Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

[Elric of Melnibone]

I don't think the agent was trying to intimidate him, it sounded more like he was trying to induce a state in which the whistleblower would begin to doubt his recollection, if not outright create a false memory.

IANAL but that sounds like coercion to me.

EDIT: I will also add for all the people saying Project Veritas is full of shit, im pretty sure that if they were going to choose a time to lie and make shit up, they would not choose to do so about the actions of federal agents in a federal investigation. That to me does not pass the risk vs reward sniff test.

 

[Wyald]

View attachment 1721935
Gee, I am starting to think Project Veritas is full of shit as usual

>Retard lies in an attempt to "save the election for god emprah trump"
>Gets faced by actual law enforcement
>"i-it was jokes lmao"
Every single time

 

[E. Knee as Weapon - Cont.]

The sperg who predicted the 2008 housing crash seems to agree with him. He's not a data scientist, though.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Burry

https://archive.md/VdsVz

https://twitter.com/michaeljburry/status/1326310808599420928

View attachment 1721850

I'm drunk but OTOH this is exactly the kind of sophisticated cheating I would expect and not like Tammany Hall ballot stuffing circa 1864.

 

[Flip: Draw 2]

When I hear screeching about "no proof" I can only think of some asshole kid eating a cookie and when you question them about you have no proof because the cookie isn't there anymore.
You could give a mountain of reasoning the makes it obvious they ate the cookie but since you didn't catch the fucker with the cookie in their mouth "lmao no proof!"

 

[Jason "Qriist" Close]

>Gets faced by actual law enforcement

USPS inspectors*

 

[Wyald]

USPS inspectors*

lmoa even better

 

[Paranoia Machine]

USPS inspectors*

Ay, that sounds like a step below a lawsuit or law enforcement but Mail Inspectors are actually kinda legit.
Did you know the first governmental use of the Thompson Submachine Gun/Tommygun was by the United States Postal Inspection Service to combat mail theft?
If I was a gambling man I'd say that inspectors have the same jurisdiction over other mail carriers to make sure they are up to the same standards.

What I'm trying to say is that Mail Inspectors are kinda awesome

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

>Retard lies in an attempt to "save the election for god emprah trump"
>Gets faced by actual law enforcement
>"i-it was jokes lmao"
Every single time

"You know, if you are lying to us, you will get charged with perjury which is a federal crime with a long prison sentence"

"It was just a prank bro!"

 

[RudeRoasts]

View attachment 1721935
Gee, I am starting to think Project Veritas is full of shit as usual

Yeah, keep up. Already been refuted by O'Keefe and Hopkins, on video, on the record.

 

[TherapyMan]

IANAL but that sounds like coercion to me.

Short answer: it's not. Law enforcement can say all sorts of things to work information out of people, including lying. "Ploys to mislead a suspect or lull him into a false sense of security that do not rise to the level of compulsion or coercion to speak are not within Miranda 's concerns." Illinois v. Perkins, 496 U.S. 292, 297 (1990). Coercion under the Fifth Amendment considers things like threats to your personal safety, leaving the suspect without food or water, not letting a suspect speak with his or her lawyer after it was requested, long interrogations without allowing the suspect a break, etc.

USPS inspectors*

The USPS Postal Inspectors are law enforcement.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Yeah, keep up. Already been refuted by O'Keefe and Hopkins, on video, on the record.

Uh huh. Right along with all that evidence of voter fraud, right?

 

[Flip: Draw 2]

Uh huh. Right along with all that evidence of voter fraud, right?

"but how can you know I ate the cookie if the cookie isn't there anymore?"

 

[Ashenthorn]

View attachment 1721935
Gee, I am starting to think Project Veritas is full of shit as usual

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1326337154050641920

 

[RudeRoasts]

Uh huh. Right along with all that evidence of voter fraud, right?

So then, what are you going to say tomorrow when PV releases the full unedited audio that confirms a lack of recanting?

 

[King's Gambit Accepted]

When I hear screeching about "no proof" I can only think of some asshole kid eating a cookie and when you question them about you have no proof because the cookie isn't there anymore.
You could give a mountain of reasoning the makes it obvious they ate the cookie but since you didn't catch the fucker with the cookie in their mouth "lmao no proof!"

"but how can you know I ate the cookie if the cookie isn't there anymore?"

This is retarded.

When I hear screeching about "no proof" I can only think of some asshole kid eating a cookie and when you question them about you have no proof because the cookie isn't there anymore.
You could give a mountain of reasoning the makes it obvious they ate the cookie but since you didn't catch the fucker with the cookie in their mouth "lmao no proof!"

This is retarded. The burden of proof always falls on whoever is making the allegation.

Logically, you can not prove a negative. If accuse you of a crime, I can’t say “well you seem like the kind of guy that would do it but I don’t have any evidence. Must be guilty.”

 

[Personal Jesus]

When I hear screeching about "no proof" I can only think of some asshole kid eating a cookie and when you question them about you have no proof because the cookie isn't there anymore.
You could give a mountain of reasoning the makes it obvious they ate the cookie but since you didn't catch the fucker with the cookie in their mouth "lmao no proof!"

Kinda like DSP and WWE Champions, the evidence is all there, the only definitive proof missing is DSP actually showing he plays the game but that obviously is not gonna happen, same case here.

 

[TheSimpShow]

As time progresses, it's looking more like the Cope™ is over at Team Biden.

 

[GherkinRealness]

It's not gonna matter if the investigators determine no tampering was done. People here are still gonna grit their teeth, insist corruption took place and keep planting doubt until they get the result they want.

Political viewpoints are becoming as immovable as religious beliefs.

 

[Shakka Ahmose]

New Trump Tweet

 

[Flip: Draw 2]

This is retarded.

This is retarded. The burden of proof always falls on whoever is making the allegation.

Logically, you can not prove a negative. If accuse you of a crime, I can’t say “well you seem like the kind of guy that would do it but I don’t have any evidence. Must be guilty.”

No. You fucking retard. If the kid ate the cookie while you weren't looking you don't have proof they ate it despite it being fucking obvious. You could point out the crumbs around their fingers and lips but since you didn't catch them in the act, they'll just say you can't prove squat.