New York Post got their hands on a hard drive from Hunter Biden's laptop and shows Joe Biden lied about Hunter's dealings with Ukraine

Couple stories on the New York Post

FBI has had the laptop for over a year already and didn't say anything. Remember when Trump got impeached for congratulating the new President of the Ukraine?

What the hell is the FBI doing?

Supposedly there is also a video of him engaged in a "sex act" and a couple of photo's of him. This is one is particular juicy

Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-40-48.png


Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-49-19.png
 
Last edited:
A thought occurs... while I tend to believe the leaks rather than not, why have no smaller papers picked up the story? Obviously we can assume that cnn and MSNBC could be in a democrat's pocket, but why isn't the Macon county journal (or whatever) publishing stories on this? Surely there are plenty of republican local rags and it would be impossible to stop all of them.

Most small papers are owned by bigger news companies owned by globohomo. Virtually all news is controlled in Ninteen Eighty Four current year.
 
Don't be stupid. I'm saying the local paper in a republican area would want to inform their republican readers of the latest democratic scandal.
Like I said, there's plenty of easier and much more concrete ways to do "Joe Biden sucks" like whatever insane shit he said in the past thirty minutes.
And literally where and what local paper are you talking about?
 
Remember there is no precedent (pardon the pun) for a nominee "leaving" between the parties convention and November. With this said; the 400+ members of the DNC would choose the replacement. In this case it would undoubtedly be the Ugandan Giant. Now "legally" Kamala's name must be put on all state ballots. Obviously this is impossibe so close to Nov 3rd. The SCOTUS would most likely take the matter up immediately and most certainly set precedent by waving Kamala through. You may ask yourself why? Welp, what the heck else can be done?

Actually there is Precedent for a Federal Election. It just has never happened to a Presudential Candidate. Senate Candidates have died between nomination and election. They remain on the ballot. In the case that they win (which has happened) the normal succession process occurs. In the case of the Dead Senator, the Governor gets a free choice. In the case of a Dead President the electors would still cast their votes for the dead guy and the Veep would succeed before the inauguration.
 
Like I said, there's plenty of easier and much more concrete ways to do "Joe Biden sucks" like whatever insane shit he said in the past thirty minutes.
And literally where and what local paper are you talking about?
In general. We're talking about 4chan analyzing ankle scars, but there's no local newspapers reporting the scandal? I'm not in the us so I don't have any particular examples, but my understanding is that there are still smaller newspapers that might serve red constituencies. I'm wondering why there doesn't seem to be any discussion of the scandal anywhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mikoyan MiG-29
I'm referring to the fact that the local newspaper in a republican area might want to publish the latest scandal to try to motivate the local voter base.
Most small papers are owned by bigger news companies owned by globohomo. Virtually all news is controlled in Ninteen Eighty Four current year.

Mitch McConnell had the perfect opportunity to investigate the Burisma bullshit and swiftly turned it down. There's plenty of GoP fallout from this too, and the left isn't the only political orientation that has copious amounts of retards willing to look the other way on naked corruption this bad for perceived political gain.

And as moobs said, at the end of the day, neocon or neolib, these people are owned by people for whom it is in their interest to not ever cross the gentleman's agreement most of our politicians seem to have with one another.
 
He could stop the signal on his website. He doesn't really like politics anyway.

In his judgement it's just not front page material that his 52,573 members will care about. No big deal.

Write up the saga as a funny OP about Hunter and post it in the prospering grounds, maybe it will take off from there.
Once there was a democrat named joe biden. He had a son named hunter. Together they did legendary corruption.

Now, joe biden is the trojan horse for super progressives.
Super progressives want to actually censor the internet of wrong think. Like kiwi farms.

So it's at least as interesting as section 230, which null has a bu
A thought occurs... while I tend to believe the leaks rather than not, why have no smaller papers picked up the story? Obviously we can assume that cnn and MSNBC could be in a democrat's pocket, but why isn't the Macon county journal (or whatever) publishing stories on this? Surely there are plenty of republican local rags and it would be impossible to stop all of them.
They don't want to risk pissing off very powerful people who may be in charge of the entire government soon for no personal benefit.

If the irs can go after the tea party and face no punishment why not newspapers.
 
In general. We're talking about 4chan analyzing ankle scars, but there's no local newspapers reporting the scandal? I'm not in the us so I don't have any particular examples, but my understanding is that there are still smaller newspapers that might serve red constituencies. I'm wondering why there doesn't seem to be any discussion of the scandal anywhere.
And that's the mistake. Most informed right leaning people get their info from the internet not newspapers. There are no newspapers large or small that serve red constituencies. In the early 2000's the right moved to the blogosphere. And talk radio is a thing. Boomers, young and old, watch Fox.

The right's sphere of influence is talk radio and the internet not newspapers, which could be your answer as to why no papers are reporting on it.
 
In general. We're talking about 4chan analyzing ankle scars, but there's no local newspapers reporting the scandal? I'm not in the us so I don't have any particular examples, but my understanding is that there are still smaller newspapers that might serve red constituencies. I'm wondering why there doesn't seem to be any discussion of the scandal anywhere.
Like I've explained, it's a really really long and complicated story when you get beyond "lol footjobs".
It's getting coverage in more long form stuff like radio and tv, but papers, even if we assume there's The Wichita Elephant or whatever make believe paper there is, they can run three different crazy things Joe Biden did in the space where they would barely get through half of the start of explaining how any of this has been found out, much less trying to get into what did or didn't happen (much of which is "a really sincere guy says a crackhead said this")
 
Show starts out on the topic of Hunter Biden.
Yeeted from spotify/YT in 3..2..1..

Attached audio

A nice comenter made the timecodes.
0:11 Jamie is back
0:20 Jamie cant taste
0:40 Introduces Alex & Tim
1:30 Ghislane Maxwell & her family
2:35 Alex learned about Epstein 20 years ago
3:36 The Borat movie & Bruno
6:36 Sacha Baron Cohen tried to cancel Alex
7:48 Censorship & White House smear campaign
10:31 Bidens daughters diary & foreign interference
13:10 Lobbyists, AT&T & big tech
22:50 Xi Jin Ping,Trump, coal plants & trade
25:44 Clean burning coal
30:04 The carbon conspiracy
35:31 Election night Joe & Alex will be live
36:01 Joe & Alex debate climate change
47:10 Electric cars & TEAM CARBON
48:02 Nuclear power & BP
51:55 Global warming, cars & centralized control
54:11 Joe wished he was high & covid conspiracy
55:50 Alex Jones mistakes & Bohemian Grove
56:57 The Post Human Era, Neuralink & AI
1:01:22 The first amendment & big tech
1:08:32 Bohemian Grove Cult & Nixon
1:20:09 Human trafficking Vietnam black ops
1:23:50 Clinton & Epstein Island
1:25:53 Ted Gunderson & William Colby
1:28:42 Apocalypse Now & Epstein
1:29:50 Jamie shoutout & Epstein Island
1:33:15 Trump & Roy Cohen, Infowars & The Young Turks
1:36:55 Free speech & censors
1:40:55 The election, Communist China & I Phones
1:49:38 Bill Maher, Democrat & covid conspiracy
2:01:00 Brian Redban & Election night podcast
2:02:32 Whitmer assassination plot & Bret Weinstein
2:11:24 The post industrial world & autonomous cars
2:13:56 Police state & the pandemic conspiracy
2:28:48 Contesting the election & voter fraud
2:34:56 The universe, aliens & DMT
2:36:43 alternate dimensions & Bob Lazar
2:41:51 Technoptimism
2:51:40 Joes new studio & Jamie appreciation
2:53:24 MRNA vaccines
3:00:25 Alex talks about retirement & addiction
 

Attachments

Last edited:
You know this is probably more impactful in launching this story mainstream than a news agency picking it up.

Can you hear the salt from the SJW crowd working at spotify
#CancelSpotify. Spotify was in bed with #Trump the whole time! They would rather profit off of sensational revenge porn perpetuated by Russian agents than to protect our American Democratic institutions!1!!

Sent from my iPhone
 
You know this is probably more impactful in launching this story mainstream than a news agency picking it up.

Can you hear the salt from the SJW crowd working at spotify
On Youtube alone this will have 10s of millions of views within a few days. I wonder what numbers Spotify pulls? Considering the topics being discussed I'm surprised that this hasn't been nixed already.
 
Back