Netflix, Inc. indicted by grand jury in Tyler Co., Tx for promoting material in Cuties film

the-texas-israeli-war-1999-front.png


As was foretold in the Ancient Books...
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: why42, Knyttet, AprilRains and 52 others
TheWickedWitch said:
Cuties 100% is intentional softcore CP, not just because of the clothes or even the moves but simply the way it was shot.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't that be the responsibility of the cinematographer working on the film, then?
 
Sackity said:
Wouldn't that be the responsibility of the cinematographer working on the film, then?
Click to expand...
Yes, the cinematographer, the editor, the director, and the distributer. Netflix is the only one of those who is under American jurisdiction.

Which is a very good thing for the casting directors who auditioned and filmed 600+ sub 13 year old girls who had to twerk to get the part.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: Troonologist PhD, Cowboy Kim, Count groudon and 11 others
Shroom King said:
If this was ten years ago, Netflix would have just cancelled the show. The fact that they are fighting this in court is their way of testing their power to see how much they can get away with. The Obama connection to Netflix is interesting; is Netflix angling to become a propaganda vessel for the DNC and their masters? If Netflix wins this case, will it give them the green light to start publishing fraudulent documentaries on people and companies that have problematic opinions?

If a normal person was distributing twerking/upskirt videos of 11 year olds to all 50 states, they would most likely be serving time in Leavenworth, so fuck Netflix for being above the law on this.
Click to expand...
Obama is a kid fucking nigger and the left wants to legalize kid fucking for their jew masters.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Ryotaro Dojima, Troonologist PhD, Allakazam223 and 29 others
Pissmaster said:
I don't know how a film that fails the DOST test multiple times counts as something that should be protected by the first amendment. Isn't DOST's entire point to decide where exactly the line between expression and porn is?
Click to expand...
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition Netflix for access to more child porn."
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Papaya23, Troonologist PhD, YarrBlueballs and 3 others
  • Autistic
Reactions: pomf
Sexy Senior Citizen said:
They're probably going to settle out of court. Shell out a few million, and this all goes away.
Click to expand...
This is not a civil case, that's not how this works. A State prosecutor has decided to bring up charges and had them confirmed by a Grand jury. The most netflix can hope for assuming its not gonna fight it in court is a plea bargain, which would be a reduction to another charge, or reduction of sentence in exchange for pleading guilty.
A civil case is when two people sue each other, you can make settlements and deals to end the suit.
That is not what this is.

I don't think it will matter however, Netflix will fight this and unfortunately likely win, its too easy to show enough political and artistic intent to provide an affirmative defense of the charge.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Allakazam223, Caecia, ScenarioOfTLoU2 and 15 others
UnsufficentBoobage said:
Told my mom about this as part of the pre-work morning news; after I explained Cuties controversy to her, she said that women are allowed to be pedos/rapists cause of "suffering through enough"...got so mad I saw red.
Click to expand...
So, to stop the wage-gap, women need to sexually abuse little girls? Weird take, but alright.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Papaya23, Puff, Officer Maggot and 27 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back