New York Post got their hands on a hard drive from Hunter Biden's laptop and shows Joe Biden lied about Hunter's dealings with Ukraine

Couple stories on the New York Post

FBI has had the laptop for over a year already and didn't say anything. Remember when Trump got impeached for congratulating the new President of the Ukraine?

What the hell is the FBI doing?

Supposedly there is also a video of him engaged in a "sex act" and a couple of photo's of him. This is one is particular juicy

Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-40-48.png


Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-49-19.png
 
Last edited:
The entire point of a digital signature in this case is that the chain of custody is irrelevant. If the signature matches, that's mathematical proof that a message with these specific contents was signed off on by the sending domain. That means one of three things must be true, in descending order of likelihood:

1. Hunter really did send the emails in question
2. Someone hacked into Hunter's account (or snuck onto his laptop) and sent the emails as him
3. The cryptographic keys for Hunter's email provider have been compromised

This rules out the "disinformation" narrative, except in the vastly unlikely case #3.

I agree, but chain of custody is still relevant for things that lack digital signatures like DKIM (locally stored files, the hardware itself).

#3 is very unlikely; his email provider was gmail.
 
I think people are confused about how the emails have been verified. What was released and analyzed by the security expert was the email and its metadata including a digital signature by Google (since the email in question is from a Gmail account). They have claimed to have all of this from the start. If they had the digital copy of the email, they had this information.

No one is getting any new information by them releasing the dkim signature other than the fact that they do indeed have the email, which we already knew because they released it. This isn't some 4d chess move keeping critical information from your enemy. It's keeping people who are interested in the story unable to prove that what you are saying is the truth.
Someone pointed out that this election is "Trump vs the Media." Better to just spool this out to discredit them. If they reported on it, they would get blamed for "another email scandal crippling a Democrat." If they try to ignore it then they are no longer objective observers. They took the third option of "actively surpress it" which is backfiring.

Best thing for everyone would have been for Biden to admit the emails are real to minimize the damage.
So, what does the MSM think happens should they be exposed as Biden cheerleaders and obfuscators the likes of K-Pop stans?
Collapse. Or at least a culling. Massive operations like MSM require lots of cash. They lose their credibility, they lose the audience, then they lose that ad money.
 
Collapse. Or at least a culling. Massive operations like MSM require lots of cash. They lose their credibility, they lose the audience, then they lose that ad money.
Their numbers are already terrible, with plenty of layoffs (even before 2020), shit ratings that rely on their channels being played in waiting rooms and other public places, and how outlets like the Washington Post are kept alive by big money (like Jeff Bezos or NGOs) to function as propaganda outlets using a once-respectable name. Surveys have shown journalist to rank lower than lawyers in terms of professions people don't trust.

It's hard for journalism and the MSM to lose much more ground. They've got their devoted cultists and Twitter circlejerk (with the same algorithm favoring them that Youtube does) and some fuck you money from all sorts of sources invested in them staying around. This let's them keep the lights on and keep churning out the same garbage as usual.
 
Don’t forget that all of the money and influence wasted trying to suppress this scandal will not be recovered if Biden loses. Companies that bent the knee will start to have firing sprees to purge the deadweights that told them bending the knee was the best path to money. The media turning on you will have practically no impact on your life, because they will have proven how toothless they actually are if Trump wins. This isn’t some big turning point because Trump magically erases the big bad, but because so many financial and personal stockpiles will be bled dry, causing everything to go out with a whimper.
 
Some emails dropped

Hunter gets into an argument about an USAA account
PDFtoJPG.me-01-4-scaled - Copy.jpg
PDFtoJPG.me-02-3-scaled - Copy.jpg
PDFtoJPG.me-03-3-scaled - Copy.jpg
PDFtoJPG.me-04-3-scaled - Copy.jpg
https://gnews.org/504650/
https://archive.vn/CzpuU

In this email, Jim Biden talks to Hunter about a business opportunity with Carlos Slim

Capture43-1-625x720 - Copy.jpg

https://gnews.org/504848/
https://archive.vn/1GAaQ

Unfortunately, nothing tying Joe to it.

However, I did come across this email. It's not from gnews. Apparently it was tweeted out, but the tweet is gone and all that's left if this imgur.
https://imgur.com/tsQZJEY
https://archive.md/qydaL
tsQZJEY - Copy.jpg

My gut says it's either fake, or it's a different Natalie. Why would Natalie be going to the dinner of an FBI director at 8, and why would they contact Hunter rather than Beau.
 
So, what does the MSM think happens should they be exposed as Biden cheerleaders and obfuscators the likes of K-Pop stans?
Depends on who wins and this has been disccused before. If Trump wins they probably be able to survive for four more years to preach to the wokeites, but if Biden wins the MSM is done. there will probably be people who still tune in but they wont be able to keep up a 24 hours news cycle or provide meaningful coverage. Fox may outlive them if Biden wins but they have a massive market share.

I think the censorship the big tech did a few weeks ago actually will do tremendous long term damage. Twitter is only relevant because the prez uses it, pre 2016 Twitter was dying and Twitter has really just become a reeing echo chamber at this point that more fun for outsides to drop hornets nests into and watch what happens. I think there will be more social media alternatives in the near future. Facebook has already hit its peak a few years ago and is now in decline. Google will be around for a while until something better comes along and can unseat them (it will happen one day it is inevitable) I think Alphabet played it smart to try and stay as low key as possible and avoid doing blatent mass censorship Twitter and Facebook did but there is still a lot of talk about shadow banning and stuff with youtube.
However I think that down the road they will get broken up because they are strangling out competition.

Overall I think we are seeing an information adaption in progress. People are just smart enough and the tools are available enough that the Internet cant be truly censored. (VPN's can get around just about anything and have other "legitimate" purposes so they probably will not be criminalized).

Mastodon is intriguing to me because it is open source and federated. I know that the creators tried to distance "far right" elements who use that platform, whatever that means, but with an open source system like that I doubt they can do anything other than try.

Video sharing sites competing with Youtube are definatly a lower quality but I think that is something that can be overcome. I dont know if there are any real Facebook alternatives out there but I think Facebook is becoming less relevant with each passing day.

--edit--

Also as for sending them money thats possible but I doubt they will be relevant, look at NPR and PBS who cares what they have to say?
 
The entire point of a digital signature in this case is that the chain of custody is irrelevant. If the signature matches, that's mathematical proof that a message with these specific contents was signed off on by the sending domain. That means one of three things must be true, in descending order of likelihood:

1. Hunter really did send the emails in question
2. Someone hacked into Hunter's account (or snuck onto his laptop) and sent the emails as him
3. The cryptographic keys for Hunter's email provider have been compromised

This rules out the "disinformation" narrative, except in the vastly unlikely case #3.
Slight correction. Hunter's email was not verified. An email from a Burisima representative sent to Hunter was verified.

I'm not actually sure if Hunter's email can be verified in the same way since he uses a custom domain for email which may not have dkim signing set up or the needed keys to verify the signature published.
 
Last edited:
Some emails dropped

Hunter gets into an argument about an USAA account
https://gnews.org/504650/
https://archive.vn/CzpuU

In this email, Jim Biden talks to Hunter about a business opportunity with Carlos Slim


https://gnews.org/504848/
https://archive.vn/1GAaQ

Unfortunately, nothing tying Joe to it.

However, I did come across this email. It's not from gnews. Apparently it was tweeted out, but the tweet is gone and all that's left if this imgur.
https://imgur.com/tsQZJEY
https://archive.md/qydaL

My gut says it's either fake, or it's a different Natalie. Why would Natalie be going to the dinner of an FBI director at 8, and why would they contact Hunter rather than Beau.
Carlos Slim? That's the Mexican who runs the New York Times.
Untitled.png
Yet more evidence of someone with lots of media influence being in bed with the Bidens.
 
Back