Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

[AnOminous]

Greer allowed for the harassment of Greer to happen. All of said email addresses (He really should have specified email addresses, not just "emails.") phone numbers and social media handles were gathered from the Plaintiff's publicly available social media accounts.

And his public record legal filings.

 

[AnOminous]

Them and the Amish share those traits.

The FLDS example is a lot more extreme, and fumarase deficiency syndrome is an incredibly horrible disease. Amish are known mainly for Ellis-van Creveld syndrome, and it's fairly rare even among them. The fumarase deficiency syndrome among the FLDS population that had it involved a batch of 20. Almost all FLDS are related to two people, whereas there's at least a small amount of new blood in Amish, usually by marriage since Amish can only marry other Amish, although the occasional person converts.

 

[WhaleOilBeefHooked]

I'm just fascinated there's someone out there who honestly believes you can sue your way into a woman's pants.

Russ is really the cow that gets me as well. I've been around the internet long enough that all the degenerate, assorted tranny/weeb/furry/fetishy/fucked up alternative shit doesn't make me blink an eye. It's just like, oh yeah, of course some fucking internet weirdo lives that lifestyle. But I have such a hard time wrapping my head around the fact that Rusty exists and unironically believes and does the horrendous shit thoroughly documented in this thread.

I know what you both mean. There's such a thing as being blind to reality and the fucking obvious, but to continue on with the exact same behavior despite zero success and every single person you have ever known telling you are wrong is just hard to comprehend. He's somehow totally evil and totally incompetent, everything he does is either a creepy attempt to sleep with a woman or get famous, or both, or an attempt to punish a woman for not giving him sex or fame, yet he's so bad at doing all of those things that he never even gets one step in the right direction and it's very uniquely strange to watch. If he were just an idiot and not a horrible person, he'd still be trying to woo Taylor Swift instead of trying to ruin her career. If he were just as horrible but more competent, he'd realize lawsuits aren't the way to go and would try to hurt women another way. Instead he remains convinced his legal argument of "I felt led on by her being a nice person" is unshakeable genius and it's the bias legal system that's to blame, and that he has a legal right to bang hookers, and that women shouldn't be allowed to refuse his sexual advances. And when everyone he knows tries to change his mind, he shuts them all out because he's so convinced he's infallible, alienating everyone who ever cared about him in a futile quest for fame and sex. His never ending life of failure and delusion is truly hard to look away from.

 

[Rule of Three]

I was thinking that the jury trial he wanted so much in the Erica case might have been a good chance at hitting it. Here he would have been in a position with a judge, (position of authority) and a jury of his peers (regular people who he can influence to influence authority on his behalf by showing them what a regular, normal even studly guy is like, and how he is so misunderstood because of the disability that keeps wimmins seeing what a NICE GUY he is!) "Now let's all tell the judge how WRONG Erica has been, but I won't countersue, as long as she goes on a date with me and sucks me my penis afterwords!"

This guy can be cowed by a judge, and clearly lies/disrespects his peers if he thinks he can get walk away from it. It doesn't seem to actually DO anything to his mindset. If anything, it seems to fuel his idea that the population is against him (going by his book). Now, I'll grant you, a more reasonable person would have long since scratched his ass raw off of the bedrock. But I'm not convinced he would have. Given the newest suit, I'm inclined to think he would have just reached out for another excuse/scapegoat/chance to tell his side of the story.

 

[Cranky Hermit]

I know what you both mean. There's such a thing as being blind to reality and the fucking obvious, but to continue on with the exact same behavior despite zero success and every single person you have ever known telling you are wrong is just hard to comprehend. He's somehow totally evil and totally incompetent, everything he does is either a creepy attempt to sleep with a woman or get famous, or both, or an attempt to punish a woman for not giving him sex or fame, yet he's so bad at doing all of those things that he never even gets one step in the right direction and it's very uniquely strange to watch. If he were just an idiot and not a horrible person, he'd still be trying to woo Taylor Swift instead of trying to ruin her career. If he were just as horrible but more competent, he'd realize lawsuits aren't the way to go and would try to hurt women another way. Instead he remains convinced his legal argument of "I felt led on by her being a nice person" is unshakeable genius and it's the bias legal system that's to blame, and that he has a legal right to bang hookers, and that women shouldn't be allowed to refuse his sexual advances. And when everyone he knows tries to change his mind, he shuts them all out because he's so convinced he's infallible, alienating everyone who ever cared about him in a futile quest for fame and sex. His never ending life of failure and delusion is truly hard to look away from.

He is really is like Maddox or Brett Keane. He's a living embodiment of the archetype of the "hilariously inept cartoon villain" that you thought could never exist in real life, yet here he is. He constantly comes up with "brilliant schemes" that just result in bullet wounds to the foot yet he is never deterred. In this case though, rather than Dick Masterson or The Amazing Atheist, his arch nemesis is a highly competent lawyer that he pissed off by going after said lawyer's family. Just wait though... he'll get 'em next time.

 

[mr.moon1488]

Lol, you have to be pretty retarded to try to file pro se.

 

[Totally Awesome]

He is really is like Maddox or Brett Keane. He's a living embodiment of the archetype of the "hilariously inept cartoon villain" that you thought could never exist in real life, yet here he is. He constantly comes up with "brilliant schemes" that just result in bullet wounds to the foot yet he is never deterred. In this case though, rather than Dick Masterson or The Amazing Atheist, his arch nemesis is a highly competent lawyer that he pissed off by going after said lawyer's family. Just wait though... he'll get 'em next time.

Damn. Brett Keane is a name I haven't heard of in years. He seems to have removed himself from the internet.

 

[Plight of the Bumblebee]

Lol, you have to be pretty retarded to try to file pro se.

I can't really recall where he said it, but Russell once acknowledged that courts usually look down on people filing pro se, and stated that he didn't understand why. Of course, instead of trying to find out why, he just assumed that everyone else is wrong and he is right.

 

[mr.moon1488]

I can't really recall where he said it, but Russell once acknowledged that courts usually look down on people filing pro se, and stated that he didn't understand why. Of course, instead of trying to find out why, he just assumed that everyone else is wrong and he is right.

Well, honestly outside of a very few select circumstances, the right to pro se representation is basically your right to commit legal seppuku. Regardless of whether it's a civil or criminal case it almost never works out for the person filing pro se. In criminal cases, Gideon V. Wainwright (1963) ensures that you always have the right to an attorney even if you can't afford one. In civil cases, the court does not have to provide an attorney, however, if you're a plaintiff and your lawsuit isn't entirely frivolous you can find an attorney. Trying to file without one is just a massive red flag to the courts that you most likely don't have any actual legal arguments and are just looking to cause problems for whoever you're suing.

 

[Cranky Hermit]

I can't really recall where he said it, but Russell once acknowledged that courts usually look down on people filing pro se, and stated that he didn't understand why. Of course, instead of trying to find out why, he just assumed that everyone else is wrong and he is right.

Judges will often take mercy on people who file Pro Se in civil court... but in the "special" way. As in the "Be nice the slow kid" and "You're too dumb/crazy to know any better so I won't hit you with excessive penalties" way. That is, assuming that they're just nuts and not malicious. It says something about Russ that he's burned away that kind of goodwill.

 

[360NoTrope]

If Resting Bitch Face really wants this place shut down he should just make an account and start selling handjobs.

 

[Apteryx Owenii]

It will be nice when the court orders him to pay the legal costs of the other party.

Unfortunately there's a good chance those costs will be $0 as Russ may again prove unable to serve the defendant.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

I guess Null is really enjoying this lolsuit. Look what showed up in the random.txt:

 

[Hongourable Madisha]

If Resting Bitch Face really wants this place shut down he should just make an account and start selling handjobs.

View attachment 1646701

Is he really comparing the Farms to a site whose owners got done for trafficking and pimping children? Pack it up, everyone, laughing at Russ's publicly posted antics is just as bad as child rape.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

This right here should be enough to get that part, at least, thrown out. If you have divulged your address, e-mail and all that information online then you bear the brunt of it being out there. It's only doxing when somebody goes and specifically gets a person's information through illegal or immoral means.

What suprises me is that he never uses the fact that doxing is illegal in Utah to make an argument. I mean, of course, it wouldn't have worked considering it only applies when you steal the personal info from his computer, but still, knowing him he would have put it in just to make it look better. It's strange that he had the brains not to do it.

Source:

Doxing amendment passed in 2017

https://le.utah.gov/~2017/bills/static/SB0227.html

Edit:

He might have a "doxing" case under Utah Code 76-9-201 (3) (because Utah is a retarded place, they have at least two different chapters under one of them it is legal, under another it is not), if he can prove the posting of his info (name is sufficient under that law) was with intent to "abuse, threaten, or disrupt the other individual's electronic communication". Interestingly, they did not bother defining these terms. It's also a coinflip on whatever it should be read as "abuse electronic communication, threaten electronic communication, disrupt electronic communication" or as "Abuse the person, threaten him, disrupt his communication". A simple ";" would have solved this issue in my opinion. Either way, clearly Null did not publish his info to "threaten him" given that he never made a threat, and given that the forum is against interaction, abuse fails for the same reasons, I think, as does disruption of Russel's communication.

Funny thing about his harassment whinning. It does not meet the legal definition under utah code. It will get instantly thrown out

Utah Code Section 76-5-106

le.utah.gov

Maybe he'd actually have a harassment case if he made it clear that he was talking about 76-9-201 Utah Code (as well if he could actually prove it was kiwifarms), but even then it heavily relies on the harassments being made by the same person over and over again.

Tl;dr: Utah code is garbage, but Russel should still have no doxing, harassment case.

He got a nasty phone call and whether or not the caller claimed to be "from Kiwi Farms" how are you going to prove it?

Why is that even relavant? He's suing the site, not the user. Given that the website does not promote (and even warns not to do so) making phonecalls to lolcows, the fact that some user of the website allegedly called him is irrelavant unless you are suing that alleged user. I genuinly don't think it'd matter even if he could prove it.

 

[️ronic]

If Resting Bitch Face really wants this place shut down he should just make an account and start selling handjobs.

View attachment 1646701

Screaming into the void.

 

[Skullshatterer]

I guess Null is really enjoying this lolsuit. Look what showed up in the random.txt:
View attachment 1646811

Russ is finally getting the recognition he deserves.

 

[Rasputin's Side Piece]

I'd like to know why he thinks that the only people who hate him are Farmers. He got a nasty phone call and whether or not the caller claimed to be "from Kiwi Farms" how are you going to prove it? I know very little about legalities, but can one really make such a huge number of unsubstantiated claims on legal documents?

ETA: Viva le Farms!

 

[AmpleApricots]

Russ is the kid nobody likes that shadows you and your group of friends hanging out although he is ignored (because all the parents are cordial and so you have to too) and then runs to the next adult as soon as somebody says a swearword. You can read that kid out of the word salad he writes, 100%. Such a bitter little gremlin.

 

[Hongourable Madisha]

Russ is the kid nobody likes that shadows you and your group of friends hanging out although he is ignored (because all the parents are cordial and so you have to too) and then runs to the next adult as soon as somebody says a swearword. You can read that kid out of the word salad he writes, 100%. Such a bitter little gremlin.

At least those kids tend to grow out of it once they're adults and learn about how to socialise with other people. Even actual diagnosed autists manage that albeit perhaps later than a lot of kids. He's just still in that state in his 30s.