New York Post got their hands on a hard drive from Hunter Biden's laptop and shows Joe Biden lied about Hunter's dealings with Ukraine

Couple stories on the New York Post

nypost.com

Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad

Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine in…
nypost.com nypost.com
FBI has had the laptop for over a year already and didn't say anything. Remember when Trump got impeached for congratulating the new President of the Ukraine?

What the hell is the FBI doing?

Supposedly there is also a video of him engaged in a "sex act" and a couple of photo's of him. This is one is particular juicy

Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-40-48.png


Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-49-19.png
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Peepeepoopoo Witch, Mojo Thief, (((Obar Lazcano Kamz))) and 129 others
Click to expand...
Does anyone have any recent polls as to how many people think this is real or ‘fake’?

Curious to see if the MSM misinformation campaign is working or not.

Edit: Also wondering how this is being received on ‘normie’ online forums.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid and IAmNotAlpharius
PeeveTheSheev said:
It is astounding that this profile was not yeeted or set to private - does Hunter have no one advising him? The family, their handlers, did they not realize the internet is full of autists that would go digging? I assume the ol' crackfiend kept mum about this account - anyone would - and not going scorched earth is exactly what this moron would do.
Click to expand...

I'd REALLY like a look at his friends list. The way he talks to the girl in the foot video about how she could do it, I wouldn't be surprised if she also had an account. And it'd help verify if it was Natalie or not.

He has 1,208 friends. If they're all randoms and strangers, why is it private?

FlappyBat said:
The problem is that it's so fucking trivial for them to let us verify the authenticity of the emails. It's been insane for them to not just release it. The best I can guess is not wanting to cloud the waters with people checking the signatures improperly, but that is easy to get out ahead of and deal with.
Click to expand...

Bill The Fucker said:
The narrative has already changed from "the laptop isn't real" to "ok, the laptop is real but *that* bit is totally faked!"

Having the specific emails that the Post included in their original story verified would be huge, and I cannot for the life of me understand why they haven't at least made those publicly available for download so that people could check for themselves.
Click to expand...

I think they're just being very careful with the materials because they feel like its such a smoking gun, so they're being extremely protective.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TerribleIdeas™, spiritofamermaid and IAmNotAlpharius
jje100010001 said:
Does anyone have any recent polls as to how many people think this is real or ‘fake’?

Curious to see if the MSM misinformation campaign is working or not.
Click to expand...
It would be very hard to judge that accurately, but enough people have heard that something suspicious is going on that it might affect the election results.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: TerribleIdeas™ and Autistic
Bill The Fucker said:
The narrative has already changed from "the laptop isn't real" to "ok, the laptop is real but *that* bit is totally faked!"

Having the specific emails that the Post included in their original story verified would be huge, and I cannot for the life of me understand why they haven't at least made those publicly available for download so that people could check for themselves.
Click to expand...
My take? Because allowing that information would allow the opposition to see the sourcing on the internal communications and run damage control. By this point you've already seen every establishment politician and glow-in-the-dark in on this shit and there is a huge amount that they want to make not fucking exist right now. Twitter and Facebook overreached to the point of censoring the government itself, indicating that if they weren't in on the take, they're certainly fucking implicated.

I don't like the drip feeding, but it's definitely the surest way to keep them guessing as to what was in them and where the emails came from. I don't think I need to remind you all of the Clintons' history with evidence preservation. If any internal sourcing could be verified, that shit would be nuked from orbit in seconds. As things stand, Scattershot is their only defensive approach and it makes it far more likely something incriminating survives.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Tree, Kekky, 1Tonka_Truck and 18 others
Bill The Fucker said:
Their goal is to sow doubt, not prove anything. They want to have an excuse to throw it down the memory hole, and proving that everything shown was valid makes it that much harder.
Click to expand...
The evidence doesn't prevent them from sowing doubt, it never has before.
The thing that makes it impossible for them to memoryhole it are all the boomers on twitter shitting on people who buy the attempts.

Long term, the only only real defense is to make the people who buy they media BS embarrassed over and over for not being wrong, but being foolish. You let them buy "it's fake" let other people hound them with 'lolz how dumb are you for listening to the media' and then you prove that point is real.

Over time people constantly being embarrassed by believing the media tripe will begin to avoid the media without even realizing it.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Grumpy, Granola Grenadine, TerribleIdeas™ and 7 others
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Grumpy, Kekky, saralovesjuicyfruit and 15 others
Jaimas said:
My take? Because allowing that information would allow the opposition to see the sourcing on the internal communications and run damage control. By this point you've already seen every establishment politician and glow-in-the-dark in on this shit and there is a huge amount that they want to make not fucking exist right now. Twitter and Facebook overreached to the point of censoring the government itself, indicating that if they weren't in on the take, they're certainly fucking implicated.

I don't like the drip feeding, but it's definitely the surest way to keep them guessing as to what was in them and where the emails came from. I don't think I need to remind you all of the Clintons' history with evidence preservation. If any internal sourcing could be verified, that shit would be nuked from orbit in seconds. As things stand, Scattershot is their only defensive approach and it makes it far more likely something incriminating survives.
Click to expand...
I think people are confused about how the emails have been verified. What was released and analyzed by the security expert was the email and its metadata including a digital signature by Google (since the email in question is from a Gmail account). They have claimed to have all of this from the start. If they had the digital copy of the email, they had this information.

No one is getting any new information by them releasing the dkim signature other than the fact that they do indeed have the email, which we already knew because they released it. This isn't some 4d chess move keeping critical information from your enemy. It's keeping people who are interested in the story unable to prove that what you are saying is the truth.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: not william stenchever, Allakazam223, Yotsubaaa and 6 others
Jaimas said:
My take? Because allowing that information would allow the opposition to see the sourcing on the internal communications and run damage control. By this point you've already seen every establishment politician and glow-in-the-dark in on this shit and there is a huge amount that they want to make not fucking exist right now. Twitter and Facebook overreached to the point of censoring the government itself, indicating that if they weren't in on the take, they're certainly fucking implicated.

I don't like the drip feeding, but it's definitely the surest way to keep them guessing as to what was in them and where the emails came from. I don't think I need to remind you all of the Clintons' history with evidence preservation. If any internal sourcing could be verified, that shit would be nuked from orbit in seconds. As things stand, Scattershot is their only defensive approach and it makes it far more likely something incriminating survives.
Click to expand...

The FBI has had the original drives for a year, and they kept an airtight lid on it. Whatever damage control they could run with information from the emails has likely already been done.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: not william stenchever, Magnum Magazine, Allakazam223 and 20 others
Watch if Joe loses this election he'll "suddenly become" senile or demented. Dong pics are funny and all but the point must stand Joe sold himself as a tough on drugs politician all the while he knew his son was doing a lot harder drugs than weed which his legislature had thrown countless people in jail for countless years for just marijuana possession. Also degeneracy runs in the Biden family Joe was notorious for opting to swim naked when he had female government staff over.

This isn't even mentioning his dealings with China.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: druid, Allakazam223, Yotsubaaa and 16 others
Kiislova said:
Is funny watching people calling "muh chain of custody" on a digital signature. And the other saying "you helped Hitler".

That's not how this work you exceptional people.
Click to expand...

chain of custody is a very important concept with both physical and digital data, there's nothing funny about it. these are important topics in legal matters and certain infosec concerns.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Coffee Shits, Cowboy Boot, Allakazam223 and 7 others
Bill The Fucker said:
The FBI has had the original drives for a year, and they kept an airtight lid on it. Whatever damage control they could run with information from the emails has likely already been done.
Click to expand...
Well it's not like Wray is possibly implicated by the contents of the drives. Nope. Certainly not. It just couldn't be that.
 
  • Like
  • DRINK!
  • Winner
Reactions: Grumpy, Potatoherder, Kekky and 17 others
Th
iRON-mAn said:
New audio from the laptop

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ter-biden-asks-soul-man-no-consequence-sight/

The one in the article is the most boring honestly. The second is pure edge poetry, and the last is Hunter talking about his dad running against Trump.

The audio files are from this soundcloud profile:

https://soundcloud.com/cassandra-rules
Click to expand...
“I am Deimos blah blah blah crackhead rambling.”

Jesus. A fifty year old man, and he sounds like an emo teen LiveJournal user circa 2004. This is top-notch lolcow material. :story:
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Hotel in Minsk, Bethesda's Todd Howard, GenericReviewerDraco and 25 others
AlexJonesGotMePregnant said:
chain of custody is a very important concept with both physical and digital data, there's nothing funny about it
Click to expand...
The entire point of a digital signature in this case is that the chain of custody is irrelevant. If the signature matches, that's mathematical proof that a message with these specific contents was signed off on by the sending domain. That means one of three things must be true, in descending order of likelihood:

1. Hunter really did send the emails in question
2. Someone hacked into Hunter's account (or snuck onto his laptop) and sent the emails as him
3. The cryptographic keys for Hunter's email provider have been compromised

This rules out the "disinformation" narrative, except in the vastly unlikely case #3.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Kekky, inception_state, Allakazam223 and 12 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back