Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
IDW = Intellectual Dark Web


I don't know if I can get any harder unless this news was being delivered by the crushinator.

Can I just point out what a shitty legal take Bob has with claiming "pedo defender" is slander? It's a perfectly accurate description of his defense of Cuties, and it certainly isn't "accusing [him] and others of a crime." If defending pedos was a crime, NAMBLA would have been destroyed years ago.
 
It's true. What Bob is doing is way closer to "targeted harassment" than a shitposting video that hits Bob with nothing but his own stupidity.

I don't know how big Memology 101 is, but it strikes me that Bob is flirting perilously closely to the Streisand Effect.
He has more regular viewers than Bob, and he only makes Powerpoint Presentations as videos.
 
So lemme get this straight:

Not slanderous:
Falsely accusing Trump (and every other Republican for that matter) of murder, racism, Nazism, tax fraud, theft, illegal collusion, and war crimes.
Slanderous:
Accurately accusing somebody who defends "Cuties" of defending "Cuties".


Ok Bob, continue.
It’s been established that Bob is willing to drag people through mud and lies because of being on the wrong side of history.
He is that psycho.

I wonder if it would help if people found out he defended an actual sex pest?
 
It's true. What Bob is doing is way closer to "targeted harassment" than a shitposting video that hits Bob with nothing but his own stupidity.

I don't know how big Memology 101 is, but it strikes me that Bob is flirting perilously closely to the Streisand Effect.

Memology has 296k subscribers and that Bob video at this time has 44k+ views.
 
Not slanderous:
Falsely accusing Trump (and every other Republican for that matter) of murder, racism, Nazism, tax fraud, theft, illegal collusion, and war crimes.
Slanderous:
Accurately accusing somebody who defends "Cuties" of defending "Cuties".


Ok Bob, continue.
well your missing the import fact its ok when moviebob does it
 
Grabbing some top comments to the video too.
Screenshot_20201007-170418.jpg
 
1602104853678.png

Yeah the reason Gunn was cancelled was because of his "progressive politics" and not his "funny" jokes about diddling kids. Really starting to notice a pattern here Bob, you disingenuous retard.

So lemme get this straight:

Not slanderous:
Falsely accusing Trump (and every other Republican for that matter) of murder, racism, rape, Nazism, tax fraud, theft, illegal collusion, and war crimes.
Slanderous:
Accurately accusing somebody who defends "Cuties" of defending "Cuties".


Ok Bob, continue.
Don't forget about Kavanaugh. While technically not a republican, is still a drunken rapist because the news and Bob told me so.
 
View attachment 1647714
Yeah the reason Gunn was cancelled was because of his "progressive politics" and not his "funny" jokes about diddling kids. Really starting to notice a pattern here Bob, you disingenuous retard.
Oh my god I thought this was an earlier tweet, I’m shocked that he actually made this claim again!

Plus (and call me a faggot if I’m wrong) it’s not really that the campaign was a false-outrage but rather the possibility that Gunn is protected in Hollywood even if the worst (known) thing he’s done was making dark jokes.
 
Movieknob might’ve really made an unforced error here, he probably could’ve even pivoted off of it and had a bump in fame, but telling people to take down a video that is just some dude criticizing him...sorry robert its not slanderous to criticize you, or even lie. “defending pedos” isn’t even a crime, no one is saying you’ve committed tax fraud. Weird crazy old people on the internet have this conception that “telling lies” is libel/slander. Nah, I can lie and tell my friend our mutual friend is a shitty racist or something, I can put it online even. Gotta be a public figure, gotta be an actual fact issue (ie, calling someone racist, evil, creepy isn’t falsifiable so it typically doesnt count) and gotta show actual damages. Bob thinks he’s being slandered when people report his words verbatim.
 
Good thing The Moving Blob has no fans to actually brigade anything worth mentioning.
I think that's what is hurting him the most is this moment is telling him exactly how many fans & allies he has and it's a much smaller number than he hoped.

Reality is about to hit Bob in a very big way.
 
my own personal conspiracy : moviebob is doomcock. You can hear the boston accent that bob uses in his voice. The voice changer shifts things a bit but doomcock's own voice sounds like bob enough or i'm just autistic.

But what if it was true?
No way would Bob's fat head be able to fit inside Doomcock's homemade Destro mask.
 
I thought Bob already reviewed Cuties, that he hasn't yet still white knights it on twitter shows how much of a fake film critic slacktivist he actually is. A fucking coward is more like it.
He claims he's seen it. He has given no review of it in any form that I've seen. He only seems to talk about the movie in the context of Drumpf supporters don't like it and they are attacking some thot movie reviewer from Baowstain. I don't even know if he's said the movie's good or not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back