And yet if Trump managed to pull this off somehow and retains the presidency for another four years you--specifically you--will be talking about how he had a conspiracy to steal the election. If that happens then quote my post right here and call me a ninny if you don't do that. Prove me wrong.
You and everyone like you who see what's right in front of your face but continue to roll your eyes in the back of your head so you don't have to see it. There's a word for that.
In the first place, if a national conspiracy
(literally "two or more people conspire together to commit an act") is "QAnon tier lunacy" then what do you call the obvious mass collusion of mainstream media and tech oligarchs (Google, Twitter, Face Book especially) to force the idea of Biden's victory (even touting the "Associated Press" as having "called" the election for Biden, as if the AP matters at all in an election, and supporting the fictional "office of the president elect" while Biden's campaign openly starts listing people he wants to elect to major government positions, specifically certain people from Silicon Valley).
Second, there's entire threads even on this site dedicated to collecting evidence of the massive voter fraud that's visible to your own eyes in the initial graphs, and we've got delightful super-autists analyzing that data like madmen. Not good enough? Fine, then let's talk about the
Dominion system,
the multiple "glitches" which switched votes by the thousands seemingly from Trump to Biden,
the seemingly endless influx of ballots written by fake/dead names,
the investigation into back-dated ballots,
the shadiness of the incestuous nature of the DNC with the press,
how there are literally pro-Biden organization(s) harassing lawyers for Trump into dropping out (look it up),
all that sketchy business regarding the Global Business Coalition's (founder George Soros) involvement of
Scytl software in elections and
Smartmatic which is worth looking into, especially when Dominion's official website lists this:
View attachment 1733706
But you don't look into anything. You don't research anything. You barely even think for yourself. We both begin this subject from opposing viewpoints, yes, and so we will view evidences and connections differently when we have our own vested interest in certain outcomes yet you don't do anything--and I mean actual research not reposting a news article from Newsweek or Snopes and saying "Done!".
You just sit back as others do all the work and don't even look into it for yourself. You're not even like that math autist Kiwi who spent a fat post detailing why some claim about Benford's Law or whatever didn't prove Biden stole anything. That post was great.
All you do is parrot the same hand-waving sentiment that's been used time and again to cleanse the brain of all challenging information:
People said "There's no vested interest in putting left-leaning politics in videogames! That's crazy!"
People said "There's no evidence that some silly spirals means "pedophile" or that some little random pizza joint has an odd fixation with children and has connections to politicians! That's crazy!"
People said "There's no evidence that BLM is affiliated financially with the DNC! That's crazy!"
People said "There's no evidence to suggest anything bad or society altering about 5G or that China is helming 5G for geopolitical ends! That's crazy!"
People said "There's no evidence Covid-19 was man made in China! That's crazy!"
People said "There's no evidence Biden as VP was ever involved in political action as favors for foreign powers for financial compensation! That's crazy!"
And if Biden himself said tomorrow that they stole the election you'd not believe it and just chalk it up to him "joking" or being senile.
You react and speak as if you're trained to certain stimuli when you just leap to claims of "no evidence" and "this is crazy".
You react like you are demoralized:
