It seems like it follows the same pattern every time too. Someone mentions the Jews because there was a legitimate reason for them to come up in conversation, and upon back and forth arguments with people discussing the topic you get a slew of Jew white knights who just spam negrates and then sperg out for five plus pages about "Jew sperging."
I don't have an issue with anyone posting mean words on the internet. I'm not some Jewish whiteknight either, this discussion only ever came up because someone responded to my post falsely claiming that the woman I was referring to was Jewish
Hey on that we agree. We might disagree on how they got there, but we agree that they are massively over-represented.
Why not both?
Which is it?
You need to see proof that shapiro is a zionist jew? Really?
An "activist"? Try to think up the rest, please.
Well they do. That's what it means to be tribalistic.
Who the fuck made that argument?
The thing about in group preference, while I agree it's not an excuse to be hostile towards other and while it's nice to be meritocratic, is that, as groups, everyone (pretty much with the exception of white people, liberals specifically) do have it and advocate, often explicitly with those interests in mind. If you're the only group not doing it, well, your future probably is going to be one where you end up at the bottom. I disagree saying it's a cope to have it, I personally think it's naive not to possess it to some degree. Again, this isn't to say that you have to hiss at people of other races when they walk by (although the thought amuses me) or that you can't be friends or anything, etc. However, specifically for white people, when the culture is and grows ever more hostile towards you and no one else really seems to be stepping in to say "What the fuck? This is insane" and you're still trying to be above considering the pragmatic merits of in group preference it seems shortsighted.
I'm here for the secret niggers.
That was a poorly thought out policy, for sure. Would have been better to leave them other professions, like being ferry captains, undertakers and the like, rather than "hey let's make it so they are both pissed at being marginalised AND control all the moneyt
This is precisely the kind of conspiratorial thinking I've been talking about. Right away, you attribute a nefarious agenda to the Jewish people, yet neglect to provide any evidence that would A) warrant singling out Jews in particular, and B) demonstrate that such an agenda is broadly characteristic of Jewish opinion.
This is literally a mantra straight from Stormfront. You're either incredibly impressionable and misinformed, or you're just plain incompetent at hiding your true beliefs. I won't automatically ascribe malice to something which can just as easily be explained by ignorance, but your choice of words here puts the rest of your argument on pretty shaky ground, to say the least.
Why would Jews want to "destroy" white people, when so many of them are white themselves? Do you seriously think that the sort of activists who genuinely want to tear down Western culture are broadly on the same side as the Jews and Israel? Have you actually studied their views and listened to their message?
Ah ok, yeah that's what I mean. And when you question why you can't discuss it that's when you are introduced to the rabbit hole of the Jewish Question. Then you find out if you get caught discussing it your life may be negatively altered and career ruined due to the ADL or any similar organization so naturally that's going to make people dig deeper and then feel persecuted. It just ties back to being unable to criticize someone so they must be your rulers, which is going to breed ire among many.
Best part of that is, the differentiation between the two is almost purely semantics.
You misspelled the word on the end there.
I think the only way not to have it is to consciously make an effort to beat it out of yourself. That's what the White liberals are doing when they encourage self-hatred. Most conservatives aren't particularly racist, yet they do show an in-group preference.
