Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

A blue Check mark just advocated for a genocide of 60 million people
 

Attachments

  • 7393A2B0-17C0-4F70-ADC1-CCC888C70C1B.jpeg
    7393A2B0-17C0-4F70-ADC1-CCC888C70C1B.jpeg
    146.2 KB · Views: 99
A blue Check mark just advocated for a genocide of 60 million people
Why not just go with the original spirit of his suggestion, and make Trump supporters wear orange stars sewn to their clothing, and keep them contained by cramming them into the most run-down quarters of major cities?

The blue checkmarks can't even hide how bloodthirsty and hellbent on vengeance they are--and they present this as a virtue, and as a civic good. How do you get citizens who are willing and eager to exterminate fellow citizens? This is where it starts.

I doubt it will ever get to that, as their perceived enemies are much better-armed and generally better at organization and discipline, but people like Gailen David illustrate something Jordan Peterson has said in old lectures: If you're so certain you would have risked your life to save Jews, had you lived in Nazi Germany, you're more than likely wrong.
 
Interesting. Show me the law that conferred ownership of the land and buffalo to those people.

If it's just "they were there first", they weren't... the actual indigenous people that were here first were slaughtered by the ancestors of the modern "natives" who crossed a land bridge armed with superior weapons and imported disease (sound familiar?). So if there was no recognized law conferring ownership of the land and buffalo, please define the number of years it takes for stolen land and resources to become yours and for someone to become a native.

.....Except there were no actual indigenous people here first for said natives to slaughter. Humans are not native to the americas and only started showing up with the whole land bridge through alaska. The fossil record is pretty clear about that

Pointless Pedant said:
The main reason Mexico didn't get annexed is that they didn't want to give suffrage to all the Mexicans

No, the main reason was that there was considerable disagreement whether said annexed territory would enter the union as free or slave states. Given its location the south didn't want to be surrounded by free states and the north didn't want more slave states. Rather than push themselves into a corner that could have ended badly for everyone involved they decided not to annex most of mexico
 
Surprised this wasn't mentioned yet, but some Asian guy is dangling from Trump Tower (Chicago) asking to speak to the President. Apparently associated with BLM he says.


I'm on mobile so forgive the lazy posting.


If he makes it past 24 hours, this Chinese spy should get a dedicated thread in Happenings.

This happened just a couple days before the dangling stunt:

 
If what they teach in school is correct GW served two terms and had to turn down the offer of being proclaimed king. Not sure if the founders wanted only single term presidents. The first one served 2.


Besides that, your concerns makes sense. I'm not of the opinion that the founders were infallible.
I think it was Jefferson who wanted it to be 1 term and no relatives of previous presidents, but couldn't get it made into law. Whether or not the founders were fallable, they're better than anyone who came later, and I trust their judgment most.
A blue Check mark just advocated for a genocide of 60 million people
So I'm guessing after this we'll use the forced tattoos on the objectionable people to move them into designated cities with only like people in them, so they can't infect or harm anyone else? Probably not allowed to vote, either. Like a permanent summer camp for all of them. with walls.
 
A blue Check mark just advocated for a genocide of 60 million people

Why not just go with the original spirit of his suggestion, and make Trump supporters wear orange stars sewn to their clothing, and keep them contained by cramming them into the most run-down quarters of major cities?

The blue checkmarks can't even hide how bloodthirsty and hellbent on vengeance they are--and they present this as a virtue, and as a civic good. How do you get citizens who are willing and eager to exterminate fellow citizens? This is where it starts.

I doubt it will ever get to that, as their perceived enemies are much better-armed and generally better at organization and discipline, but people like Gailen David illustrate something Jordan Peterson has said in old lectures: If you're so certain you would have risked your life to save Jews, had you lived in Nazi Germany, you're more than likely wrong.

Then he mocks.
1603089770305.png

 
Surprised this wasn't mentioned yet, but some Asian guy is dangling from Trump Tower (Chicago) asking to speak to the President. Apparently associated with BLM he says.

https://nypost.com/2020/10/19/man-d...-trump-tower-demands-to-speak-with-president/
I would've cut the rope.
A blue Check mark just advocated for a genocide of 60 million people
>The jew demands the goys mark themselves
Gee, I wonder why he thinks this is a good idea. No bad ideas, only bad targets.
 
I'll believe it when he's indicted on it, and not a second sooner. This reeks of bullshit, and like opportunism. Do I think its impossible? Nah, far form it, if any one involved in this election has done it, it'd be Biden's monumental fuckup of a son. But come on, this is "Anonymous Source Says" but from the right.
 
Back