New York Post got their hands on a hard drive from Hunter Biden's laptop and shows Joe Biden lied about Hunter's dealings with Ukraine

Couple stories on the New York Post

Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad

Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine in…

nypost.com

• https://archive.is/hKrRu

https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/hunter-biden-emails-show-leveraging-connections-with-dad-to-boost-burisma-pay/

• https://archive.is/XYjti

https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/senate-committee-investigating-hunter-biden-hard-drive-email/

• https://archive.is/tzf98

FBI has had the laptop for over a year already and didn't say anything. Remember when Trump got impeached for congratulating the new President of the Ukraine?

What the hell is the FBI doing?

Supposedly there is also a video of him engaged in a "sex act" and a couple of photo's of him. This is one is particular juicy

 

[Roybertitos]

Maybe, but you'd almost have to know what you're looking for with the emails, because superficially they read as business dealings if you don't have any context. I don't think the repairman would nessicary notice that, but he would definitely catch porn.

My money is snuff of a human trafficking victim who is assumed to be legal. Not CP, so copying is less illegal but still absolutely horrifying. It would also tie in perfectly with the repairman's fear.

Honestly if I were him and I realized who owned the laptop I would definitely scour the thing for anything juicy, if only to appease my own curiosity. Not everyday the laptop of the son of one of the most known dude in politics lands on your lap after all.

My theory is if he read through enough of it and saw all the dirty dealings and shady pics, he'd want it out of his shop ASAP even without the CP. Since crackhead Hunter didn't pick it up in time and it defaulted to him, now it's his fucking problem and he'd definitely want to cover his ass so he gave it to the FBI and sent a copy to lawyer just in case.

 

[BaronDaRolla]

Sorry to disturb the hivemind but how are emails stored on a device? I understand the photos and stuff but emails?



2nd question. Is biden's son rich or not? If yes, why don't just call the repair guy to return it to his house?



3rd question. Was the device mac or windows? Don't tell me billionaire sons use linux

There are many different ways to accomplish this, but the easiest I find is this: The person who handed the hard drive over used the saved passwords on it to access his email, dived in, and downloaded select ones.

 

[draggs]

Some kind of indication that the communist lung dissolver came out of a communist lab for whatever reason being on the laptop of an high-ranking American politician's junkie son would be near peak Clown World 2020. Seems very unlikely, there's still 2 and a half months for the peak, mid-October is a little bit early to get that close.

 

[It's HK-47]

https://archive.is/s3zZH

Bo Erikson, CBS, had to ambush Biden 10 seconds before he hopped on his private jet in order to finally pry an answer out of his campaign.

Bo: Mr. Biden, what is your response to the New York Post story about your son?​

​

Biden: I know you'd ask it. I have no response, it's a smear campaign. Right up your alley, those are the questions you always have.​

And that's it. That's the only answer we're going to get out of him after three straight days, and it took an ambush question to even get it in the first place. That's not good enough. That's not even close to good enough. It doesn't help that Bo was immediately reprimanded by his news director at CBS as a result of this, chastising him for not "properly" framing the question as Russian disinformation, even though there literally is not a scrap of evidence that suggests any of this came from Russia.



Paula Reid, CBS, jumped to Bo's defense to suggest that it's inappropriate to attack the reporter instead of the story, to which Ben Rhodes, Obama lackey, leaps in to berate Bo for "spreading Russian disinformation." So there we go, we have our narrative: Russia, Russia, Russia, and not a splinter of proof to back it up. As long as we flap anything away as "Russian propaganda" the proles will believe whatever we tell them to.

 

[AnotherPleb]

View attachment 1667552

https://archive.md/s3zZH

Bo Erikson, CBS, had to ambush Biden 10 seconds before he hopped on his private jet in order to finally pry an answer out of his campaign.

Bo: Mr. Biden, what is your response to the New York Post story about your son?​

​

Biden: I know you'd ask it. I have no response, it's a smear campaign. Right up your alley, those are the questions you always have.​

And that's it. That's the only answer we're going to get out of him after three straight days, and it took an ambush question to even get it in the first place. That's not good enough. That's not even close to good enough. It doesn't help that Bo was immediately reprimanded by his news director at CBS as a result of this, chastising him for not "properly" framing the question as Russian disinformation, even though there literally is not a scrap of evidence that suggests any of this came from Russia.

View attachment 1667558

Where the fuck does Biden come from even pretending that the media does anything but suck his dick and do all the hard work of campaigning for him?

 

[Inshallah]

Dear goodness I have relatives who fled from Soviet invasions who hold less of bias against Russians than the US media is at this point.

Seems like anything that makes them look bad was "the Russians!!!" fault, no evidence needed.

 

[AnotherPleb]

Dear goodness I have relatives who fled from Soviet invasions who hold less of bias against Russians than the US media is at this point.

Seems like anything that makes them look bad was "the Russians!!!" fault, no evidence needed.

The MSM still remembers the days where Russia was the big evil and hopes to use it to silence critics. The spicier idea is to look at all of their vicious smearing as projection and realize that they're the whore of everyone except the American people.

 

[DrunkenDozing]

View attachment 1667552

https://archive.md/s3zZH

Bo Erikson, CBS, had to ambush Biden 10 seconds before he hopped on his private jet in order to finally pry an answer out of his campaign.

Bo: Mr. Biden, what is your response to the New York Post story about your son?​

​

Biden: I know you'd ask it. I have no response, it's a smear campaign. Right up your alley, those are the questions you always have.​

And that's it. That's the only answer we're going to get out of him after three straight days, and it took an ambush question to even get it in the first place. That's not good enough. That's not even close to good enough. It doesn't help that Bo was immediately reprimanded by his news director at CBS as a result of this, chastising him for not "properly" framing the question as Russian disinformation, even though there literally is not a scrap of evidence that suggests any of this came from Russia.

View attachment 1667558

Paula Reid, CBS, jumped to Bo's defense to suggest that it's inappropriate to attack the reporter instead of the story, to which Ben Rhodes, Obama lackey, leaps in to berate Bo for "spreading Russian disinformation." So there we go, we have our narrative: Russia, Russia, Russia, and not a splinter of proof to back it up. As long as we flap anything away as "Russian propaganda" the proles will believe whatever we tell them to.

Bo, this is big brother speaking. You should have thought twice before engaging in actual journalism Bo. Your family would have very much liked if you hadnt done that Bo... Such a shame...

 

[Just Here for A and H]

Hunter is a train-wreck and I would NOT have a methed-and-or-cracked-out orgy with him.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

Where the fuck does Biden come from even pretending that the media does anything but suck his dick and do all the hard work of campaigning for him?

It's a narrative, it doesn't have to represent reality. In the narrative reality, the media, ALL THE MEDIA, is sucking Trump's dick 24x7 hiding TEH TROOF about his obvious Russian collusion and war crimes and yadda yadda yadda. Those with him in the narrative reality will nod and cross their arms and post on Twitter about how the right wing media like CBS and CNN are smearing Biden again.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Dear goodness I have relatives who fled from Soviet invasions who hold less of bias against Russians than the US media is at this point.

Seems like anything that makes them look bad was "the Russians!!!" fault, no evidence needed.

It helps that Putin will never refute them. Russia likes the idea of them being presented as some evil masterminds capable of making the United States dance to their tune. In that respect Russia makes the perfect foil for the crony establishment to strawman. Russia would love for nothing more then all this deranged shrieking to be true.

 

[DrunkenDozing]

It's a narrative, it doesn't have to represent reality. In the narrative reality, the media, ALL THE MEDIA, is sucking Trump's dick 24x7 hiding TEH TROOF about his obvious Russian collusion and war crimes and yadda yadda yadda. Those with him in the narrative reality will nod and cross their arms and post on Twitter about how the right wing media like CBS and CNN are smearing Biden again.

Ah yes. It was those dastardly Soviets Chris Cuomovitch and Don Lemonski again..

 

[mr.moon1488]

As someone that's to the right of @Hollywood Hulk Hogan but to the left of almost everyone else in A&N, my retarded hot take on this (the tl;dr version):

• The NYP story is based on real data pulled from Hunter Biden's laptop, but the story about the Delaware computer tech is BS. Remember this is a Murdoch paper we're talking about, and they have form in obtaining explosive stories via less than kosher means (think along the lines of the News Of The World phone hacking scandal). I'm not saying this is necessarily how this data was obtained, but I'd believe this sooner than I believe a story that sounds like it came straight from a Louis Rossmann video.
• The fact that Creepy Joe doesn't appear to have been triggered by this story, despite being triggered by the mere mention of Hunter at pressers on a number of occasions over the past year or so, suggests that his wranglers have him on a very short leash for some reason.
• The Dems' besties at Twitter have done a brilliant job of Streisanding the shit out of this story. Whether they did it unilaterally or under instructions from Creepy Joe's handlers is unclear; although Dorsey's reeeeeeeeing makes me think it was the former; he was just trying to earn good boy points from his fellow Silicon Valley fartknockers and the DNC.
• Zuck also wants some good boy points, hence Facebook followed into the same vortex of Streisand as Twitter; perhaps I'm being optimistic, but I don't believe there's collusion here.
• The worst (or best, depending on one's perspective) is yet to come. NYP clearly has several sanitation barges worth of dirt on the Bidens. They also have the resources and experience to dump said dirt in the most damaging possible way. It's going to be fun watching the DNC and Creepy Joe's wranglers tip-toe around it all.

As to why the NYP would want to release such a story? I suspect it's a combination of hyperpartisanship and self-interest. As others have suggested, the way Twitter and Facebook handled this has just handed more ammo to those who stand to gain from Section 230 being repealed or heavily watered down. People like Rupert Murdoch, whose media empire has been creaking along for the past decade, stand to gain the most from Silicon Valley's biggest liberal mouthpieces being brought to heel.

Be that as it may, both Hunter and Creepy Joe need to be brought to justice. IMHO (and I can't believe I'm even saying this) Trump is the lesser of the two evils, and by a substantial margin.

Yeah, I know I said this is the tl;dr version. I could sperg about this for days, and my mind has already been changed several times during the course of this thread. Make of this what you will.

I agree that it's highly unlikely that it was the Biden team that wanted to so overtly try to shoah the information. His typical line has been to just say "it was debunked" whenever something like this is brought up and then just ignore it, which is a very effective political strategy since the JewMurican people A: have the attention spans of goldfish which causes almost anything and everything which isn't a shitty cape fag movie to get memory-holed and B: are far too lazy to ever actually look anything up for themselves, so just believe whatever story has been told the most of two conflicting stories. Twatter and Kikebook moderation has no such understanding of how such things work since they live in a complete bubble from the rest of the world. They don't understand that when you ban someone for saying something, they will inevitably become more confident in their ideas and will simply start to dig deeper into the information, and will become more vocal in discussing said information because now it has become some personal thing, rather than some big macro issue they only tangentially relate to. Recall how Corbin behaved following his ban here, even though it was justified

 

[It's HK-47]

https://archive.is/JuCuM

Local CNN political analyst is very upset. I'm not sure that "Republican scum" is a particularly unbiased way to talk about a political party, but the only people who believe that CNN is unbiased are people who have so many chromosomes that they could juggle them. Are you going for a high-score there, Joe? Chill out with the talking points, goddamn.

 

[draggs]

Screeching that it's Russian propergander looks like an ill-thought response spurred by terror.

 

[american_amadan]

I'm kinda on the side of it doesn't matter. I've seen kids from great families with great parents turn into fuckups. It happens. While there's an argument that it's the parents fault, it's a pretty lame way of putting the blame on them. Especially because it can go both ways, the parent(s) was too lenient/didn't care, or the parent(s) was overprotective and the kid got destructive when he failed the expectations.

Hunter Biden is a dickhead for sure. But I can't say I wouldn't be a manic like that if my dad was a US Senator/Vice President. I can't sit here and tell people to stop letting opportunity pass you by and then belittle Hunter Biden for taking a job with a shady gas company making a ton of money. And then taking that money to blow coke out of a strippers asshole.

Boys will be boys. I still believe in that term, especially since it's become part of the third wave feminist rhetoric as horrible. If anything this shows that regardless of political party, people will reap the benefits of it in any way they can. There's a ton of Hunter Bidens in politics. Kids of rich, influential people that just don't give a fuck. Is it shameful? Yes. Do they really care? Not at all.

 

[mindlessobserver]

There is apparently something major here I'm just not grasping.

Section 230, to my knowledge, only prevents the entities running internet platforms from being held responsible for accusations of libel against something a third party posts. That's about it. If Al makes a post on Facebook and Bob thinks it's a lie that's irreperably damaged his reputation, Bob can't sue Facebook for it. Logically, because Facebook itself was not responsible for posting the libel, it's just the medium that Al decided to write his message on. It would be like if I printed up a bunch of fliers about you that you thought were libelous and stapled them to telephone poles, and you tried to sue the city for owning the telephone poles.

Likewise, the "in good faith" clause is there, to my understanding, to mean that even if one of these entities moderates their platform in order to remove things like explicit content (as opposed to letting it be a free-for-all), they're still not considered "publishers" way a newspaper or magazine would be. Logically, because they're not in complete control of everything their average citizen users posts, unlike a newspaper or magazine that's reviewing everything their hired writers do before it's sent off to print. A journalist who works for the New York Times is writing as a representative of the Times, while you're probably not tweeting as a representative of Twitter, Inc.

Again, I must be missing something huge because to me, the main issue doesn't seem to be that these platforms are abusing their lack of responsibility for content, it's that they're acting like they are responsible for it by trying to clamp down on stories that they haven't explicitly approved. They're not hiding behind Section 230 protections, they're blatantly disregarding them and acting as if they were a publisher.

What you are missing is that the statutory immunity for what people post on your platform is ESSENTIAL for any social media platform, including the Kiwi Farms, to function. In order for you have this exemption, you cant engage in "editorial control". Any idiot can post something on the Kiwi Farms. But very few people can post in the New York Times. Because the New York Times is a Publisher. Their "mods" decide what gets posted and what does not. This makes what gets posted their responsibility. On the Kiwi Farms, anyone can post without the Mods involvement. That means what is posted is not the Farms' responsibility. This is important because if Null could get sued for any random shit posted on here, this webzone would be done in in a tidal wave of litigation.

Where it gets dicey is section 230 has an exemption that allows platforms to remove illegal content (like CP) and the kicker "or otherwise objectionable content". That last part was the open barn door that twitter, facebook and the rest ran through. Here on the Kiwifarms, the mods remove illegal content and under the "otherwise objectionable" full spergtastic posts that are annoying. What twitter and facebook have decided to do was remove wrong thinking opinions. And that is where things get really dicey because the digital public square has very much become a thing.

There is not an easy solution to this. The "otherwise objectionable content" loop hole needs to be closed somehow, but how you do that without breaking the very core of how the internet polices content (content moderation) is a huge challenge. One the geriatric boomers in Congress are almost certainly not up too

 

[heathercho]

View attachment 1667592 View attachment 1667593

https://archive.md/JuCuM

Local CNN political analyst is very upset. I'm not sure that "Republican scum" is a particularly unbiased way to talk about a political party, but the only people who believe that CNN is unbiased are people who have so many chromosomes that they could juggle them. Are you going for a high-score there, Joe? Chill out with the talking points, goddamn.

Literally this faggot.

 

[CrippleThreat]

View attachment 1667592 View attachment 1667593

https://archive.md/JuCuM

Local CNN political analyst is very upset. I'm not sure that "Republican scum" is a particularly unbiased way to talk about a political party, but the only people who believe that CNN is unbiased are people who have so many chromosomes that they could juggle them. Are you going for a high-score there, Joe? Chill out with the talking points, goddamn.

Jesus, tell us how you really feel about President Trump.

 

[XYZpdq]

"Republican scum"

dude is that a motherfuckin star wars reference