US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
The reddit poster also posted on SA by the name Stonetear. I used to post on SHSC and while he didn't ask about bleach bit specifically, he had a post get memory-holed about how to remove specific emails from outlook exchange servers. There's a meme that goes through some effort to link Paul Combetta to Stonetear and it's essentially accurate.

Oh yeah that was 100% him. His reddit post history outed him, even down to the car he drove that was visible in the streetview outside of the address on his voter registration.

The twittersphere is popping off today. Joe Biden, Barry Oh, and Killary are apparently responsible for the assassination of Seal Team Six. Hillart's State Department illegally sold the stinger missiles that shot down the heroes. And bin Laden is still alive and was under their protection.

Congress was paid to keep quiet.

:story:

I had to look up what you meant about Bin Laden. You know, normally I would dismiss it right away, but I remember when Trump very confidently and publicly said that Obama etc. had spied on his campaign and fabricated the whole Russia thing. The news and even the people who were involved in doing those very things rushed to call it a conspiracy theory. Well, 4 years later pretty much every accusation Trump made at the time has turned out to be true, so hell, for all I fucking know, Osama Bin Laden is alive and being protected by the shadow government. :stress:
 
1602709162233.png
1602709184761.png

It's true So WHAT??? :story: :story:
 
Twitter is just asking for a smacking because it's very clear cut and dry one-sided political censorship right here. Other news companies can post all the smears they want but when it's a breakthrough story on one of "their guys" suddenly it's no bueno to post links to a political article. Not even trying to hide it, I actually hope this gets big because of what they're doing via the Streisand effect because this scummy shit really gets on my nerves.
Maybe websites don't deserve 230's protection if they have no idea what they are doing with it. They aren't like Null who respect what it offers.

Let it be known that I want 230 to be rewritten to account for censorship and not be completely revoked. But when one of my autists that I follow for election data gets nuked because of wrongthink, it starts to wear on my resolve. I want Twitter, Facebook, all of them to become the street where Ajit Pai takes the biggest shit on. Fuck them all.

Either way, my opinion or not, a lot of people are going to call for ending 230 as a quick solution to this retarded decision by Twitter to protect a rotting corpse from scandal. And if Trump sees this, and without a doubt he is seeing this since his sons are directly acknowelding it, we shall see how long he monitors. My guess, nothing happens, but time will tell.
 
I had to look up what you meant about Bin Laden. You know, normally I would dismiss it right away, but I remember when Trump very confidently and publicly said that Obama etc. had spied on his campaign and fabricated the whole Russia thing. The news and even the people who were involved in doing those very things rushed to call it a conspiracy theory. Well, 4 years later pretty much every accusation Trump made at the time has turned out to be true, so hell, for all I fucking know, Osama Bin Laden is alive and being protected by the shadow government. :stress:
Jesus, what if that explains why it is the Obama administration were so fucking adamant about NOT releasing the photos of his corpse? Not because it's too graphic, but because they knew some autist was going to examine every follicle to prove it wasn't him.
:stress:
 
Maybe websites don't deserve 230's protection if they have no idea what they are doing with it. They aren't like Null who respect what it offers.

Let it be known that I want 230 to be rewritten to account for censorship and not be completely revoked. But when one of my autists that I follow for election data gets nuked because of wrongthink, it starts to wear on my resolve. I want Twitter, Facebook, all of them to become the street where Ajit Pai takes the biggest shit on. Fuck them all.

Either way, my opinion or not, a lot of people are going to call for ending 230 as a quick solution to this retarded decision by Twitter to protect a rotting corpse from scandal. And if Trump sees this, and without a doubt he is seeing this since his sons are directly acknowelding it, we shall see how long he monitors. My guess, nothing happens, but time will tell.
Your hurting Nulls Feelings But, I guess this includes Dictionaries like Weebster & Urban Dictionary now too.
 
"Trusted" is the keyword.

I remember some discussion about how Hillary, for all her power, had her IT run by that moron who was asking how to use BleachBit on Reddit. The election leaks showed how incompetent the entire DNC was with technology. The thing is, these politicians have very few people they can trust, especially to take care of their personal computers, emails, etc. Usually they pick someone like the child of a college frat brother or someone who's been working for their family forever. It has to be a person who's joined at the hip to them or who they have solid blackmail material on so they can be certain they won't leak secrets.

Also, politicians don't know anything about computers and don't know how to verify that the person they're hiring knows what they're doing. They also have little understanding of the dangers of technology use - they know that information can be stolen by hackers, but they don't know how that works and what things pose a risk. So a lot of them end up leaking sensitive information, because as politicians they can't avoid using modern communication technology and there are few people they can trust to manage their use of it.

Remember the debacle of the Iowa primaries? They farm-out IT jobs not to competent organizations, but to friends and family trying to start a business/build a resume who, while they may have the diploma in hand, don't have the experience that their FIRST real programming gig should be cellphone ap that will be serving thousands of clients and a big red neon sign saying "SENSITIVE POLITICAL INFO" for hackers... and that's "best case", they may be total incompetent nitwits who get the job because "Cousin Donny knows computers, like, he can download custom Doom maps and stuff, so sure, he can run this email server full of sensitive info..... " or, total frauds banking on the fact that your average Democrat will hire you if you're a POC or just a sycophant embellishing your ability to look good at worst.
 
Your hurting Nulls Feelings But, I guess this includes Dictionaries like Weebster & Urban Dictionary now too.
I just think 230 should be adapted to account for basic collusion with political parties or campaigns, not nuked off the face of the Earth. I've heard Null's pitch on the issue on his stream and I agree with him mostly. I just think there should be an addition to account for this obvious abuse.

This isn't just some Twitter autist who posts dumb shit, this is a fucking national newspaper. It is a blatent violation of the 1st Amendment for the right to free press.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back