Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[White Baby]

Quit trying to hide Hebrew words with a KJV translation

http://www.godrules.net/library/strongs2a/heb5650.htm

http://www.godrules.net/library/strongs2a/heb519.htm

 

[A Cardboard Box]

Happiness doesn't validate anything. Lots of evil and wicked people are happy.

I doubt your relationship is healthy. You're a Christian IE a patriarchal sexist. Patriarchy is Narcissism. There's nothing healthy about that at all. I have observed enough Christian and Patriarchal men to know that the only way you Christian men treat your wives right is IF they submit. It's benevolent sexism. Or in other words, "I'll treat you good if you submit to me". SICK SICK SICK

If your wife stood up for her rights and wants and needs you'd be a monster.








It's in your head. Not true in the slightest degree. I'll speak for myself

I don't know, I'm happy, she's happy, and we aren't divorced. So sad your relationships are all failures. Must be terrible.

I don't subscribe to your theology.

 

[LoverofPi]

Man, I have a lovely weekend away with my loved ones and this thread just explodes. Mel must really be soothing a wounded ego to be on all day.

Especially with the going hog wild accusing everyone of being narcissists and even patriarchy of being narcissism. That is an amazing turnaround from earlier this year when she refused to admit such a thing existed, now it's her favorite response. Not that she understands what it is she's saying, but then again that would be our Mel.



But yeah, these last two days have really crystalized Mel's a priori assumptions about a lot of things, and what those assumptions say about her state of mind.

 

[White Baby]

I don't know, I'm happy, she's happy, and we aren't divorced. So sad your relationships are all failures. Must be terrible.

I don't subscribe to your theology.

But didnt you know? In Mel's backwards land, being in a happy marriage now means you're an evil patriarch even if you're a woman.

 

[Baby Yoda]

@TamarYaelBatYah Did it hurt when Marshall fucked your butt? Ive been told many people feel like they have to poop after anal, did you feel that way, like full and constipated?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

I don't know, I'm happy, she's happy, and we aren't divorced. So sad your relationships are all failures. Must be terrible.

I don't subscribe to your theology.

Exactly. So you admit that the only way your relationship survives is because you both conform to Patriarchy. She submits to you and agrees to be subservient to you. That's sickness. And I don't respect that in the least bit.

Ignorance is bliss for some.
Your relationship is the failure because it doesn't honor The Torah.

Mel must really be soothing a wounded ego to be on all day.

Right, because no one is interacting with me on here, huh? Idiot.

I'm breastfeeding my daughter almost non-stop. She's going through a growth spurt.
Don't flatter yourself to think I'm not on other sites

Especially with the going hog wild accusing everyone of being narcissists and even patriarchy of being narcissism. That is an amazing turnaround from earlier this year when she refused to admit such a thing existed, now it's her favorite response. Not that she understands what it is she's saying, but then again that would be our Mel.

I never said Narcissism didn't exist. I said you can't use Psychology over The Torah. IDIOT

Why didn't you sue sooner? The Statue is up to 10 years(depending on the state), so surely it's enough time to realise something's wrong.

Statute is 2 years in VA.

I called a lawyer a few months after a major incident and he was a pompous dick.

That's why you get a job.

Oh really? Which jobs are available for breastfeeding women?

And don't come back at me with that "pump your milk" BS, I'm not an animal.

But didnt you know? In Mel's backwards land, being in a happy marriage now means you're an evil patriarch even if you're a woman.

Internalized misogyny of a Christian woman

@TamarYaelBatYah Did it hurt when Marshall fucked your butt? Ive been told many people feel like they have to poop after anal, did you feel that way, like full and constipated?

No, I didn't feel like that. And it didn't hurt either.

Adoption. But, again, involves responcibility.

Because your male ego can't bear the thought of a Matriarch?

.... and by getting a decent enough job, you can get out of it.

And there we have it folks. Oppression of the Patriarchal system admitted.

It's because they don't know law well.

Not true at all. Many pro-se litigants are well informed. It's that the lawyers and judges have feelings of grandiosity and want to rule over everyone else so they want to invalidate pro-se litigants

A lawyer, even a bad one, will have more knowledge on law than any citizen

Not true either. I had a lawyer once say in a pleading that CPS coming without a Warrant wasn't even a Constitutional issue.

Do you seriously think thst a demon burned Marshall? Did Marshall accuse you of burning him? How often do demons punish you or Marshall while you're asleep?

I don't think it was a demon. I seriously believe it was a Messenger of YHWH. Marshall didn't accuse me of burning him. Because he saw me asleep and then jolt up because I didn't know what the hech was going on. I have never heard Marshall scream in agony like that before. It was sheer agony.

I've never been punished by a demon. I reached the level of TAMIYM when I was 28 years old, stayed on the path since then.

 

[White Baby]

Internalized misogyny of a Christian woman

How many times have you used sexist insults against me, again? Are we at a five or six on the Bimbo-meter?

Because your male ego can't bear the thought of a Matriarch?

What about you is matriarchal? You let Marshall "Smackin Bitches" Castersen walk all over you for multiple years and now you're stuck with his kid. The way you've gone from man to man in a desperate search for lasting companionship, going directly against the words of your own Messiah, is not very matriarchal of you.

No, I didn't feel like that. And it didn't hurt either

Melinda you know you don't have to keep answering these questions right

 

[Baby Yoda]

Exactly. So you admit that the only way your relationship survives is because you both conform to Patriarchy. She submits to you and agrees to be subservient to you. That's sickness. And I don't respect that in the least bit.

Ignorance is bliss for some.
Your relationship is the failure because it doesn't honor The Torah.





Right, because no one is interacting with me on here, huh? Idiot.

I'm breastfeeding my daughter almost non-stop. She's going through a growth spurt.
Don't flatter yourself to think I'm not on other sites





I never said Narcissism didn't exist. I said you can't use Psychology over The Torah. IDIOT





Statute is 2 years in VA.

I called a lawyer a few months after a major incident and he was a pompous dick.








Oh really? Which jobs are available for breastfeeding women?

And don't come back at me with that "pump your milk" BS, I'm not an animal.






Internalized misogyny of a Christian woman








No, I didn't feel like that. And it didn't hurt either.







Because your male ego can't bear the thought of a Matriarch?







And there we have it folks. Oppression of the Patriarchal system admitted.







Not true at all. Many pro-se litigants are well informed. It's that the lawyers and judges have feelings of grandiosity and want to rule over everyone else so they want to invalidate pro-se litigants







Not true either. I had a lawyer once say in a pleading that CPS coming without a Warrant wasn't even a Constitutional issue.





I don't think it was a demon. I seriously believe it was a Messenger of YHWH. Marshall didn't accuse me of burning him. Because he saw me asleep and then jolt up because I didn't know what the hech was going on. I have never heard Marshall scream in agony like that before. It was sheer agony.

I've never been punished by a demon. I reached the level of TAMIYM when I was 28 years old, stayed on the path since then.

Tell us more about Marshall's car project. What was he doing to his car and what kind of car is it?

 

[Toasty]

You can be a single mother and have other people watch your children to have a job. You don't have to have a man to do this.

Never said that you did. You in fact chose not to. Every time anyone suggests a viable path to income earned by your own intelligence, skill, or labor, instead of abusing charity,you have an excuse.

he will bend moral rules to whatever way that puts him on top

I imagine you know all about this and can spot it quickly.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

Exactly. So you admit that the only way your relationship survives is because you both conform to Patriarchy. She submits to you and agrees to be subservient to you. That's sickness. And I don't respect that in the least bit.

Ignorance is bliss for some.
Your relationship is the failure because it doesn't honor The Torah.





Right, because no one is interacting with me on here, huh? Idiot.

I'm breastfeeding my daughter almost non-stop. She's going through a growth spurt.
Don't flatter yourself to think I'm not on other sites





I never said Narcissism didn't exist. I said you can't use Psychology over The Torah. IDIOT





Statute is 2 years in VA.

I called a lawyer a few months after a major incident and he was a pompous dick.








Oh really? Which jobs are available for breastfeeding women?

And don't come back at me with that "pump your milk" BS, I'm not an animal.






Internalized misogyny of a Christian woman








No, I didn't feel like that. And it didn't hurt either.







Because your male ego can't bear the thought of a Matriarch?







And there we have it folks. Oppression of the Patriarchal system admitted.







Not true at all. Many pro-se litigants are well informed. It's that the lawyers and judges have feelings of grandiosity and want to rule over everyone else so they want to invalidate pro-se litigants







Not true either. I had a lawyer once say in a pleading that CPS coming without a Warrant wasn't even a Constitutional issue.





I don't think it was a demon. I seriously believe it was a Messenger of YHWH. Marshall didn't accuse me of burning him. Because he saw me asleep and then jolt up because I didn't know what the hech was going on. I have never heard Marshall scream in agony like that before. It was sheer agony.

I've never been punished by a demon. I reached the level of TAMIYM when I was 28 years old, stayed on the path since then.

I don't subscribe to your theology. My relationship is a success because we are both happy. It is, by an objective measure, more successful than any relationship you've ever had. So sad.

 

[LoverofPi]

Exactly. So you admit that the only way your relationship survives is because you both conform to Patriarchy. She submits to you and agrees to be subservient to you. That's sickness. And I don't respect that in the least bit.

Ignorance is bliss for some.
Your relationship is the failure because it doesn't honor The Torah.

There's more to life than your extremely narrow minded view of a holy book, Mel.

Right, because no one is interacting with me on here, huh? Idiot.

Of course people are interacting with you, but you're responding to everyone at a much higher rate and with a lot more rage than even the norm for you.

I'm breastfeeding my daughter almost non-stop. She's going through a growth spurt.
Don't flatter yourself to think I'm not on other sites

Your presence or absence from other sites is immaterial to the sheet amount of time and energy you've put into feuding here on the farms, Mel.

I never said Narcissism didn't exist. I said you can't use Psychology over The Torah. IDIOT

Well, no, you said you don't believe in Psychology.

I'm not mad at all. That's your own fairytale perception, something you do a lot of. You do realize that telling others how they feel and making up fairytales like that is symptomatic of the very mental illness you claim not to have (NPD)? Since I don't believe in pagan psychology, I'll just call it what it is: UNEDUCATED.

Of course that's just a way to weasel out of having a critical eye turned against you, because- and I do admit this is quite often I say this about you- "If not for double standards you would have no standards at all"

Internalized misogyny of a Christian woman





And there we have it folks. Oppression of the Patriarchal system admitted.

Mel, you really just make yourself look silly when you do this. You aren't using the terms correctly, and you're not actually convincing anyone here with the triple point emoji thing. Not even- I suspect- yourself.

Not true at all. Many pro-se litigants are well informed. It's that the lawyers and judges have feelings of grandiosity and want to rule over everyone else so they want to invalidate pro-se litigants

Most judges try and bend over backwards to give Pro-Se litigants as much slack as they can, Mel. You're just salty because your filings are just so bad there's no way to give you a leg up without violating all sorts of procedure.

Not true either. I had a lawyer once say in a pleading that CPS coming without a Warrant wasn't even a Constitutional issue.

So why not post that pleading?

he will bend moral rules to whatever way that puts him on top. I won't go into all the nitty gritty details, because I am going to save that for therapy.

It's amazing just how well that describes all the behavior you exhibit as well.

You deserve each other.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Exactly. So you admit that the only way your relationship survives is because you both conform to Patriarchy. She submits to you and agrees to be subservient to you. That's sickness. And I don't respect that in the least bit.

How did you get that from "I'm happy, she's happy, we aren't divorsed"?

Statute is 2 years in VA.

That is still a lot of time.

I called a lawyer a few months after a major incident and he was a pompous dick

Either bear with it so you get payment for medical malpractice, or just call another one.

Oh really? Which jobs are available for breastfeeding women?

A few lists:

One list

Second List

Third List

Fourth List

There's also the fact that if you arrange for a babysitter, and feed the baby formulas, or just hire a wet nurse, fuck ton of jobs open up.

And don't come back at me with that "pump your milk" BS,

Or that, yes. See? We are comming up with so many solutions!

Because your male ego can't bear the thought of a Matriarch?

Why do you assume I must be male? Regardless, that is in no way related to my statement.

And there we have it folks. Oppression of the Patriarchal system admitted

"You can get a job and earn money. Then you don't have to starve"

OPPRESSION! STOP OPPRESSING ME! REEEEEEEEE!

Many pro-se litigants are well informed

If they were, they wouldn't constantly fail their suits. A sucessful pro se litigant is a very rare thing. There's a reason why this is a thing judges must do:

The handwritten pro se document is be liberally construed. As the Court unanimously held in Haines v. Kerner, 404 U. S. 519 (1972), a pro se complaint, "however inartfully pleaded," must be held to "less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers" and can only be dismissed for failure to state a claim if it appears "beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.'"

-Supreme Court Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976)

It's that the lawyers and judges have feelings of grandiosity and want to rule over everyone else so they want to invalidate pro-se litigants

See my citation. They are forced to bend over backwards and fix bad pleadings by pro-se littigants because they are just that bad. Pro-se littigants literally get special priviledges.

I had a lawyer once say in a pleading that CPS coming without a Warrant wasn't even a Constitutional issue.

It might not be. 4th might not apply. Qualified immunity likely applies. Probable cause is also an exception to the 4th. I'd be hard to make the 4th apply, and make it a constitutional issue.

How many times have you used sexist insults against me, again?

In almost every single reply to you, probably?

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

How many times have you used sexist insults against me, again? Are we at a five or six on the Bimbo-meter?

What about you is matriarchal? You let Marshall "Smackin Bitches" Castersen walk all over you for multiple years and now you're stuck with his kid. The way you've gone from man to man in a desperate search for lasting companionship, going directly against the words of your own Messiah, is not very matriarchal of you.

Melinda you know you don't have to keep answering these questions right

Hey Melinda, I know a friend over in Virginia who might be able to give you a pysch evaluation if you ever want to prove us wrong that you aren't autistic, don't suffer from NPD, etc. Granted, she graduated recently, but she does have quite a bit of intern experience under her belt. Her name is Christine Chandler, if you're interested drop me a message and I can forward you a contact

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

I don't subscribe to your theology. My relationship is a success because we are both happy. It is, by an objective measure, more successful than any relationship you've ever had. So sad.

Happiness does not validate a relationship.

Strippers are happy with all the cash they go home with at night, does that validate their employment?

Women who engage in Polyandry getting down with 2 dudes at the same time are happy too, does that validate their relationship?

I don't feel sad for myself at all. I am happy in the knowledge that all these years I have stood up for my moral principle to live as a woman who will not be subservient to any man.

I had an ex who called me "Satan" because I wouldn't submit to him. He went on to marry a woman who didn't follow The Torah because "at least she is submissive".

Your presence or absence from other sites is immaterial to the sheet amount of time and energy you've put into feuding here on the farms, Mel.

Not true.

Well, no, you said you don't believe in Psychology.

Exactly. I don't BELIEVE in it. That means it doesn't take precedence in my life. It's just a way of explaining stuff in secular terms.

now you're stuck with his kid.

Internalized misogyny

Those are my children too. I'm not "stuck". I love my children and it's part of my blessed journey as a woman to raise them, husband or no husband.

My grandmother's generation lived under the fierce criticism of divorce being taboo for women. They couldn't even fathom the idea of facing society as a mother without a husband.

I'm not going to go back in time

feed the baby formulas

Formula is disgusting and not a substitute for breast*milk

Also bottle feeding is both bad for the mother and the baby

Hire a wet nurse

Firstly, that's disgusting. No other woman's nipple is going in my baby's mouth.

Secondly, this statement is entirely insulting and demeaning to women who have an inherent human right to hold their own baby

Thirdly, it's also dangerous because STDs can pass through breast*milk

Supreme Court Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976)

That's also why I'm filing a Motion to Recuse the judge next week

The way you've gone from man to man in a desperate search for lasting companionship, going directly against the words of your own Messiah

You're confusing Paul's words with The Messiah again.

imagine you know all about this and can spot it quickly.

I have always upheld The Torah as a consistent standard for the entire world.

Yes, I do NOT give Goy the love I give to Israelites but that is fair. You don't get love when you are Wicked. The Torah doesn't reward evil.

The notion that evil behavior should be rewarded is Christianity. It is disgusting.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Happiness does not validate a relationship.

Strippers are happy with all the cash they go home with at night, does that validate their employment?

Women who engage in Polyandry getting down with 2 dudes at the same time are happy too, does that validate their relationship?

I don't feel sad for myself at all. I am happy in the knowledge that all these years I have stood up for my moral principle to live as a woman who will not be subservient to any man.

I had an ex who called me "Satan" because I wouldn't submit to him. He went on to marry a woman who didn't follow The Torah because "at least she is submissive".





Not true.





Exactly. I don't BELIEVE in it. That means it doesn't take precedence in my life. It's just a way of explaining stuff in secular terms.







Internalized misogyny

Those are my children too. I'm not "stuck". I love my children and it's part of my blessed journey as a woman to raise them, husband or no husband.

My grandmother's generation lived under the fierce criticism of divorce being taboo for women. They couldn't even fathom the idea of facing society as a mother without a husband.

I'm not going to go back in time







Formula is disgusting and not a substitute for breast*milk

Also bottle feeding is both bad for the mother and the baby










Firstly, that's disgusting. No other woman's nipple is going in my baby's mouth.

Secondly, this statement is entirely insulting and demeaning to women who have an inherent human right to hold their own baby

Thirdly, it's also dangerous because STDs can pass through breast*milk







That's also why I'm filing a Motion to Recuse the judge next week









You're confusing Paul's words with The Messiah again.






I have always upheld The Torah as a consistent standard for the entire world.

Yes, I do NOT give Goy the love I give to Israelites but that is fair. You don't get love when you are Wicked. The Torah doesn't reward evil.

The notion that evil behavior should be rewarded is Christianity. It is disgusting.

Seeing as you've never read a piece of religious literature in your life, I can tell you that you're wrong here. Christianity doesn't reward evil, if gives those who've sinned a chance at redeeming themselves because they are still children of the Lord. No religious literature rewards evil, not even the Quran, you're fuckin delirious.

 

[Toasty]

L

I also cursed his car project because he is has over invested his time in the car project at the expense of doing his duty to me as his former wife.

To this day his car is still a hunk of junk sitting there.

You've claimed to be legally married by the state, and virginia law doesn't grant immediate divorced on a whim. So legally, you aren't his former wife. Even if your marriage contract is strictly personal and spiritually based, he hasn't actually accepted your GET yet, or if he did it was like 5 minutes ago, and you will want your curtains flapped tonight, so you will be back together.
Anyway, calling yourself his "former wife" is a bit of a stretch. Saying that you cursed his car project because he wasn't "doing his duty to you as a former wife" makes it sound like you cursed it a while back, until you hit the former wife bit. Like I said, you aren't divorced. If you are, the ink ain't dry, and you will have crossed it out by tonight.
But I gotta say, cursing your husband and father of at least one of your kids to not have success seems kinda like shooting yourself in the kneecap. Sure the car might be a waste of time and money, but it also might be the hobby and space to clear his head that keeps him sane. Or it might be to have another vehicle for household use, thus benefitting you. It could be something to fix up and sell, which could mean much needed funds for your impoverished children. But who cares about any of that? Marshall is doing something she doesn't control, and that has to stop. She better pull out her personal curse dispenser. Because in Soviet Melinda, Elohim obeys YOU!!

 

[LoverofPi]

Not true.

"I spent even more time elsewhere" does not change "You spend a hell of a lot of time here"

Exactly. I don't BELIEVE in it. That means it doesn't take precedence in my life. It's just a way of explaining stuff in secular terms.

So you don't believe in it, but do think it exists. Just gonna let that speak for itself.

 

[Deadpool]

It's in your head. Not true in the slightest degree. I'll speak for myself

It's not in my head, I had it pointed out to me by several people before I had even noticed it. Deny it all you want but it's fucking obvious to everyone who reads the thread.

I doubt your relationship is healthy. You're a Christian IE a patriarchal sexist. Patriarchy is Narcissism. There's nothing healthy about that at all. I have observed enough Christian and Patriarchal men to know that the only way you Christian men treat your wives right is IF they submit. It's benevolent sexism. Or in other words, "I'll treat you good if you submit to me". SICK SICK SICK

If your wife stood up for her rights and wants and needs you'd be a monster.

This is retarded and you're retarded for believing it.

You don't know anything about them or their spouse. They could be 100% equal in their marriage. I know you don't understand this but not everyone is an overzealous religious fanatic the way you are. There are parts of their religion they disagree with. For example I don't think there is anything wrong with homosexuals, marriages should be an equal partnership and the creation myth and the story of Noah's flood are simply not true.

Happiness does not validate a relationship.

Yes it does.

Strippers are happy with all the cash they go home with at night, does that validate their employment?

Yes.

Women who engage in Polyandry getting down with 2 dudes at the same time are happy too, does that validate their relationship?

Yes.

The notion that evil behavior should be rewarded is Christianity. It is disgusting.

This is retarded and you're retarded for believing it.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

Happiness does not validate a relationship.

Strippers are happy with all the cash they go home with at night, does that validate their employment?

Women who engage in Polyandry getting down with 2 dudes at the same time are happy too, does that validate their relationship?

I don't feel sad for myself at all. I am happy in the knowledge that all these years I have stood up for my moral principle to live as a woman who will not be subservient to any man.

I had an ex who called me "Satan" because I wouldn't submit to him. He went on to marry a woman who didn't follow The Torah because "at least she is submissive".





Not true.





Exactly. I don't BELIEVE in it. That means it doesn't take precedence in my life. It's just a way of explaining stuff in secular terms.







Internalized misogyny

Those are my children too. I'm not "stuck". I love my children and it's part of my blessed journey as a woman to raise them, husband or no husband.

My grandmother's generation lived under the fierce criticism of divorce being taboo for women. They couldn't even fathom the idea of facing society as a mother without a husband.

I'm not going to go back in time







Formula is disgusting and not a substitute for breast*milk

Also bottle feeding is both bad for the mother and the baby










Firstly, that's disgusting. No other woman's nipple is going in my baby's mouth.

Secondly, this statement is entirely insulting and demeaning to women who have an inherent human right to hold their own baby

Thirdly, it's also dangerous because STDs can pass through breast*milk







That's also why I'm filing a Motion to Recuse the judge next week









You're confusing Paul's words with The Messiah again.






I have always upheld The Torah as a consistent standard for the entire world.

Yes, I do NOT give Goy the love I give to Israelites but that is fair. You don't get love when you are Wicked. The Torah doesn't reward evil.

The notion that evil behavior should be rewarded is Christianity. It is disgusting.

Lmao. Your life is sad. I'm incredibly happy that I'm not you. Holy shit.

 

[White Baby]

Internalized misogyny

Ok, cousin fucker.

My grandmother's generation lived under the fierce criticism of divorce being taboo for women. They couldn't even fathom the idea of facing society as a mother without a husband.

And that was wrong. You, however, have subscribed to a religion that unequivocally condemns divorce and then refused to listen to it. Hypocritical much?

That's also why I'm filing a Motion to Recuse the judge next week

Lel good luck with that

You're confusing Paul's words with The Messiah again.

Okay, let me crack my knuckles and show you the passage again, since your autism is keeping you from understanding basic english for the hundredth time this month:

Matthew 19​

King James Version​

​

19 And it came to pass, that when Jesus had finished these sayings, he departed from Galilee, and came into the coasts of Judaea beyond Jordan;
2 And great multitudes followed him; and he healed them there.
3 The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?
4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,
5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
7 They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?
8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.
9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.
10 His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry.
11 But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given.
12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.

In case you're having trouble reading bolded text, these are all things the Messiah said. Not Paul. Paul didn't have a thing to do with this. The book of Matthew, or Mattiyahu, was not written by Paul, as even a child might be able to guess by the title of the fucking book. The Messiah directly contradicted Mosaic law here because it was no longer serving Elohim's purpose to allow people to divorce willy nilly. The entire purpose of Yeshua's arrival was to retire the bits of Mosaic law that no longer were needed because Israel was not a nation of nomads wandering in the desert, reinforce the basic ten commandments, and provide salvation to those outside Elohim's special chosen people.

If you don't understand that, then you might as well convert, because you're not Netzarim and you're certainly not Messianic.