Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's going to be funny to see boomer republicans argue with these type of people again:

41ED0943-9D16-4139-BC41-692BCA392D54.jpeg
 
They'll be confused as why police brutality is still happening in the glorious Biden era of peace and happiness. It will be Trumps fault obviously. But they can avenge the death of their comrade and stick it to Trump by stealing from their local community. It always works
Can't wait till Kamala Harris becomes president and see how much of BLM we will see afterwards.
 
Democrats control the legislative and executive branches (even if Republicans win both outstanding Senate seats, people like Romney, Collins, Murkowski, etc. are still there,) and will likely stack the judicial.
With Mitch still in charge of the Senate they won’t be able to stack anything. Biden will also have to get his cabinet confirmations past Mitch. The biggest mistake the Democrats ever made was leaving so many vacancies open under Obama and not force RBG out. That blunder will haunt them for decades.
2016 was a big deal.
AF8BB18C-EC71-4B71-9C68-D9BA86B11BF4.png
 
That's a complete strawman statement from "SCOTUSblog" whoever runs that.
Nobody expects them to "overturn the results of the election" but if evidence is presented that there was fraud and/or unconstitutional provisions related to the ballots (such as PA's where it does not have to be postmarked and an unverified signature is just fine) then they would be expected to rule on that.
And with ACB now having hopefully reviewed the material, it would be at least presumptive that the SC would find in favor of the President's arguments.
 
Spics are cute though
I know first hand when they're young they're like white black chicks but they hit the wall harder than white girls. Ironically not because they never had any kids but because they have too many and end up looking like a freakish hybrid of fat chick with jew hair and nose and injun skin. Think Frida callo/seylma hyack blown up with an air pump
 
Citation needed. You know that laptop was deboonked right? That's not Hunter in those photos, unless you have a source to say otherwise? Note that any source that confirms those photos from that laptop are of Hunter also confirms the texts and emails from that laptop saying he wasn't allowed near the Biden kids for being sexually inappropriate with them.
hunter_chad.jpg
 
If I'm not mistaken wasn't the DNC's legal argument in 2016 after wikileaks proved they were rigging the primary against Bernie Sanders that they were allowed to rig their own primaries because they are a private organization?
That is the DNC admitting to fraud once already, just in a different type of National election
 
That's a complete strawman statement from "SCOTUSblog" whoever runs that.
Nobody expects them to "overturn the results of the election" but if evidence is presented that there was fraud and/or unconstitutional provisions related to the ballots (such as PA's where it does not have to be postmarked and an unverified signature is just fine) then they would be expected to rule on that.
And with ACB now having hopefully reviewed the material, it would be at least presumptive that the SC would find in favor of the President's arguments.
So that means President Jeb?
 
If I had to guess, this is completely normal. But it's 2020 and I don't remember hearing this in any past elections I was old enough to pay attention to, so who knows any more.
This comes as a shock to out of touch boomers and also-out of touch lefties, but there's nothing incompatible with homosexuality and right-wing politics, even far-right-wing politics. Evola was talking about this in the 40s-70s. It's not the 1950s any more lol
 
I don’t think the SCOTUS will do anything.
But who the fuck is the “SCOTUSblog” and why do they think they have any say in what the court does and doesn’t do?
It's a generally well regarded SCOTUS covering blog but anyone who says shit like that with that degree of certainty about a court case where we don't even know what laws might apply yet is absolutely full of shit no matter who they are.
 
If I'm not mistaken wasn't the DNC's legal argument in 2016 after wikileaks proved they were rigging the primary against Bernie Sanders that they were allowed to rig their own primaries because they are a private organization?
That is the DNC admitting to fraud once already, just in a different type of National election
Feels like the equivalent of "dont worry baby. I only cheated on my boyfriends. You and me are married now, that's the end of my cheating days."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back