Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%

  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%

  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%
  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
PV seems like a trash organization but they are above the rest right now because they have a guy on record putting his name down.

MSM just has “anonymous sources” and is always taken as gospel with “sources close to”. They never get anyone to go on record no matter how serious the claim.
This lowly postman upended his life and is likely fired to get his story out. The spineless, rich DC anonymous sources never seem to have the guts to do nearly that but they are always talked about as being great patriots.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Donny Cheese, NoSpiceLife, XtrmGamr719 and 21 others
💗Bitchstopher Columbitch💗 said:
Trump supporters are planning a march this saturday. Expect antifa to show up and fistfights to start.

View attachment 1719821
Click to expand...
Apparently Eventbrite canceled the event on their own.
1605062316954.png
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: DerSandstrom, Count groudon, big ups liquid richard and 4 others

20201110_214551.jpg


Not that "muh edits" does anything to discredit the information, anyway.
I mean, look at what this Agent said:

Agent : I am not- I am actually, I'm trying to twist you a little bit because in that, believe it or not, your mind will kick in.

Hopkins: Okay

Agent: We like to control our mind. And when we do that, we can convince ourselves of a memory. But when you're under a little bit of stress, which is what I'm doing to you purposefully, your mind can be a little bit clearer and were going to do a different exercise too, to make your mind a little bit clearer. So, but this is all on purpose.

Hopkins: Roger.

Agent: I am not scaring you. But I am scaring you.
Click to expand...

It's like something out of a shitty political thriller movie or some shit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Meth Kennedy, Ebonic Tutor, Lady Round Buns and 2 others
COCl₂ said:
Only thing about this is this guy seems like a bit of a lolcow himself. Claims to have invented email? Does not mean he is wrong here, but I really have no idea. Interesting, but I would like a second opinion from another data scientist.
Click to expand...
The sperg who predicted the 2008 housing crash seems to agree with him. He's not a data scientist, though.
archive.is

Michael Burry MD on Twitter: "What if #votingsoftware #algorithms use…

archived 11 Nov 2020 03:02:15 UTC
archive.is archive.is
michael.png
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria, Ivan Shatov, SmokingPig and 2 others
COCl₂ said:
Only thing about this is this guy seems like a bit of a lolcow himself. Claims to have invented email? Does not mean he is wrong here, but I really have no idea. Interesting, but I would like a second opinion from another data scientist.
Click to expand...
He's questioned COVID-19 so he's automatically on Wikipedia's shitlist. At a cursory glance the email stuff seems to have been an instance of independent invention that got picked up and later discovered to not have been the first.

1605064103787.png
 
Last edited:
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria and Terrifik
COCl₂ said:
Only thing about this is this guy seems like a bit of a lolcow himself. Claims to have invented email? Does not mean he is wrong here, but I really have no idea. Interesting, but I would like a second opinion from another data scientist.
Click to expand...
I think he's just stuck on it because he sees himself as having invented it without knowing it already existed but is too retarded/proud to let it go. He's certainly an interesting character but I don't think he's insane and he's definitely not stupid.
Ignoring his potential lolworthiness, taking the data as it stands raises questions.

If I had time I'd go through and start just acquiring voter data from 2016 and 2008 and then checking for what appear to be the current telltale signs.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: COCl₂ and Serin Spaghetti
  • Like
Reactions: Lady Round Buns and Pomme Poire Peche
GHTD said:
www.theguardian.com

Project Veritas: how fake news prize went to rightwing group beloved by Trump

James O’Keefe’s organisation specialising in media stings received donations from Trump’s foundation but was caught red-handed peddling a false story
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
www.theverge.com

Project Veritas’ YouTube sting was deeply misleading — and successful

James O’Keefe’s stunt playbook keeps giving conservative lawmakers ammunition, even if the evidence is all phony. It’s time to dismiss these bogus videos
www.theverge.com www.theverge.com

I'm just going to post links because I'm really not in a way to get into an autistic slapfight over ego-stroking how everyone else is completely wrong and there's "mountains of evidence" proving they are.
Click to expand...
Cheef O'Keefe edits his videos somewhat dubiously, but even in that time piece you've linked here the author very long windedly admits that the exec being stung said what he said. He then goes on at length justifying why political discourse is actually very nuanced and you need to have full context. Often I think the ACORN thing is brought up to poison the well, as its easy to point to this clear fuck up on O'Keefe's part to justify dismissing out of hand any evidence he provides. The fact is that npr sting revealed an elitist attitude and a sort of disgust toward tea party republicans, as well as a sort of willingness to appease ethnic pressure over perceived racism, but perhaps not the the extent PV would have desired.

It is also amusing the unnecessary slights aimed at O'Keefe and veritas which could be construed as propagandistic. Apparently Veritas conspired to "sexually humiliate a CNN reporter", which of course is ABSOLUTELY TURRIBLE ...

Unless of course its a trump ally being humiliated in which case its hilarious
1605065344096.png

I will admit, the neolib elite is better at propaganda. It is more subtle, and more conservative. However it is still propaganda, or perhaps in its defensive mode one might call it apologetics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meth Kennedy and Justa Grata Honoria
potato in mah painus said:
Guy threw his life away revealing the wire footage, the people he just spat in the face of kill for far less then that.
Click to expand...
More like that agent who was interrogating him is going to get skullfucked for his inept attempt at intimidating a whistle blower. This USPS guy is going to make millions in defamation suits from the various media outlets and in lawsuits against the government. That he was wise enough to wear a wire when they came for him shows he isn't a dullard and that evidence will utterly crush any feeble attempts the USPS can come up with in court to mitigate the shitshow they just unleashed on themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Star Stuff, Ebonic Tutor, Captain Chromosome and 1 other person
Greatest Gonger said:
Cheef O'Keefe edits his videos somewhat dubiously, but even in that time piece you've linked here the author very long windedly admits that the exec being stung said what he said. He then goes on at length justifying why political discourse is actually very nuanced and you need to have full context. Often I think the ACORN thing is brought up to poison the well, as its easy to point to this clear fuck up on O'Keefe's part to justify dismissing out of hand any evidence he provides. The fact is that npr sting revealed an elitist attitude and a sort of disgust toward tea party republicans, as well as a sort of willingness to appease ethnic pressure over perceived racism, but perhaps not the the extent PV would have desired.

It is also amusing the unnecessary slights aimed at O'Keefe and veritas which could be construed as propagandistic. Apparently Veritas conspired to "sexually humiliate a CNN reporter", which of course is ABSOLUTELY TURRIBLE ...

Unless of course its a trump ally being humiliated in which case its hilarious View attachment 1721886
I will admit, the neolib elite is better at propaganda. It is more subtle, and more conservative. However it is still propaganda, or perhaps in its defensive mode one might call it apologetics.
Click to expand...
Okeeth just legal kunfu warrior does thing perfectly to point being legal .:optimistic:
his lawsuit record is stupid good:optimistic:
But this will not stop BIdden & Harriss from wining the election i give more to supreme court & House of Rep.( which will give to hillary or kamalla if they choose)
 
CNN On Spanish is going also full TDS with the "there is no PROOF OF ANYTHING NO PROOF NO PROOF"

Is must be a new low when actual Third world countries had to remind you that those things take time and they have to stop blowing their load to early even their own damn website say that they have "projected" Biden as a winner is still not a sealed deal
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria, Andrew Neiman, PaleTay and 2 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back