Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Last edited:
You're just steering away from the fact that the phrase was meant to sTaRt A cOnVeRsAtIoN about the murder and abuse of women, not to generalise all men.

Well, if that's the case, then that's some pretty shitty messaging you've got going on, since the phrase quite literally generalizes all men as evil. Perhaps you should've chosen a much better slogan than one that could be misinterpreted outside your clique. If you have to explain what you mean when you state a message, it's not a very good message.

Of course, knowing what I know about these types, I know that isn't really the point. It's just another motte and bailey to push for misandry while claiming to be fighting against a perceived injustice.
 
Are they confusing slogans with memes? How is "all cops are bad" or "black lives matter" a meme?
Isn't a "meme" by definition a self-propagating cultural unit, being capable of mutation, and subjected to natural selection and Survival of the Dumbest? If that holds true then slogans are memes.
 
As I've mentioned numerous times in the past, the lunatic left have gotten so fucking deep with the anti-life shit that any attempt to backpeddle to bring back any real sense of normalcy would require them surrendering huge swarths of gained ground and admit to fucking up/being wrong and that they absolutely REFUSE to cede ANY of the ground gained under Obama and beyond because of their paranoia that any concession will never be won back in their lifetime (see the Supreme Court) and paranoia based upon all of their grand dreams of the future hinging on America entering a Thousand Year SJW Reich reign, with a one party (Democrat) control and preferably under a totalitarian Catherine the Great figure leading the nation into benevolent despotism where the benevolent part is only for the wealthy elites.

To them, burning America to the ground is preferable to admitting they fucked up and returning things to normal. They are currently scrambling like mad to preserve their territorial gains/gain more power where they can while in the minority, all the while holding out hope that if they can just get a President installed they can drop the mask of democracy and go full faschy.

It's a reasonable attitude for them to have. The ringleaders must understand on some level that they've been fantastically lucky to have taken over so much of the public consciousness in a few years. They had the perfect socioeconomic conditions and they were able to take over institutions and subcultures in a kind of ideological blitzkrieg. They appealed to people's sense of fairness to get their foot in the door and they were equipped with a perfect set of psychological weapons to rapidly monopolize power and banish all dissenters. They had backing from the elite to do this, since their moral crusades were the perfect distraction from the criticism of the elite aired in movements like Occupy.

They've never had anything close to a majority, but they've been able to create an illusion of one by seizing power in key organizations. They expend a huge amount of effort to make sure that no opposition to them is able to organize. A few people with fuck-you money like Notch and JK Rowling can thumb their noses at them, but even for all their riches they're just individuals shouting into the void. They say "believe what we believe or be a hated outcast." If there's ever a competing culture with a true alternative ethos that people can join without the threat of being cancelled and they have to compete with it, they'll be crushed and they know that. They're against fun, beauty, freedom and, as you said, life itself. They've managed to be a hundred times less charming than the prune-faced church ladies of yesteryear, and that's no mean feat.

They have to keep up constant forward momentum or they'll collapse on themselves. One of the things that made them so effective was their belief that they can never compromise or bargain. Trump's victory in 2016 caused them to drop most of the niceties they cloaked themselves in before. I wonder what another such loss would drive them to do?
 

The Last of Us 2 is going to be one of those things SJWs never forgive the world for not accepting. Like The Last jedi or that stupid Ghostbusters reboot, it was something that we were supposed to love because it so blatantly enshrined some of their dearest dogmas. The fact that it failed so spectacularly despite their best efforts makes their blood boil, and they're never going to forgive the world for that.

I'll bet they've forgotten most of the shit they're angry at the world over because of those reasons, but they sure as hell haven't forgotten the anger and the hate.
 
The Last of Us 2 is going to be one of those things SJWs never forgive the world for not accepting. Like The Last jedi or that stupid Ghostbusters reboot, it was something that we were supposed to love because it so blatantly enshrined some of their dearest dogmas. The fact that it failed so spectacularly despite their best efforts makes their blood boil, and they're never going to forgive the world for that.

I'll bet they've forgotten most of the shit they're angry at the world over because of those reasons, but they sure as hell haven't forgotten the anger and the hate.

They could try making something that isn't utter shit.

Oh wait they can't because they have no fucking talent, all they can do is destroy what others created by defecating their garbage all over it.
 
You're just steering away from the fact that the phrase was meant to sTaRt A cOnVeRsAtIoN about the murder and abuse of women, not to generalise all men.

Well, if that's the case, then that's some pretty shitty messaging you've got going on, since the phrase quite literally generalizes all men as evil. Perhaps you should've chosen a much better slogan than one that could be misinterpreted outside your clique. If you have to explain what you mean when you state a message, it's not a very good message.

Of course, knowing what I know about these types, I know that isn't really the point. It's just another motte and bailey to push for misandry while claiming to be fighting against a perceived injustice.
At this point, that's pretty much standard operating procedure for the SJW types. "Extreme statement" and when you call them out they go "oh, it doesn't mean THAT, I'm trying to start a conversation" even though it wouldn't be that hard to rephrase it in a way that didn't demonize an entire group.

Of course if pressed on the matter and asked to cite any sources you'll get "It's not my job to educate you". Well, here's the thing- if you publicly take a position, you either better be able to defend or better be able to take being publicly laughed at.

Further complicated by the fact that there are those among them that do actually want to do "extreme statement" (men are trash, abolish cops, whatever).

Wasn't ACAB originally a slogan associated with Nazi skinheads?
Just to be safe, I always assume anyone spouting that slogan is a unrepentant felon and liable to commit another felony at any moment.
 
Last edited:
At this point, that's pretty much standard operating procedure for the SJW types. "Extreme statement" and when you call them out they go "oh, it doesn't mean THAT, I'm trying to start a conversation" even though it wouldn't be that hard to rephrase it in a way that didn't demonize an entire group.

Imagine how they'd respond if someone said "gas all kikes and niggers now!" and then responded to being called out on it by saying they were just trying to start a conversation and really just disagree slightly with Israel and BLM.
 
At this point, that's pretty much standard operating procedure for the SJW types. "Extreme statement" and when you call them out they go "oh, it doesn't mean THAT, I'm trying to start a conversation" even though it wouldn't be that hard to rephrase it in a way that didn't demonize an entire group.

Of course if pressed on the matter and asked to cite any sources you'll get "It's not my job to educate you". Well, here's the thing- if you publicly take a position, you either better be able to defend or better be able to take being publicly laughed at.

Further complicated by the fact that there are those among them that do actually want to do "extreme statement" (men are trash, abolish cops, whatever).
SJWs (and ideologues in general) are masters of the motte-and-bailey fallacy. We're so used to being gaslighted by it that we don't even bat an eyelash when someone goes "ABOLISH THE POLICE" and then immediately backtracks to "what do you mean, there would be consequences? I just want more police accountability and better community policing!".
 
I mean I empathize with her empathy towards rape victims and victims of abuse but having a hatred towards men is going to be damaging to her in the long term because good looks fade away with time and infertility gets set in stone.
She'll find a simp that'll support her through her old age, or more likely several, because there's Millennial men willing to accept being cucked.

Imagine how they'd respond if someone said "gas all kikes and niggers now!" and then responded to being called out on it by saying they were just trying to start a conversation and really just disagree slightly with Israel and BLM.
Multiple people have pointed out that the example you're proposing is entirely logically consistent, and gotten screamed at that they're raaaaaaycist, without a hint of self-awareness.

1601899411353.png

1601899421045.png

Found the commie bitch with no friends.

Edit - Oh, this is fucking rich, Vice is still trying to disassociate from it's founder, Gavin McInnes, while repeatedly trying to tie him to the Proud Boys, which he has openly stated he was no longer associated with -

Relevant screenshot -

1601900450115.png


The ADL declaring anyone anything is bullshit, anyways.
 
Last edited:
Maybe it's just me, but does anyone else think that entertainment in general 15-20 years ago was a lot more progressive than it is right now?
When it comes to children's entertainment, there were many shows that featured women and minorities, for children's entertainment, there were shows like Shelby Woo, The Journey of Alan Strange, The Brothers Garcia, and Space Cases (Harland Band for the win). There were animated shows like The Proud Family and Static Shock that were well made. Even shows, movies, and comics mostly tackled difficult themes without lecturing you, this may be a generalization, but I feel like some people are completely ignorant of what came before, or they conveniently forget and claim "it didn't count because it didn't happen in their lifetime".

I just wonder, what happened?
 
Last edited:
Back