Jeremy Hambly / The Quartering / MTGHeadquarters / Unsleeved Media / Midwestly - Buttblasted manchild upset he was banned from a childrens' card game, Grifter, supporter of the cancel culture

[pleasedesdontbannem]

4,463 cases in Wisconsin in the past day. He might be part of the Quarter.

REPORTED cases. Its probably a lot worse, because, you know, Wisconsin.

 

[The Omni Cuckold]

https://twitter.com/TheQuartering/status/1326534775851585536?s=19 guy sick with the flu mad about having to wear a mask in public

 

[TheMadAutist]

Pounder makes 9 videos yesterday even while having the flu and looks to be on track to drop 6 today. Somebody must really need their "beer money."

 

[Virus418]

One day later, let's see how Jeremy's unboxing video performed against others:

The Tech Giant (42k subs) - 35k views
JazzyGuns (378k subs) - 35k views
BRO YOU WACK (308k subs) - 40k views
Seth (42.6k subs) - 85k views
NotYourAverageFlight (2.92m subs) - 185k views

TheQuartering (929k subs) - 26k views

It's absolutely hilarious to see channels drastically smaller than Jeremy's now running circles around him. Even the follow-up video he made ranting about Amazon performed better with 40k, still bad but not 26k bad. I mean, it's his money to spend, but considering how he even said yesterday that he planned to play Cyberpunk 2077 (a game he's anticipated for a while now) on strictly PC, I can't help but wonder if he only bought this with an unboxing video in mind.

Speaking of the Cyberpunk 2077 video, he read a list of "controversies" the game has had and one of those included a man named Sean Halliday, which Jeremy immediately got upset about for including the man's name. Odd, since he usually never complaims about that sort of thing, but a quick Google search and I find out this is the man Jeremy supposedly hired for Exclusively Games. Now I don't believe this man is video editor Sean since the picture I found on Google Images doesn't match, but hey, I could be wrong. Regardless, I find it funny how Jeremy doesn't cite his own experience with Halladay when reading the article, could they have possibly had a falling out after EG shuttered down?

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

The Tech Giant (42k subs) - 35k views
JazzyGuns (378k subs) - 35k views
BRO YOU WACK (308k subs) - 40k views
Seth (42.6k subs) - 85k views
NotYourAverageFlight (2.92m subs) - 185k views
TheQuartering (929k subs) - 26k views

The real shocker on this one is the fact that the reactor Flight only had 185k views for a channel that has almost 3 million views on his YT page. It’s even more strange for Jeremy to have 929k subscribers, but to only have 26k views?

YT can be strange when it comes to adding up statistics regarding views.

 

[Virus418]

He just uploaded the inevitable "YouTube Purge OMG My Days Are Numbered Give Me Money" video, and it managed to surpass the Xbox unboxing video in just two hours.

He states the obvious, that channels covering politics are getting hit and how his march to 1m subscribers came to a screeching halt, and he's somehow shocked. Again, wasn't the whole point of the MidWestly channel so he could cover political content without having it affect his main channel? Regardless of YouTube's intention, Jer knew covering politics on TQ was a risk but did so anyway numerous times. He was asking for it, and is only crying now because he's feeling the aftereffects.

Jeremy goes as far to say he will be surprised if he remains monetized going into 2021, and I wouldn't be surprised if YouTube does something in the coming months. While I'm all for free speech and YouTubers having the ability to share it within reason, I draw the line when it comes to monetization. It's well within YouTube's right to de-monetize anyone at any certain point because they aren't obligated to pay everyone. It's their platform and their money as far as I'm concerned. This is what scares the average Anti-SJW, and instead of finding alternative ways to make an income, they plan to hunker down and hope it blows over? Not likely.

 

[KillThemCrackasBabies]

Are there even significant mask protests anymore? It seems like even the people who thought it was all "theatrics" resigned themselves to it over the summer. Fatboy's late to the game again...

 

[TheMadAutist]

So it seems Pounder was talking out of his ass in his unboxing video and now randos on Twitter are roasting him.

https://mobile.twitter.com/EagleUS2013/status/1326417052719058944

 

[Iron Hamster]

He's losing precious views at the moment. The tube has been down about 20 min so far.

 

[KillThemCrackasBabies]

I may be very autistic and mad but how the fuck would anyone with even the most basic knowledge of vidya be unaware they're not giving away a fucking full-price game the day it comes out?

 

[Neil]

If a Biden presidency means Pounder becomes irrelevant then I welcome it. I do think he is going to fall back on "being liberal" and try to play that he loves Biden and was just a Trumper for the lulz.

With Trump being gone, media has no big "main antagonist" target to smite with forced last minute 2D lesbians or blackwashed pre-established characters. Eventually their "first ever ___"s and "stunning and brave" diversity pandering will die out since it won't have the same spark or "provocativeness".

The Pound's outrage gravy train is at the end of its tracks, probably a year or two at most into the Biden presidency.

 

[Virus418]

So it seems Pounder was talking out of his ass in his unboxing video and now randos on Twitter are roasting him.

https://mobile.twitter.com/EagleUS2013/status/1326417052719058944

Damn, I gave Jer too much credit when I assumed he was reading off a website, but I really shouldn't be surprised. For something he hyped up so much, the unboxing was a complete letdown and the winner of his giveaway has to wait until December to even get their's.

With Trump being gone, media has no big "main antagonist" target to smite with forced last minute 2D lesbians or blackwashed pre-established characters. Eventually their "first ever ___"s and "stunning and brave" diversity pandering will die out since it won't have the same spark or "provocativeness".

The Pound's outrage gravy train is at the end of its tracks, probably a year or two at most into the Biden presidency.

It's funny, Jeremy was quick to claim that late night hosts were going to be a lot more boring with Trump out, but it works both ways. But unlike them, Jeremy doesn't have consistent viewership, celebrity friends, and huge sponsorships to fall back on. I'm no fan of Jimmy Kimmel, but it's pretty safe to say he'll be around longer than Jeremy at this rate.

 

[TheMadAutist]

Gentlemen, I would like to direct your attention to Invesp. Now, what is Invesp you ask. According to their website they are a company that does Digital Marketing Strategy, Conversion Rate Optimization, User & Conversion Research, and ect. Basically it is a market research firm to help you get more eyes on your product/website/whatever. Now, on their main page they have testimonial videos from some clients and their is one at the bottom that is particularly interesting. You see the video is labeled Sterling(DishNetwork) & Invesp BUT the guy on the video says he is the marketing director for Bizlab.

Now Bizlab has a webpage more than a website that lists 3 clients, Sterling Commerce Group, Rocket Clicks, and Sterling Law Offices S.C. I wonder why a "marketing genius" needs a marketing firm? The video was uploaded 3 months ago, so it's not a very old video. The BizLab webpage has a 2019 copyright on it so again, this isn't some old venture. Here is a link to BizLabs' Inc. page which shows Hambly's old BeYouOwnIT listed as one of the assets BizLabs holds. Here is the Indeed review page for BizLabs, nd a nice BizTimes article.

 

[You]

"Jeremy, we need you to give a video testimonial for our business so you qualify for that reduced rate we talked about"
"Can you make sure the camera is angled to show none of my body below my head and leave 80% negative space above it?"
"No."
"....okay, let me go find an old bed sheet"

For real, I thought his left sleeve was that part of his body for most of the video until realizing it wasn't. He's borderline deathfat at this point.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

He just uploaded the inevitable "YouTube Purge OMG My Days Are Numbered Give Me Money" video, and it managed to surpass the Xbox unboxing video in just two hours.

He states the obvious, that channels covering politics are getting hit and how his march to 1m subscribers came to a screeching halt, and he's somehow shocked. Again, wasn't the whole point of the MidWestly channel so he could cover political content without having it affect his main channel? Regardless of YouTube's intention, Jer knew covering politics on TQ was a risk but did so anyway numerous times. He was asking for it, and is only crying now because he's feeling the aftereffects.

Jeremy goes as far to say he will be surprised if he remains monetized going into 2021, and I wouldn't be surprised if YouTube does something in the coming months. While I'm all for free speech and YouTubers having the ability to share it within reason, I draw the line when it comes to monetization. It's well within YouTube's right to de-monetize anyone at any certain point because they aren't obligated to pay everyone. It's their platform and their money as far as I'm concerned. This is what scares the average Anti-SJW, and instead of finding alternative ways to make an income, they plan to hunker down and hope it blows over? Not likely.

1. You don't support free speech. Free Speech is freedom from consequences. If there are consequences for your speech than that's not free, there is a cost.
2. YouTube monetization is still BDS warfare. They are boycotting him. They are waging an economic war against him. If all your companies are punishing you for the same content then you're effectively a refugee in your own nation, a 2nd class citizen. Social justice is Jim Crow against whites.
3. "Build your own" A) Not always possible. B) Even if possible this creates parallel society. If you're not speaking or doing business with the other side, why even exist under the same government? YouTubes demonization leads to a civil war, political collapse. There are consequences for YouTube's censorship or demonization. So what you're saying doesn't result in a sustainable result.

 

[KillThemCrackasBabies]

Hey you know what would be fucking BASED?

Seven Figures Hambly should make videos and deliberately go out of his way to make them demonetized! Yeah, he's achieved big baller status already, right? What better way to demonstrate what a fucking alpha male badass he is than by making YouTube videos and being so fucking spicy, that he's willing to spill those harsh truths... for free!

 

[Taco]

1. You don't support free speech. Free Speech is freedom from consequences. If there are consequences for your speech than that's not free, there is a cost.
2. YouTube monetization is still BDS warfare. They are boycotting him. They are waging an economic war against him. If all your companies are punishing you for the same content then you're effectively a refugee in your own nation, a 2nd class citizen. Social justice is Jim Crow against whites.
3. "Build your own" A) Not always possible. B) Even if possible this creates parallel society. If you're not speaking or doing business with the other side, why even exist under the same government? YouTubes demonization leads to a civil war, political collapse. There are consequences for YouTube's censorship or demonization. So what you're saying doesn't result in a sustainable result.

What consequences does Hambly face? He's demonized on certain YouTube videos and sometimes sponsors stop giving him money. What do you expect to happen? The government to step in and say companies have to advertise on his videos even if they disagree?

Jim Crow for white people because some obese neckbeard can cry about his stupid identity politics and cartoon tiddies on YouTube but they won't pay him for it? wow you guys really did just turn into SJWs in reverse EVERYTHING IS RACIST AGAINST ME.

YouTube demonization leads to political collapse and civil war? Reminder this situation exists because companies saw their commercials popping up on videos about white genocide and were ready to pull out of YouTube entirely. I don't know where the fuck you got the idea not paying someone for their YouTube videos is violating their rights. No one is going to start a civil war because of YouTube demonizating videos, you guys really need to come off this tough guy 1776 LARP because it's fucking embarrassing when everyone knows you aren't going to do shit except cry on the fucking internet like a bunch of camo wearing SJWs.

 

[TheMadAutist]

1. You don't support free speech. Free Speech is freedom from consequences. If there are consequences for your speech than that's not free, there is a cost.
2. YouTube monetization is still BDS warfare. They are boycotting him. They are waging an economic war against him. If all your companies are punishing you for the same content then you're effectively a refugee in your own nation, a 2nd class citizen. Social justice is Jim Crow against whites.
3. "Build your own" A) Not always possible. B) Even if possible this creates parallel society. If you're not speaking or doing business with the other side, why even exist under the same government? YouTubes demonization leads to a civil war, political collapse. There are consequences for YouTube's censorship or demonization. So what you're saying doesn't result in a sustainable result.

Let me guess, you're not a fan of Pounder but he's not that bad of a guy right?

 

[BoxerShorts47]

What consequences does Hambly face? He's demonized on certain YouTube videos and sometimes sponsors stop giving him money. What do you expect to happen? The government to step in and say companies have to advertise on his videos even if they disagree?

Yes, this is called "Civil Rights." You don't have a right to refuse service to a black people they are black. YouTube doesn't have a right to refuse service to a conservative because they are conservative (or libertarian in this case). Even without Civil Rights (Minority Rule), YouTube could be regulated under the Interstate Commerce Act.

Jim Crow for white people because some obese neckbeard can cry about his stupid identity politics and cartoon tiddies on YouTube but they won't pay him for it? wow

Nice Marginalization.

you guys really did just turn into SJWs in reverse EVERYTHING IS RACIST AGAINST ME.

Yep. SJWs were right about many things, the only problem is their result was always anti white, anti male.

YouTube demonization leads to political collapse and civil war? Reminder this situation exists because companies saw their commercials popping up on videos about white genocide and were ready to pull out of YouTube entirely. I don't know where the fuck you got the idea not paying someone for their YouTube videos is violating their rights. No one is going to start a civil war because of YouTube demonizating videos, you guys really need to come off this tough guy 1776 LARP because it's fucking embarrassing when everyone knows you aren't going to do shit except cry on the fucking internet like a bunch of camo wearing SJWs.

YouTube demonetization is economic separation and that leads to political separation. If you cannot see this than you're a brainlet or midwit.

 

[GunnlaugurSassoon]

1. You don't support free speech. Free Speech is freedom from consequences. If there are consequences for your speech than that's not free, there is a cost.

Do you want the government to force businesses to continue to sponsor and have their name associated with people who they actively disagree with and no longer want to have them as a representative?

Does the consequence of plummeting views as a result of terrible content require the same freedom of consequence? If someone once was getting hundreds of thousands of views on a video and then begins to get tens of thousands when not outrage mongering as a result of being generally objectionable are companies now not allowed to deem someone not worth the cost of their advertising budget and thus choosing a channel which may yield higher reach?

Does being able to be a loathsome, insipid bore trump capitalism? Does The Quartering's freedom to say whatever he wants without consequence trump a free market?

Either way it doesn't really matter because your definition of freedom of speech is explicitly different from the USA's definition which specifies that freedom of speech only applies to government restrictions and not private restrictions.

Yes, this is called "Civil Rights." You don't have a right to refuse service to a black people they are black. YouTube doesn't have a right to refuse service to a conservative because they are conservative (or libertarian in this case). Even without Civil Rights (Minority Rule), YouTube could be regulated under the Interstate Commerce Act.

Luckily being a noxious slob who is in the process of making his 35th Bre Larson video isn't a protected class, nor is any other myriad of political leaning along the vast spectrum of political leanings, like being a tankie.