2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
spiritofamermaid said:
This made me curious to check my state's/county's election software. I found out that Dominion might also go by another name, Diebold. Read the part about the background.

Sorry for lack of archive, am filthy phoneposter.
Click to expand...

1605210541770.png

1605210555278.png


Why did you use the bit ly URL shortener?
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: wopirish, Parthenos, axfaxf and 31 others
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Autistic
Reactions: PESTPOOM, GenericReviewerDraco, Itu aru kamusu tugeza and 4 others
HTTP Error 404 said:
View attachment 1725178
theconservativetreehouse.com

IT Contractor for Dominion Ballot Counting Software Co. Exposes Massive Ballot Fraud in Detroit Michigan... - The Last Refuge

If what Ms. Mellissa Carone outlines is true, this would explain how the ballots in Michigan were manipulated. Ms. Carone was a contracted worker for Dominion a company providing software services for ballot counting machines in Detroit. Carone was sent … Continue reading →
theconservativetreehouse.com theconservativetreehouse.com
Click to expand...
You know.... this gives Dominion an out. If they can say "The poll workers did it themselves", and then just... release any data or describe how. They can neatly throw the left under the bus.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Parthenos, Livecorpse, Botchy Galoop and 7 others
NeroRisotto said:
Additionally, the campaign awaits action from the Supreme Court regarding whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court acted properly in granting the three-day extension for accepting mail-in ballots.
Click to expand...

Interesting. I've been saying what she did was flagrantly illegal for ages given she did it over the objection of the PA state legislature which has the constitutional power to decide election rules. I still thought they'd lose in the state courts, appeal and win in the SCOTUS though. Seems like the state courts are either legit or they know they'd just get overruled.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: JohnDoe and Puerto Pollo
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: KooksandFreaks, axfaxf, Shield Breaker and 4 others
NeroRisotto said:
Article (Archived)

Pennsylvania court: Secretary of state lacked authority to change deadline 2 days before Election Day

Judge ruled ballots that were previously set aside should not be counted

A Pennsylvania judge ruled in favor of the Trump campaign Thursday, ordering that the state may not count ballots where the voters needed to provide proof of identification and failed to do so by Nov. 9.

State law said that voters have until six days after the election — this year that was Nov. 9 — to cure problems regarding a lack of proof of identification. After the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that mail-in ballots could be accepted three days after Election Day, Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar submitted guidance that said proof of identification could be provided up until Nov. 12, which is six days from the ballot acceptance deadline. That guidance was issued two days before Election Day.

“[T]he Court concludes that Respondent Kathy Boockvar, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth, lacked statutory authority to issue the November 1, 2020, guidance to Respondents County Boards of Elections insofar as that guidance purported to change the deadline … for certain electors to verify proof of identification,” Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt said in a court order.

This was in line with the Trump campaign’s argument, which was that there was no basis in the state’s law to extend the identification deadline, and that Boockvar did not have the power to unilaterally change it.

The court had previously ordered that all ballots where voters provided proof of identification between Nov. 10 and 12 should be segregated until a ruling was issued determining what should be done with them.

On Thursday, Leavitt ruled that those ballots shall not be counted.

This is one of several legal challenges the Trump campaign is bringing in Pennsylvania. On Friday they are scheduled to have a hearing over thousands of ballots that they claim were improperly counted despite lacking required information.

Additionally, the campaign awaits action from the Supreme Court regarding whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court acted properly in granting the three-day extension for accepting mail-in ballots.

- End of Article -
Click to expand...
This is enormous, and one of the ones everybody called. It's just weird actually reading it.
CrippleThreat said:

@Gehenna, your stage points are correct so far. Let's see how many "key" RINOs the MSM pulls out to talk about Trump.
Click to expand...
The thumbnail is a classic use of a picture of a politician looking down for a second to imply he's sad because bad thing happened for him.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Parthenos, babadook, FriedPickles and 13 others
Gustav Schuchardt said:
Interesting. I've been saying what she did was flagrantly illegal for ages given she did it over the objection of the PA state legislature which has the constitutional power to decide election rules. I still thought they'd lose in the state courts, appeal and win in the SCOTUS though. Seems like the state courts are either legit or they know they'd just get overruled.
Click to expand...
The PA supreme court might still rule again, but they might also see the writing on the wall and simply uphold the lower court ruling. same for SCOTUS. It would be easier and less messy for them if they did.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: soy_king, spiritofamermaid and Cristobal’s Colon
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back