Inactive Richard "Lowtax" Kyanka - Deadbeat (emphasis on "Dead") founder of Something Awful, forced out of his own community, on his second divorce, stuck his dick in crazy, "Birth Giver"

Sabrina said:
🤔
Click to expand...
Is this the frank the spank guy? I think so
Screenshot_20201029-161702__01.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: BOLDYSPICY! and In Memoriam
Yeah probably, he just keeps posting Nazi propaganda at Lowtax and how crazy the troons are and not even Lowtax will go for that
 
We had better all go back and edit all of our posts itt that called Lowtax a drunken wife/girlfriend beater. He is actually a drunken peace disturber. He's going to sic his lawyer on us for libel and be vindicated yet again.

e: Having even a class B misdemeanor won't help Lowtax get a job at Walmart when he blows through all the money in 3 months.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: sick_hypnotic, Maggots on a Train v2, MidUSA and 2 others
moonman1488 said:
We had better all go back and edit all of our posts itt that called Lowtax a drunken wife/girlfriend beater. He is actually a drunken peace disturber. He's going to sic his lawyer on us for libel and be vindicated yet again.

e: Having even a class B misdemeanor won't help Lowtax get a job at Walmart when he blows through all the money in 3 months.
Click to expand...
You've given me the image of Walmart greeter Lowtax, awkwardly yelling hyper-niche 2000s memes at midwestern grandmas as they enter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: User Name, lightswitchdoll, Maggots on a Train v2 and 7 others
Sabrina said:
Someone's shelled out for the paid version of Facetune
View attachment 1692989
Click to expand...
She's aging like spoiled milk.

Autism Crowley said:
You've given me the image of Walmart greeter Lowtax, awkwardly yelling hyper-niche 2000s memes at midwestern grandmas as they enter.
Click to expand...
I'm seeing Lowtax as a min-wage temp worker at the local chicken plant, awkwardly yelling hyper-niche 2000s memes at immigrant workers who don't understand what the hell the crazy gringo's going on about, even if they understood English.
 
Kwopsie Peepsie said:
View attachment 1693607
Click to expand...
Can we just talk about that third answer?

This is a self-proclaimed brand strategist, designer & developer with supposedly almost a decade worth of business experience who thinks of the Fyre fucking Festival as the pinnacle of digital marketing strategy. Even in her own words their strategy just consisted of outright lies, promises they couldn't possibly keep if they had five times more budget to work with and just paying a bunch of e-celebs to talk about how amazing this festival they never heard of was going to be. That's some game-changing strategy right there. Nevermind the fact the Fyre brand is forever associated with this fiasco, organizers of this con were the subject of more than half a dozen lawsuits asking for millions of dollars in damages, or that the founder of the event got six years of federal jail, I bet those guys are really proud of their marketing team.

It's really sad that we never got to see Bogan's work as a CMO or whatever the fuck her made-up title was at SA. I'd have loved to see the front page proudly stating that the forums are officially sponsored by Nike, Google and Amazon and talk about all the amazing celebrities that got their careers started thanks to the forums and are still very frequent posters. As long as it gets attention, right?
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: MidUSA, Hongourable Madisha, Ghostse and 3 others
Ghostse said:
Well see he PLEAD guilty, he wasn't found guilty. Check mate, gooftroop.
Click to expand...
True but to plead guilty you have to admit under oath that you actually did what you're about to be convicted of.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Ghostse
AnOminous said:
True but to plead guilty you have to admit under oath that you actually did what you're about to be convicted of.
Click to expand...
No you don't.

Section 33.6 Alford Pleas

Defined. An "Alford plea" is a plea of guilty based upon certain precepts enunciated in North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970). Alford held that where there was strong evidence of guilt, a defendant is not constitutionally required to admit commission of the criminal act in order to plead guilty. See Bird v. State, 657 S.W.2d 315 (Mo. App. 1983) and Jenkins v. State, 788 S.W.2d 536 (Mo. App. 1990).

I see no mention of Richard entering an Alford Plea but the point still stands that you do not have to admit guilt to plead guilty.
 
  • Informative
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: MidUSA, Trip Chesterton III, Ghostse and 2 others
You said:
No you don't.

Section 33.6 Alford Pleas

Defined. An "Alford plea" is a plea of guilty based upon certain precepts enunciated in North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970). Alford held that where there was strong evidence of guilt, a defendant is not constitutionally required to admit commission of the criminal act in order to plead guilty. See Bird v. State, 657 S.W.2d 315 (Mo. App. 1983) and Jenkins v. State, 788 S.W.2d 536 (Mo. App. 1990).

I see no mention of Richard entering an Alford Plea but the point still stands that you do not have to admit guilt to plead guilty.
Click to expand...
You have no actual right to such a plea. The court can refuse it. It's a special case that is an exception to the general rule.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: Leonard Helplessness, Sabrina, Ghostse and 2 others
You said:
And yet it still means you do not have to admit guilt to plead guilty, which is what you claimed.
Click to expand...
You do unless you're given special permission not to. Still it's a good point because if he did this it wouldn't be admissible against him in a civil case. He's exactly the kind of person who would try it. So maybe his tweet was actually true.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Brain Problems, Leonard Helplessness, BScCollateral and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back