Orbiter Ashton Joel Parks / People's Populist Press / PPP - Ethan Ralph and Nicholas J Fuentes' professional a-log, fat, churchless, starfish exhibitionist and abortionist, has a diet of potato chips and allegedly killed a cat, he is FATTTTT. 🕯️🐱🕯️

Should the thread be moved to deathfats after Ethan Ralph dies?


  • Total voters
    800
My point is he streamed about Tea Clip and the issue of monetization weeks, if not almost a month later, than the actual occurrence. It wasn’t until his grift was pointed out that he started making a fuss. A really dumb one that people aren’t actually enjoying. So tf is the point other than he’s being petty about $4?

He’s free to criticize all he wants but the events just happened to coincide with Mundane Matt having a big stream because of Keemstar & Boogie being on, also pointed out PPP’s claim in his stream that it was his audience not Matt’s. Fine.. but saying people are only PPP’s & Godwinson’s audience is gay.

All of this too spergy and a waste of time tbh.
Who cares about a clip channel? They need to go back to the content idea board and find something else.
Are you TeaClips defending yourself in the third-person on Kiwi Farms in 3P's thread or was @Likeigod simply incorrect months ago and if you are TeaClips defending yourself in the third-person on Kiwi Farms in 3P's thread are other posters in the thread aware of it?
btw tho this tea clips/ booberlee / fslur girl messages me on discord literally every time i vaguely talk about either ralph or josh
I don't think she even has an account here on the site.
@Fslur
 
Last edited:
If I ran a clipping channel, I would l not ask, for three reasons:

A) It is transformative, so appropriate to do under fair use.

B) The original channel cannot have suffered any loss or monetary damages, due to it being unmonitized to begin with.

C) The way the Youtube algorithm works is non monetized streams are not promoted and actively hidden many times.

Another problem with actually asking is it puts you in a problematic situation if you get told no. Because then do you go ahead and do it anyway? If you were going to do it regardless of whether you asked, why bother asking? And if you get told no and do it anyway, now there's a record of you having asked and been denied permission. This makes it look as if you believed you needed permission, instead of believing your conduct was already lawful and you didn't need permission for it, which is usually going to be the case.

This is especially true if you're clipping stuff where people are not happy about the original content for whatever reason, either because it's become drama or because it is now making them look bad somehow.
 
Are you TeaClips defending yourself in the third-person on Kiwi Farms in 3P's thread or was @Likeigod simply incorrect months ago and if you are TeaClips defending yourself in the third-person on Kiwi Farms 8n 3P's thread are other posters in the thread aware of it?
I was wondering that too. It's almost the tweets summary, then 'it's just a clip channel, move on' . I know I had never heard the theory before.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: anameisaname
It was kino from beginning to end despite it being a little bit too repetitive at times.

Once I realized that PPP, in the persona of a deranged Catholic priest mixed with Oberyn Martell, was shouting about how JMK needed to CONFESS to raping bearded dragons, pigs, and Taco Bell workers and Phantom Organisation was just going to keep telling a speechless JMK to calm down and stop shouting it was fucking hilarious.
 
Has Tea Clips been the IBS 2 electric boogaloo puppetmaster this whole time? Pressing autist e-celebs into spergouts by stalking them aggressively in DMs? Is she playing cybernetic interdimensonal backgammon with these plebs while she waits for the moment to strike them down by crushing them under her gargantuan milkers??

Really I thought the nectar might start going downhill with this attack from PPP but the PO stream was glorious, a relic from a bygone era really.
 
TBF I think it has more to do with the continual kayfabe. For me personally that shit started getting old when they really had the Vickers on, it destroys a brand's credibility if the target audience doesn't know if its real or not.

His lashing out at people on twitter is another thing entirely, its not comical, so any entertainment value is lost. JMHO

I do think comparing him to the gunt is way too premature. If he really wants to grift for videogames at least ask for money to improve your streaming capabilities first. Some of his shows are unbearable due to technical issues and sound quality. I've noticed video can be overlooked but when it sounds like shit I can't force myself through a whole show.
Season one of PPPwinon conent was for the annons. It was edited often short and concise and had no technical issues and seeked to inform the viewer on the most nectar content of the week. Little bit of hyperbole with a lot of real information and the real personas of Adam and Ashton.
This is PPPwinson season two where all of the content is aimed at ecelebs and their reactions. The mainpoint is not for us. 90% of it is kayfabe which said ecelebs make real by their cowish reactions. Godwinson and PPP play good cop, bad cop switching every few weeks.
My point is he streamed about Tea Clip and the issue of monetization weeks, if not almost a month later, than the actual occurrence. It wasn’t until his grift was pointed out that he started making a fuss. A really dumb one that people aren’t actually enjoying. So tf is the point other than he’s being petty about $4?

He’s free to criticize all he wants but the events just happened to coincide with Mundane Matt having a big stream because of Keemstar & Boogie being on, also pointed out PPP’s claim in his stream that it was his audience not Matt’s. Fine.. but saying people are only PPP’s & Godwinson’s audience is gay.

All of this too spergy and a waste of time tbh.
Who cares about a clip channel? They need to go back to the content idea board and find something else.
To be fair crawling in the dirt for a few cents is really pathetic. The main problem with teaclips is that she involves herself with the drama when she should chronical it. But i don´t think anyone takes this drama seriously.
Be like Swedish_mate and cronos. Rip sweet golden princes
I thought Zoom attacking PPP was very entertaining tbh
I think that usually Zoom can bring the fire when hes arguing with autists but this was a big fail.
He came off as a complete homosexual, that had spent 3 minutes in this thread for talking points.
He seemd to haveno idea of what had happend these last few weeks or how PPPwinson 2.0 operate.
I also like how he used a few of JMKs talking points and he sounded completely butthurt at the end.
"PPP, you're so fat"
Also, "PPP, you're so unoriginal"

And he just kept going uninterrupted, not even acknowledging that PPP left. Clearly wanted to finish reading off his pre-written script.
and "You have no agency without godwinson!"
Isn´t zoom like 400 pounds how can he attack anyone for being fat?
I love how he had to snake his way on by making a new Discord account and spamming phantom with it.
 
Last edited:
I dislike that TeaClips started uploading full shows/audio instead of clips because it takes away views from the original video, sometimes making a event out of it by premiering the videos, but if the creator gives the okay it's whatever I guess and Gator is definitely right about her in a few ways. There may be some genuine trollshielding afoot on her part. Stop defending m'lady's honor!

Teaclips is like some sort of kayfabe litmus test. Anyone who professes to be unironically upset about them is clearly engaging in tomfoolery, because who the fuck would ever actually care?
 
To be fair crawling in the dirt for a few cents is really pathetic.
Pushing "enable ads" when uploading a video is hardly crawling in the dirt though.

He can say "I was only keyfabing being retarded" all he wants, but he just looks like a sperg when he pulls this shit on someone not already in hot water like ralph and dick were.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: anameisaname
Pushing "enable ads" when uploading a video is hardly crawling in the dirt though.

He can say "I was only keyfabing being retarded" all he wants, but he just looks like a sperg when he pulls this shit on someone not already in hot water like ralph and dick were.
Is it as simple as that tough? I tought youtube were really sensitive with songs, fslurs, kslurs and nslurs. Even the little things such as bad terms like shooting and pedo gets you demontised.
Which means she has to spend hours crawling trough content and edit it.
Why not work instead?
 
Is it as simple as that tough? I tought youtube were really sensitive with songs, fslurs, kslurs and nslurs. Even the little things such as bad terms like shooting and pedo gets you demontised.
Which means she has to spend hours crawling trough content and edit it.
Why not work instead?
That depends if she's actually doing that, or just monetizing the ones that don't get flagged.

IDK what it is, but considering the second to last clip has an fbomb in the first 2 seconds and a sniper aimed at boogie holding a gun as the thumbnail, I doubt she's avoiding or censoring things to keep it family friendly.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: anameisaname
Personally I'm a fan of PPP doing the "Jim killed Terry" angle. He's using direct Diogenes taking points to attack Jim after Leo warned him that he "wouldn't want to be the new Diogenes". Tasteful writing there.

Considering how quickly the sweety squad destroyed Danny(?) the Panda's sonic forum it's not a far reach to assume that someone would fuck with Terry in the same vein, don't know exactly the time between Jim doing the Terry video and Terry being booted for opening that porn but it wasn't that much. Then again it could be just some anon fucking with Terry since he was put in the spotlight.
 
Monetization must also be applied for. Enabling ads may be some easy/automatic thing after applying, but applying in itself shows money is a goal even if it's just pocket change.
Its not hard enough that it prohibits anyone who is doing youtube for fun from enabling it for a bit of extra income.

But even if it was a lot of effort, its far less effort than grifting hundreds of dollars in lemons and then withdrawing them from dlive "to own ethan ralph in donations," so if I was autistic about someone monetizing their content, I would look elsewhere before getting mad over about $3.50 in ad revenue.
 
Back