There's no law in VA against having some glasses of wine while you're breastfeeding
There is actually. It's called Child Neglect. Let's read, shall we?
Any parent, guardian, or other person responsible for the care of a child under the age of 18 who by willful act or willful omission or refusal to provide any necessary care for the child's health causes or permits serious injury to the life or health of such child is guilty of a Class 4 felony. For purposes of this subsection, "serious injury" includes but is not limited to (i) disfigurement, (ii) a fracture, (iii) a severe burn or laceration, (iv) mutilation, (v) maiming, (vi) forced ingestion of dangerous substances, and (vii) life-threatening internal injuries
"refusal to provide any necessary care for the child's health causes" = No vaccination, alternative medicine means you are guilty.
"(vi) forced ingestion of dangerous substances" Alcohol is dangerous for kids, so you are guilty
Any parent, guardian, or other person responsible for the care of a child under the age of 18 whose willful act or omission in the care of such child was so gross, wanton, and culpable as to show a reckless disregard for human life is guilty of a Class 6 felony.
Your replies make it clear you are guilty.
The CDC is a cult of idiots. Science doesn't even agree.
Citation, please? Because science seems to agree with the CDC. In fact, they even cite a lot of studies.
At one time science said clitorectomies were good for women.
I've said "medicinal marijuana" twice already
It has the same unhealthy effects on you. Pretty much the only use for it is pain dilution
Anyone who knows even a little about the law knows that rule number one is to shut your damn mouth.
Exactly! How is that so hard to understand?
LLL says moderate amounts are OK
That's not at fucking all what it says. It says that it's okay after it has left your system, which is not the same as chugging a wine glass while feeding your child.
There's nothing here I have said that can "haunt me later" as "Exhibits".
Pretty much every comment of yours I have replied to in today is an amazing "Exhibit A" for CPS to use.
...how are you this unable to link properly? I literally get an error while clicking on it.
So you're threatening to use a computer to put me under surveillance in order to harass, attempt to intimidate, and stalk me?
No. What we said was "We won't know your location until you give it away". It is not an "attempt to intimidate, stalk or harass"
A Pacer account that is only given once your information is screened.
I have a pacer account and I can confirm that is bullshit. The only thing they check is for a working credit card, and you can get them under any name in
here.
Federal Court records aren't public, you have to have a Pacer account to access them
Creating a free account to access info hardly counts as non-public.
Not if you filed a Motion to seal the document
And if that gets accepted.
The CDC is a junk institution
Any proof of that claim? For a person that likes citing science, you sure hate scientific institutions. Btw, all medical organisations agree with what CDC said. Just saying.
that also says vaccines are safe
They are though. About 90-97% safe, with rare, but also non-serious, side-effects, which once again, are fairly rare. It does, however, increase the chance of you not dying from a disease to incredibly high levels.
Feel free to disprove me, if you can.
They don't know shit about health.
They know more than you. Besides, literally everyone in CDC has PhDs in science and medicine.
marijuana being bad for you
It is bad for you. It can be used in good ways, ie medicinal use, but even then it has drawbacks. It is very easy to get addicted to, causes memory damage, etc.
They don't want people to know that wine is safe
Alcohol in general is not safe for human bodies, although in moderation it is not all that bad. Ever hear of alcohol poisoning? It's especially bad for babies, which is why every institution agrees on this. Or is it just a big grand conspiracy?
safe, like medicinal marijuana
The cumulative probability estimate of transition to dependence was 8.9% for cannabis users.
Source
Epidemiological research during the past 10 years suggests that regular use of cannabis during adolescence and into adulthood can have adverse effects. Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory studies have established an association between cannabis use and adverse outcomes. We focus on adverse health effects of greatest potential public health interest—that is, those that are most likely to occur and to affect a large number of cannabis users. The most probable adverse effects include a dependence syndrome, increased risk of motor vehicle crashes, impaired respiratory function, cardiovascular disease, and adverse effects of regular use on adolescent psychosocial development and mental health.
Source
Neuroimaging studies provide evidence of morphological brain alterations in both population groups, particularly in the medial temporal and frontal cortices, as well as the cerebellum. These effects may be related to the amount of cannabis exposure. Functional neuroimaging studies suggest different patterns of resting global and brain activity during the performance of several cognitive tasks both in adolescents and adults, which may indicate compensatory effects in response to chronic cannabis exposure.
Source
Our findings suggest that chronic marijuana use is associated with complex neuroadaptive processes and that onset and duration of use have unique effects on these processes. Our findings provide evidence that heavy, chronic marijuana users have lower OFC gray matter volumes compared with nonusing controls. This finding remained even in the smaller sample of exclusively marijuana users (
n = 27, i.e., no comorbid substance use), demonstrating that this effect (
i) is robust and (
ii) is greater than potential effects of comorbid substance use. Similar decreases in OFC volume have been reported in marijuana using adults (
29) and adolescents (
12) compared with nonusing controls. Interestingly, a prospective study also found that smaller OFC volumes at 12 y of age predicted initiation of marijuana use at 16 y of age (
30). These effects on the OFC are not surprising given that the OFC is a primary region in the reward network, is enriched with CB1 receptors, and is highly implicated in addictive behaviors (
23,
24,
31,
32) such as those related to disruptions in motivation (
33) and decision making (
34,
35).
Source
Multiple and logistic regressions were employed to analyze the relations between marijuana use and behavior problems of the children, while controlling for the effects of other extraneous variables. Prenatal marijuana use was significantly related to increased hyperactivity, impulsivity, and inattention symptoms as measured by the SNAP, increased delinquency as measured by the CBCL, and increased delinquency and externalizing problems as measured by the TRF.
Source
I could sit here all day and cite you studies proving marijuana is bad. Anyway, feel free to try to debunk these.
like medicinal marijuana, because they want people hooked on their pharma
You idiots are so brainwashed you can't even see the money trail behind these claims
Please point out that money trail then. While you are at it, show how marijuana can treat cancer, aids, coronavirus, ect. Because medicine can. Marijuana? Nope.
There's nothing wrong with drinking a glass or two while breastfeeding
One glass? No problems. Two glasses? Big problems. Again, we proved you this.
You don't owe me an explanation. You only owe that to cps, dear.
Her replies about her children would be a goldmine for CPS, if they ever wanted to enter a site that has been cited in killing trannies(I know we haven't killed them, but media says we have)
Oh, my. Have your kids had all their shots?
They'll probably be forced to get all of them when Corona Vaccine comes around. Supreme Court says it's perfectly legal. See:
Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905)