- Joined
- Apr 27, 2015
Neither side will disavow radicals in their party because that would cost them votes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What it boils down to. If someone looks at the "peaceful" arsons and lootings but still believes Trump is a "white supremacist", they have to have completely overdosed on Kool-Aid.Not to pull a whataboutism, but is it any more alarming than saying "antifa is just an idea"? I mean, it's not white nationalists, boogaloo boys, or prouds that have been rioting, looting, and burning down buildings for five months.
The PB aren't radicals though.Neither side will disavow radicals in their party because that would cost them votes.
Neither side will disavow radicals in their party because that would cost them votes.
Nevermind that Trump's disavowed White Supremacy before, but anything less than him labeling any and all of his supporters as Nazis is "supporting the Extreme Right".
'antifa is just an idea' is more like a dishonest talking point than it is anything immediately alarming, something more equivalent would be something like Bernie Sanders saying 'antifa must prepare themselves'.Not to pull a whataboutism, but is it any more alarming than saying "antifa is just an idea"? I mean, it's not white nationalists, boogaloo boys, or prouds that have been rioting, looting, and burning down buildings for five months.
When you have ants in your house, eventually you figure out which way they're going to get back to their hive.Side note but I don't get what the obsession with 'antifa' is, the looting and burning is being done by anarchists in general as well as criminals not just people who active members of antifa phantom cells.
Condemning white supremacists and telling the proud boys to "stand back and stand by" is alarming, but refusing to acknowledge the organizational structure of antifa isn't? Is that just because antifa has not committed all of the violence and looting? How would that metric apply to the proud boys who have barely committed any of the violence in the last 5 months?'antifa is just an idea' is more like a dishonest talking point than it is anything immediately alarming, something more equivalent would be something like Bernie Sanders saying 'antifa must prepare themselves'. Side note but I don't get what the obsession with 'antifa' is, the looting and burning is being done by anarchists in general as well as criminals not just people who active members of antifa phantom cells.
Nobody knows who the proud boys are, and the president of the country just told them to stand back and stand by. Not acknowledging the organisational structure of a terrorist collective is a detail, not something with any immediacy, there's no command to it.Condemning white supremacists and telling the proud boys to "stand back and stand by" is alarming, but refusing to acknowledge the organizational structure of antifa isn't? Is that just because antifa has not committed all of the violence and looting? How would that metric apply to the proud boys who have barely committed any of the violence in the last 5 months?
You know, it really sucks when the general public is ignorant about a topic. If only there were some sort of "media" that could accurately and succinctly explain political topics so that the public could better keep informed.Nobody knows who the proud boys are, and the president of the country just told them to stand back and stand by. Not acknowledging the organisational structure of a terrorist collective is a detail, not something with any immediacy, there's no command to it.
The media has irreversibly destroyed its credibility to the point where people aren't even sure if a virus is real. Expecting them to be able to inform people on political topics is extremely optimistic, they themselves are uninterested in being informed.You know, it really sucks when the general public is ignorant about a topic. If only there were some sort of "media" that could accurately and succinctly explain political topics so that the public could better keep informed.
Is that a giant red dick?I really do think kiwi represents June if she was born 10 years later. The same incessant desire for internet approval. Willing to do whatever it takes to get it. It's honestly scary how much the internet now shapes peoples psyche.
View attachment 1638019
Shoe will be fine as long as lonely online Communist men can be tricked into thinking Shoe's looks make her smart and they have a shot with her.Been a while since i came here and LMFAO that Greg moved on and is already doing better for himself as Mr.Leaftokur, Destiny proving a broken clock is based at least once a day, and that even the gunt has a (somewhat ironic if you can even call it one) win... over fucking shoe0nhead.
Question: Does a ritual suicide still help you keep your honor if you had none left? Asking for a wop...
Agreed. I think I said it before in a post that was randomly deleted because jannies couldn't be arsed to distinguish between posts reacting to bait and others, but taking a look at cryptids (and other fringe things like UFOs and whatnot) in a rational manner from both sides (the whole "is real"/"is fake" format) might be a decent niche for this guy among the Youtube sceptics.Mothman video was fine, though. It was entertaining. This is the kind of video that people actually want to watch on YT, specially youths who aren't even into occult shit.
Why would anyone want to debate some rando nobody on a platform that is probably the worst place to debate on? Why do none of these dumb motherfuckers think this shit through?None of you fucking cowards even actually debated me on Twitter, just insulted me and harassed me to the point where I locked my account for a while. You people are just like Lauren Chen, too cowardly to be proven wrong.
Surely this is a bad attempt at trolling? Surely?Because I enjoy debunking right-wing/republican bullshit.