World Economic Forum Megathread (The Great Reset)

I see this creeping in and it has been for a while. You don’t own all those kindle books and when you die they disappear. Ditto all those iTunes downloads. The move towards subscription based stuff has been going on for a while. It also allows control of the media - books can be edited and films cut to please.
I’m now seeing it in adverts - there’s one for a car rental thing that pops up a lot. But if you have a car it’s because you need one, and the whole point of owning one is you control it’s use, service etc.
The move to rental only and communist type shit in general is antithetical to base human instincts. People have been making stuff, hunting stuff, and bartering that stuff for other stuff since time began. Even other animals like chimps and crows learn about how to use objects and take those skills back to their home groups (dolphins have been seen holding sponges in their beaks to avoid sharp pointy bits of prey when they rough up the seabed looking for food.) The instance to acquire things, whether thats ideas or tools or goods, is so deeply wired into us it’s pre human. To remove the human behaviour of ‘the village market’ is going to need such a huge shift in human society that I can’t see how it can be done.

The lever has been immigration and the hollowing out of the middle class. It’s created a generation of people who have no chance of owning a home, and so they are bitter about that. They can have shiny throwaway consumer goods but they’re up to their eyeballs in student and other debt and trained to buy new every year.

anyway you don’t even need nanochips etc. The point isn’t the vaccine it’s the infrastructure and social conditioning around it.
1. Mass acceptance of something not needed.
2. Internal social control (your peers pressuring you)
3. External social control (need proof of vaccination to travel etc.)
4. The infrastructure of tracking around all this.
5. Profit. The money involved is staggering, and more than enough to bribe or influence anyone with doubts.

the cars are the same. The idea is to reduce private ownership, and private ownership is freedom. If everyone has a car that’s tracked everywhere you can stop them going where you don’t want. And what’s the lever for getting that through government? Money. Petrol duty in the uk brings in tens of billions a year. So they’ve said ‘look now, you’ve a forty billion quid hole in the budget, but I have a solution for you...’ and government happily buys it.
Remember when you could go to news websites, and they actually gave you the goddamn news? It was amazing. Free news! Remember when you could just, y'know, buy Adobe software? Remember when video games were about skill, and not paying for freemium bullshit? Everyone these days wants a subscription or microtransaction ass-pat. They want to suck you dry forever. It's disgusting.

Renting everything means no dynastic wealth. It means you have no expectation of purchasing things and passing them on to your children. In fact, their goal is to atomize and break up the nuclear family as much as possible, clearly. Of course, none of this shit is actually good for the environment. What's best for the environment is for people to buy things and not have to replace them constantly, or hardly ever. Renting implies that things are disposable and replaceable. The planned obsolescence will be built right in. Revenue streams will be guaranteed, and the global Ponzi scheme that is our economy will thrive.

The question is, who the hell would we be paying for the privilege to live and consoom? Who profits, and what do they do with those profits?

People with mansions and private yachts aren't going to give up their luxuries. They want renting for you, and dynastic wealth for them. Different rules for different sets of people. A caste system. Indeed, it looks like they are pulling up the ladder, so to speak.

Why are leftists presently fighting in the streets for the "privilege" of becoming corporate slaves?






I tried telling people. NGOs and think tanks, unelected bureaucrats, the wealthy, and alphabet agencies form an ecosystem of power that is totally separate from democracy and the desires of the public. They use Manufactured Consent to get their way. They control the media. They control our educational systems. They control what people are allowed to think. They create crises out of nothing, and then, they offer unthinkable solutions.
 
One thing that confuses me is: Why bother making a video about this and then make it public for everyone to see? Either they thought this was going to be received in positive light to the audience of (mostly) middle class people with access to any type of internet connection or they are just mocking people by just telling all of us "you will live in a pod and you will like it".

The only person that would consider this in a slighty positive note would be dirt poor motherfuckers (who certainly don't have internet connections) that see this as an improvement for their lives or wealthy people detached from reality.
 
One thing that confuses me is: Why bother making a video about this and then make it public for everyone to see?
They've convinced themselves that everyone worth listening to agrees with them, and that they're right, and that everyone who disagrees is either stupid, or deliberately lying in order to trying to tear them down. Like a lolcow, but with actual power.

There's also a bit of ritual humiliation involved, forcing people to silence their dissent as a sort of dominance display.
 
One thing that confuses me is: Why bother making a video about this and then make it public for everyone to see? Either they thought this was going to be received in positive light to the audience of (mostly) middle class people with access to any type of internet connection or they are just mocking people by just telling all of us "you will live in a pod and you will like it".

The only person that would consider this in a slighty positive note would be dirt poor motherfuckers (who certainly don't have internet connections) that see this as an improvement for their lives or wealthy people detached from reality.
Like I said, the "Great Reset" is the future as envisioned by deranged psychopaths, assembled piecemeal from TED Talks. Most will think that phrase is a bit of humorous hyperbole. It is not. It is exactly what these people are trying to make into our reality.




YouWillEatTheBugsKlausSchwab.png

The New York Times recently referred to the "Great Reset" as a baseless conspiracy theory:



They did so on the same exact day that the WEF published this:



Jesus Christ. The gaslighting is real.

Gaslighting.png
 
I'm not sure how true this is and it might be worth taking with it grain of salt since it came from an anonymous source posted in a Telegram group but (allegedly):

"A source from the inside has relayed to us confidentially that a major event is coming within the next 72 hours regarding the election and could be coordinated with a DEW [Direct Energy Warfare] initiated disaster to derail the focus. We have been told that everyone needs to backup all hard drives and make paper copies for storage."

Sound like an EMP. If this is true, it could be what Klaus Schwab described during the cyber polygon exercise this past July.
 
I'm not sure how true this is and it might be worth taking with it grain of salt since it came from an anonymous source posted in a Telegram group but (allegedly):



Sound like an EMP. If this is true, it could be what Klaus Schwab described during the cyber polygon exercise this past July.
Semper Fi to QAnon for still looking out for us.
 
I noted today that bojo declared that all petrol driven vehicles will be banned in 9 years time. Fuck. It's the end of an era. Insert fave Bruce Springsteen song here about the grand age of gas/petrol.
You know your country is fucked when its equivalent to Trump takes globalist dick up the ass until it bleeds.
 
The turk was never our Trump. He's an old money, aristocratic, paternalist fuckwit, who got by on a public persona of affable idiocy and floppy hair.
I had read a few weeks ago that Boris Johnson's father wrote a book back in the 1980s about a pandemic and mass mandatory vaccinations. I can't remember what it was called but I did find it on Amazon.
OzQty4t-1.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One thing that confuses me is: Why bother making a video about this and then make it public for everyone to see? Either they thought this was going to be received in positive light to the audience of (mostly) middle class people with access to any type of internet connection or they are just mocking people by just telling all of us "you will live in a pod and you will like it".

The only person that would consider this in a slighty positive note would be dirt poor motherfuckers (who certainly don't have internet connections) that see this as an improvement for their lives or wealthy people detached from reality.
From what I see, normies are dumb and that most of the dislikes on those videos come from multiple socks that are from the dying white race. You are a minority and that is a FACT. There is no one in the public eye that dislikes the idea of a dystopian future because the entire public is easily sold on the concept. One of the many examples can be seen in videos where you have someone sell you the idea of living in a pod in which most of the videos have a lot of likes.

People's voting habits in the urban centers often reflect the opinions of the majority more than what is seen in society as whole and as we reach this new age known as the Great Reset it will be much harder to fight back. When some terrible race baiting video or some video that promotes something stupid it is usually linked by the youtubers who will see it. Most of the bad neoliberal leftist videos are not viewed by the general popluation and the ones that promote an agenda will usually sell their terrible ideas much better by having more of a personal connection with the viewer.

To be fair, living in a pod would not be all that terrible if their was no banksters or agenda to set up a totalitarian police state. However when a normie sees a video like this on accident, they will be unaware that they are selling them an agenda.


ENJOY THE POD:
 
Last edited:
So let me get this straight, Brenton Tarrant shoots up a mosque for accelerationism, and then the globalists think 'Hey, that's a great idea" and capitalised on the Wu Flu to make it happen? It's like they turned the wignat/ancom logic on its head, collapsing the current society doesn't provide a niche for the fringes to seize power, but makes people cling harder to the old mainstream out of fear, and its association with the "good old days". Kind of like how Christianity became more fanatical after Western Rome fell, or Russia turned into a Stalinist dictatorship after the fall of the USSR.. oh wait.
Going into the creative and intrinsic part of the whole problem of this, as said in Fahrenheit 451, "Flowers do not come from flowers, fireworks cannot come from fireworks. Flowers come from the dirt, fireworks are made with metals and the earth."

The whole problem with the Great Reset is that it believes that an "inferior structure" can only be remade if you wipe everything off the face of the map materially and start over from scratch. It does not account for the human condition nor psychology. You think how people think these days will be all better and happy if you give them shiny new toys? Look at the internet. People these days feel fucked and without hope, and it's in human nature to rebel and create hope for the future, these things many people are taught to repress. All this Great Reset sounds like is some supervillain plan you'd hear out of a video game or movie, hoping to calculate and control humankind into a system that purges anything that dares to step out of line. It is way more materialistic than it will help humankind spiritual and mentally.

The Great Reset is merely the festered and long rotting corpse side of 1950s pulp fiction that has refused to grow with the times and anticipation for the 2000s to become a futuristic wonderland for mankind. It is not wrong to seek a great future, but there is much much more going on beyond the surface that shows that we kind of don't deserve it until a great ethical and moral dilemma is resolved. A future like Mad Max and A Clockwork Orange seem more feasible until something gets everyone to think clearly. Even then, this is all about facing a crisis, which America has sadly failed to approach in the right mental angle post 9/11.

And for my floodgates to suddenly malfunction and go full sperg, you cannot have anime and video games simply off of the mental infrastructure that will exist based off of today's. While Japan is experiencing major backlash over the 1980s Bubble Crash economy and the Lost Decade, America and everywhere else out west has artistic inspiration lost because the schools do not promote building creativity and imagination and knowing what place art has in the human condition. Creating anime and video games require going outside to also experience life, and for its historic value, to be mediums of sequential art to rebel and blow up against the corrupt and hypocritical while entertaining the whole way, not being propaganda pieces, the latter which is already what is happening to tumblr hired fags making their own "anime", and is something that devs like Bethesda and EA have been doing for years.

I want a future where I can have good anime and video games while having good food and not sacrifice my soul to enjoy things. Fuck the Great Reset.
It's already happening potentially, video games and movies in general have been getting less inspired lately. I'd say it's because they're now made by people who grew up playing other games or watching other shows (or in the case of long runners the same show), and thus turning into an ouroboros of self-referential bullshit, but HP Lovecraft was a NEET who read books all day but still managed to invent an entire literary genre from scratch. It's not exactly new though, Jonathan Swift sperged out about it back in 1704 in "The Battle of the Books"

At this the spider, having swelled himself into the size and posture of a disputant, began his argument in the true spirit of controversy, with resolution to be heartily scurrilous and angry, to urge on his own reasons without the least regard to the answers or objections of his opposite, and fully predetermined in his mind against all conviction.

“Not to disparage myself,” said he, “by the comparison with such a rascal, what art thou but a vagabond without house or home, without stock or inheritance? born to no possession of your own, but a pair of wings and a drone-pipe. Your livelihood is a universal plunder upon nature; a freebooter over fields and gardens; and, for the sake of stealing, will rob a nettle as easily as a violet. Whereas I am a domestic animal, furnished with a native stock within myself. This large castle (to show my improvements in the mathematics) is all built with my own hands, and the materials extracted altogether out of my own person.”

“I am glad,” answered the bee, “to hear you grant at least that I am come honestly by my wings and my voice; for then, it seems, I am obliged to Heaven alone for my flights and my music; and Providence would never have bestowed on me two such gifts without designing them for the noblest ends. I visit, indeed, all the flowers and blossoms of the field and garden, but whatever I collect thence enriches myself without the least injury to their beauty, their smell, or their taste. Now, for you and your skill in architecture and other mathematics, I have little to say: in that building of yours there might, for aught I know, have been labour and method enough; but, by woeful experience for us both, it is too plain the materials are naught; and I hope you will henceforth take warning, and consider duration and matter, as well as method and art. You boast, indeed, of being obliged to no other creature, but of drawing and spinning out all from yourself; that is to say, if we may judge of the liquor in the vessel by what issues out, you possess a good plentiful store of dirt and poison in your breast; and, though I would by no means lesson or disparage your genuine stock of either, yet I doubt you are somewhat obliged, for an increase of both, to a little foreign assistance. Your inherent portion of dirt does not fall of acquisitions, by sweepings exhaled from below; and one insect furnishes you with a share of poison to destroy another. So that, in short, the question comes all to this: whether is the nobler being of the two, that which, by a lazy contemplation of four inches round, by an overweening pride, feeding, and engendering on itself, turns all into excrement and venom, producing nothing at all but flybane and a cobweb; or that which, by a universal range, with long search, much study, true judgment, and distinction of things, brings home honey and wax.”

From what I see, normies are dumb and that most of the dislikes on those videos come from multiple socks that are from the dying white race. You are a minority and that is a FACT. There is no one in the public eye that dislikes the idea of a dystopian future because the entire public is easily sold on the concept. One of the many examples can be seen in videos where you have someone sell you the idea of living in a pod in which most of the videos have a lot of likes.

To be fair, living in a pod would not be all that terrible if their was no banksters or agenda to set up a totalitarian police state.


ENJOY THE POD:
Maybe, but who watches videos about living in pods unless they actually want to live in a pod? Also is there a source for the wignat votebot, because it sounds like a breadtuber cope explanation for why woke pandering videos with wider public exposure tend to get downvoted into oblivion.
 
Last edited:
I had read a few weeks ago that Boris Johnson's father wrote a book back in the 1980s about a pandemic and mass mandatory vaccinations. I can't remember what it was called but I did find it on Amazon.
Oh shit, someone tell Dave Cullen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Based Cheeto
"The justice sector is being challenged to rethink fundamental ideas about personal responsibility, as the link between brain states and behavior becomes better understood. In many countries, courts are wary about relying on devices that claim to interpret a person's thoughts, such as the lie detector or polygraph. However, as capabilities in this area improve, the temptation for law enforcement agencies and courts to use techniques to determine the likelihood of criminal activity, assess guilt or even possibly retrieve memories directly from people's brains will increase. Even crossing a national border might one day involve a detailed brain scan to assess an individual's security risk." -Klaus Schwab

Yes, that's an actual quote from another of his books. We're full-on fucking Minority Report, now.


1_FsLnbH1QmG3QrZ6rcw98jA.jpeg

They want to be able to use brain scans to figure out if you have a criminal-like mind, even if you've never committed any crimes in your life. :stress:
 

Attachments

Back