2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
This GOP consultant, if they actually exist, which I doubt, shows why the base ignored these career political types and picked Trump. They're fucking stupid. Is ACB really supposed to just turn on him less than an hour after getting confirmed?

And how on earth do you not attend your own swearing in ceremony? You literally have to be present in order to be sworn in.
View attachment 1688840
Assuming this GOP consultant exists, it's more than likely Rick Wilson. And given his miserable performance in 2008 and 2012, he's a consultant the GOP can do without.
 
I think the Prez has got PA locked up right about now.
ElTnqrIXUAAg9hQ.jpg
Now here's something to think about, how will the Dems punish their Jogger Golems for fucking over their blue wave?
 
Baris just dropped this:
View attachment 1687691

Alleviates da doom, but let's see what he has to say when he speaks with Barnes at 2. I expect @GuntPunt and @Someone Awful to post the link.

And don't forget, Trump has 2 more rallies there today, and who knows how many more for the remainder of the race.
The poll's internals.

Baris just briefly glossed over it. I personally don't buy the internals - no way does Biden have a near 40 point lead on Independents and still lose the state - and I do think the 2.9% win in Pennsylvania for Trump is too good to be true, even as someone who thinks he will win the state (voter fraud aside). I do see, however, what the swing is supposed to represent. Biden was leading prior to the third debate. Now that he made the mistake of promising to ban the oil industry, which is crucial to the Appalachian Pennsylvanian economy, a lot of undecided voters are breaking for Trump. I'm not sure if I buy a five point swing, but something like three is definitely plausible. Given that Pennsylvania is a competitive state, Trump may already have a slight lead. The question now is if Trump can overcome the voting fraud margin to accommodate for cheating.

Listening to Baris and Barnes right now, and Barnes is saying that Nate Antimony is acting fraudulent with his polls and egging on other pollsters to fraud along just to create the narrative that if Trump wins, either he won within a crazy margin of error or he stole the election again. So the folks who rightfully say that the doctored polls will tighten, expect to see Biden reach high single digits in the last foot of the race. I heard that Nate took Trafalgar out of his data just because it had Trump looking good.

Shit's getting crazy.

In the event of a Trump win, that will be the narrative fraudsters like Nate Slimer pushes out. Expect "Russia Russia Russia" to be plastered all over the headlines for the next few years, especially if he does not get the popular vote again. Biden's already in the high single digits. I doubt he will drop much below a seven point lead aggregate in RealClearPolitics. Nate and his cronies will never owe up to how horribly skewed their polls are and the only way to deal with them is to take away their powers and throw them out of business.

At this rate, if the Dems were smart, they would just count their losses and let the election ride its course for Biden to lose. This will hurt the Democrat party for years to come if they don't do a significant course correction for the next two years. The time is NOW to start memory-holing this Biden campaign altogether if you ask me.

But the Dems are too corrupt and evil to be smart at this point. I hate using such strong terms to describe political adversaries, but the shit they are guilty of this year alone does, in fact, make them evil.

They aren't giving up on this election. Things may look good for Trump now, but voter fraud will still be an issue in states like Pennsylvania and Nevada. Pennsylvania is Trump's best state in the Rust Belt and he needs to run up the margin in that state to avoid the state being stolen, at least initially.

It's a good thing that Barrett is in the Supreme Court now so she can deal with this issue should it come up. If Pennsylvania is the deciding state and the DNC try to pull off fraud, I think Barrett will rule for Trump in a 5-4 decision. But the point is, we should not have to worry about this coming up in the first place.

I don't think over 300 is unrealistic. Trump got 304 in 2016. And as I've been saying for months, what is going to flip from red to blue? I don't think anything will. In fact, I would give Trump Minnesota, putting him at 314.

I actually think the gap will be a little bit more, because I'm a little more optimistic. I think Trump eeks out the popular vote, which would basically give Trump Nevada, Maine, and New Hampshire. Again, I'm being super optimistic though.

What you're describing is the best case scenario (except that I don't think Trump can get Maine Congressional District 1 since the anti-war vote all reside in northern Maine, far more favorable towards Trump and more opportunities to squeeze out votes for an off-chance at-large Maine flip). That would neat him 328 electoral votes, a rather comfortable victory. But I'm not sure he would win the popular vote in that scenario.

Even if Pennsylvanian GOPs can overturn the absurd three day after Election Day ballot counting and no signatures on absentee ballots rule before Election Day and Trump beats the margin of fraud in Nevada by 2% and wins the state, the Democrats will be cheating to hell in back in safe states like New York, New Jersey, and California. I wouldn't be surprised to see millions of fake ballots somehow seep through the system and Biden winning the popular vote. None of the potential flips have a massive population.

This is why in a potential second term that Trump needs to push for reforming election laws to ban counting absentee ballots after Election Day and require all ballots to have a signature. I don't think Republicans could afford leaving this issue unchecked when Democrats will be spending the next four years perfecting their voting fraud scheme for a likely weaker candidate.

That said, I do agree that we could see Trump win over 300 electoral votes, but it's a shame that the coronavirus hurt his approval rating so badly. Had he not fumbled on the optics, he could have as Harvey Danger said, focused on flipping states and the House instead of fighting a contentious election and keeping the Senate.
 
Why are they talking about ACB as if she has to manage her popularity

She's a Supreme Court Justice for as long as she wants to be
Because many neocon Republicans became comfortable during the Bush era being shit on by Hollywood and other boomer hippies so much that the new elites of the country decided to become democrats. Why join the country club as a Republican when they are viewed as humorless cuckolds happy with lower taxes and Israel.

I hope to see a realignment under Trump and his win in 2020 will solidify it.
 
I think the Prez has got PA locked up right about now.
Now here's something to think about, how will the Dems punish their Jogger Golems for fucking over their blue wave?

the same way they always do, a handshake and a smile with a knife behind their back

also it’s only thematically fitting that 2020 ends in a 269 to 269 deadlock, you know it in your heart that it’s gonna happen.
 
I'm watching the Philly shit right now and listening to the police Scanner. At the point of me writing this (23:24 Philly time) the Police have exhausted all their resources ( All the cops are dealing with the riot or other wise occupied) and there has been reports of shots fired (don't know if they are riot related) This is really going to throw Pennsylvania up in the air because this riot is very high energy and violent, it hearkens back to May and June levels and activities including many reports of looting.
 
I'm watching the Philly shit right now and listening to the police Scanner. At the point of me writing this (23:24 Philly time) the Police have exhausted all their resources ( All the cops are dealing with the riot or other wise occupied) and there has been reports of shots fired (don't know if they are riot related) This is really going to throw Pennsylvania up in the air because this riot is very high energy and violent, it hearkens back to May and June levels and activities including many reports of looting.

I can’t imagine living in one of these cities and voting democrat this election. I seriously am having trouble understanding the logic behind it.
 
This.

States have more effect on your lives than the dealing of the presidink. Don't just vote straight red or blue, make sure you actually read up on the person that you are endorsing or voting for and make sure that they don't try to give into one of those new-age progressivism extremes that fuck people up.

I always do this, even for things like the Soil and Water Conservation Supervisors (I still remember recoiling in disgust after discovering that one of the candidates worked for the Democratic Socialists of America. The guy even wore a bow-tie).
 
Has anyone else noticed how unlike prior elections there's been like not even a sliver of a mention of any party aside the 2 big ones? Like even in 2016 with all the Hillary shills and Sudden 180 on opinions of trump from the media, there was still coverage of some independent parties. The democrats if I remember were doomsaying about how a vote for any party other than them was only going to count as a vote for trump and they still won out majority by 1%. The only thing remotely close to that I can think of this year was them shitting on kanye for saying he wanted to run as an independent and talking him out of it. As far as election stuff has gone, it's just been nothing aside from "WE NEED TO MAIL IN BALLOTS EARLY MAKE SURE TODO IT SO THE OTHER SIDE LOSES AND WE WIN" from people supporting the big 2, and reports of people tampering with the mail in votes.

4 years of potential were stolen by the garbage ass politics games of our "masters" in the bureaucracy and media machines, and a bunch of people who used to be fun turned into hollow politics shills bragging about how they disowned their families or ruined their friends lives over inane shit. 2012 doesn't feel like 8 years ago and it probably has to do with the fact that We've been in this wacky zany purgatory where everyone's screaming artificially hyped up politics shit at you for 4 years now. I really hope I'm wrong, but it's probably gonna happen the next 4 years no matter who wins this election.
 
Has anyone else noticed how unlike prior elections there's been like not even a sliver of a mention of any party aside the 2 big ones? Like even in 2016 with all the Hillary shills and Sudden 180 on opinions of trump from the media, there was still coverage of some independent parties. The democrats if I remember were doomsaying about how a vote for any party other than them was only going to count as a vote for trump and they still won out majority by 1%. The only thing remotely close to that I can think of this year was them shitting on kanye for saying he wanted to run as an independent and talking him out of it. As far as election stuff has gone, it's just been nothing aside from "WE NEED TO MAIL IN BALLOTS EARLY MAKE SURE TODO IT SO THE OTHER SIDE LOSES AND WE WIN" from people supporting the big 2, and reports of people tampering with the mail in votes.

4 years of potential were stolen by the garbage ass politics games of our "masters" in the bureaucracy and media machines, and a bunch of people who used to be fun turned into hollow politics shills bragging about how they disowned their families or ruined their friends lives over inane shit. 2012 doesn't feel like 8 years ago and it probably has to do with the fact that We've been in this wacky zany purgatory where everyone's screaming artificially hyped up politics shit at you for 4 years now. I really hope I'm wrong, but it's probably gonna happen the next 4 years no matter who wins this election.
That’s an interesting point, the only reason I know who the libertarian candidate is because of anime spergs. I’ve never seen the Green Party even mentioned this election.
 
Isn't this just gonna make libs more assmad and increase their turnout?

Maybe. Or it could blackpill them and act as a demoralizing factor since one of the last major reasons for the leftists and progressives to hold their nose and vote for Biden/Harris was the Supreme Court and now that RBG's seat is filled by a relatively young and very conservative justice, that's probably got to be a major kick in the balls for the Democrats and their voter base.


In Coachella????

Okay, I make a lot of fantasies, but I keep hearing stories out of California lately. But there cant be any way California becomes in play.

Its impossible.

I think California is obviously safe for the Democrats but I do think Trump's trying to shore up the popular vote and maybe flip some close seats in the House. A lot of moderate and rural Californians are probably pissed at Newsom and the Woke Left, and rightfully so. Trump paying attention to them despite the state being largely a write-off can net him a lot of goodwill there. Not enough to flip California, but enough to get an increased turnout of voters and maybe help him in the House.

I mean he'd get the appointment if they lost, but maybe? I'm pretty sure it was polling very well among ind. voters.
It certainly energizes the Trump core base and the crazy TDSers, but to what extent?

It's better to have the justice and risk the presidency than to not try. It's a much more secure long term position.

True, and I also think it'll energize Trump's core base and more than likely blackpill the TDS crowds and the ones who'd begrudgingly vote for Biden to get more lefty judges on the Supreme Court.

I think the Prez has got PA locked up right about now.
Now here's something to think about, how will the Dems punish their Jogger Golems for fucking over their blue wave?

Honestly, if Trump can win and get the popular vote, he'll pretty much have a mandate. Especially if he gets lucky and wins all the states in 2016 plus Minnesota. The DNC will do everything they can to clean house internally and probably scapegoat Antifa and maybe BLM by extension.

My personal guess is that they'll tie any narratives against Antifa and BLM into preexisting narratives about Bernie Sanders and "Bernie Bros" and the typical "muh Russia" sperging. It gives them a way to save face and do internal purges without totally upsetting the joggers (most of whom will vote Democrat anyway)
 
Maybe. Or it could blackpill them and act as a demoralizing factor since one of the last major reasons for the leftists and progressives to hold their nose and vote for Biden/Harris was the Supreme Court and now that RBG's seat is filled by a relatively young and very conservative justice, that's probably got to be a major kick in the balls for the Democrats and their voter base.



I think California is obviously safe for the Democrats but I do think Trump's trying to shore up the popular vote and maybe flip some close seats in the House. A lot of moderate and rural Californians are probably pissed at Newsom and the Woke Left, and rightfully so. Trump paying attention to them despite the state being largely a write-off can net him a lot of goodwill there. Not enough to flip California, but enough to get an increased turnout of voters and maybe help him in the House.



True, and I also think it'll energize Trump's core base and more than likely blackpill the TDS crowds and the ones who'd begrudgingly vote for Biden to get more lefty judges on the Supreme Court.



Honestly, if Trump can win and get the popular vote, he'll pretty much have a mandate. Especially if he gets lucky and wins all the states in 2016 plus Minnesota. The DNC will do everything they can to clean house internally and probably scapegoat Antifa and maybe BLM by extension.

My personal guess is that they'll tie any narratives against Antifa and BLM into preexisting narratives about Bernie Sanders and "Bernie Bros" and the typical "muh Russia" sperging. It gives them a way to save face and do internal purges without totally upsetting the joggers (most of whom will vote Democrat anyway)
Yeah it's much better to make the left depressed than to give them a rallying cry that they can save Ruth's seat by voting for Biden.

Now the voting issue for Democrats is what can Biden do for you? And really it's not much besides make Obamacare bigger I guess?
 
Rioting during nationwide early voting? A week before election day?

That's a bold move, Democrats.

Philly is where the most blue votes come from.
1603777579491.png

Trump won this by just under 1% in 2016, Philly is that deep blue dot on the bottom right, it was 20% of the total Dem vote across the entire state. (~500k)

If the riot blocks or even discourages any voting in the city, I can only see that hurting Dems, when they were already dealing with razor thin margins and Biden's oil slipup.

If you weren't sure about betting on PA, now's probably the time.
 
Philly is where the most blue votes come from.
View attachment 1689086
Trump won this by just under 1% in 2016, Philly is that deep blue dot on the bottom right, it was 20% of the total Dem vote across the entire state. (~500k)

If the riot blocks or even discourages any voting in the city, I can only see that hurting Dems, when they were already dealing with razor thin margins and Biden's oil slipup.

If you weren't sure about betting on PA, now's probably the time.
Chances on the voting center getting trashed?
 
I can’t imagine living in one of these cities and voting democrat this election. I seriously am having trouble understanding the logic behind it.
The main completely flawed logic basically boils down to "if we give them what they want, they'll stop."

Not only would this reward bad behavior, but it wouldn't work as they will riot again the moment Biden does something they don't like. They've openly admitted that they will riot unless Biden passes progressive legislation. Even THEN they'll figure out some new reason to be mad because these people only want to be mad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back