Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Also bottle feeding is both bad for the mother and the baby
_Citation_needed_.jpg

Secondly, this statement is entirely insulting and demeaning to women who have an inherent human right to hold their own baby
Nowhere did I say you are forbidden from holding your child. You asked me how to get a job. I told you how. Don't whine that you got an answer you didn't like.
Thirdly, it's also dangerous because STDs can pass through breast*milk
It's very reasonable to ask the wetnurse to produce an STD's test result before hiring, so no problems there.
That's also why I'm filing a Motion to Recuse the judge next week
Pretty sure you said you were filling rule 19 next week. Are you gonna file both?

Anyway, "Weller v. Dept. of Soc. Serv. for Baltimore" gives the judge a good defence.

While pro se complaints may "represent the work of an untutored hand requiring special judicial solicitude," a district court is not required to recognize "obscure or extravagant claims defying the most concerted efforts to unravel them."
As well as "Scott v. Carlson et al" which says pretty much the same thing.
 
Honestly might be beating a dead horse here, but Mel? Lay off the farms and get therapy. You might not be the most well-adjusted (and honestly been worse as of late), but I'm sure you'd be happier without seeing christians, curses and goys everywhere. Since let's be honest here, you've failed to amaze the farms with your brilliance, and baffle us with your bullshit to paraphrase a saying.
 
Honestly might be beating a dead horse here, but Mel? Lay off the farms and get therapy. You might not be the most well-adjusted (and honestly been worse as of late), but I'm sure you'd be happier without seeing christians, curses and goys everywhere. Since let's be honest here, you've failed to amaze the farms with your brilliance, and baffle us with your bullshit to paraphrase a saying.

The problem is that she will see those things everywhere regardless. Paranoia and persecution complexes will do that to you.
 
It's very reasonable to ask the wetnurse to produce an STD's test result before hiring, so no problems there.

She could infect the baby later on

Pretty sure you said you were filling rule 19 next week. Are you gonna file both?

Yes, both.

And a Motion to challenge subject matter Jurisdiction

Honestly might be beating a dead horse here, but Mel? Lay off the farms and get therapy. You might not be the most well-adjusted (and honestly been worse as of late), but I'm sure you'd be happier without seeing christians, curses and goys everywhere. Since let's be honest here, you've failed to amaze the farms with your brilliance, and baffle us with your bullshit to paraphrase a saying.

I'm not here to baffle or amaze you

I'm here for my own personal interests

And that was wrong. You, however, have subscribed to a religion that unequivocally condemns divorce and then refused to listen to it. Hypocritical much?

The Torah does not condemn divorce.


In case you're having trouble reading bolded text, these are all things the Messiah said. Not Paul. Paul didn't have a thing to do with this. The book of Matthew, or Mattiyahu, was not written by Paul, as even a child might be able to guess by the title of the fucking book. The Messiah directly contradicted Mosaic law here because it was no longer serving Elohim's purpose to allow people to divorce willy nilly. The entire purpose of Yeshua's arrival was to retire the bits of Mosaic law that no longer were needed because Israel was not a nation of nomads wandering in the desert, reinforce the basic ten commandments, and provide salvation to those outside Elohim's special chosen people.

If you don't understand that, then you might as well convert, because you're not Netzarim and you're certainly not Messianic

That's where you're wrong. And once again shows your terrible inability to do proper Exegesis.

The Messiah was a JEWISH MAN who TAUGHT HIS SHEEP TO FOLLOW THE TORAH

Go back to Point A: THE TORAH
The Book of Matthew was written 1000s of years AFTER The Torah.
You're trying to read The Messiah without the context of The Torah.

And even Matthew 19 shows you're a liar...

"He answered, “Moshe allowed you to divorce your wives because your hearts are so hardened. But this is not how it was at the beginning" (Matthew 19:8)

AND WHY MIGHT THAT BE? Because Moses was a Judge and THE TORAH PERMITS DIVORCE.

You aren't a Judge in the House of Israel, you have no authority whatsoever to tell anyone who they can and cannot divorce.
You're a liar with guile on your lips. You mistake your imagination for intelligence.

You Christians believe in moral relativism, the idea that moral rules change over time. NEWSFLASH: The same moral rules laid out at Mt Sinai are the same moral rules today

Lmao. Your life is sad. I'm incredibly happy that I'm not you. Holy shit.
👆👆👆 A bruised male ego against a woman who doesn't get sucked into Patriarchy

Your life is evil. I'm glad I'm not you or your wife/married to a man like you

They could be 100% equal in their marriage

Pssht. All Christian men are patriarchal male sexists.

I'm not buying your pathetic attempt at trying to make excuses for a man who goes to church to hear s preacher tell everyone that humans born with a vagina are second rate creations born to serve men

LIARS
Seeing as you've never read a piece of religious literature in your life, I can tell you that you're wrong here. Christianity doesn't reward evil, if gives those who've sinned a chance at redeeming themselves because they are still children of the Lord. No religious literature rewards evil, not even the Quran, you're fuckin delirious.

Lie

Christianity teaches that they are accepted and saved regardless of how they behave because they are "covered by the blood"

L

You've claimed to be legally married by the state, and virginia law doesn't grant immediate divorced on a whim. So legally, you aren't his former wife. Even if your marriage contract is strictly personal and spiritually based, he hasn't actually accepted your GET yet, or if he did it was like 5 minutes ago, and you will want your curtains flapped tonight, so you will be back together.
Anyway, calling yourself his "former wife" is a bit of a stretch. Saying that you cursed his car project because he wasn't "doing his duty to you as a former wife" makes it sound like you cursed it a while back, until you hit the former wife bit. Like I said, you aren't divorced. If you are, the ink ain't dry, and you will have crossed it out by tonight.
But I gotta say, cursing your husband and father of at least one of your kids to not have success seems kinda like shooting yourself in the kneecap. Sure the car might be a waste of time and money, but it also might be the hobby and space to clear his head that keeps him sane. Or it might be to have another vehicle for household use, thus benefitting you. It could be something to fix up and sell, which could mean much needed funds for your impoverished children. But who cares about any of that? Marshall is doing something she doesn't control, and that has to stop. She better pull out her personal curse dispenser. Because in Soviet Melinda, Elohim obeys YOU!!

👆👆👆Tacky unsolicited advice from a Goy women. Spoken like a true Goy.

For one, you immediately revert to defending the penis in the relationship because of your Internalized misogyny. Goy woman that you are. Nothing gives you Goy women more Narcissitic supply than trying to subvert a married female.

For two, you aren't a third wheel on my former marriage Covenant with Marshall. You don't get to decide the terms of any agreement I had with Marshall about the vehicle. I DO. I SET THE TERMS WITH HIM, NOT YOU. Terms were set by US already. In typical Goy fashion you're trying to intrude on my Covenant like an emotional mistress. Nobody asked your opinion.

For three, you're a Goy dog, not a Judge in The House of Israel. You have ZERO authority to tell any Israelite who they can and cannot divorce.

I don't need your permission to walk away from Marshall. I don't need his either.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's where you're wrong. And once again shows your terrible inability to do proper Exegesis.

The Messiah was a JEWISH MAN who TAUGHT HIS SHEEP TO FOLLOW THE TORAH

Go back to Point A: THE TORAH
The Book of Matthew was written 1000s of years AFTER The Torah.
You're trying to read The Messiah without the context of The Torah.

And even Matthew 19 shows you're a liar...

"He answered, “Moshe allowed you to divorce your wives because your hearts are so hardened. But this is not how it was at the beginning" (Matthew 19:8)

AND WHY MIGHT THAT BE? Because Moses was a Judge and THE TORAH PERMITS DIVORCE.

You aren't a Judge in the House of Israel, you have no authority whatsoever to tell anyone who they can and cannot divorce.
You're a liar with guile on your lips. You mistake your imagination for intelligence.
Exegesis literally does not matter. Yeshua, the Messiah you claim to follow, condemned divorce except in the case of sexual misbehavior. The words are there on the page. This specific Mosaic law was declared defunct.

If you refuse to acknowledge the words of your own Messiah, you are nothing less than a heretic. You're so desperate to justify yourself in the bounds of your religion that you've made yourself a blasphemer and completely gone against the will of Elohim.

Convert to Judaism or stop calling yourself a Netzarim because you obviously don't give two shits about anything the Messiah ever said.
 
I'm here for my own personal interests
So far your personal interests seem to be you yelling to the void.

Christianity teaches that they are accepted and saved regardless of how they behave because they are "covered by the blood"
Source? Because that sounds like really wonkyass version of Christianity. I mean..

Tacky unsolicited advice from a Goy women. Spoken like a true Goy
Oh right, Curse of twelve yahoos upon you too.
 
Tacky unsolicited advice from a Goy women. Spoken like a true Goy.
I was offering commentary, not advice. But hey, you and reading comprehension aren't friends. And I'm only one woman.
In typical Goy fashion you're trying to intrude on my Covenant like an emotional mistress. Nobody asked your opinion.
You involved every user on this site by dramatically playing out your relationship dysfunction here. If you didn't want us to discuss it, you wouldn't choose to engage in your little one sided slap fights here. You would do it where the prying eyes of the people you are trying to sue couldn't see it.
YOU wanted it to be a topic of conversation. YOU held it up to be judged. Don't get pissy when you don't like the results.
 
So far your personal interests seem to be you yelling to the void.

I'm taking notes on what has been said. That's all you need to know.

Yeshua, the Messiah you claim to follow, condemned divorce except in the case of sexual misbehavior.

The Messiah Yahushua (call him Yeshua if you will, I won't argue over that) TAUGHT THE TORAH WHICH ALLOWS DIVORCE FOR MULTIPLE REASONS, not just "sexual misbehavior"

How hard is that for you to understand?


If you refuse to acknowledge the words of your own Messiah, you are nothing less than a heretic.

Lady, you condemn yourself with your own words!!

You're so desperate to justify yourself in the bounds of your religion that you've made yourself a blasphemer and completely gone against the will of Elohim

The will of Elohim is The Torah

You condemn yourself with your own words!!

You involved every user on this site by dramatically playing out your relationship dysfunction here

And yet they haven't tried to act like an emotional mistress

that's the difference!

If you didn't want us to discuss it, you wouldn't choose to engage in your little one sided slap fights here.

Look at you trying to defend the penis again. Such a Goy.

There's a difference between commenting and trying to act like an emotional mistress. But I know you wicked Goy women can't be anything other than emotionally Polygynous, always trying to whisper into the ears of involved men.

YOU held it up to be judged.

According to who?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pssht. All Christian men are patriarchal male sexists.
This is retarded and your retarded for believing it.
You can't just claim that 2 billion people are automatically sexist because of their religion. I mean you can, but doing so makes you a fucking moron.



I'm not buying your pathetic attempt at trying to make excuses for a man who goes to church to hear s preacher tell everyone that humans born with a vagina are second rate creations born to serve men
It's not a pathetic attempt at anything, because I don't need to make excuses for him. I'm telling you flat out your wrong and willfully so. Your whole view of Christianity is a straw man shaped by your own religious fanaticism. I've been to quite a few churches in my 38 years and literally none of them have ever said women were second rate creations born to serve man.
Christianity teaches that they are accepted and saved regardless of how they behave because they are "covered by the blood"
There's that retarded straw man you're so fond of. Have you considered getting rid of it and learning something instead? Oh wait of course not, because to want to learn something you have to admit your ignorance on the subject and your narc ego is simply too strong to allow you to do that.
 
I'm taking notes on what has been said. That's all you need to know.
Honestly, book of grudges is some FaBa dwarf stuff. Ain't healthy for anyone to keep a list of perceived slights. Or screech like harpy to everyone about goys, demons or christians. Some questions a mental health professional might ask would be "those goys, are they in the room with us? do you communicate with them? do they speak to you?".
 
The Messiah Yahushua (call him Yeshua if you will, I won't argue over that) TAUGHT THE TORAH WHICH ALLOWS DIVORCE FOR MULTIPLE REASONS, not just "sexual misbehavior"

How hard is that for you to understand?
Where?
 
She could infect the baby later on
Fair enough. Look into her life? If she's married, and doesn't have STD's, she's unlikely to have them in the future. Alternativly, get a job from the 4 lists I linked you.
Yes, both.

And a Motion to challenge subject matter Jurisdiction
That's not gonna look good. You will be saying at the same time that:

  • The Judge failed to give you enough special priviledges
  • And that he didn't even have the right to give you priviledges(because of lack of jurisdiction(which then brings up the question as to why you filed to a court that could not have solved your problem. Seems like it accidently proves that 12(b)(6) was the right action by the judge))
Point is, your motions contradict one another.

Not worth talking more on Rule 19, since I don't think you can prove Rule 19 (1)(a)(1) and Rule 19 (1)(b)(1)
Pssht. All Christian men are patriarchal male sexists.
_Citation_needed_.jpg



I'm taking notes on your worldviews and theological beliefs not grudges
Why? What's the point?
Well, wait and see what I put in it
Eagerly waiting for your next week's filling.
 
Last edited:
But I know you wicked Goy women can't be anything other than emotionally Polygynous, always trying to whisper into the ears of involved men.
:story::story::story:
Who's ears am I trying to whisper into? Marshall's? First off, my standards are way higher than yours. Not to mention, he's not involved. Unless you crawled back already.
Is this making you feel better since you keep getting called out for your erotomania for @Deadpool ?
 
Honestly, book of grudges is some FaBa dwarf stuff. Ain't healthy for anyone to keep a list of perceived slights. Or screech like harpy to everyone about goys, demons or christians. Some questions a mental health professional might ask would be "those goys, are they in the room with us? do you communicate with them? do they speak to you?".

I'm taking notes on your worldviews and theological beliefs not grudges

That's not gonna look good. You will be saying at the same time that:

Well, wait and see what I put in it


Where what?

Where did The Messiah say that? Or where does The Torah allow divorce??

Please specify

You can't just claim that 2 billion people are automatically sexist because of their religion

I sure can. 2 billion people say that Rabbi Paul's writing are "inspired by G-d". If Paul teaches it, they are saying they believe it.

I've been to quite a few churches in my 38 years and literally none of them have ever said women were second rate creations born to serve man.

Oh, yeah, they just say "man is head of the house". Wow so much better

because to want to learn something you have to admit your ignorance on the subject

I grew up in American (USA) Christendom. I know what they preach

Where does it say he taught that? Because Mattiyahu says the absolute opposite.

Once again...

"Don’t think that I have come to abolish the Torah or the Prophets. I have come not to abolish but to complete. Yes indeed! I tell you that until heaven and earth pass away, not so much as a yud or a stroke will pass from the Torah — not until everything that must happen has happened. So whoever disobeys the least of these mitzvot and teaches others to do so will be called the least in the Kingdom of Heaven. But whoever obeys them and so teaches will be called great in the Kingdom of Heaven. For I tell you that unless your righteousness is far greater than that of the Torah-teachers and P’rushim, you will certainly not enter the Kingdom of Heaven!" (Matthew 5:17-20)


:story::story::story:
Who's ears am I trying to whisper into? Marshall's? First off, my standards are way higher than yours. Not to mention, he's not involved. Unless you crawled back already.
Is this making you feel better since you keep getting called out for your erotomania for @Deadpool ?

Don't try to front on me bitch. You know Marshall reads this thread.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't try to front on me bitch. You know Marshall reads this thread.
I don't know that. But more importantly I don't give a flying fuck you absolute doorknob.
Why do you care so much if he's around here, able to message other users. You guys are done right? That's what you told everyone here, and him too since he hangs on my every word.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Chariot Of Mara
Exactly. So you admit that the only way your relationship survives is because you both conform to Patriarchy. She submits to you and agrees to be subservient to you. That's sickness. And I don't respect that in the least bit.

Lol, but nobody here is saying anything of the sort about our own relationships. Your absurd reaches are both amusing and horrifying, to equal degrees.
Pssht. All Christian men are patriarchal male sexists.

I'm not buying your pathetic attempt at trying to make excuses for a man who goes to church to hear s preacher tell everyone that humans born with a vagina are second rate creations born to serve men

LIARS

I don't think I've ever heard a preacher express anything remotely like that. You have some very strange ideas about what happens in the wider world of religion.

True Fact: You're much more likely to hear patriarchal, women are second rate-type talk from fringe cultists like Hebrew Roots and Jews for Jesus preachers than from any mainstream religious preacher. I'm sure Melinda thinks that everyone's just keeping it secret, that it's a big conspiracy. But we all know that isn't so.
Don't try to front on me bitch. You know Marshall reads this thread.

Probably, very slowly and with his lips moving, brow furrowed in a vain attempt to understand the big words being used. And you chose to breed with him!
 
Don't try to front on me bitch. You know Marshall reads this thread.
He still reads this? Tell him to come back. He was way funnier than you with all his sock accounts. :story: We’d love to ask him about Bradley again and his flat earth views.

Toasty has her eye on me now because my video game scores are better than Marshall’s. That’s very important criteria when deciding partners for relationships. Of course, if you’re worried about Marshall becoming infatuated with Toasty, he can 1vs1 me in Mario Kart. He’ll lose and then you won’t have to worry about losing your rebound dick since you seem so concerned over a man you’re trying to divorce.
Edit: whoa. Double quote. Fixed format.
 
Probably, very slowly and with his lips moving, brow furrowed in a vain attempt to understand the big words being used. And you chose to breed with him!
I dunno, I kinda like gearhead type men. What you see is what you get with them.
 
Back