Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jesus, imagine actually blocking/ignoring someone in 2020 and then trying to claim that you're not butthurt as hell lmao. That's some thin-skinned tranny stuff.


It won't be over until 2024 for these people.
I may be an autist posting on Kiwi Farms, but I've never blocked anyone lol
 
Strictly speaking, I wouldn't say Bigfoot or Loch Ness are conspiracies, they are myths, like all monster stories.
Conspiracy theories adhere more to the principle of the original word conspiracy - that is to say they are theories of nefarious undertakings by an individual or group which are illegal or harmful to others/society.
Werewolves, witches, bigfoot, mothman etc are myths, stories about creatures or supernatural occurrences that defy normal explanation.
UFOs are technically both myth and conspiracy because there are stories of alien "monsters" without proof but there is also a level of conspiracy in that the US government hid away knowledge of them for decades before finally declassifying what they knew in recent years.

But back to the topic. You say there's zero evidence in this case - Why would you expect conclusive evidence when the actual investigating hasn't even begun? No, there is not, at this point, conclusive evidence enough to say that there was widespread fraud to swing the election. There is however enough evidence that some shit could have went wrong to merit doing an investigation to see if there is any conclusive evidence to be found. And it will probably all amount to nothing, but at least it would be done.
Conspiracy is one of those words that now in new speak has a different meaning. Like good zombie jew slaves our brains are supposed to shut off whenever we hear that word otherwise we are nutcases. Anything that goes against globo homo is a conspiracy (newspeak meaning) after all as they are the arbiters of the "truth" nowadays
 
Jesus, imagine actually blocking/ignoring someone in 2020 and then trying to claim that you're not butthurt as hell lmao. That's some thin-skinned tranny stuff.
Never mind butthurt, it's clearly a waste of time to approach HHH expecting anything but mendacity. This is after @It's HK-47 vouched for him having been a thoughtful person at some point and just being turned into a spitemonger by alt-right weens. Bullshit.
I'll be legit surprised if it turns around in Donald's favor. Like the asspull required to overcome the asspull democrats did these last four years will be phenominal.
It most likely won't. If we're operating off the assumption that the Dems have been putting pieces in place since 2016 it would be profoundly silly to assume they haven't put contingencies in place to try and assure that Trump's efforts would bear no fruit. Then again, maybe someone somewhere on Trump's team knows something we don't.
 
I wouldn't say so but the odds shrink because now he not only needs to reverse PA but also both Michigan and Georgia, both of which seem unlikely. Unless the court cases in Arizona look anything as good as those in PA, which would mean he'd still need two of those. They're still possible though.
He's down like 11k votes in AZ. I'd say it's unlikely there was that much voter fraud that it flips for him even if the court case is a slam dunk
 
Same, even if someone is a cunt or has a massively different set of morals and ideals than me, I won't block people.
Never know when they may say something poignant, or you may share an interest elsewhere.
Lot of fish in this sea. I'm not losing anything I'd actually miss.
 
Conspiracy is one of those words that now in new speak has a different meaning. Like good zombie jew slaves our brains are supposed to shut off whenever we hear that word otherwise we are nutcases. Anything that goes against globo homo is a conspiracy (newspeak meaning) after all as they are the arbiters of the "truth" nowadays

It drives me crazy because of the amount of "conspiracy theories" that have been proven right in hindsight. But because it's never fully reported they remain ignorant of it and think a conspiracy theory is something outlandish like flat earth, rather then real stuff like project mockingbird and mkultra.
 
It drives me crazy because of the amount of "conspiracy theories" that have been proven right in hindsight. But because it's never fully reported they remain ignorant of it and think a conspiracy theory is something outlandish like flat earth, rather then real stuff like project mockingbird and mkultra.
It's a conspiracy theory right up until something happens that takes it out of the realm of mere theory and conjecture and then it's suddenly very uninteresting to the people who accused others of being conspiracy theorists.
 
Conspiracy is one of those words that now in new speak has a different meaning. Like good zombie jew slaves our brains are supposed to shut off whenever we hear that word otherwise we are nutcases. Anything that goes against globo homo is a conspiracy (newspeak meaning) after all as they are the arbiters of the "truth" nowadays
the word “conspiracy” has reached the point where it delegitimizes anything you attach it to. it’s an easy way of censoring anything and dismissing it.
 
All this arguing is pointless, anyway. We all know, deep down, what's gonna happen. You can deny it all you want, but it's coming

1605287362073.png
 
Fucked.PNG

So is Trump going to get on that business of overturning this result?

the word “conspiracy” has reached the point where it delegitimizes anything you attach it to. it’s an easy way of censoring anything and dismissing it.
Conspiracy.PNG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: kūhaku



So yeah, despite what Dear Leader says, his lawyers don't agree when questioned under oath.
They're playing around with the term "widespread". Look at any mainstream coverage or argument about this, they shove the term "widespread" in. You can have many instances that appear to be voter fraud without it being "widespread". Actually, how would you even define "widespread"? It's an intentionally vague terminology being used so they can disregard any affirmative answer by responding "it's not widespread enough to be actually widespread". It's the "sources familiar with his thinking" of this news cycle.

Like with your inability to understand the term "evidence", your inability to execute a middle school level of reading comprehension and critical thought leaves me laughing in my seat. Man, you really are assblasted that the mean old orange man hasn't conceded to Sniffy Joe aren't you?
 
They're playing around with the term "widespread". Look at any mainstream coverage or argument about this, they shove the term "widespread" in. You can have many instances that appear to be voter fraud without it being "widespread". Actually, how would you even define "widespread"? It's an intentionally vague terminology being used so they can disregard any affirmative answer by responding "it's not widespread enough to be actually widespread". It's the "sources familiar with his thinking" of this news cycle.

Like with your inability to understand the term "evidence", your inability to execute a middle school level of reading comprehension and critical thought leaves me laughing in my seat. Man, you really are assblasted that the mean old orange man hasn't conceded to Sniffy Joe aren't you?
So why didn't they produce this "evidence" when under oath, then? The only reason would be because they know that they'd get in deep shit from the BAR association for bullshitting.
 
Actual info is hard to find. It's been a shit storm of misinformation and crap. Everyone is clinging to their ideology rather than the what is real.
Rekieta covering the legal docs
Never though I'd say this but Crowder has a pretty even handed take on everything going on and is doing a daily morning show
Ryan Dawson has been good at sorting out made up shit from fake shit
 
So why didn't they produce this "evidence" when under oath, then? The only reason would be because they know that they'd get in deep shit from the BAR association for bullshitting.
I don't have a WSJ account so I can't read that article and see if they're doing the modern journo thing of having a headline that is contradicted in the text. But if they're being asked to support Trump's claim about it being "widespread", the lawyers have to be autistically accurate about what they can and can't say. Like I stated above, if the contention is over the "widespreadness" of it then that's just a red herring for the defense and not really the point.
 
I wouldn't say so but the odds shrink because now he not only needs to reverse PA but also both Michigan and Georgia, both of which seem unlikely. Unless the court cases in Arizona look anything as good as those in PA, which would mean he'd still need two of those. They're still possible though.
If there is any strategy at all now I'm guessing it's to create enough chaos and doubt to give cover for faithless electors.
 
So since this the sperg threat about elections I gotta ask.

How would lolcows compete with current clown world?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back