Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

[BULLY HUNTER_77]

Imagine trusting anything they vomit out.

Imagine completely ignoring valuable information because you personally don't like the messenger. James O'Keefe is your Al Gore, your Michael Moore.

Plugging your ears, closing your eyes, and screaming "la la la la I can't HEAR YOU" really makes you seem confident that you're right.

 

[Constellationzero]

ACLU is going to sue to protect some votes it seems.
View attachment 1721684

Great. Glad to hear it.

So... that means if the votes actually place Trump in the lead, that STILL MEANS the American people decide the winner?

Right?

Right?

 

[GHTD]

So wait - there are seriously people ITT that think that Biden gathering hundreds of thousands of magical ballots in the dead of night in states that counted millions of votes on election night and are now dragging their heels or stopping counts for days to release hundreds of thousands is a coincidence?

That all of the glitches that have been discovered and disclosed thus far that unanimously work in Biden's favor is just a coincidence?

You think all of that is above board, and yet you think that O'Keefe is peddling bullshit based on... what?

O'Keefe has been caught heavily editing his 'investigative videos' to be in favor of him before. I'd trust fucking MSNBC or OANN before I'd trust Project Veritas.

Should I add, O'Keefe actually was convicted on 3 years probation with charges relating to his ACORN investigative video.

 

[RudeRoasts]

Great. Glad to hear it.

So... that means if the votes actually place Trump in the lead, that STILL MEANS the American people decide the winner?

Right?

Right?

Notice that they didn't say use "legal" as a prefix to those votes that should count.

 

[Cubanodun]

Orange man keep being the master trole

The comments are full of "he CANT DO THAT"

 

[BULLY HUNTER_77]

O'Keefe has been caught heavily editing his 'investigative videos' to be in favor of him before. I'd trust fucking MSNBC or OANN before I'd trust Project Veritas.

What videos have been heavily edited? And, more importantly, how were they misleading? I always hear the planned parenthood ones but they really did sell baby/fetus parts. In fact, it was confirmed years after it was supposedly deboonked, if I'm remembering things right.

 

[BlackDragoons]

What videos have been heavily edited? And, more importantly, how were they misleading? I always hear the planned parenthood ones but they really did sell baby/fetus parts. In fact, it was confirmed years after it was supposedly deboonked, if I'm remembering things right.

ACORN investigation which he settled out of court paying the man on camera over 100k.

 

[BULLY HUNTER_77]

ACORN investigation which he settled out of court paying the man on camera over 100k.

If this is true, then O'Keefe is a confirmed liar. His "wall of shame" would be bullshit.

You might have a point.

 

[GHTD]

What videos have been heavily edited? And, more importantly, how were they misleading? I always hear the planned parenthood ones but they really did sell baby/fetus parts. In fact, it was confirmed years after it was supposedly deboonked, if I'm remembering things right.

Project Veritas: how fake news prize went to rightwing group beloved by Trump

James O’Keefe’s organisation specialising in media stings received donations from Trump’s foundation but was caught red-handed peddling a false story

www.theguardian.com

Project Veritas’ YouTube sting was deeply misleading — and successful

James O’Keefe’s stunt playbook keeps giving conservative lawmakers ammunition, even if the evidence is all phony. It’s time to dismiss these bogus videos

www.theverge.com

https://entertainment.time.com/2011/03/13/the-twisty-bent-truth-of-the-npr-sting-video/

I'm just going to post links because I'm really not in a way to get into an autistic slapfight over ego-stroking how everyone else is completely wrong and there's "mountains of evidence" proving they are.

 

[BubbleButt]

He's pathologically self-obsessed and indifferent to the truth; he's a philistine; he's spiteful, gauche, boastful and undignified; he's thin-skinned and whiny; he's unskilled at diplomacy and statecraft; he's a poor writer; he's fat and eats junk food; and, once you get beyond the initial novelty of watching the President of the United States shout insults at people, his persona becomes repetitive and tedious. Listening to him yell about how great he is is dull; listening to other people complain about him is dull. I'm eager for this all to be over.

Yeah, Biden's kind of a fucker. I agree.

 

[spinal gas chamber]

So...

Because he got a much better video, now with the audio of the agent trying to force the guy into recanting his declaration

I can’t seem to find this video. I see lots of posts saying it exists but nothing in this thread.

edit: nothing outside this thread either, but I’m okay with that if anyone claiming this video exists posts it

 

[Rupin]

Imagine trusting anything they vomit out.

Except when it turns out to be fact.

 

[RudeRoasts]

So...

I can’t seem to find this video. I see lots of posts saying it exists but nothing in this thread.

What?

https://mobile.twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1326323334800437248

I posted the video attached in this link in the last page.

The other where Hopkins says that he didn't recant:

https://mobile.twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1326337154050641920

ACORN investigation which he settled out of court paying the man on camera over 100k.

Fair.
Name me a major news publication that hasn't experienced their own set of settlements in or out of court, the latter of which PV has not done on any count. Has such an out-of-court settlement occurred since then?

Past mistakes or bullshit from... shit, how many years ago (Edit: over 11 years) doesn't disqualify what he's got now. The batting average for PV is far from low, and if it was really as fake as it's made out to be, they'd have been sued into oblivion at best. They've not been messing around with 2-bit institutions here.

I've never been a Project Veritas champion, but listening to the audio, seeing shit on the record and very little of it being actually refuted at this point, it's obvious to me that there's some merit to what they're saying here.

 

[TherapyMan]

If this is true, then O'Keefe is a confirmed liar. His "wall of shame" would be bullshit.

You might have a point.

The settlement figure is true. If you find that you have some extra time, here is an in-depth review of the 2009 ACORN Controversy by the California State Attorney General's Office. Worth noting is that O'Keefe and others supplied the California Attorney General's Office with the unedited footage in exchange for immunity from criminal prosecution (see page 17). Ultimately, the California AG's Office found that none of O'Keefe's claims were true and he had deceptively edited the recordings to imply wrongdoing that did not exist (page 23-24).

The edited O’Keefe videos released on the BigGovernment.com website portrayed ACORN as an organization infested with employees committing crimes. However, the impression of rampant illegal conduct created by the recordings at the various ACORN offices around the country is not supported by the evidence related to the videos in California. Our investigation revealed facts which were not reflected in the recordings . . . . ACORN was not the criminal enterprise described by O’Keefe in his “Chaos for Glory” statement – it did not receive billions in federal funds and did not control elections.

 

[Crankenstein]

 

[ddlloo]

Project Veritas are right leaning investigative reporters that are functionally just propagandists. If you take any of their larger claims at face value, then more fool you. Most of their reporting seems to have elements of truth, but they also go out of their way to selective edit things and push a larger narrative that they usually can't fully support.

In this case though they have the guy involved literally saying he was intimidated and does NOT recant his testimony. However (unless I've missed something) I don't like that we appear to, once again, only have a partial copy of his 'interview' with the feds.

 

[attractive_pneumonia]

I don't like that we appear to, once again, only have a partial copy of his 'interview' with the feds.

This is just common practice by the media. People got too used to Wikileaks dumping the raw data, its made people very mistrustful of anything that isn't 100% unedited material. The best manner of handling this would be to release the edited videos for the short attention span types and have a FTP folder with raw footage to shit on naysayers.

 

[King's Gambit Accepted]

What?

https://mobile.twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1326323334800437248

I posted the video attached in this link in the last page.

The other where Hopkins says that he didn't recant:

https://mobile.twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1326337154050641920

Fair.
Name me a major news publication that hasn't experienced their own set of settlements in or out of court, the latter of which PV has not done on any count. Has such an out-of-court settlement occurred since then?

Past mistakes or bullshit from... shit, how many years ago (Edit: over 11 years) doesn't disqualify what he's got now. The batting average for PV is far from low, and if it was really as fake as it's made out to be, they'd have been sued into oblivion at best. They've not been messing around with 2-bit institutions here.

I've never been a Project Veritas champion, but listening to the audio, seeing shit on the record and very little of it being actually refuted at this point, it's obvious to me that there's some merit to what they're saying here.

I remember when Project Veritas got exposed for trying to get WaPo to write a false story about Roy Moore in the run-up to the 2018 Alabama senate race.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/a-woman-approached-the-post-with-dramatic--and-false--tale-about-roy-moore-sje-appears-to-be-part-of-undercover-sting-operation/2017/11/27/0c2e335a-cfb6-11e7-9d3a-bcbe2af58c3a_story.html

O’Keefe is a buffoon only a slightly more competent than Jacob Wohl.

 

[Jason "Qriist" Close]

So...

I can’t seem to find this video. I see lots of posts saying it exists but nothing in this thread.

edit: nothing outside this thread either, but I’m okay with that if anyone claiming this video exists posts it

Project Veritas are right leaning investigative reporters that are functionally just propagandists. If you take any of their larger claims at face value, then more fool you. Most of their reporting seems to have elements of truth, but they also go out of their way to selective edit things and push a larger narrative that they usually can't fully support.

In this case though they have the guy involved literally saying he was intimidated and does NOT recant his testimony. However (unless I've missed something) I don't like that we appear to, once again, only have a partial copy of his 'interview' with the feds.

This is just common practice by the media. People got too used to Wikileaks dumping the raw data, its made people very mistrustful of anything that isn't 100% unedited material. The best manner of handling this would be to release the edited videos for the short attention span types and have a FTP folder with raw footage to shit on naysayers.

 

[Andrew Neiman]

Oh, so it's his personality. Personally, I liked it more than Biden's and Kamala's.

Well, you asked what I hate; hatred or disdain, and disagreement, are different things.