Cyberpunk 2077 Grieving Thread

If I understood it right, it's about the junk. So if you're male presenting and sounding, but have a pussy, straight girls won't be interested? But I also can't find anything that talks about it rn, so I might be wrong.

One of the first big signs CDPR was becoming pozzed was when they put in this incredibly gay and complicated gender system instead of just making male and female options.
 
the alternative statement is that they again reassure they will hit the December release date which after the previous delays would just be hot air, there's no winning here.


yep, the entire era and twitter sphere raised a big fucking stink about it.

View attachment 1696278
the troon cries in pain as xir strikes you
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Witcher 3 a hot mess for a little while after launch? And that was a game that had a lot more going for it being a sequel with things to build on from the previous games.

I had W3 a couple days after launch and there was nothing wrong with it technically. They also were pretty sharp about bugfixes as well.

that's a good point, but I think whatever happens it will be problematic, toxic, ableist, perpetuate rape culture, reinforce gender stereotypes, or any combination thereof.
with that hype and whatever people think the game will be in their headcanon some people will be triggered.

can't wait for it tbh, the cringe will be spectacular.

I know I shouldn't, but I'm so tempted to play a male V with a manpussy right now.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Casshern
I feel like pandering to the "prounouns in social media account bio" will work.

Remember when people were saying that giving in to the demands of the insane woke people with regards to the character generator was ACTUALLY an epic own to them and CDPR was "based" for doing so?
Anyway just ignore them and they will go away, If you criticize these people you're cringe and just as bad as them etc etc.

:as the insane woke people keep getting influence in the entertainment industries: Uh sure, whatever, not important, anyways did you see what OAG just wrote???!!!?!??
 
  • Feels
Reactions: SiccDicc
I feel like pandering to the "prounouns in social media account bio" will work.

Remember when people were saying that giving in to the demands of the insane woke people with regards to the character generator was ACTUALLY an epic own to them and CDPR was "based" for doing so?
Anyway just ignore them and they will go away, If you criticize these people you're cringe and just as bad as them etc etc.

:as the insane woke people keep getting influence in the entertainment industries: Uh sure, whatever, not important, anyways did you see what OAG just wrote???!!!?!??
When you wrote that did you expect people to understand what you meant?
 
I had TW3 at launch and it was pretty shit. It crashed fairly consistently every 30 minutes and was horribly optimized. The part in the intro dream where the Wild Hunt appears I remember being particularly bad with tanking the frame rate. It runs incredibly smoothly now, so hopefully a lot of the optimizations they did for TW3 can be ported over to Cyberpunk, which uses an updated version of the same engine.

Given all the delays and reports of crunch, though, I think we'll be lucky if it's even playable at launch, especially on anything below the recommended specs.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Ginger Piglet
I think it's pretty clear what I meant, that the "woke" crowd will never be satisfied by any concessions made, that for a loud and abrasive minority they have come to wield an outsized amount of power and influence in industries like video games and so on, but some of the so-called "anti-SJW" crowd will say nothing needs to be done, just ignore them and try to pretend it's just a phase that will be over soon, one day, instead it's going to get worse before it gets better, if it ever gets better.

As CP2077 gets closer to release, the you-know-whos are ramping up the insane complaints, one that has become popular is that the game features gangs that organize along ethnic lines which is you know, totally racist and nothing like that has ever happened in real life, much less a fictional setting. Characters being able to purchase replacement cybernetic agumentations for body parts? That sounds pretty heckin' ableist! and so on and so on. It is, well, rather tiresome, all of the hue and cry over nothing issues, and publishers and other companies desperately attempting to soothe these people with apologies and concessions that will be quickly ignored anyways.
 
Eh, people just don't like getting "lied to". If you tell them something is going to be in the game and then its not, they feel like you lied so they get angry. If you tell people that people that you're going to release on a certain day, then move it back, then you "lied" about when the game was coming out. The more lies there are, the more people are annoyed. The bigger the lies are, the more people are annoyed. Its one of the reasons 76 was such a mess, if it didn't break so many promises it wouldn't be nearly as hated.

So when they come out and say "We pinky swear for real on our grandma that this game is going to come out on this date!" and then move it back again people feel like they made a bigger lie than the previous delays, which where already little lies that everyone can give them passes on since we had that whole pandemic thing.
Nobody gave Peter Molyneux a break for similar shit -- granted his were more grandiose for the time.

I'm still peeved they took wall running out because that's something that's been figured out by Respawn. I'm also angry at Respawn taking it out of Apex Legends because they had it for their multiplayer twice. Fuck, EA mastered it even before that with Mirrored Sky. Someone here said they took it out for balancing issues in multiplayer, but why even have multiplayer? Does CDPR even have any experience on that front?

I dunno. I need to vent about something. Rockstar pissed me off with their bullshit in RDO and now I'm angry at this bullshit.
 
Nobody gave Peter Molyneux a break for similar shit -- granted his were more grandiose for the time.

I'm still peeved they took wall running out because that's something that's been figured out by Respawn. I'm also angry at Respawn taking it out of Apex Legends because they had it for their multiplayer twice. Fuck, EA mastered it even before that with Mirrored Sky. Someone here said they took it out for balancing issues in multiplayer, but why even have multiplayer? Does CDPR even have any experience on that front?

I dunno. I need to vent about something. Rockstar pissed me off with their bullshit in RDO and now I'm angry at this bullshit.

your first mistake was playing rockstar games, let alone multiplayer.

I assume they took it out because they figured their special snowflake clientele couldn't handle it (same reason for apex), combat will probably a shitshow anyway, can't have polygon and dean takahashi get filtered by it (fun fact, that doom video is now "identified as inappropriate or offensive content by the youtube community".)
 
The death threats against CDPR seem to be real: https://twitter.com/ZawAndy/status/1321441240630657024

View attachment 1694078

I don't care if CDPR is using it as cover, this shit is autistic and useless. Boohoo your tranny shoot doot game is delayed.

Glad I decided to get this one from the bargain bin once the furor is over. There's way too much autism in gamers in the past couple of years. It's not a social or political statement to play a game and it's not a big deal if a game gets delayed.

I hope this game is a shitty broken mess, gamers need to be humbled again and to stop putting their faith in hype.
Not cool tbh. And this is controversial but I wouldn't even have wished death on Jennifer Helper for the Anders controversy.

Its bad enough they're being crunched for time.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: haurchefant
Not cool tbh. And this is controversial but I wouldn't even have wished death on Jennifer Helper for the Anders controversy.

Its bad enough they're being crunched for time.
I get what you and others mean but I say get over it. It's [current year] well over two decades of getting used to existing on the internet. If people, especially people in a high profile company--which is what's getting the death threats, not a particular person but a company--have a tizzy about spergs sperging at them like this they need to give up or consider more lead in their daily nutrition so they can have a higher immunity to stupid. This isn't some autist youtuber getting harrassed and bot'd during streams or having death threats sent about their mother. It's a company of grown ass adults (presumably). Drop the soy and chew a B12 vitamin

What a bunch of sissies
 
Nobody gave Peter Molyneux a break for similar shit -- granted his were more grandiose for the time.

I'm still peeved they took wall running out because that's something that's been figured out by Respawn. I'm also angry at Respawn taking it out of Apex Legends because they had it for their multiplayer twice. Fuck, EA mastered it even before that with Mirrored Sky. Someone here said they took it out for balancing issues in multiplayer, but why even have multiplayer? Does CDPR even have any experience on that front?

I dunno. I need to vent about something. Rockstar pissed me off with their bullshit in RDO and now I'm angry at this bullshit.
IMO wallrunning is a niche transversal feature that works well in fast-paced, arena/linearly-designed, geometric spaces. I.e. Titanfall, Mirror's Edge, etc.

If it's in a less speed-oriented game like this one, it raises the questions of what use it serves- as a stealth feature? Or maybe it's integrated a la Mirror's Edge Catalyst into the world? As such, how would it be integrated into mission design? Does it make level design harder (i.e. transversal with a character with that ability vs one without)?

Lots of questions, and I personally think they just removed it to simplify the mission and level design and to stop the game from becoming too sprawling in its features.

Multiplayer in single-player-focused games is dumb regardless, and should have been a free-DLC feature half-a-year down the road. Anytime it's crammed into a sprawling single-player game at release, the single-player game suffers- i.e. with RDR2 where there was clearly some elements cut out at the last moment because of a lack of time.
 
Which is what is happening with CP77. It'll either be a DLC or a paid expansion.
Separate game actually (that's what they keep saying anyway), 2 years down the line and from what they revealed it has its own department in the studio.
No news on the ca$h money model but my bet is on a less aggressive GTAO monetization and that it'll be free for people who bought singleplayer.
 
Separate game actually (that's what they keep saying anyway), 2 years down the line and from what they revealed it has its own department in the studio.
No news on the ca$h money model but my bet is on a less aggressive GTAO monetization and that it'll be free for people who bought singleplayer.
That sounds awful. GTA Online is cancer. Those crappy old multiplayer mods for Vice City and San Andreas were loads more fun.
 
Back