Another example of non-sequitor responses.
This is why women shouldn't be allowed to discuss abortion. Never really contribute to discussion. Only attempts at mockery and reputation destruction. Never willing to answer questions or clarify what they say.
Just attack attack attack.
It's also why the discussion is won overall though, because quality of arguments doesn't matter. It only matters who is on the defensive.
We know abortion is killing. We know that what was alive is now dead.
We also know that thr killing isn't justifiable in the majority of cases. The fact that things like rape or danger to mother or serious birth defects get brought up as defense is not because they are a defense (after all even countries where abortion is illegal, it is still legal to do one if it saves the mother's life).
We also know how angry everybody is if a third party causes the end of pregnancy. So it isn't just "a parasite" or "clump of cells" either.
The remainder is that it is murder. It is very inconvenient when it is. It means serious reflection required of anyone that had an abortion. If they have to reexamine their mistake as murder, can you imagine the psychological damage to an incredible number of women?
Or the men and women performing the abortions for that matter?
And the difficulty of how these mistakes should be organised in the future?
The way to deal with anti-abortion people is to paint them as religious nutjobs, like they do on shows like the L word. Hateful, angry irrational people. Shows using the literal "I am SILLY" level of propaganda. So what if you switch? Then you too become reviled.
Reviled for caring about life, reviled for wanting mothers to care for their child, reviled for spreading simple truths, that would be apparent without a lifetime of hollywood, netflix, or even just falsified kinsey studies that helped pave the way intellectually for roe v wade, even as he paid parents to orgasm their crying babies and fighting children.
