Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 608 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,595
Bragging you paid for sex is like bragging you paid someone to repair your car. It's not impressive.

Oh yeah? Well I just went to Firestone and I paid them with my credit card. That fat son of a bitch bled the SHIT out of my brake lines! You mad at all the mad car repair I'm scoring? You jelly?
 
Oh yeah? Well I just went to Firestone and I paid them with my credit card. That fat son of a bitch bled the SHIT out of my brake lines! You mad at all the mad car repair I'm scoring? You jelly?
Yes, but were the brake lines really hot?
And anyway, I went to the gas station and paid for gas with my Visa, AND got oil too. You wish you could be me.
 
wow I'm impressed that Russ actually took the time to file a suit against the 'Farms, even if it appears to be little more than a lolsuit.

2020-09-26 14.41.40 kiwifarms.net 44ec7b3fba0d.png

So where's your family to defend you, then, Russell?
Law isn't my area of expertise, but wouldn't a more valid complaint include an exhibit showing the alleged harassment of his family/friends whenever possible? Otherwise, the response could simply state, "Defendant denies the claims of paragraph 132."

So basically thirty pages of "REEEEEEEE!" ?
I couldn't make it through all 30 pages of word salad in detail, but I have a feeling this is an accurate TL;DR of the entire document.

Greer's DMCA claim may actually have some merit to it. The biggest problem is personal jurisdiction over Null, I doubt that merely running a website is sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction in a given state.
Hasn't it been said by both Dear Leader at the time and others in this thread as I caught up that the DMCA for the contents of the Google folder should go to Google? Although it's only happened twice that I know, Dear Leader has removed content when he actually receives a valid DMCA request involving content on the site. So, if there is content here for which Russ has copyright, a properly formatted DMCA will easily take care of that.

Jurisdiction with regards to websites can be murky from a legal standpoint. I want to say @AnOminous may have already discussed that previously in this thread when it came up once before. Nevertheless, it's best to have an attorney look into jurisdictional issues instead of trying to figure them out alone.

I was gonna post this on day 22 of this years kiwi inktober, but it simply cannot wait another month.
NGL, I can easily see Russ looking like this as he rage-typed for 30 straight pages.

It's like he couldn't decide whether to file suit for defamation or copyright infringement, so he went with the latter while including all of the complaints of the former.
Even if Russ doesn't have any mental issues, the legal documents that he's prepared and that have been posted here look as if he easily mixes up or confuses both legal terminology and different parts of his complaints. The end result is an illogical mishmash of word salad that can be both frustrating to decipher and lulzy.

My only question about this suit it whether it states any actionable claims. Nearly every other suit Russ filed was dismissed for the lack of actionable claims. However, this may be a moot point; I suspect Russ won't successfully serve Dear Leader with the suit and I doubt he'll get his wish to serve via e-mail without expending efforts to serve through traditional means.

He'd probably try to serve the toaster in his confusion.
And then he'd try to butter up the toaster for a hot date. :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
For some reason he changed it recently. I don't have sophisticated Forensic Files style equipment but they look like scanned in copypastas in both cases:

View attachment 1625504
Are you sure that's a signature and they didn't just get some random kid with Parkinson's Disease to draw a straight line.

Reading this the entire document is more headache inducing than Reading Linkara's little fan fiction (or whatever those would be considered).
 
Hasn't it been said by both Dear Leader at the time and others in this thread as I caught up that the DMCA for the contents of the Google folder should go to Google? Although it's only happened twice that I know, Dear Leader has removed content when he actually receives a valid DMCA request involving content on the site. So, if there is content here for which Russ has copyright, a properly formatted DMCA will easily take care of that.

Null's defense was that it qualifies as fair use because it's here for purposes of criticism. While it is true that criticism falls under fair use, my concern is that a link to the entire book is on this site. Fair use only protects unauthorized use of a copyrighted work to the extent necessary to criticize it. Whether it is truly necessary for the entire book to be available here is debatable, and I could definitely see a judge ruling against Null on the fair use defense.

Regardless, I'm willing to bet that this case will be dismissed on jurisdictional grounds because Greer is too fucking lazy to leave Utah.
 
Nobody has pointed out the obvious that one of the named defendants is not a legal entity that can be sued. The actual legal entity is lolcow llc. Looks like Jersh is going to win another lawsuit without having to do anything.
Well its not like Russ can win for losing.

Dont really need to tell you he sucks.
 
Null's defense was that it qualifies as fair use because it's here for purposes of criticism. While it is true that criticism falls under fair use, my concern is that a link to the entire book is on this site. Fair use only protects unauthorized use of the copyrighted work to the extent necessary to criticize it. Whether it is truly necessary for the entire book to be available here is debatable, and I could definitely see a judge ruling against Null on the fair use defense.
The book isn't hosted here; it's hosted on Google Drive. As such, the farms isn't directly infringing with respect to the book, so Russ's best shot would be to argue that the farms engage in contributory copyright infringement by linking to it. And that's harder to prove than direct infringement.

At least one of the songs is actually hosted here, and that's what Null was referring to when he said it's fair use.
 
Null's defense was that it qualifies as fair use because it's here for purposes of criticism. While it is true that criticism falls under fair use, my concern is that a link to the entire book is on this site. Fair use only protects unauthorized use of a copyrighted work to the extent necessary to criticize it. Whether it is truly necessary for the entire book to be available here is debatable, and I could definitely see a judge ruling against Null on the fair use defense.

Regardless, I'm willing to bet that this case will be dismissed on jurisdictional grounds because Greer is too fucking lazy to leave Utah.
The book is hosted on Google, not the Farms; Null has already pointed out that there is legal precedent that exonerates him.. If Russ really wanted it taken down, he'd go to them. No, this is him trying to get some external authority to punish people for laughing at him (and lending credence to the theory that he would do the same when he was a child.)
Also, I'm fairly sure Russ legally cannot leave Utah due to his recent court ruling.
 
Are you sure that's a signature and they didn't just get some random kid with Parkinson's Disease to draw a straight line.

I think it's just a 'digital signature' which, without buying an electronic stylus and pad, always looks like shit. Although I wouldn't be surprised if he signs his name like that anyway.
 
View attachment 1620329
I know the phrase "I can't believe Greer actually submitted this into a legal document" gets said a lot on this thread, but holy shit.

I'm not sure what about this you find so surprising; It's a direct violation of Mr. Moon's parole after his previous conviction for being an internet meanie to engage in any behavior that fits within the legal definition of "fighting words".
Russ will have Null tied to prostitution in no time.

1601244601877.png


Your honour, I submit that throughout history and the world, humans have been killing other humans therefore it is discrimination for my client to be singled out for one murder while ignoring the millions who have been killed in wars.

1601244940186.png


Saw this coming; Russ knows that Erika saying that Russ's harassments was scary worked in her favour in court so now he's put it in his pocket for personal use.

Also I would LOVE for him to have to prove in a court of law that he has any friends.
 
"This harassment has been scary for Greer, his family and his friends."

Remember when T-Swift's lawyer said that his attempts to contact her family was 'invasive and troubling'. I cannot recall, but didn't he claim that them saying that was defamatory or something? I remember him getting angry about that.

Kind of ironic now that he's trying to use a similar claim.
 
Law isn't my area of expertise, but wouldn't a more valid complaint include an exhibit showing the alleged harassment of his family/friends whenever possible? Otherwise, the response could simply state, "Defendant denies the claims of paragraph 132."

"Your family hates you and you have no friends."
 
Back