Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Maybe. I have enough muscle mass built up, I need to work on lowering my BMI/body fat percent. Usually it takes more repetitions of lower amounts of weights to do this.

Not to derail the thread too much but I can't deny people input on lifting because I've trained and worked with a lot of people over the years (especially women).
Low weight and lots of reps will still build endurance (and strength to a lesser degree), but unfortunately ANY weightlifting is very ineffectual at burning calories and losing weight. Our bodies are astoundingly good at preserving energy when exerting short controlled bursts of strength. A mere 15 minutes of jumprope will usually burn more calories than 1-1.5 hours of heavy (or light) weightlifting, which is why it makes sense to separate weight-loss time from muscle building time (A lot of people attempt to combine them and get mediocre results at both, which can be a real motivation killer. Much better to do 1 month of just building muscle with heavy weights and 1 month of just cutting weight by doing nothing but cardio and reflexes and vice versa). As such, I retract what I said earlier and recommend going ahead with what you mentioned (cycling, triathlon) and waiting with any lifting at all (even low weights high reps) until you are approaching a weight you feel comfortable with. Maybe keep doing pull ups and push ups to make sure you're not burning through muscle too much as you lose weight.

Back to our regularly scheduled program:
TURN ON MY EDIT PRIVILEGES ASSHOLES
Lolno
 
Last edited:
Marshall and I are not together anymore.

I'm holding my boundary. He's out of chances.







You obviously live in a small isolated bubble where you attract only people that think like you

There are hundreds and thousands of people who reject Pacifism

Here's a quote from a respectable woman:

"For every pacifist willing to lay down their gun are two terrorists willing to fire off theirs" --Margaret Thatcher







Because you're a Sadist looking for Narcissitic supply




Ok Mr. Legal Expert, do you know what "joining in a Defendant" is?






That's a fake screenshot that was fabricated. I never wrote that

I never was in a relationship with him.

Leaving Marshall, I first plan on going to therapy and do some intense athletic training. Im not going to rush into another relationship. I want to get my PhD. I want to train for Triathlons and Mountain biking competitions.

I have an online life coach. I'm still learning more about Narcissism from her. The fact that I'm still learning things she is pointing out shows me I'm not ready to go forward until I can learn to really guard myself. I'm a recovered Co-dependent. I have a chronic history of attracting people who fit Covert Narcissist profiles. I'm cautious about ever trusting a man to the point of marriage again. I have to figure out how not to let those type of men magnetize to me.

Perhaps a long engagement until menopause?

My life coach married 2 times before she found an Empath/Righteous guy (3rd marriage). "3rd times a charm!"?







It's not anger that does that. It's fatigue, stress and interruptions

What your issue with anger?

Oh, you're Goy. In Goy culture women aren't allowed to be angry. They have to be "nice" all the time.

Well fuck that!





When have I ever filed a Motion to join in Defendants?

Tell me you aren't that DUMB.
Wait a minute. Weren’t you the one bragging about your bdsm sex life? Sadism is a part of that. How do you know this isn’t just my sado role play.
 
👆 👆 👆 Abusive tactic to silence victims
It's the truth and you know it.
Gaslighting
Also the truth but you're too wrapped up in your self righteous fantasy to admit it.
See, blind. You think you can do proper exegesis and you're just a FOOL
I'm just pointing out what Yeshua said, I'm not the one who's repeatedly twisted the Torah and New Testament around to support her broken theology. What you call exegesis is changing the meaning of scripture to support your beliefs, which if you'd ever take the NT and Yeshua's words seriously, you'd know it is a serious sin.
 
it's "just don't speak". Sometimes my auto correct goes back and changes words in the middle of a sentence, after I've typed the second or third word, it's really annoying.

TURN ON MY EDIT PRIVILEGES ASSHOLES
This is easily remedied by a quick proofread before you hit post. A literal child can figure this out.
 
👆👆👆 Another pathetic Narcissistic re-framing and gaslighting. PASS on all that shit.


Wait, I see a PROJECTION in there too. Goodness forbid you might actually be the one who is wrong, eh?
You guys said it would dismissed for 12(b)(6) now didn't you, but it wasn't now was it? Oh no, it wasn't. Guess you were wrong.

Your profile particularly doesn't even know what you are reading. I can tell by your sweeping generalizations of what's going on in the pleadings. You can't understand basic things like "for this reason" and Rule dismissals and dismissals for not pleading facts well enough.
👆👆👆 Another uneducated take including re-framing and gaslighting. PASS. It’s gotta be painful to be so stupid. ”You’re profile doesn’t even know...” what the fuck does that even mean? It doesn’t matter *why* we said it would get dismissed, rather that it *did* get dismissed, because you are a moron. And every single one you intend to file about this moving forward will fail due to the same thing.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Viridian
👆👆👆Abuse tactic of trying to condition your victim to be a doormat/punching bag
No. It means that you should learn to ignore what some randos say on an irrelevant internet forum, or at least, stop getting offended by everything they do.
Viable claim = 12(b)(1)
I'll admit to having trouble answering to this brain-dead reply of yours. There was no viable claim. The judge said as much.
You're the one who didn't read the whole dismissal because in case you haven't noticed: HE DIDN'T ORDER THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE CASE
Why are your replies only briefly related to the statement you are replying to? 'Cause I didn't mention closing the case, not that it matters at all, since, after dismissal, your only available actions are an appeal, or just sue someone else.
Because I can Motion under Rule 19 to add in Defendants
No, you really can't. Even if you could, Rule 19 (a) (1) (a) in all likelihood will get your motion dismissed too. Because an additional defendant is not needed to "complete relief among existing parties" which the judge already did without another defendant. Actually, Rule 19 (a) (1) (b) would dismiss it too because the additional defendant does not have interest in this case, that if he didn't participate in, would cause him "impair or impede the person's ability to protect the interest".

So, even if you could do that, you'd still fuck up.
Might be a better plan than a recusal
It really really is not. It's about equally as bad.
For someone who claims to be a polyglot she sure struggles with basic grammar and sentence structure.
Sometimes she doesn't even finish her sentences. I can't imagine she had any English learning at all.
You have been receiving unsolicited advice for 628 pages. If you don't want to receive it, stop coming here.
How is it so hard to understand for her?
Pregnancy isn't something that happens to a woman.
....have you ever read a biology book?
👆 👆 👆 Abusive tactic to silence victims
Given that you keep voluntarily coming back here, I can't see how that makes you the victim in any way. Unless you are addicted to us?
Sometimes, yes. Under extreme stress or fatigue I sometimes cannot understand what I am reading.
Then leave, chill out, and then return. We aren't going anywhere.

This is the same woman who thinks viruses are '4th dimensional spiritual matter" and that fetuses need constant doses of sperm during development so they don't end up retarded or something. So no, I don't think she has.

....I honestly have no words for this...

👆👆👆Victim blaming
How, pray tell, is that victim blaiming?
Have you?
Yes, and it may suprise you, some people do, in fact, get education.
A woman's egg captures the sperm. It's not happening to her. She's part of the process
"I didn't stab this woman, officer! I stabbed her cells! It is her injured organ that is bleeding, not her!"

Your body is you, ergo what happens to your body, happens to you.
I have to do some research before I decide who to name
Indeed.
Incorrect.
Incorrect how?
If the Wise County Board of Supervisors is responsible, they can be a Defendant.
Not according to your cited Rule 13, they can't.
I can't file an Appeal if the case is still open.
Sure you can. Most recently I heard this done was in Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. The Plantiff appealed after his case was dismissed but before the attorney's fees were agreed upon by the judge. The Appeals Court accepted that.

A challenge to subject matter jurisdiction can be brought at any point in time....
This must be the 4d chess I keep hearing about. What, are you gonna challenge the court's ability to enter a valid, enforceable judgment on a claim, even though you sued in that specific court?
 
Last edited:
👆👆👆 Another uneducated take including re-framing and gaslighting. PASS. It’s gotta be painful to be so stupid. ”You’re profile doesn’t even know...” what the fuck does that even mean? It doesn’t matter *why* we said it would get dismissed, rather that it *did* get dismissed, because you are a moron. And every single one you intend to file about this moving forward will fail due to the same thing.

Seriously?

First you say....

It doesn’t matter *why* we said it would get dismissed

And then you say...

will fail due to the same thing.

You're an idiot. You don't even understand what you're reading in those pages, you just spout off at the mouth



Another uneducated take including re-framing and gaslighting. PASS
👆 Narcissistic mimic


Just copying what I say doesn't validate you

This is easily remedied by a quick proofread before you hit post. A literal child can figure this out.
👆👆👆 Narcissitic double standard


Given that you keep voluntarily coming back here, I can't see how that makes you the victim in any way. Unless you are addicted to us?
👆👆👆Victim blaming


.have you ever read a biology book?
Have you?

A woman's egg captures the sperm. It's not happening to her. She's part of the process

Aristotle believed a man's sperm alone grew into a child inside a woman


No, you really can't. Even if you could, Rule 19 (a) (1) (a) in all likelihood will get your motion dismissed too. Because an additional defendant is not needed to "complete relief among existing parties" which the judge already did without another defendant. Actually, Rule 19 (a) (1) (b) would dismiss it too because the additional defendant does not have interest in this case, that if he didn't participate in, would cause him "impair or impede the person's ability to protect the interest".

So, even if you could do that, you'd still fuck up.

Incorrect. If the Wise County Board of Supervisors is responsible, they can be a Defendant. Same with the VA DSS. I have to do some research before I decide who to name. Eleventh Amendment immunity is very complex.

However, can't ignore the fact that the Judge hasn't closed the case

He's either waiting for me to Motion to join Defendants or he's going to do it sua sponte. Instead of me re-filing the entire complaint and paperwork, it's been left open to add Defendants

I can't file an Appeal if the case is still open. And it's open

So Melinda is up in the middle of nowhere in Virginia, right?

Think she needs some moonshine.

Lol. Moonshine .... It's like gold in a bottle


I'm just pointing out what Yeshua said, I'm not the one who's repeatedly twisted the Torah and New Testament around to support her broken theology. What you call exegesis is changing the meaning of scripture to support your beliefs, which if you'd ever take the NT and Yeshua's words seriously, you'd know it is a serious sin.

Exegesis is the art of applying your brain to find continuity and harmony in the text. Has nothing to do with changing the meaning of anything

You think a Jewish Messiah came to teach against The Torah. The notion is so ridiculous. That's why Rabbis think Christians are bonkers
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seriously?

First you say....





And then you say...







You're an idiot. You don't even understand what you're reading in those pages, you just spout off at the mouth











👆 Narcissistic mimic


Just copying what I say doesn't validate you




👆👆👆 Narcissitic double standard







👆👆👆Victim blaming












Have you?

A woman's egg captures the sperm. It's not happening to her. She's part of the process

Aristotle believed a man's sperm alone grew into a child inside a woman







Incorrect. If the Wise County Board of Supervisors is responsible, they can be a Defendant. Same with the VA DSS. I have to do some research before I decide who to name. Eleventh Amendment immunity is very complex.

However, can't ignore the fact that the Judge hasn't closed the case

He's either waiting for me to Motion to join Defendants or he's going to do it sua sponte. Instead of me re-filing the entire complaint and paperwork, it's been left open to add Defendants

I can't file an Appeal if the case is still open. And it's open




Lol. Moonshine .... It's like gold in a bottle








Exegesis is the art of applying your brain to find continuity and harmony in the text. Has nothing to do with changing the meaning of anything

You think a Jewish Messiah came to teach against The Torah. The notion is so ridiculous. That's why Rabbis think Christians are bonkers
I doubt the judge is specifically waiting for you to name more people. Lmao. Also any government employees you name will fall under QI.
 
I doubt the judge is specifically waiting for you to name more people. Lmao. Also any government employees you name will fall under QI.

QI cannot be invoked against Declaratory Relief.

Don't think I can challenge it further? Think again...

A challenge to subject matter jurisdiction can be brought at any point in time....


1602968364758.jpg




1602968407346.jpg






Melinda, do you have any contact with a rabbi? A synagogue? Or do you think that You're the only Real, Actual Jewish person on Earth?

I've talked to some Rabbis through email. There was a point I thought about converting to Reform Judaism because of how Marshall treated me. I thought to myself: "if this man claims to follow The Messiah, why does he not follow The Torah? Why is he so incredibly _____?" I thought, "Maybe all these Messianic dudes have these same bad traits because he's a false messiah they are following?". But then I decided that I cant blame The Messiah for people's actions. It would be incorrect to think that way. I think Patriarchy's is to blame. My exes all had one major thing in common: they start treating me like shit when I won't submit/be controlled.

Anyhow, I think anyone whose ancestors stood at Mt Sinai is a Jew/Israelite/Hebrew. And those who come from afar to serve Elohim.

I'm just one of the more obedient ones
 
Exegesis is the art of applying your brain to find continuity and harmony in the text. Has nothing to do with changing the meaning of anything

You think a Jewish Messiah came to teach against The Torah. The notion is so ridiculous. That's why Rabbis think Christians are bonkers
I'm only telling you what the NT says, Mel. You're free to read it yourself. Nowhere in there does the Messiah demonstrate hatred against Goyim; in fact he shows mercy even to the Romans killing him on the cross, praying to Elohim to forgive them because they didnt know what they were doing.

Your entire understanding of how the Torah relates to the NT is backwards. You really are only a couple of degrees different than a Hasid, and its unfortunate because if you were smart enough to understand why the "new covenant" is called such you might actually be useful as a teacher.
 
Seriously?

First you say....





And then you say...







You're an idiot. You don't even understand what you're reading in those pages, you just spout off at the mouth











👆 Narcissistic mimic


Just copying what I say doesn't validate you




👆👆👆 Narcissitic double standard







👆👆👆Victim blaming












Have you?

A woman's egg captures the sperm. It's not happening to her. She's part of the process

Aristotle believed a man's sperm alone grew into a child inside a woman







Incorrect. If the Wise County Board of Supervisors is responsible, they can be a Defendant. Same with the VA DSS. I have to do some research before I decide who to name. Eleventh Amendment immunity is very complex.

However, can't ignore the fact that the Judge hasn't closed the case

He's either waiting for me to Motion to join Defendants or he's going to do it sua sponte. Instead of me re-filing the entire complaint and paperwork, it's been left open to add Defendants

I can't file an Appeal if the case is still open. And it's open




Lol. Moonshine .... It's like gold in a bottle








Exegesis is the art of applying your brain to find continuity and harmony in the text. Has nothing to do with changing the meaning of anything

You think a Jewish Messiah came to teach against The Torah. The notion is so ridiculous. That's why Rabbis think Christians are bonkers
Not according to:
I'm only telling you what the NT says, Mel. You're free to read it yourself. Nowhere in there does the Messiah demonstrate hatred against Goyim; in fact he shows mercy even to the Romans killing him on the cross, praying to Elohim to forgive them because they didnt know what they were doing.

Your entire understanding of how the Torah relates to the NT is backwards. You really are only a couple of degrees different than a Hasid, and its unfortunate because if you were smart enough to understand why the "new covenant" is called such you might actually be useful as a teacher.
Remember Linda considers Jesus a false prophet.
 
It would be incorrect to think that way. I think Patriarchy's is to blame. My exes all had one major thing in common: they start treating me like shit when I won't submit/be controlled.

Anyhow, I think anyone whose ancestors stood at Mt Sinai is a Jew/Israelite/Hebrew. And those who come from afar to serve Elohim.

I'm just one of the more obedient ones
A woman's place in the Torah is to be submissive to her husband. If you are refusing to submit to your husband's will, you are being a bad Jew. Women are little more than property in the old testament, so you better shape up and keep your yap shut.
 
I'm only telling you what the NT says, Mel. You're free to read it yourself. Nowhere in there does the Messiah demonstrate hatred against Goyim; in fact he shows mercy even to the Romans killing him on the cross, praying to Elohim to forgive them because they didnt know what they were doing.

Your entire understanding of how the Torah relates to the NT is backwards. You really are only a couple of degrees different than a Hasid, and its unfortunate because if you were smart enough to understand why the "new covenant" is called such you might actually be useful as a teacher.

The Messiah showed plenty of hatred for the Goyim. You think The Book of Matthew is the first time The Messiah ever appeared? Who do you think YHWH-Tzvaot is?

What does it say in The Book of Revelation the rider on the white horse (The Messiah) will do to the Goyim?

Just because those Roman soldiers nailing him onto the stake were dressed as Romans doesnt mean they weren't Jews employed by the Roman government

You're a Christian who doesn't even understand that THE MESSIAH WAS A TORAH FOLLOWING JEW

"Those who claim to be in him must walk as he walked".

A woman's place in the Torah is to be submissive to her husband. If you are refusing to submit to your husband's will, you are being a bad Jew. Women are little more than property in the old testament, so you better shape up and keep your yap shut.
👆👆👆Lie

You're advocating something called Patriarchy, which is male spiritual Narcissism.

Genesis 3:16 is a curse, not a command. If you want to live under a curse, than follow it. I choose to be free.

More proving what you said is a LIE



 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back