2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
What's really funny is they meant it as a parody / attack on the Right. "Look at how you stupid fucks can be manipulated by propaganda, not like us noble communistorinoos who love facts and logic as long as it doesn't affect our feelings!"

Except it's really catchy (even the non choir version), as are basically all the "bad guy" songs on the album.

It's like Benjamin Franklin's ode to the rattlesnake as a symbol of America

http://www.greatseal.com/symbols/rattlesnake.html

I observed on one of the drums belonging to the marines now raising, there was painted a Rattle-Snake, with this modest motto under it, "Don't tread on me." As I know it is the custom to have some device on the arms of every country, I supposed this may have been intended for the arms of America; and as I have nothing to do with public affairs, and as my time is perfectly my own, in order to divert an idle hour, I sat down to guess what could have been intended by this uncommon device – I took care, however, to consult on this occasion a person who is acquainted with heraldry, from whom I learned, that it is a rule among the learned of that science "That the worthy properties of the animal, in the crest-born, shall be considered," and, "That the base ones cannot have been intended;" he likewise informed me that the ancients considered the serpent as an emblem of wisdom, and in a certain attitude of endless duration – both which circumstances I suppose may have been had in view. Having gained this intelligence, and recollecting that countries are sometimes represented by animals peculiar to them, it occurred to me that the Rattle-Snake is found in no other quarter of the world besides America, and may therefore have been chosen, on that account, to represent her.

But then "the worldly properties" of a Snake I judged would be hard to point out. This rather raised than suppressed my curiosity, and having frequently seen the Rattle-Snake, I ran over in my mind every property by which she was distinguished, not only from other animals, but from those of the same genus or class of animals, endeavoring to fix some meaning to each, not wholly inconsistent with common sense.

I recollected that her eye excelled in brightness, that of any other animal, and that she has no eye-lids. She may therefore be esteemed an emblem of vigilance. She never begins an attack, nor, when once engaged, ever surrenders: She is therefore an emblem of magnanimity and true courage. As if anxious to prevent all pretensions of quarreling with her, the weapons with which nature has furnished her, she conceals in the roof of her mouth, so that, to those who are unacquainted with her, she appears to be a most defenseless animal; and even when those weapons are shown and extended for her defense, they appear weak and contemptible; but their wounds however small, are decisive and fatal. Conscious of this, she never wounds 'till she has generously given notice, even to her enemy, and cautioned him against the danger of treading on her.

Was I wrong, Sir, in thinking this a strong picture of the temper and conduct of America? The poison of her teeth is the necessary means of digesting her food, and at the same time is certain destruction to her enemies. This may be understood to intimate that those things which are destructive to our enemies, may be to us not only harmless, but absolutely necessary to our existence. I confess I was wholly at a loss what to make of the rattles, 'till I went back and counted them and found them just thirteen, exactly the number of the Colonies united in America; and I recollected too that this was the only part of the Snake which increased in numbers. Perhaps it might be only fancy, but, I conceited the painter had shown a half formed additional rattle, which, I suppose, may have been intended to represent the province of Canada.

'Tis curious and amazing to observe how distinct and independent of each other the rattles of this animal are, and yet how firmly they are united together, so as never to be separated but by breaking them to pieces. One of those rattles singly, is incapable of producing sound, but the ringing of thirteen together, is sufficient to alarm the boldest man living.

The Rattle-Snake is solitary, and associates with her kind only when it is necessary for their preservation. In winter, the warmth of a number together will preserve their lives, while singly, they would probably perish. The power of fascination attributed to her, by a generous construction, may be understood to mean, that those who consider the liberty and blessings which America affords, and once come over to her, never afterwards leave her, but spend their lives with her. She strongly resembles America in this, that she is beautiful in youth and her beauty increaseth with her age, "her tongue also is blue and forked as the lightning, and her abode is among impenetrable rocks."

There's something incredibly based about this.
 
I just had a chat with an old friend of mine about this situation. And while he's not pozzed I just realized he didn't make the ties to electoral fraud until I made the comparisons to the borbon restoration, point at which he just lost his shit about as hard as I've done on this very thread some pages back. And that's made me realice one thing.

The Bourbon Restoration, the political system it operated under, and the socioeconomic and political consequences it had for the nation should really be taught in school as basic education EVERYWHERE during the last year of mandatory schooling.

And I'm not exaggerating here when I say EVERYWHERE. Even on countries with literally 0 ties to Spain, even to people who wouldn't even be able to point at the Iberian Peninsula on a fucking map. EVERY. SINGLE. DUNCE on this blue ball of mysery floating in space should know what they did, how and what consequences it had.

Because it's the best example we'll ever get of how Democracy can collapse under its own weight if corruption isn't shed. And I mean, thinking about it, the comparisons likely aren't coincidence. Those motherfuckers literally wrote the damned instruction manual on electoral fraud. Because they were under such scrutiny thanks to the rise of liberal notions like freedom of speech and press, and they had to rig not just general but regional elections too for 16 whole damned years, those fuckers slowly but surely implemented and depleted every single fucking way an election can be rigged and showcased it to the whole damned world. That's why Biden's doing the same shit, there's just no way to rig this shit they didn't pull.

Even the blasted machines. You might say, how the fuck would someone that lived before computers ever existed use machines to rig an election? Well they didn't use machines, but they did hire the figure of the "Gran Elector" whose supposed job was to ensure the counting had been done correctly but whose actual job was to add and substract just enough votes from each pot to make sure their desired result happened on every single circumscription with the least amount of downright fuckery going at that level, a process known as "Encasillamiento", which is the same fucking bullshit Dominion's pulled except using pen and paper instead of an algorithm.

This is basically required knowledge for democracies to have. It's like the 2nd ammendment of voting. It's not about individual rights, but the requirement a nation has to have a healthy portion of the population armed with these tools so they can serve to protect the herd. That's why it needs to be taught. Everyone, and I mean everyone needs to understand firmly how they did this, why, and what it caused. So when something like this happens again they know what they're looking at.
Oh no, there was voter fraud to put a ceremonial figure back on the throne, what a fucking horror! You should be more concerned when someone with an actual chance to fuck shit up gets elected, like Zapatero or Rajoy.
 

'This video proves Donald Trump won 2020 Presidential Election'​

Computer scientist: 'Donald Trump won 2020 US Presidential election using voting transactional data. It's 100% provable and verified.'
Tags: Voter Fraud Trending 2020 USA Elections


Arutz Sheva Staff , Nov 15 , 2020 2:37 PM




Computer scientist and entrepreneur Sarah Westall says she can prove that "Donald Trump won the 2020 United States Presidential election using voting transactional data. It's 100% provable and verified.
"If you add in other forms of fraud including, but not limited to, mail-in ballot fraud, dead voters, non citizens voting, thrown out ballots, and other software fraud, Donald Trump won in an absolute landslide.
"Anything short of a complete audit of the entire United States election process is a fraud on the American people.

"A complete audit of the entire election process will not only highlight that Donald Trump won the Presidential election, but that other seats in the congress and senate were stolen as well.
"The American people deserve a fair and honest election."

President's National Security Education Board Member Sebastian Gorka says in a phone call last week he discusses Dominion election software with U.S. President Donald Trump, and read a letter penned by two Michigan State Senators demanding a recount.


Meanwhile, President Trump tweeted about the software, writing: "People are not going to stand for having this Election stolen from them by a privately owned Radical Left company, Dominion, and many other reasons!"


The election software he references was explained by cyber-security consultant Phillip Legard: "HAMR (The Hammer) was developed by the CIA under John Brennan. It was designed to allow US intelligence to manipulate the outcome of foreign elections using a number of covert electronic hacks such as Scorecard. Scorecard is a means of storing election results and it uses integers rather than whole numbers. The number 1.2 for instance will be rounded down to 1.0, whereas 1.7 will be rounded up to 2.0. The number 1.1 will also be rounded down to 1.0 and 1.6 will be rounded up to 2.0. From this simple example, it’s easy to see how totals can be skimmed and manipulated behind the scenes, and moved between candidates.


"The Hammer and Scorecard were later privatized. Dominion Systems, who are responsible for collecting the election results in all the swing States (and beyond) were one of the recipients of the privatized technology.


"How does Dominion work? Well, the basic design is pretty straightforward. There are data input terminals at the election sites. These feed into a number of ‘aggregator’ servers, which then feed up into a central database. To be secure, all of this infrastructure must be on its own, unique network.


"Except it isn’t. The Dominion systems are widely connected to the internet, allegedly for admin purposes. This is a major red flag.


"Secondly, the aggregator servers are all black box solutions. The code is proprietary and not subject to peer review. Another massive red flag. The code on the voting terminals has been shown to be shoddy and easily hackable. Many of the suggested fixes from previous elections have yet to be implemented. This is a third red flag.


"Now add the cozy relationship that exists between Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton and the Dominion Systems execs and you can see how there might be a bit of a problem."



"There was a massive data dump on Dominion on the dark web last night, and the nerds are still picking through it. Cursory analysis suggests that the aggregator servers are able to be accessed and the data they contain manipulated in real-time. However, because Trump was able to muster his voting base in huge numbers, the initial algorithms that were deployed were not up to the job. There were too many Republican votes. They couldn’t be switched without it being obvious. That’s why we saw voting pause in the middle of night. A new set of code had to be dumped ASAP to the aggregator servers, or Trump was going to win. The numbers were still too big though and what was done is glaringly obvious to anyone who’s a forensic investigator (see my posts from yesterday). It also looks like CNN and others were granted access to the aggregator servers in real-time, so they were seeing the raw voter figures before they were manipulated and before the election officials saw them. This is serious stuff, because it means that the MSM knowingly lied about the election results. They were in on the theft as it happened. System access across the board was disguised using PornHub accounts and betting shop accounts Hundreds were created. Twice during CNN’s live updates, a PornHub tab was accidentally shown. This is why."


He continues: "Electronic rigging is just one part of a bigger puzzle. There was also massive fraud with printed ballots. A lot of this has already been picked up by the State auditors. For instance, if you need to add 120,000 votes for Biden, you also need to change the number of registered voters. Compare and contrast spreadsheets that were logged at the end of each day, and when the registered voters total changes day on day, fraud is taking place.


"At the moment, Biden is not the President-elect. This is media fiction. The fraud as described is still a crime in progress. It’s only when Biden declares himself the winner that a crime has taken place. I have no idea of the timescales involved, but I am confident that just as the Dems had 4 years to plan stealing an election so Trump had 4 years to plan how to defend against a stolen election. If he’d stopped the crime in progress and allowed himself to win the election, it would all happen again. By moving in once the election has been stolen, with cast-iron proof, he can shut the whole damn enterprise down once and for all."



"I think that what we saw on election night was a carefully crafted set of vote manipulation algorithms get blown out of the water by the sheer volume of votes for Trump," Legard continues. "Whatever values were set initially were based on the polls, which as we know favored Biden and were plain wrong. The vote-riggers panicked. They had to take the Aggregation Servers down for a few hours to deploy ‘software updates’ (i.e. modified manipulation algos) whilst at the same time searching behind the sofa for extra votes for Biden. All of these fixes to the vote rig were applied at speed and under pressure. They’ve since caught the attention of the forensics guys."

 
I see you guys are still clinging to the "voting fraud" coping mechanism. It's not healthy, guys. Just accept it. Your guy lost.

There is actual evidence of it though, and people still support Trump and half of the friggin country will believe Biden is illegitimate (same for Trump too if he can get SCOTUS to rule in his favor, if he had good evidence to prove the voter fraud) if he's sworn in. Shit's fucked for Biden either way.
 
It's hilarious seeing the cope here with people moralfagging, without proof, about how the election has been stolen(because launching 14 failed, frivolous lawsuits isn't trying to steal anything), crying about the far left(because Trump never appealed to the far right), schizophrenically bringing up Hillary and doing everything to shift the blame away from why the Trump 2020 campaign was a total dud in the water. Aren't you the same people who go "muh senile Grandpa" over and over, yet that senile Grandpa just busted your head in effortlessly without needing to properly campaign. This is what you call "populism"? What a joke :story:
 
Predictit still has the election open, ez money for you to bet on Biden
When under oath, Trump's lawyers themselves admitted that there's no evidence of voting fraud. Lying to a judge under oath would get them cucked by the BAR and they'd be in deep shit, so they couldn't lie. Trump can screech and lie on Twitter all he wants without consequence (besides you tards believing everything Daddy says), but a lawyer under oath lying to a judge gets in deep legal shit.
 
Oh no, there was voter fraud to put a ceremonial figure back on the throne, what a fucking horror! You should be more concerned when someone with an actual chance to fuck shit up gets elected, like Zapatero or Rajoy.

*Facepalm*

The vote was to place Sagasta as the president not to place the king on the throne, the king had already been set in place by the army. And the Turnismo (Uniparty) of Cánovas and Sagasta were orders of magnitude worse than Rajoi, who himself was way worse than Zapatero. (Zapatero was an idiot but he didn't do much of nothing... That's precisely the issue with him. He didn't do much of nothing when Spain was facing the burst of Aznar's bubble. Fucking retard.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: the fall of man
When under oath, Trump's lawyers themselves admitted that there's no evidence of voting fraud. Lying to a judge under oath would get them cucked by the BAR and they'd be in deep shit, so they couldn't lie. Trump can screech and lie on Twitter all he wants without consequence (besides you tards believing everything Daddy says), but a lawyer under oath lying to a judge gets in deep legal shit.

Sounds like free money to me
 
It's hilarious seeing the cope here with people moralfagging, without proof, about how the election has been stolen(because launching 14 failed, frivolous lawsuits isn't trying to steal anything), crying about the far left(because Trump never appealed to the far right), schizophrenically bringing up Hillary and doing everything to shift the blame away from why the Trump 2020 campaign was a total dud in the water. Aren't you the same people who go "muh senile Grandpa" over and over, yet that senile Grandpa just busted your head in effortlessly without needing to properly campaign. This is what you call "populism"? What a joke :story:
View attachment 1730636

Anyone with a brain can see the numerical discrepancies and cases of fraud being brought to light, king of bait. I trust a dumbass Qtard more than I do the legacy media, at this point.
 
Last edited:
*Facepalm*

The vote was to place Sagasta as the president not to place the king on the throne, the king had already been set in place by the army. And the Turnismo (Uniparty) of Cánovas and Sagasta were orders of magnitude worse than Rajoi, who himself was way worse than Zapatero. (Zapatero was an idiot but he didn't do much of nothing... That's precisely the issue with him. He didn't do much of nothing when Spain was facing the burst of Aznar's bubble. Fucking retard.)
I apologize, it's very hard to go through your massive text walls, especially when they're only tangentially related to the thread topic. Also, why are you so autistically focused on something that happened 150 years ago, as if the rest of Spanish history isn't more relevant to what's going on in your country today? That would be like me crowing on about how the Kansas-Nebraska Act is the reason for the current mess: it may have had some effect, but the more immediate causes happened somewhat more recently
 
When under oath, Trump's lawyers themselves admitted that there's no evidence of voting fraud
You're rather disingenuous.

Their legal strategy doesn't hinge on proving that specifically fraud happened, but that a systemic and severe mishandling of ballots took place. The difference between the two is it's in the former that intent has to be proven, but it doesn't matter if fraud was committed or there was a lot of stupidity that took place if it throws the electoral process of a state into disrepute.

Under oath, Trump's lawyers said as much.
 
There is actual evidence of it though, and people still support Trump and half of the friggin country will believe Biden is illegitimate (same for Trump too if he can get SCOTUS to rule in his favor, if he had good evidence to prove the voter fraud) if he's sworn in. Shit's fucked for Biden either way.
That's funny. Trump's lawyers, when under oath, said there was no evidence.

You're rather disingenuous.

Their legal strategy doesn't hinge on proving that specifically fraud happened, but that a systemic and severe mishandling of ballots took place. The difference between the two is it's in the former that intent has to be proven, but it doesn't matter if fraud was committed or there was a lot of stupidity that took place if it throws the electoral process of a state into disrepute.

Under oath, Trump's lawyers said as much.
Your logic makes no sense. They have no evidence that there's fraud, yet you tards are still claiming there is. Cope harder, though. It's fucking hilarious to anyone who isn't in the cult
 
Your logic makes no sense. They have no evidence that there's fraud, yet you tards are still claiming there is.
Legally, it's easier to make an argument of negligence than an argument of malice. That, and many here assert that there may not have been fraud, but the audits need to be performed in order to make sure.
 
That's funny. Trump's lawyers, when under oath, said there was no evidence.


Your logic makes no sense. They have no evidence that there's fraud, yet you tards are still claiming there is. Cope harder, though. It's fucking hilarious to anyone who isn't in the cult
Alleging the Mishandling of ballots isnt the same as alleging fraud. Now who's sounding like they're coping too hard?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back