Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Chariot Of Mara]

After reading all of her rationalizations, I’m just convinced she’s got an out of wack libido if she’s not able to go clothes shopping online without being turned on by the model wearing the shirt. Her shows that she claims to have a .01% chance of “lewdness” include sitcoms that often have bits about revealing clothing. What happens when she’s forced to speak to someone who is shirtless other than Marshall?

Spoiler: Mel don’t click or you’ll be cheating on Marshall

Oh wait. Those are the shows you already watch and say have .01% chance of what a quick google search can find. Click away, you’ve already seen it.

 

[Toasty]

She

never said it wasn't a woman's choice. What I said was: that women are not empowered by shaking their goods out in public for free. That's making yourself a sexual object. A woman should know her value by covering up. Make a man show some respect and work for her assets

"Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?"

Make the man buy the cow

That whole adage about "free milk and a cow" has universally referred to sex, not how a woman is dressed. Most empowered, or self respecting women don't wish to be bought. If being paid for is your aim, how are you different from a whore? Has Marshall provided a net monetary gain, or loss?
When choosing a partner I have never considered asking them to "buy the cow" I expect them to want my presence in their life, and I to want theirs. No bronze age ideas of women as property enter into it.
It's interesting that none of the men you have chosen have decided to "buy the cow"
How do you explain this, you bovine bitch?
Why do dozens of pictures of you exist online without your being covered by a burkha?

 

[LoverofPi]

Jurisdiction is a very complex issue. You can't just file wherever you want

And yet you have essentially done that with every filing by doing so in your home district regardless of who you are suing and if the forum is relevant to them.

There's no difference in watching a girl in her underwear and bra OR bikini (a socially acceptable outdoor bra and panties) in a movie and standing in a room seeing a woman in the same. It's lack of faithfulness to one's partner.

Would it be okay if I watched the movie 300 (while married)??

Yes. Next question.

Agreed. She likes "Golden Girls" which frequently showed cleavage as well as frank discussion of sexual encounters. I guess she needs to shun that one too. She's gone from the goalpost of porn watching being the same thing as infidelity, to merely seeing a woman in a miniskirt as same. She's claimed to piously look away from "300", yet is somehow still able to locate and post a promotional picture from the movie. Must have been really tricky to do while averting her eyes lol.
I can agree with expecting your partner not to partake in looking at images for the purposes of sexual gratification, IF that partner has promised that to you.
I think it's a dumb thing to ask, but some people are just that insecure I guess.

And there you have the crux of the issue, I think. Melinda is always bringing up ways in which she stands apart, even in her own mind, or denigrating another person or group. This is just a way for her to try and feel special to fill in the gaping cracks of insecurity. Not looking at other sexy people, the fixation on bikinis and bikini bodies, Mel 1000% believes any man she gets will leave her for a sexier model at some level deep down. That's why she's against men seeing naked women. She thinks it speeds the process up.

 

[Toasty]

https://youtu.be/cPtw_Cd3zTk

 

[A Cardboard Box]

Documentaries online? Like YouTube ones?

How can you watch drama movies and not see women in their under garments, cleavage, mini skirts, etc?

Lmao. Keep moving those goalposts. They must be motorized at this point.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

It's interesting that none of the men you have chosen have decided to "buy the cow"

Factually incorrect

And there you have the crux of the issue, I think. Melinda is always bringing up ways in which she stands apart, even in her own mind, or denigrating another person or group. This is just a way for her to try and feel special to fill in the gaping cracks of insecurity. Not looking at other sexy people, the fixation on bikinis and bikini bodies, Mel 1000% believes any man she gets will leave her for a sexier model at some level deep down. That's why she's against men seeing naked women. She thinks it speeds the process up.

Since that's the exact opposite of what I said multiple times, in which I stated it's a matter of moral principle, I'll call you both a liar, and a person with poor reading comprehension.

Your narcissitic attempt at reframing what I said without actual facts is merely an attempt to reinforce your western style Patriarchy. Goodness forbid anyone challenge the sexual objectification of women, the walls of your patriarchal world order just might come crumbling down.

I wouldn't leave a Covenant partner or husband for a sexy man in a speedo because of moral principle.

Moral principle.

That went right over your head. Typical Goyim.

Lmao. Keep moving those goalposts. They must be motorized at this point.

The goal post has always been The Torah. Haven't changed it for 550 pages now.

 

[Spergichu]

I never said it wasn't a woman's choice. What I said was: that women are not empowered by shaking their goods out in public for free. That's making yourself a sexual object. A woman should know her value by covering up. Make a man show some respect and work for her assets

"Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?"

Make the man buy the cow

Hey Rookie. Did you just call my girlfriend a cow?

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Since that's the exact opposite of what I said multiple times, in which I stated it's a matter of moral principle, I'll call you both a liar, and a person with poor reading comprehension.

Your narcissitic attempt at reframing what I said without actual facts is merely an attempt to reinforce your western style Patriarchy. Goodness forbid anyone challenge the sexual objectification of women, the walls of your patriarchal world order just might come crumbling down.

I wouldn't leave a Covenant partner or husband for a sexy man in a speedo because of moral principle.

Moral principle.

That went right over your head. Typical Goyim.


The goal post has always been The Torah. Haven't changed it for 550 pages now.

Are you sure you're Jewish? You strike me more as an Islamic radical ngl

 

[LoverofPi]

Since that's the exact opposite of what I said multiple times, in which I stated it's a matter of moral principle, I'll call you both a liar, and a person with poor reading comprehension.

Neither lying nor misunderstanding. I am making an assessment based on the summation of your overt words and actions and what those tell us is going on behind the surface. I'm reading the subext to your actions, to put it into literary terms.
But hey, good seeing that you're still mad we noticed you no read the good.

Your narcissitic attempt at reframing what I said without actual facts is merely an attempt to reinforce your western style Patriarchy. Goodness forbid anyone challenge the sexual objectification of women, the walls of your patriarchal world order just might come crumbling down.

Man, all the buzzwords are coming out in this one. I hit very close to home on that one.

I wouldn't leave a Covenant partner or husband for a sexy man in a speedo because of moral principle.

Moral principle.

That went right over your head. Typical Goyim.

I didn't say anything about YOU leaving a partner, Mel. Is this just another example of you no read the good, or have you just given us yet another subconscious slip? I'm leaning towards the latter, especially as your repeated use of "without facts" just comes across as simply another way to scream "You can't prove that" without giving up the game too much.

Oh, and remember when I pointed out that accusing people of being narcissists to deflect from an accusation was a frequent behavior of malignant narcissists? Isn't that food for thought.

 

[Toasty]

I wonder if @TamarYaelBatYah is ever bothered by the fact that the only "Torah scholar" she can cite is herself? Apparently the Torah has been around from the beginning of history, (according to Linda) yet in all that time literally no one has agreed with her. Funny that.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

I wonder if @TamarYaelBatYah is ever bothered by the fact that the only "Torah scholar" she can cite is herself? Apparently the Torah has been around from the beginning of history, (according to Linda) yet in all that time literally no one has agreed with her. Funny that.

I've cited other scholars

And there is at least one sect that agrees with each and every one of my views. Name a view I hold and I'll tell you which sect believes it.

For example:

View: limited atonement

Sect: Calvinism

I didn't say anything about YOU leaving a partner

You missed the point.

I said that because the inverse is true for why I don't look at male nudity

Oh, and remember when I pointed out that accusing people of being narcissists to deflect from an accusation was a frequent behavior of malignant narcissists? Isn't that food for thought.

There was no deflection

Are you sure you're Jewish? You strike me more as an Islamic radical ngl

Islamic radicals and Ultra Orthodox Jews have a lot in common

 

[Karl der Grosse]

If you feel like discussing the concept of atonement, I'm game. You refused to elaborate further, but you stated your belief in "blood atonement" earlier in the thread. How does this work? What kind of sins demand "blood" atonement? What is an acceptable sacrifice?

 

[Trombonista]

Carrots might be better to masturbate with than plastic dildos because they are organic matter.

This might be the dumbest thing you've ever said.

 

[LoverofPi]

You missed the point.

I said that because the inverse is true for why I don't look at male nudity

I got your point, Mel. Your point is just completely irrelevant to what we were talking about, unless you're saying you don't look at male nudity because you think it will drive you away from your partner, which is the actual inverse of what I was talking about.

There was no deflection

Did I say there was one? I didn't explicitly say there was, nor did I say you were doing it. I just talked about how narcissists do it regularly. Unless you're admitting that we can infer information from context and information aside from the explicit literal statements of the people we talk to.

Islamic radicals and Ultra Orthodox Jews have a lot in common

Fundamentalist Christians, too.

This might be the dumbest thing you've ever said.

And that's saying something. Carrots are chock full of little fibrous tissues that can abrade off and get stuck. The thought along makes me shudder and I don't even have a vagina.

 

[Trombonista]

And that's saying something. Carrots are chock full of little fibrous tissues that can abrade off and get stuck. The thought along makes me shudder and I don't even have a vagina.

I was thinking more that it's a waste of food and could only be used as a dildo once.

 

[LoverofPi]

I was thinking more that it's a waste of food and could only be used as a dildo once.

I mean, you're not wrong, just that Mel's ideas tend to be wrong on multiple layers at once. She has a talent for that, really.

 

[Bloitzhole]

I was thinking more that it's a waste of food and could only be used as a dildo once.

Why?

Also what makes calves sexy?

Oh no, watch out Mel, it's topless Hugh Jackman

 

[obliviousbeard]

Avert thy gaze, fellow kiwis

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

If you feel like discussing the concept of atonement, I'm game. You refused to elaborate further, but you stated your belief in "blood atonement" earlier in the thread. How does this work? What kind of sins demand "blood" atonement? What is an acceptable sacrifice?

Ok.

Blood atonement is the concept in The Torah that certain sins require blood to atone for them, in order to be forgiven by Elohim. Without this blood their is no forgiveness from Elohim.

There are two other situations in which blood is offered on The Altar. The two lambs that are sacrificed daily (Exodus 29:3 and Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement) (Lev. 16/33). These atone for anyone who cannot afford cattle and for sins done accidentally. Say, something like, someone serves you unclean food and you didn't know they snuck it in your meal while you chomped it down.

There are more than 70 sins listed in The Torah for which blood will not atone. These sins result in permanent excommunication or the death penalty (decreed by Judges). Except for a murderer who may be killed by the Kinsman Avenger even without permission of Judges. I have the full list of those sins in this writing in an Appendix

https://www.academia.edu/38953912/On_Paul_An_excerpt_from_Seven_Theses

John Calvin believed and taught others that blood atonement was limited to the sins of The Elect, not the whole world. Imbedded in that doctrine was the idea that The Elect would never commit a sin that leads to excommunication or death. Rabbi Paul, author of 13 books of the Christian New Testament teaches that all sins can be atoned for by blood. What Rabbi Paul teaches is exact opposite of The Torah.

I got your point, Mel. Your point is just completely irrelevant to what we were talking about, unless you're saying you don't look at male nudity because you think it will drive you away from your partner, which is the actual inverse of what I was talking about.

No, you didn't get my point.

Your hypothesis was that I don't like someone I am in a covenant with to look at other female nudity because of insecurity and fear of abandonment. I pointed out that not only was the opposite of what I said (because I said openly that I hold that belief due to moral principles of monogamy) but also the fact that I avert my eyes as well from male nudity/sexuality shows that my motive is pure monogamy. Undefiled monogamy.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Carrots might be better to masturbate with than plastic dildos because they are organic matter.

So is cow manure.

And plastic dildos, for that matter, but let's not muddy the waters too much on poor Mel. I already know that "organic chemical" means something completely different to her from reality.