Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

It's interesting how extreme the degree of difference is. Men's athletic records are obviously better than women's but the margins actually aren't that huge. The men's record for 2 miles is 7:58 and the women's is 8:58.
It depends on the sport. In terms of endurance men and women aren't that far apart. In terms of outright strength, the difference is significantly larger. That's also why nobody complains about trans marathon runners, and it's always weightlifters, sprinters or fighters that you hear about,
 
It depends on the sport. In terms of endurance men and women aren't that far apart. In terms of outright strength, the difference is significantly larger. That's also why nobody complains about trans marathon runners, and it's always weightlifters, sprinters or fighters that you hear about,
Well, you also don't usually win money or make a career running marathons. It's more of a lifestyle for people who have other things they do.
 
Well, you also don't usually win money or make a career running marathons. It's more of a lifestyle for people who have other things they do.
That's true enough, but the gap is just a lot smaller. As far as marathons are concerned, we're talking 121 vs 134 minutes for the men's and women's record, respectively. If you look at Olympic powerlifting (69 kg class, snatch lift), it's 122 kg vs. 169 kg.for women/men. 10% difference in the marathon, 40% difference in weightlifting.

An male amateur runner couldn't just dominate a women's marathon, but there are plenty of male amateur weightlifters in any larger city who could win an Olympic gold medal in the women's category.
 
It depends on the sport. In terms of endurance men and women aren't that far apart. In terms of outright strength, the difference is significantly larger. That's also why nobody complains about trans marathon runners, and it's always weightlifters, sprinters or fighters that you hear about,
Currently the biggest bone of contention is on mid-distance, 800m race, and the controversy didn't stem from how much differential there is between the best times, but because the best three places in Rio 2016 were taken by 46XY "hyperadrenergic women".

Focusing on the magnitude of differences between best times is a red herring, and you fall into the troon brigade's numerical sophistry (A favorite argument of the likes of Rhys McKinnon is "why are you so concerned about the 1.6-sec difference between men and women when the difference between the first place and the last place in a typical women's race is 4 sec?"). The decision to ban troons from women's race should instead depend on whether we can establish a statistical significance between the performances of the two sexes.
 
Last edited:
Currently the biggest bone of contention is on mid-distance, 800m race, and the controversy didn't stem from how much differential there is between the best times, but because the best three places in Rio 2016 were taken by 46XY "hyperadrenergic women".

Focusing on the magnitude of differences between best times is a red herring, and you fall into the troon brigade's numerical sophistry (A favorite argument of the likes of Rhys McKinnon is "why are you so concerned about the 1.6-sec difference between men and women when the difference between the first place and the last place in a typical women's race is 4 sec?"). The decision to ban troons from women's race should instead depend on whether we can establish a statistical significance between the performances of the two sexes.
Testosterone definitely makes a huge difference, that's why it was used in communist doping programmes decades ago. None of those runners were troons though, Semenya was intersex but closer to female.
 
All of those runners were XY males.
Sort of. Human babies start on a female-ish template (hence why men have nipples) and male babies then develop from that. Intersex conditions are where that goes wrong. You could argue that those runners were male, but they didn't have the same advantage that a literal fully developed man declaring himself a woman would.
 
This is why the oppression olympics truly don't work guys
5a5f3a9b79e96.jpg



blackandembodied.JPG

blackandembodied2.JPG
blackandembodied3.JPG
blackandembodied4.JPG
blackandembodied5.JPG
blackandembodied6.JPG
blackandembodied7.JPG
blackandembodied8.JPG
blackandembodied9.JPG
money!!.JPG

I know what's missing: Money!!!
money2.JPG

segregation.JPG

segregation2.JPG

So basically, you lot are in favour of segregation and don't want your retarded beliefs questioned? Sounds good.
 
Currently the biggest bone of contention is on mid-distance, 800m race, and the controversy didn't stem from how much differential there is between the best times, but because the best three places in Rio 2016 were taken by 46XY "hyperadrenergic women".

Focusing on the magnitude of differences between best times is a red herring, and you fall into the troon brigade's numerical sophistry (A favorite argument of the likes of Rhys McKinnon is "why are you so concerned about the 1.6-sec difference between men and women when the difference between the first place and the last place in a typical women's race is 4 sec?"). The decision to ban troons from women's race should instead depend on whether we can establish a statistical significance between the performances of the two sexes.

I don't disagree with you. Testosterone is an advantage in all physical sports as best as I can tell. My point is just that in sports that require explosive strength the advantage is significantly larger than in sports that require endurance.

I remember reading a scientific study that compared the performance in sports of pre- and post-pubescent boys and girls to measure the effect of testosterone. Before puberty boys and girls are pretty close together, but once they turn 15 or so there's a considerable gap that opens up between them, and the largest gap is in sports where explosive strength is important.

Remember the dude who broke the British women's deadlift record?

zuby1.PNG


zuby2.PNG
 
Isn't it nice how they act like black and white are the only races that exist?
 
It's Vadim being painfully unfunny. I didn't mind listening to his movie reviews, but his takes on any kind of social issue are absolutely fucking retarded, at best.
I actually agreed with almost everything point in the video, but my main problem with Vadim / CreationCat is his editing and how unfunny his videos are

I thought we grown past the “making a hour long sketch to set up the beginning statement” era via la nostalgia critic, but I guess not

Also, what was the point of getting all of those guest stars, when they end up going to do nothing on the long haul
 
Last edited:
Back