Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
For the sake of everyone here, please proof-read before you post.
Sorry, & Adding more context.

1605214383997.png
1605214410760.png
 

Attachments

  • 1605214410871.png
    1605214410871.png
    17.3 KB · Views: 70
So again, if there was fraud, why wouldn't they just fill out the Senate for the democrat?
That actually makes it significantly more believable that it was fraud, because it seems likely that the people opposing Trump would do something that stupid. The answer is the cronies and bureaucrats committing the fraud are retarded but haven't ever met any resistance.
 
Nigga, you can't wrap your peanut brain around the concept of a mask stopping virus particles from spreading around. Do you really think anybody believes that you and people like you (and I'm not talking about all Trump supporters by saying that) will just concede and say that the election was fair if all those investigations and lawsuits will amount to nothing?
Can't spread what you don't have.

This election turned out almost perfectly; I only wish Biden had won without a popular majority so that we could see even more people turn themselves inside out.

As it is, we've seen an unmasking of all the Trump Enslavement Sufferers who spent the last four years saying "how do, fellow trolls. Those liberals sure are fragile, aren't they? We all laugh together!"
Reaching.

My understanding of that stance switch: Masks were limited at the start of the pandemy, and the craze gave hospitals who needed them a shortage.

Once a supply was obtained, the directive to use masks to protect oneself and people around was pushed back into public eyes.

Anything else sounds like conspirationnal over exagerration.

I keep seeing this "it went from mask useless to mask mandatory", and that's just not what I remember seeing, and I refuse to be gaslighted by assertions without strong evidence.
Lol that is so incorrect that you couldn't be more incorrect if you tried. Do you think covid just grows by itself? You won't catch covid unless you're exposed, so the warm and moist environment doesn't do anything. I work with doctors and have relatives who are doctors and every one of them says to wear masks.

Cloth masks don't increase your risk at all. They decrease your risk, although they decrease your risk of infecting others by a lot more. They don't have to filter 100% of everything to help. They aren't 100%, obviously, but they do help. Masks, even shitty cloth ones, help slow the spread.
The flu isn't covid, dude. Covid is quite a bit more deadly and contagious. There's also no vaccine for it, like there is the flu. Nice false equivalency, though. Whatever helps you sleep at night because you throw a temper tantrum when asked to do something that isn't selfish
I get vaccinated against the flu. I follow CDC recommendations because, unlike you, I am not narcissistic and ignorant enough to think I know more about a disease than actual doctors and scientists.

If you wear a mask, why are you being such a tard and arguing anti-mask points?
1605212598098.png

Link

No one is mad about the recount. A recount in Georgia is completely justified, with it being such a slim margin.

We're just laughing at the Trumpers clinging to any hope of voting fraud, despite the lack of any evidence of it occurring, just because their cult leader said it was voting fraud because he lost
I'm of the mind that all races should be automatically recounted/revalidated with an entirely new staff that's randomly selected ala jury selection.

Let's see the evidence, then.

And by evidence, I don't mean shitty interpretations of graphs by retards on Twitter. I mean real, solid evidence.


Why isn't anyone contending the other seats, then? Why just the presidency? I don't see you tards saying that the senate wins are invalid. I didn't see you tards saying this shit in 2016, either.

Until there's actual evidence, you guys are looking like QAnoners
yeah because pre-snowden there was no evidence

present evidence
There has been a ton of evidence presented in this thread. Will all of it pan out? Probably not. Will all of it fall short of being proof? Probably not. Here's something new to the thread:
1605213004330.png
1605213016986.png
1605213025973.png
1605213032237.png
1605213043181.png

1605213065914.png
1605213072491.png
1605213076971.png

1605213099909.png
1605213400260.png
https://www.sos.texas.gov/elections/laws/oct2019-dominion.shtml (linked PDFs attached)
1605213161437.png
1605213179488.png
1605213185076.png

1605213209223.png
1605213214188.png
1605213223298.png
1605213234527.png

1605213253313.png
1605213262955.png
1605213269620.png
1605213274721.png
1605213281568.png

Thread / Archive
I live in a state that went 65% Trump and I see plenty of Biden stickers and Biden signs. I think you're full of shit.
I live in DC and I saw very few pro-Biden signs. I did see lots of anti-Trump signs and a non-zero amount of "literally anyone sane" signs.

If you're retarded enough to believe conspiracies that have no evidence behind them just because Daddy Trump said so, then I don't know what to tell you. Trump is the one claiming voter fraud, so it's up to him to prove it. So far, all but one of his lawsuits were laughed out of court.
You're conflating evidence with proof. Let's look at our definitions again, shall we?
brave_qgINCyvHzY.png
brave_cGnuDhfhfl.png


Evidence is the pre-ponderance suggestion that supports an allegation.
Proof is the post-ponderance establishing that the evidence does indeed support the allegation.

Words mean things.
I am totally fine with recounts in close states. I was fine with it 2016 and am fine with it now. However, there's no denying that Trump and his cult are acting like whiny bitches over this whole thing and won't accept defeat. Amazing how they don't seem to think Republicans won senate seats by fraud in the same election
To turn your own statements back on you: if you're claiming the Republicans won Senate seats by fraud then please present evidence.

done everything he can to shift responsibility for the pandemic onto state leaders
With a non-violent issue inside the United States, that is literally the correct response. The President should defer to state rights at all times except when the states become unable to govern themselves (or have armed inter-state conflict).

Well I guess we better audit all these elections now shouldn't we? Or is it that only bad when it's claimed that the Democrats run the fraud machine?
Yes. Automatically audit all elections.
 

Attachments

bad news
[ICE's Twitter is purportedly kill]
wat.png

Its loading just fine for me. Maybe some maintenance shit or something?

Still a bunch of media's picked up on it, so, uh, fuck if I know.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Uncle Ted's Cabin
That actually makes it significantly more believable that it was fraud, because it seems likely that the people opposing Trump would do something that stupid. The answer is the cronies and bureaucrats committing the fraud are retarded but haven't ever met any resistance.
Given that the conspirators are retarded, do you think it's likely that they'll have left proof of this fraud that the courts will recognize?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Buster O'Keefe
I really think we should pause for a moment and wait, now that trump has endorsed the accusations of software fraud. That claim should be easy to prove/rebuke. Just hand count the votes. Regardless of the alleged more primitive forms of fraud, if the software fraud is true, a hand count should show discrepancy. If the software fraud is true then he flips multiple states. If it's not then he's lost enough credibility on the issue that I don't see any of his other fraud claims going through the legal system regardless of their truthfulness.
 
So this plan was dreamed up and executed during the election itself? That is, that it wasn't planned ahead of time?
Maybe they didn't want it to be too obvious by having a blow out and in turn they underestimated what they needed?

Maybe they put the plan together at the last second when it seemed obvious Trump was going to take it because they relied on faulty polling numbers?

Hell if I know. Not like I can effect anything, I just shitpost on a new Zealand farming enthusiast board.
 
Given that the conspirators are retarded, do you think it's likely that they'll have left proof of this fraud that the courts will recognize?
It depends on what you mean by recognize, whether it's acknowledgement or action. I think their main strategy is hoping that the courts will decide they don't want to "alter" the election, regardless of what's found.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomme Poire Peche
I really think we should pause for a moment and wait, now that trump has endorsed the accusations of software fraud. That claim should be easy to prove/rebuke. Just hand count the votes. Regardless of the alleged more primitive forms of fraud, if the software fraud is true, a hand count should show discrepancy. If the software fraud is true then he flips multiple states. If it's not then he's lost enough credibility on the issue that I don't see any of his other fraud claims going through the legal system regardless of their truthfulness.
Has he actually endorsed the accusations of software fraud or has he just claimed votes have been switched or deleted? Software bugs and glitches are a possibility.
 
There should have been an extra poll option to reflect our expectation of the true winner of this election: Mitch McConnell, the man who is effectively the President until at least 2022.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nekoi.Inukuma.00
keep larping Antifa :story: :story:
1605216041826.png

1605216091714.png

1605216130956.png

1605216130790.png

1605216245446.png
 

Attachments

  • 1605216066720.png
    1605216066720.png
    457.9 KB · Views: 66
  • 1605216091540.png
    1605216091540.png
    422.9 KB · Views: 74
Can't spread what you don't have.


Reaching.





View attachment 1725247
Link


I'm of the mind that all races should be automatically recounted/revalidated with an entirely new staff that's randomly selected ala jury selection.



There has been a ton of evidence presented in this thread. Will all of it pan out? Probably not. Will all of it fall short of being proof? Probably not. Here's something new to the thread:
View attachment 1725257View attachment 1725259View attachment 1725260View attachment 1725261View attachment 1725262
View attachment 1725264View attachment 1725265View attachment 1725266
View attachment 1725267 View attachment 1725284https://www.sos.texas.gov/elections/laws/oct2019-dominion.shtml (linked PDFs attached)
View attachment 1725269View attachment 1725270View attachment 1725271
View attachment 1725274View attachment 1725275View attachment 1725276View attachment 1725277
View attachment 1725278View attachment 1725279View attachment 1725280View attachment 1725281View attachment 1725282
Thread / Archive

I live in DC and I saw very few pro-Biden signs. I did see lots of anti-Trump signs and a non-zero amount of "literally anyone sane" signs.


You're conflating evidence with proof. Let's look at our definitions again, shall we?
View attachment 1725306View attachment 1725307

Evidence is the pre-ponderance suggestion that supports an allegation.
Proof is the post-ponderance establishing that the evidence does indeed support the allegation.

Words mean things.

To turn your own statements back on you: if you're claiming the Republicans won Senate seats by fraud then please present evidence.


With a non-violent issue inside the United States, that is literally the correct response. The President should defer to state rights at all times except when the states become unable to govern themselves (or have armed inter-state conflict).


Yes. Automatically audit all elections.
I am not reading all that shit, but that tweet was from Feb 29, you retard. Recommendations change over time as we learn more about the disease, even a tard like you should know this
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back