- Joined
- Jan 3, 2020
It's a damn shame that Halo 3 is too short and easy. I love it, since it was my first fps, but damn Halo 1 and 2 had some moments that really busted my balls compared to 3, usually in a good way.I've only been playing Halo casually thru the Master Chief Collection. And I gotta say out of the original 3 I think Halo 2 is the weakest entry.
Something about Halo 1's mechanics are just satisfying even two decades later. Yes the levels are the same but in reverse but it's fun to play and the battlefields are nice and large. Halo 3's 360 era visuals have aged very well. 3's weapons are fun to use and it's clear Bungie had a big budget with that game.
Halo 2 on the otherhand just doesn't feel very good to play and I think dual wielding is kinda stupid. I hate how at least one-third of the screen are the guns themselves.
Also Reach is shit. But I think that's a common belief among Halo fans.
Then again, the levels in Halo 1 and 2 tend to be way too damn long. The library is the worst halo level in existence IMO.
I like Reach, though, and I thought it was generally well-liked too.
To be fair, I don't really play a lot of multiplayer anymore so I'm missing out on a lot of what makes these games, I guess.