New York Post got their hands on a hard drive from Hunter Biden's laptop and shows Joe Biden lied about Hunter's dealings with Ukraine

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Couple stories on the New York Post

FBI has had the laptop for over a year already and didn't say anything. Remember when Trump got impeached for congratulating the new President of the Ukraine?

What the hell is the FBI doing?

Supposedly there is also a video of him engaged in a "sex act" and a couple of photo's of him. This is one is particular juicy

Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-40-48.png


Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-49-19.png
 
Last edited:
OANN is claiming the 14-year-old is Natalie Biden. Also various young-looking Eastern Europeans.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2LDd-tH0I4
https://archive.vn/WSSbu
View attachment 1682863
They're really dancing around what the pictures are actually of, which is understandable, but it's still leaving a lot of room for interpretation.

"Natalie Biden was horizontal!" That could be as simple and innocent as the two of them, fully clothed, atop the blankets, watching TV or something. Or, it could be something far, far, far worse. And OAN isn't exactly a neutral party in this.

So still. Who knows? More waiting, really.
 
Rudy's specific words about the contents of the pictures stuck with me from his initial reveal (back when he broke the "walking around naked smoking crack" texts), he was VERY specific. He said as I recall that "it would be a felony for a law enforcement officer to not report it" or something identical in meaning.

My working theory is some of the pictures do depict child abuse or neglect, as defined by law, but not necessarily sexual abuse, he didn't go that far in what I heard.

Law enforcement are mandatory reporters, and the scope of things they are required to report if they see them include sexual abuse of children...but also a lot of other kinds of abuse and neglect against children which ain't necessarily sexual.

I'm 95% sure that a picture of HB walking around smoking crack naked while a 14 year old is in his presence in that 14 year old's parent's home given the surrounding context would qualify for reporting, even if he wasn't sexually abusing that 14 year old in said picture.

Feel free to tell me I'm full of it, but my cynical side glommed on to that very specific wording and knowing Rudy is a lawyer makes me think that specificity isn't a coincidence.
 
Rudy's specific words about the contents of the pictures stuck with me from his initial reveal (back when he broke the "walking around naked smoking crack" texts), he was VERY specific. He said as I recall that "it would be a felony for a law enforcement officer to not report it" or something identical in meaning.

My working theory is some of the pictures do depict child abuse or neglect, as defined by law, but not necessarily sexual abuse, he didn't go that far in what I heard.

Law enforcement are mandatory reporters, and the scope of things they are required to report if they see them include sexual abuse of children...but also a lot of other kinds of abuse and neglect against children which ain't necessarily sexual.

I'm 95% sure that a picture of HB walking around smoking crack naked while a 14 year old is in his presence in that 14 year old's parent's home given the surrounding context would qualify for reporting, even if he wasn't sexually abusing that 14 year old in said picture.

Feel free to tell me I'm full of it, but my cynical side glommed on to that very specific wording and knowing Rudy is a lawyer makes me think that specificity isn't a coincidence.
What do you think "reporting" entails, exactly?

I'm familiar with the system through my work. Here's how it goes:

You're some kind of authority figure over a minor - maybe a teacher, maybe a coach, maybe a nanny, whatever - and you have before you a textbook example of neglect. You know it's an unhealthy home environment. You know whatever the kid is experiencing is going to employ a therapist one day. So you make a report. But the cops don't go in and rescue the kid. They send a social worker. It's their job, after all.

So the social worker goes in and interviews the family. Maybe they interview the minor alone. Maybe they interview the minor with the parents present. In either case, the minor doesn't exhibit obvious signs of abuse or neglect. No bruises, no malnutrition, coached responses, family loyalty, etc. Turns out that, whatever's happening to the minor, they weren't looking to be rescued. And the parents have an explanation for everything. So the social worker needs to think about the worst case scenario: what do I tell a judge & jury if they (including the minor) dispute me in court?

So the social worker says, "okay, well, let's follow up in a few weeks and see how it's going." And they do the song & dance until the worker closes the case, or until the kid shows up with a black eye or ribs showing from hunger.

And that's how it goes with fucking ghetto kids, never mind the granddaughter of one of the most powerful men in the world.
 
Guaranteed that the CP shit is Biden's niece topless at Hunter's pool or whatever. Maybe a few pics that are plausibly from the same day where Hunter is doing drugs or appearing in frame with his topless niece. Illegal shit by US standards but nothing sexual, nothing you wouldn't see in some European art house movie.

They overplayed their hand on the sex shit. All that ever mattered was Biden's integrity, Hunter is a sideshow.
 
This is called Post-Modernism, btw, and it's basically the religious offshoot of Marxism. "Yes, the facts data and reasoned thinking state that Marxism will never work because it's a failed, shitty ideology, but I FEEL that it should and honestly, shouldn't my FEELINGS count as much as your facts? No, well, I FEEL that they should, and my FEELINGS are peer reviewed "scientific" papers, so checkmate oppressor!"
It's so disgustingly manipulative, but it somehow "works".
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Tismguide
Guaranteed that the CP shit is Biden's niece topless at Hunter's pool or whatever. Maybe a few pics that are plausibly from the same day where Hunter is doing drugs or appearing in frame with his topless niece. Illegal shit by US standards but nothing sexual, nothing you wouldn't see in some European art house movie.

They overplayed their hand on the sex shit. All that ever mattered was Biden's integrity, Hunter is a sideshow.
The sideshow gets the Q-tards and normies up in arms.
Even if it's in the realm of "this isn't illegal, but photos of it is" would get a decent reaction if they'd stop implying and drop what they can.
 
Wait... Hunter Biden had possible creep pics of Natalie Biden?

Bruh... I swear liberals are mostly or all paedos and this is why the "woke" Hollywood crowd want it all quiet and used #MeToo as a smear campaign to hide the fact every male and female in that Hollywood circle are fucking creeps of the highest order.
It's already been confirmed he had topless pics of her, I think.
 
So is that fabled huge drop going to happen this weekend, or next weekend?


They'll do nothing but find another contrary stance to take because they're a troll, and apparently Kiwi Farm trolls only know the 'find majority opinion on board, take opposite stance to annoy people' method. Somehow people constantly fall for it anyway.

TBH I’m kinda suspicious of anyone who aggressively shills for Biden in places like KF or pol. Publicly supporting Biden is acceptable in the mainstream. Most popular platforms (Twitter, YT, Facebook, Reddit, etc) are actively pro-Biden, and aggressively anti-Trump. Why would anyone come to Kiwi Farms to express an opinion they can safely express anywhere else?
 
TBH I’m kinda suspicious of anyone who aggressively shills for Biden in places like KF or pol. Publicly supporting Biden is acceptable in the mainstream. Most popular platforms (Twitter, YT, Facebook, Reddit, etc) are actively pro-Biden, and aggressively anti-Trump. Why would anyone come to Kiwi Farms to express an opinion they can safely express anywhere else?

what about all the people who aggressively shill for hitler?
 
TBH I’m kinda suspicious of anyone who aggressively shills for Biden in places like KF or pol. Publicly supporting Biden is acceptable in the mainstream. Most popular platforms (Twitter, YT, Facebook, Reddit, etc) are actively pro-Biden, and aggressively anti-Trump. Why would anyone come to Kiwi Farms to express an opinion they can safely express anywhere else?
Just because this is one of the only places that doesn't ban stormfag edgelords on sight doesn't mean the lefties should all fuck off. Though the specific user shilling Biden hard in this thread is obviously trolling and is the one who should be fucking off.
 
yeah anybody with a real name has been VERY specific to word things by saying things that aren't "CP", like "situations that might involve endangerment of children" and shit
obviously that doesn't take away from "yo brah Big Papi Corn Pop Big Man (aka my dad Joe) says cough up dough, assholes" but still the "it's totes CP" thing is really getting tiresome
 
TBH I’m kinda suspicious of anyone who aggressively shills for Biden in places like KF or pol. Publicly supporting Biden is acceptable in the mainstream. Most popular platforms (Twitter, YT, Facebook, Reddit, etc) are actively pro-Biden, and aggressively anti-Trump. Why would anyone come to Kiwi Farms to express an opinion they can safely express anywhere else?

There's doubtless a few not-insane Biden supporters on the Farms, and I'd be glad to hear their takes. The main issue I think everyone has been having is that the most vocal and vehement supporters we've seen in these threads are either attempting a significantly less entertaining version of the CatParty gambit or engaging with such passive-aggressive idiocy that it borders on parodic. Election seasons tend to bring out the Autist in everyone, but it's surreal how wonky it's been this go-round.
 
Just because this is one of the only places that doesn't ban stormfag edgelords on sight doesn't mean the lefties should all fuck off. Though the specific user shilling Biden hard in this thread is obviously trolling and is the one who should be fucking off.

Not saying anyone should fuck off. I just think is an odd place for a Left-wing person to want to post about politics.


what about all the people who aggressively shill for hitler?

Remember these two simple rules:
  • Aggressive Hitlerposting = feds running 24 hr ops
  • Aggressive Bidenposting = campaign-sponsored astroturfing
 
Last edited:
Not saying anyone should fuck off. I just think is an odd place for a Left-wing person to want to post about politics.

Why is that odd at all? If you have been paying any sort of attention to people solidly left-wing they have generally made it very clear that they don't think people of even a semi-right-wing persuasion should get any ability to speak.
 
There's doubtless a few not-insane Biden supporters on the Farms, and I'd be glad to hear their takes. The main issue I think everyone has been having is that the most vocal and vehement supporters we've seen in these threads are either attempting a significantly less entertaining version of the CatParty gambit or engaging with such passive-aggressive idiocy that it borders on parodic. Election seasons tend to bring out the Autist in everyone, but it's surreal how wonky it's been this go-round.

I have a feeling we got on shareblue or some other pay-by-the-post type of things radar tbh.
 
Back