2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't forget that Trump had appointed Ajit Pai to the FCC which was a disaster.

Like Trump is not the worst president out there or even bad (honestly I'd say he's mediocre leaning to being a good president), but he has made some legitimate blunders and ideally if the Democrats didn't act batshit insane then they could've had legitimate arguments against him instead of going deep on "HE'S A MEANIE AND LITERALLY HITLER"
Honestly, I am alright with Pai. His big thing was removing the FCC net neutrality thing... which upon looking into it was FCC over reach. It was something that should have been passed in the legislature, not done unilaterally by the FCC.
 
Don't forget that Trump had appointed Ajit Pai to the FCC which was a disaster.

Like Trump is not the worst president out there or even bad (honestly I'd say he's mediocre leaning to being a good president), but he has made some legitimate blunders and ideally if the Democrats didn't act batshit insane then they could've had legitimate arguments against him instead of going deep on "HE'S A MEANIE AND LITERALLY HITLER"
You need to tell me what Ajit Pai did, because my TDS-afflicted friends certainly cannot articulate a list of coherent reasons except the generic "Orange man appointee bad". I'm sure he did some shady stuff but damn if you need to dig through mountains of emotion appeals of TDS just to get to the facts.
 
The real show starts tomorrow. Whether or not it results in a win will remain to be seen.

Getting a feeling that the Supreme Court won't want a repeat of the 2000 election.

This isn't a 2000 election situation. This isn't "whoops we made a stupid ballot."

This is "whoopsydoodle, 40,000+ dead people voted, people from CA who had summer homes voted in swing states they don't live in voted, we illegally screwed with poll watchers and kept finding votes, and we fucking ignored your court order because FUK U ORANGE MAN BAD."

If the SCOTUS lets them get away with this they know things are beyond fucked. So I anticipate they won't.
 
Don't forget that Trump had appointed Ajit Pai to the FCC which was a disaster.

Like Trump is not the worst president out there or even bad (honestly I'd say he's mediocre leaning to being a good president), but he has made some legitimate blunders and ideally if the Democrats didn't act batshit insane then they could've had legitimate arguments against him instead of going deep on "HE'S A MEANIE AND LITERALLY HITLER"
I seem to remember hearing that Ajit Pai was first placed into the FCC by Obama. Is this accurate?

In addition, you articulate my problem with the animus against Trump. It's not about policy, and this is irrational because that's all it should be about as a comparative point.
 
Yeah, but at some point the government is so corrupt, unreachable and harmful to the country that you have nothing left to do but revolt.
:optimistic:
Look at the living conditions of normal French people right before the revolution; when your children starve while the nobles tell you to just eat cake, everyone snaps.
Marie Antoinette never actually said that but that's not even the point. The French Revolution did not come solely because the peasants were starving. The elites were in a time of crisis themselves and not to mention the shit ton of support and funding the Jacobins got from the Britbongs. Just because everything turns to shit and the people are out demanding change doesn't mean that there's a real threat to those in power. Peasants revolts are not a real possibility especially now when people will almost certainly never be at a point where their children are starving and more than half of the populace is perfectly happy with the status quo.
We aren't at that point yet, but if the Democrats don't have to fear losing elections, what's stopping them from doing catastrophically stupid things?
Nothing, really. As long as people are fed and entertained they'll take anything and everything.
 
Every time people call these sites "far right", I simply roll my eyes.

The Farms alone would probably send them shaking, let alone actual 1488 sites.

A few weeks ago, in the Saint Floyd the Breathless Riot Thread, we had a reddit'r show up and try to chastize me for racism or something. So I did what any sane and rational person would do -- I shouted nigger nigger nigger nigger at him and then ignored him. He had a complete and utter meltdown, ending in him chasing me around to other threads demanding my attention and him creating a new thread just to bitch about me ignoring him which got him banned from the site.

So yeah, they probably wouldn't react well to a site like this, in general.
 
1604852188313.png



Where's the lie?
 
Don't forget that Trump had appointed Ajit Pai to the FCC which was a disaster.

Like Trump is not the worst president out there or even bad (honestly I'd say he's mediocre leaning to being a good president), but he has made some legitimate blunders and ideally if the Democrats didn't act batshit insane then they could've had legitimate arguments against him instead of going deep on "HE'S A MEANIE AND LITERALLY HITLER"
It kind of shows of how the Democrats have abandoned any pretense of being the antiwar and proworking class party, Obama's win in 2008 came with a super blue majority. Biden's win is apparently coming with a possible red wave.
 
Wasn’t this debunked though? Or am I misremembering things?
I'm sure it was "debunked" like this
"These 14000 dead people voted here"
"Did 15889 dead people vote there? No actually only 14,000 did, we rate this false"

"These 14000 dead people voted here"
"Did 14,000 dead voters cause widespread election fraud? No, these were all in one county so it wasnt widespread, we rate this false"

this is how all these "debunks" work and people are willing to buy it because they're too lazy and stupid to see it. These are the same people of course who will say YOU have no critical thinking skills because you disagree with MSM
 
The real show starts tomorrow. Whether or not it results in a win will remain to be seen.

Getting a feeling that the Supreme Court won't want a repeat of the 2000 election.

Unless there's examples of absolutely massive fraud then the SCOTUS will side with Biden. The ramifications of overturning an election will be too much. The ensuing chimpouts will make the Floyd riots look like Tea Party rallies. Biden will be a massively unpopular lame duck president once the ecstasy over getting Orange Man out of office subsides. We might bomb a country during the next four years but everything will stay the same. I think everyone knows this so they'd rather just sweep all this under the rug and move on.
 
Apparently on Crowder's stream, they showing CNN claiming that Melania is convincing Trump to concede. Melania of all people after that leaked tape by her friend, CNN really wants the polite concession still lol.
They can get it from Drumpf's cold, small, orange and dead hands.

Love how they're still with the "Drumpf's world is shattering" bombshells though. What's next? Demands for handwritten apologies for every rude remark to a "trusted journalist?"
 
I'm sure it was "debunked" like this
"These 14000 dead people voted here"
"Did 15889 dead people vote there? No actually only 14,000 did, we rate this false"

"These 14000 dead people voted here"
"Did 14,000 dead voters cause widespread election fraud? No, these were all in one county so it wasnt widespread, we rate this false"

this is how all these "debunks" work and people are willing to buy it because they're too lazy and stupid to see it. These are the same people of course who will say YOU have no critical thinking skills because you disagree with MSM

I've been trying to spread some of the voter fraud stuff on normiebook, and yeah, the debunking is literally:

"Claims of Election Fraud are not credible because our system is designed to make Election Fraud impossible."

Which, if you break it down, is: "This isn't true because."

That's not debunking anything. It's not even a complete sentence, yet alone a complete argument. That's "pay no attention to the ballot printer behind the curtain."
 
A few weeks ago, in the Saint Floyd the Breathless Riot Thread, we had a reddit'r show up and try to chastize me for racism or something. So I did what any sane and rational person would do -- I shouted nigger nigger nigger nigger at him and then ignored him. He had a complete and utter meltdown, ending in him chasing me around to other threads demanding my attention and him creating a new thread just to bitch about me ignoring him which got him banned from the site.

So yeah, they probably wouldn't react well to a site like this, in general.
Got a link to that pile of autism. That sounds like a fun read.
 
Unless there's examples of absolutely massive fraud then the SCOTUS will side with Biden. The ramifications of overturning an election will be too much. The ensuing chimpouts will make the Floyd riots look like Tea Party rallies. Biden will be a massively unpopular lame duck president once the ecstasy over getting Orange Man out of office subsides. We might bomb a country during the next four years but everything will stay the same. I think everyone knows this so they'd rather just sweep all this under the rug and move on.
The problem is, "everything will stay the same" is simply not true.

You're forgetting domestic policy like Trump gutting Critical Race Theory, which within mere months forced corporations to tone down decades of their own fronting of it.

Imagine what four years of that standing would have done.
 
Don't forget that Trump had appointed Ajit Pai to the FCC which was a disaster.

Like Trump is not the worst president out there or even bad (honestly I'd say he's mediocre leaning to being a good president), but he has made some legitimate blunders and ideally if the Democrats didn't act batshit insane then they could've had legitimate arguments against him instead of going deep on "HE'S A MEANIE AND LITERALLY HITLER"
Its pretty much my view on Trump. He's mediocre to barely decent at best, but when compared to all the other options for POTUS, he looks fucking great because on the DNC you have literal lunatics who've completely lost touch with their voter base and have abandoned the low-middle class they once claimed to give a shit about for the sake of pandering to corporations, trustafarian idpoltards, political correctness, and socialist countries, while the RNC has just become a bunch of spineless cucks like Mitt Romney who never get shit done and just want to avoid any negative press, so they bend over backwards to try and appease the MSM and act as doormats for the DNC and corporations. They're all nothing but a bunch of slaves to their own greedy corruption and political correctness, so when people voted for a wild card like Trump who was hated by everyone in Washington, it was basically a middle finger to the whole fucking institution.

Now I leave you all with this.
 
Last edited:
The governor in charge of Florida when Bush won it in 2000 through SCOTUS.

Given how badly Trump raped him in the debates, he will give the whole show away to Biden.

Cruz had it 10 times worse and he's jumped on the Trump bandwagon when he had all the reasons to do the exact opposite. Duty before pride. One thing is sure, I trust Jeb more than anyone else from that nest of vipers known as the Bush family.
 
I've been trying to spread some of the voter fraud stuff on normiebook, and yeah, the debunking is literally:

"Claims of Election Fraud are not credible because our system is designed to make Election Fraud impossible."

Which, if you break it down, is: "This isn't true because."

That's not debunking anything. It's not even a complete sentence, yet alone a complete argument. That's "pay no attention to the ballot printer behind the curtain."
Did you bring up Russia?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back