dispositive of the need to remove him from society, he has flat out said his biggest fantasy is to commit a combination of statutory rape/incest, and then group suicide. You don't even need the Dame Pasos clip of the Dick Show now. That admission to Mumkey Jones is the smoking gun in isolation.

I respectfully disagree with some of Secret Asshole's arguments regarding virtual CP but, as they say, "time and place." This ain't it. Interesting though it is, Digi perhaps isn't the proper case study to do a deep dive on that subject.

---

* https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moe_(slang)

I have been an anime fan since the 80s. This is one of the biggest cancers killing anime IMO.

I've already taken it to PMs, so there's no need.

Truthfully, I didn't even know about Digibro until I heard the Mumkey audio. I don't really know what else he besides that and I really don't want to, to be honest. He's clearly got pedophilic fantasies far beyond anime and he is not a proper case study IMO, because simply hearing that clip is basically a stereotypical pedophile fantasy.