2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you want my oppinion this whole clusterfuck of an election is just smoke and mirrors. While all this is going on Israel is expanding its boarders and China is going deeper in their games in the ME. It quite frankly isnt gonna change anything who ends up winning, Trump or Biden same shit is gonna happen. This isnt a transfer of presidency but a transfer of power from West to East, thats the real redpill in this situation. The dollar has 2 years time max and things are looking really grim for the economy because the can cannot be kicked down the road anymore. What we are witnessing is the end of the demoralization period, which in America repeated for many generations and decades starting by the Frankfurt school. Now its going to be the start of the destabilization period soon enough, then crisis and then violent exchange of power ending with the normalization period. However i gotta say this shitshow is highly entertaining.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Disagree
  • Agree
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria, FunPosting101, Nguyen Van Phuoc and 5 others
Puerto Pollo said:
SCOTUS members aren't machines, they're actual human beings. Twitter libtards are making clear they want rehabilitation camps (or worse), for Republicans. This can't leave them indifferent. I mean, if we automatically counted RBG as a a permanent upvote for anything crapped by a Democrat President, why shouldn't we assume the same the other way around?
Click to expand...
Randos making empty threats on twitter will not sway the SC, no.

HTTP Error 404 said:
Worried. The SCOTUS can only look at evidence that was presented, right? If they prevent them from presenting the evidence, they can't look at it.
Click to expand...

Scotus is going to decline to hear these cases the way it's going. If they do hear one of these cases it will probably be out of some sense of obligation to Trump and pity.
 
  • Like
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
Reactions: AnitaSarsleezian, PepsiVanilla, JimmyNugget and 4 others
"oh god not this again."
static.politico.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, George Geef, Exterminatus and 9 others
Meat Target said:
I beg to differ. Consider how many bogus narratives persist to this day:
  • Columbus proved the world was round in a time when everyone thought the earth was flat
  • Abraham Lincoln wasn't racist
  • The Germans were solely at fault for WW1
  • Joe McCarthy went after Hollywood commies who dindu nuffin because he was a big poopyhead meanie
  • Drumpf called white supremacists "very fine people" and colluded with Russia
History is a series of lies agreed upon. And there was a time and place where those lies were started, and they were started by people on purpose.

Sure, most of them are idealistic useful idiot NPCs, but that's a feature, not a bug.

And you use the term "conspiracy"; well, I know it's your attempt at a thought-terminating cliche, but you're not technically wrong. All you need for a "conspiracy" is: two or more parties, working in tandem, to do something illegal or illicit. That is not a high hurdle.
Click to expand...

Puerto Pollo said:
SCOTUS members aren't machines, they're actual human beings. Twitter libtards are making clear they want rehabilitation camps (or worse), for Republicans. This can't leave them indifferent. I mean, if we automatically counted RBG as a a permanent upvote for anything crapped by a Democrat President, why shouldn't we assume the same the other way around?
Click to expand...

HTTP Error 404 said:
Worried. The SCOTUS can only look at evidence that was presented, right? If they prevent them from presenting the evidence, they can't look at it.
Click to expand...

murdered meat bag said:
look at the snide comments from judges who ruled against trump.

but who knows how it will go? scotus will have to make large rulings against a lot of stuff in PA (if trump's team makes good arguments). it really will set the rules for future elections.

there's also a hard deadline to boot.
Click to expand...

FAQnews Correspondent said:
People are worried about the conservative justices because they tend to switch much more often than the progressive ones. Roberts siding with the progressive justices is something of a meme, and people see the Obamacare rulings as indicative of how this can go.

The Trump team's best shot in SCOTUS for PA is attacking the unconstitutionality of what the courts and SoS did, along with disregarding Alito's orders.
Click to expand...
The thing about it is conservatives don’t have any resolve, crack under the slightest amount of pressure, and the thought of making any changes to the status quo makes them shit bricks. With the exception of Thomas, what’s there to suggest that SCOTUS justices would be any different?
 
  • Like
  • Autistic
  • Agree
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria, George Geef, FunPosting101 and 6 others
All becomes gunt said:
It quite frankly isnt gonna change anything who ends up winning, Trump or Biden same shit is gonna happen
Click to expand...
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume this is true (since I don't exactly disagree in the long term), but for purely selfish reasons, I'd rather Trump delay the inevitable if it means there can at least be 4 more years of my life where a global superpower isn't completely lost to corruption. Can't say I'm optimistic about how 2024 will turn out even if Trump wins this election, but if he actually carries out significant election reform, slows down immigration rates and is followed by another populist candidate, then maybe the same shit won't end up happening. Considering that it's dependent on four ifs though, I won't be surprised if you're proven right- 250 years is about what you'd expect anyway before the decline becomes really obvious.
 
  • Feels
  • Lunacy
Reactions: George Geef, FunPosting101, MrJokerRager and 3 others
Seeing as none of you Trump-dead enders actually believe he can still win and want to take free money from a poor Chinese Turkish Iraqi chinky Xerxes-looking fucking sandnigger, I thought I'd run an interesting observation up the MAGA-flagpole and see who screams that the courts hate Trump.

I'm seeing these frivolous suits that the Trump campaign is filing getting thrown out really, really fast. It's true that none involve any actual fraud, none of them would make any difference even if the factual claims (complaints about how mail in ballots were handled) were true, but judges seem to be working hard to clear these cases off their dockets. Some koolaid drinkers are suggesting this could drag out to January. I doubt it. No judge with ambitions to higher office who isn't actually on the Supreme Court wants to be the 'last regular judge dealing with a Trump lolsuit', because that judge will be hated by Republicans for rejecting Trump's nonsense, and Democrats for dragging Trump's scam out. These cases are going to be banged out fast, and the corporatists that Trump appointed to the Supreme Court won't overthrow the will of the American people just because they were appointed by 2020's Biggest Loser.
 
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Autistic
Reactions: Tour of Italy, 5t3n0g0ph3r, PepsiVanilla and 10 others
verissimus said:
Rhetorical question but....what happens if one of the Justices decides to have a little "accident" before they take up any case Trump has?
Click to expand...
If it's one of the conservative justices and and the court is deadlocked then the original ruling from the lower court stands.

This actually happened to one of the PA emergency injunctions that went to SCOTUS the end of October.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: suprig, Yamma Damma, MrJokerRager and 4 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back