Leighanna Rose Walsh / Princess of the Crystal / ScarletJusticeWitch / Wetflame - Irish Phil & Pro Ronald McDonald Cosplayer.

Didn't you just accuse us non SJWs of all being abusive and hateful, those are pretty negative things to call people.
Is the irony lost on you?

... but they're entirely accurate. And few of you are near as vulnerable as the people you're targeting too. You are abusive, hateful people who are feeding off people you perceive as socially weaker. You're much more likely to go after vulnerable targets like Chloe than take down the big dogs. Where you do take on higher profile targets, it's where there are higher profile hate campaigns agianst them, so it balances out. Nobody is brave here.

I know, because I've been there. I've been pushed to the brink of suicide many times.

It's not about being "selfish". It's when you feel like you have no escape, when you feel like you're completely alienated by society and the abuse won't stop. With singular instances of abuse, you can work past them. But when you don't know when a community you're a part of will suddenly turn against you because someone d0xes you it's fucking frightening.

I have a life outside of the internet, but a lot of vulnerable trans women and people with social anxiety or autism don't. They don't get the help they need. And on top of that, have to put up with you guys. If you employed any level of empathy you'd see why people targeted by online hate campaigns(like i have been in the past) get pusehd to the point of suicide. It can be a very bleak and hopeless place to be in when you're already marginalised in real life on top of that.
 
Because of the way most societies are set up, it's an overall disadvantage, a disability.

Autism is often characterised by lack of social skills, it would figure that a lack of social skills would disadvantage you in a society.

Also, it's not the way a society is set up, lack of ability to communicate your feelings means you'd suffer regardless of your societal constructs, I'm interested to see a society where autism isn't so much of a hinderance due to the way it's set up.
 
@ScarletJusticeWitch

CarrotTop.3.250.jpg
 
You said you do, though. It's in the Personal Lolcows thread. You have "kept in contact" with him.

How can you preach to us aboug tolerance and abuse and then turn around and talk to this person who admitted to molesting children and watching CP?

Even if he had turned out to be lying out of his ass I'd never have talked to this person again for being disgusting.

Sorry but I'm not justifying myself to agroup of people who have effectively no morals or boundaries of their own to begin with and would bully someone to suicide and blame it on them. I remember at the time being satisfied that Tweaker never made any such admission. Whether I'd come to the same conclusion under my current lens, I don't know. But like I said, I don't really have any ties there. I have him on FB and on rare occasion will comment on something. That's about as far as I've kept in contact.

I'm not dealing with this any further when you're linking to an ED article in the OP that was set up by the personality cult of a convicted minor molester(Pachuka).

vulnerable targets like Chloe
:story:

no we just have no issues criticizing professional victims and criminals

... but Chloe IS a vulnerable target. She's trans, Romani, and has a history of mental illness.

Whether you like or not, whatever she's done, she's still a vulnerable person. Hell, Laurelai is a fucked up person but she's "vulnerable "in her own way too.

All these arguments are based on the idea that you don't have to sympathsie with someone and it's ok to abuse them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry but I'm not justifying myself to agroup of people who have effectively no morals or boundaries of their own to begin with and would bully someone to suicide and blame it on them. I remember at the time being satisfied that Tweaker never made any such admission. Whether I'd come to the same conclusion under my current lens, I don't know. But like I said, I don't really have any ties there. I have him on FB and on rare occasion will comment on something. That's about as far as I've kept in contact.

I'm not dealing with this any further when you're linking to an ED article in the OP that was set up by the personality cult of a convicted minor molester(Pachuka).
Morals are entirely subjective. I'm not saying there aren't things that are naturally fucked up, I'm just saying that you can't expect everyone to have the same views and beliefs. That would be ridiculous.
 
Autism is often characterised by lack of social skills, it would figure that a lack of social skills would disadvantage you in a society.

Also, it's not the way a society is set up, lack of ability to communicate your feelings means you'd suffer regardless of your societal constructs, I'm interested to see a society where autism isn't so much of a hinderance due to the way it's set up.
I guess when your idea of socialization is mumbling broken Roma at the gypsies in your menial job and posting about how cyber bullies make trannies kill themselves, normal social skills would seem like a hindrance.
 
... but Chloe IS a vulnerable target. She's trans, Romani, and has a history of mental illness.

Whether you like or not, whatever she's done, she's still a vulnerable person. Hell, Laurelai is a fucked up person but she's "vulnerable "in her own way too.

All these arguments are based on the idea that you don't have to sympathsie with someone and it's ok to abuse them.
Clearly they are vulnerable to be mocked, they stole from people and lied.
 
... but Chloe IS a vulnerable target. She's trans, Romani, and has a history of mental illness.

Whether you like or not, whatever she's done, she's still a vulnerable person. Hell, Laurelai is a fucked up person but she's "vulnerable "in her own way too.

All these arguments are based on the idea that you don't have to sympathsie with someone and it's ok to abuse them.
Explain how talking about people is considered "abuse".
 
I've always been of the opinion that lolcows are disproportionately likely to claim to be trans (or any other maginalized group) for oppression points and asspats, but whatever. And look at you go, policing language. And here I thought all terms were made up. ;)


What level of education have you completed that allows you to lecture on logic and stats again?

Bachelor of science degree in Computer Science, which had modules that dealt with logic design & statistics.

Either way, the fact is that the definitions of choice you use don't mesh with the statistics. Again, if trans people are far more likely to kill themselves you can't say it's a personal choice. Clearly, there's some other external factor influencing it.

And again, you're just reasoning things backwards to justify your senseo f entitlement to abuse these people. Some people are denying I'm trans in another thread, despite having a diagnosis.

If you think this is attacking, you ain't seen shit yet. Our own Dear Leader actually put the brakes on some of the Chris-Chan stuff awhile back because of how far it was going.
And yes, you're goddamn right that I'll treat you any way I please. Free will, sugar. It's a bitch, ain't it?

I'm sorry but this is Mod Shadow levels of edgy lol
 
... but Chloe IS a vulnerable target. She's trans, Romani, and has a history of mental illness.

Whether you like or not, whatever she's done, she's still a vulnerable person. Hell, Laurelai is a fucked up person but she's "vulnerable "in her own way too.

All these arguments are based on the idea that you don't have to sympathsie with someone and it's ok to abuse them.
So anyone who you deem to be "vulnerable" should be absolved of all crimes, including scamming people out of a rather large sum of money?
 
Sorry but I'm not justifying myself to agroup of people who have effectively no morals or boundaries of their own to begin with and would bully someone to suicide and blame it on them. I remember at the time being satisfied that Tweaker never made any such admission. Whether I'd come to the same conclusion under my current lens, I don't know. But like I said, I don't really have any ties there. I have him on FB and on rare occasion will comment on something. That's about as far as I've kept in contact.

I'm not dealing with this any further when you're linking to an ED article in the OP that was set up by the personality cult of a convicted minor molester(Pachuka).

Stop beating around the bush and pointing fingers at other people. The fact that we are "bullies" or that PACHUKA (a guy who was convicted in very similar circumstances to Tweaker, I might add) has a tenuous link to the makers of your ED page has nothing to do with you shielding a pedo. I'd rather be a bully than casually talk to a pedophile on Facebook.

You don't have the moral high ground.
 
... but Chloe IS a vulnerable target. She's trans, Romani, and has a history of mental illness.

Whether you like or not, whatever she's done, she's still a vulnerable person. Hell, Laurelai is a fucked up person but she's "vulnerable "in her own way too.

All these arguments are based on the idea that you don't have to sympathsie with someone and it's ok to abuse them.

It's not abuse, you silly goose. Chloe (and yourself) should be thanking us, we are giving you all the attention you so desperately seek. I hardly find criticism and joking abuse. Please list and itemize what you consider abuse, so in return we can make more jokes.
 
Back