Culture A 'child fair' in Brussels sells children to gay couples - yes really, not a joke

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

A two day long international child expo took place in Brussels over the weekend. No, this isn’t about an expo for products for children, but trading actual, real children in the form of surrogacy.
The event conducted by the pro-LGBT Men Having Babies organization has an itinerant character, with the organization moving to different locales to promote its activities on a regular basis. In September, the organization held its event in Paris, in October in Taipei and in December it will take place in Tel Aviv.

The goods being sold are children and the buyers are rich gay men who can afford to spend between $90,000 to $150,000.
Included in the price is not only the chance to rent a uterus for nine months, but also legal assistance, ova and semen delivery, and coverage of travel expenses.

Due to the pandemic, the expo has a hybrid character — some of it is in-person while other parts are conducted online. Gay couples are invited to booths to check out prospectuses, and given the wide selection of products, it appears that many have difficulty even making up their minds. You can choose a race, gender, hair, eye color, and other attributes for the child.

Women are being treated like broodmares because that is their only job. No one is asking for their opinions, feelings, dreams, or plans. They’re simply females whose usefulness has been reduced to the uterus.
Everything points to a new battle in the cultural war, this time concerning the legalization of surrogacy.

The fair takes place in Brussels despite commercial surrogacy being banned in the country. In all reality, if such deals are being made and uteri are being used like incubators, then it is clear this law no longer has any relevancy.
In this context, it is perhaps no surprise that the first transgender deputy prime minister in European history, Petra de Sutter, was appointed in Brussels. De Sutter, an LGBT activist, is demanding legalization of surrogacy across all of Europe.

Now, everything points to a new battle in the cultural war, this time concerning the legalization of surrogacy.
There is no doubt that we’re dealing with a form of enslaving women and human trafficking. Surrogacy tramples on human dignity in every aspect. It is likely that nearly all the women involved would not freely agree to being a broodmare and giving birth to a child for gay couples if they were not forced to do so by tragic financial situations.

It is also not a coincidence that surrogates are recruited from poor countries.


Yet in the West, a whole media campaign has been initiated to revalue and switch the meanings concerning this issue. What is in reality the debasement of women and instrumentalization of children is being presented by the media as a great good and human right. Sentimental stories about celebrities, such as Elton John or Ricky Martin, who bought children from surrogacy and proudly display them are meant to legitimize this shameful procedure.


The fact that rich men are using poor women is being covered up by touching stories about happy children in gay families and sublime slogans about human rights.


A few more years of this brainwashing and public opinion will change. We’ve already seen that what was treated as a deviancy 20 years ago, today is seen as a cultural, social and legal norm.


It very well might be that surrogacy — the enslavement of women and child trade — will be considered a human right and thousands will go out onto the streets to protect that right at some point in the near future.
 
So you can think whatever you want about surrogacy, but science, yes, science knows that bond between a mother and a child starts in utero, and that's why adoption has both biological and psychological consequences that we really cannot fully grasp.

For instance: I think it's pretty clear that it's beneficial for children to be fed their mother milk instead of artificial formula. Surrogacy makes it impossible, unless you tell me that the contract involves pumping and delivering milk for a year after birth. (then not only breed mares, but also milk cows).

All of this reeks of denial of biology and nature. Men do not have the same maternal instinct as women. We are different for a reason. Women who decide to be surrogates have to be desperate or emotionally damaged.

Just like trannies idiocy, it's just pretending that you can shape reality to your wishes. But even if you pretend very hard, and make a nice show about it, it still doesn't make it true.
 
The adoptive parents won that case, even though the surrogacy contract was thrown out by the court.
They won on bullshit dicta about "the best interests of the child" that was adopted by the trial court on remand. The bigger issue was the Supreme Court tossing out the surrogacy contract as invalid, which by all rules of contract law it clearly wasn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Squidbot
Jesus. Fucking. Christ. I don't have words for how absolutely dystopian and fucked this is.
If you're attracted to the same sex, fine whatever, but shit like this is really starting to make me think the whole "homosexuals can't properly raise a child" people are on to something, if the rich degenerate assholes have this sort of blatant disregard for human life.
moral intensifies.jpg

These people need Jesus (and contrition, and Confession, and firm purpose of amendment, and...)
 
Daily reminder that Russia and China and almost every other semi civilized country banned adoptions to the USA because so many homos were molesting their adoptive children.
China banned domestic breeding slaves and selling babies, though. Russia on the other hand may have banned adoption but is eagerly selling babies of Russian, Ukrainian (esp. Donbas refugees), and Central Asian slaves to homos (Chinese homos included), human collectors, and high-maintenance whores. (Soon they'll be joined by victims of child trooning.) Russian authorities are only pretending to be wary of homos so they can get their share from overseeing the trade and private slavers can additionally jack up prices ("we know you're a wholesome heterosexual couple, but the gubmint may wrongly suspect something").

Slaves themselves get subsistence wages. White slaves (Russians) are more expensive due to a comparatively higher cost of life in Russia, so they often buy eggs of white breeding stock and implant them into Central Asian gestator slaves.

Human trafficking should be banned in any shape or form and punishable with the chair.

I don't see how this is any different to how an adopted child whose mom was a pregnant teen who gave them up for adoption would feel.
The difference is adopting genuinely unwanted children doesn't create an economic incentive for more human misery. No one got paid to bring about either the infertility or the unintended pregnancy. The adoptive parents would've preferred to have a biological child, the teen mom would've preferred to not get pregnant at all.
 
Women are being treated like broodmares because that is their only job. No one is asking for their opinions, feelings, dreams, or plans. They’re simply females whose usefulness has been reduced to the uterus.

Now, everything points to a new battle in the cultural war, this time concerning the legalization of surrogacy.
There is no doubt that we’re dealing with a form of enslaving women and human trafficking. Surrogacy tramples on human dignity in every aspect. It is likely that nearly all the women involved would not freely agree to being a broodmare and giving birth to a child for gay couples if they were not forced to do so by tragic financial situations.
Instead of killing babies before they're born, these w*men are paid to shit out kids that will probably kill themselves once they reach puberty after they found out that they were just a personal project or sexual object of their gay parents.
That said, it's quite interesting to see that people are only finding out now about that type of market. For decades, gays would travel to asian countries to buy kids. There's also some disgusting stuff that happens, like gay couples order a kid and then refuse to pay because the kid is deemed"ugly" or they ordered a boy not a girl, so the biological mother has to raise him/her alone.

So, what about the children's take on this? Imagine how your mom sold you to a pair of rich old dudes for a small fortune.

Shit must be traumatizing.
Don't forget the pizza places.
 
View attachment 1719999
These people need Jesus (and contrition, and Confession, and firm purpose of amendment, and...)
Ireland already tried that, and the church's adoption processes did pretty much exactly the same thing: they took babies from unwed mothers and sold to rich adoptive parents in the USA, and if they were lucky they weren't molesters. The mothers were usually enslaved in the Magdalene laundries.

There's been problems lately with rich couples ordering a surrogate baby and then not being able to collect them, or rejecting them. There's a lot of babies in the Ukraine born to surrogate mothers, whose adoptive parents can't come and collect them because of the pandemic travel restrictions, there's been cases of kids born with disabilities or disfigurements being rejected by the buyers (that case was even worse because the adoptive dad was a convicted paedophile) and left with the mother to care for, or the mother's been ordered to have an abortion and she's refused, and cases where the adoptive parents have split up and don't want the baby any more so they just ghost the mother. Posie Parker has a miniseries on YouTube, "Commodifying Human Nature", where she interviews people involved in surrogacy and there's some horrific tales that come out. The whole thing's fucked up.
 
Ireland already tried that, and the church's adoption processes did pretty much exactly the same thing: they took babies from unwed mothers and sold to rich adoptive parents in the USA, and if they were lucky they weren't molesters. The mothers were usually enslaved in the Magdalene laundries.

Ah yes, the classic "Catholics-are-hypocrites-not-me-though-I-have-no-standards" dance that liberals, atheists and faggots (but I repeat myself) have played over and over since the Enlightenment.

Is the system we have in place now so much better? Hint: check the title of this thread and the OP.

Liberals have told Catholics that their teachings have no place in the bedroom. Now, the bedroom has spilled out into the public square, reducing the act of coition to a dopamine chase and degrading the entire human race it its wake. 60 million killed unborn children (just in America) couldn't be reached for comment on today's state of affairs.
 
Back