2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[AMHOLIO]

What time should we expect news from the courts?

 

[All becomes gunt]

What time should we expect news from the courts?

Your guess is as good as mine.

 

[Meat Target]

Do you know the good news about Powell? Now she's been disavowed she can be omitted from the movie.

So that means Kristy Swanson can play Jenna.

Rudy Giuliani: Robert Duvall
Jenna Ellis: Kristy Swanson
Donald Trump: Jon Voight.

Directed and financed by Mel Gibson from all the cash he made from The Passion of The Christ. Vince Vaughn could play some obnoxious Democrat reporter and antagonist.

The ending scene of the movie would be some allusion to Powell's claims finally getting to court.

Title suggestions welcome. No, you can't have "The Passion of The Trump". You know why.

What is James Woods? Chopped liver?

 

[CrystalHead]

So.... Tucker Carlson was completely right about Powell and you all immediately threw him under the bus, lmao.

Anyway, anyone who still thinks Trump will win needs to give it up before they hurt themselves from coping too hard; The actual lawyers were threatened and quit a week or so ago, now the only people left working on this are grifting lolwyers who are taking you all along for a ride that goes nowhere like the hunter biden emails.

Hey even a broken clock is right every now and then. And even then I still think it's perfectly fine to not be that high on Tucker at the moment.

 

[Hollywood Hitler]

I know a QAnon believing boomer, who legit screencaps posts from /pol/ and posts them on Facebook as "breaking news". Like, she posted that Biden was arrested like a dozen times after he was the nominee because some troll on 4chan posted it. You'd think after the first few times she would learn, but nope.

Not much different than CNN using Reddit as a source

 

[ChikN10der]

People keep saying "The trump team has to hurry up and show their evidence in court".

You realize they don't get to call up the supreme court and say "ok give us a trial today so we can present all our evidence."

The trump team wants to be in front of the SC as soon as they can. They have to make their way through the lower courts first. Which is basically a formality. And clearly they don't want to prematurely show their hand to judges who can't give them what they want anyway.

I don't have any idea what will happen if/when we get to that point (hopefully really soon). But I can tell you for sure, I do know that before that point, we won't have seen all or even most of the evidence.

It still could be a terrible nothing burger, but we won't know until then. It could be that the vote counts stopping, votes being removed from trump, votes showing up repeatedly with impossibly similar ratios, observers being locked out, and the software being seemingly written for the purpose of electoral fraud, are all nothing but coincidence. Maybe the Dems just can't do anything without the appearance of heinous cheating?

Don't forget the evidence you've seen with your own eyes. The court may consider it good evidence even if HHH, Don Lemon, and Tucker Carlson don't agree.

 

[CrystalHead]

https://twitter.com/Peoples_Pundit/status/1330888480717754370?s=19

Should be an interesting show.

 

[Smarty Pants]

Do you know the good news about Powell? Now she's been disavowed she can be omitted from the movie.

So that means Kristy Swanson can play Jenna.

Rudy Giuliani: Robert Duvall
Jenna Ellis: Kristy Swanson
Donald Trump: Jon Voight.

Directed and financed by Mel Gibson from all the cash he made from The Passion of The Christ. Vince Vaughn could play some obnoxious Democrat reporter and antagonist.

The ending scene of the movie would be some allusion to Powell's claims finally getting to court.

Title suggestions welcome. No, you can't have "The Passion of The Trump". You know why.

Can Samuel Jackson play Justice Thomas?

 

[ChikN10der]

So.... Tucker Carlson was completely right about Powell and you all immediately threw him under the bus, lmao.

Anyway, anyone who still thinks Trump will win needs to give it up before they hurt themselves from coping too hard; The actual lawyers were threatened and quit a week or so ago, now the only people left working on this are grifting lolwyers who are taking you all along for a ride that goes nowhere like the hunter biden emails.

According to "Barnes" and "Nina Frei".

Your standard of proof is quite flexible. Tucker ain't gonna read this bro.

It's weird, with the case being so over and pointless, why are we seeing more and more dedicated trolling of people trying to follow the case?

Every single thread on kiwi farms dot net is completely pointless and will accomplish nothing. Amber lynn won't fuck any of you. Chris Chan is a delusional retard who has managed to accomplish more than the losers obsessed with him.

None of you are better than anyone. Shut the fuck up and post on topic news or discussion thereof.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

there are no fucking gyms open in this pandemic you sped

I knew her before the pandemic, retard. Plus, gyms are still open in some states

 

[Smarty Pants]

Amber lynn won't fuck any of you.

Don't say that, man.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

One random thought: Powell could have been a feint.

Because there's exactly fucking ZERO percent chance the DNC will fire off Dominion's tricks, if they exist, in the Georgia special election. If not 2022, 2024. Too many eyes.

That might have been the ploy all along.

 

[Doctor of Autism]

I have evidence that Sonic was part of a globohomo plot to turn us all into furry hedgehog fuckers dating back to the 1990s.

I will file my evidence in all state courts on Wednesday or maybe Friday. Or maybe I'll just announce on Friday that you need to wait until December 14th after the electoral college vote has happened and Biden is President.

No, you can't see any of it until then, but please pay attention to me and don't get distracted by anyone else until December 14th. The evidence is coming, I promise you.

What are you talking about man, that’s common knowledge at this point. Unlike Powell’s claims about Dominion, we can just look with our two eyes at how Sonic can make people furfags, and not only that it can cause autism as well.

This is all the proof you need

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

What is James Woods? Chopped liver?

Good point. Another asshole Democrat media person perhaps? Ted Turner?

The idea of James Woods as Ted Turner screaming at Vince Vaughn to shut it down because he's henpecked by Jane Fonda is funny.

Jane Fonda could be played by Kennedy of MTV and later Fox Business fame.

You realize they don't get to call up the supreme court and say "ok give us a trial today so we can present all our evidence."

The trump team wants to be in front of the SC as soon as they can. They have to make their way through the lower courts first. Which is basically a formality. And clearly they don't want to prematurely show their hand to judges who can't give them what they want anyway.

I don't have any idea what will happen if/when we get to that point (hopefully really soon). But I can tell you for sure, I do know that before that point, we won't have seen all or even most of the evidence.

As I understand it they can't use evidence at the SCOTUS they didn't present to earlier courts. Of course, that's not really an issue. In PA they filed vast amounts of affidavits and had a huge number of amici curiae briefs filed. Because the judge was an Obama appointee he just dismissed the case and the media ignored the evidence. It's as good as not disclosing it.

Can Samuel Jackson play Justice Thomas?

Hell yes! The idea of Jackson reading out Thomas's opinion for the majority, assuming they win is awesome. You can tell Thomas's opinion is going to be devastating for the DNC if it comes to that.

 

[Techpriest]

People keep saying "The trump team has to hurry up and show their evidence in court".

You realize they don't get to call up the supreme court and say "ok give us a trial today so we can present all our evidence."

The trump team wants to be in front of the SC as soon as they can. They have to make their way through the lower courts first. Which is basically a formality. And clearly they don't want to prematurely show their hand to judges who can't give them what they want anyway.

I don't have any idea what will happen if/when we get to that point (hopefully really soon). But I can tell you for sure, I do know that before that point, we won't have seen all or even most of the evidence.

It still could be a terrible nothing burger, but we won't know until then. It could be that the vote counts stopping, votes being removed from trump, votes showing up repeatedly with impossibly similar ratios, observers being locked out, and the software being seemingly written for the purpose of electoral fraud, are all nothing but coincidence. Maybe the Dems just can't do anything without the appearance of heinous cheating?

Don't forget the evidence you've seen with your own eyes. The court may consider it good evidence even if HHH, Don Lemon, and Tucker Carlson don't agree.

The thing is that to present evidence to the Supreme Court, you have to also present evidence to the lower courts to prove your case has any merit what so ever. The Trump team has submitted NO evidence of voter fraud beyond affidavits that fell apart under cross examination. Many of the viral videos about “voter fraud evidence” are standard procedures in every election like ballot curing. They have no evidence which is why the federal case in PA was dismissed with prejudice - if they had evidence they should have already submitted it, and they’d amended their complaint before and still didn’t provide evidence. As such they’d had their shot in court and blew it. The “appeal” they’re crowing about is begging the Appeals court to allow them to appeal at all, arguing that their case as is has at least some merit by virtue of the evidence they have. The opinion and ruling was the Judge telling them that they’re wasting his time, the states time, their clients time, and the courts time, and should stop because they’re embarrassing themselves.

The problem with this is they haven't submitted any evidence that stands up to strict scrutiny. The Appeals court is like 99% likely to simply say no.

 

[Nathan Higgers]

The problem with this is they haven't submitted any evidence that stands up to strict scrutiny. The Appeals court is like 99% likely to simply say no.

Exactly. All evidence needs to be in the public domain, and frankly, unless CNN says there is a evidence of worldwide (perhaps even planet-wide) fraud, I will not agree to let drumpfg undermine this beautiful nation's democracy.

 

[Eggplant Wizard]

The Supreme Court is going to hear everything that they can bring up and then some. The justices know that it is rapid-fire court time, due to time constraints. Don’t knock any possibility of evidence being accepted because the PA court tossed everything out.

 

[murdered meat bag]

The thing is that to present evidence to the Supreme Court, you have to also present evidence to the lower courts to prove your case has any merit what so ever. The Trump team has submitted NO evidence of voter fraud beyond affidavits that fell apart under cross examination. Many of the viral videos about “voter fraud evidence” are standard procedures in every election like ballot curing. They have no evidence which is why the federal case in PA was dismissed with prejudice - if they had evidence they should have already submitted it, and they’d amended their complaint before and still didn’t provide evidence. As such they’d had their shot in court and blew it. The “appeal” they’re crowing about is begging the Appeals court to allow them to appeal at all, arguing that their case as is has at least some merit by virtue of the evidence they have. The opinion and ruling was the Judge telling them that they’re wasting his time, the states time, their clients time, and the courts time, and should stop because they’re embarrassing themselves.

The problem with this is they haven't submitted any evidence that stands up to strict scrutiny. The Appeals court is like 99% likely to simply say no.

the judge's ruling means the that pa cant certify until it gives voters a chance to cure. every individual voter who wasnt give the chance to cure has to sue their district for the opportunity.

thats how pa expects the voters to maintain their right to vote, not to cast out the tainted ballot.

he acknowledges that curing may be illegal, but that's not at stake.

The Supreme Court is going to hear everything that they can bring up and then some. The justices know that it is rapid-fire court time, due to time constraints. Don’t knock any possibility of evidence being accepted because the PA court tossed everything out.

its buffet time!

 

[Meat Target]

The thing is that to present evidence to the Supreme Court, you have to also present evidence to the lower courts to prove your case has any merit what so ever. The Trump team has submitted NO evidence of voter fraud beyond affidavits that fell apart under cross examination. Many of the viral videos about “voter fraud evidence” are standard procedures in every election like ballot curing. They have no evidence which is why the federal case in PA was dismissed with prejudice - if they had evidence they should have already submitted it, and they’d amended their complaint before and still didn’t provide evidence. As such they’d had their shot in court and blew it. The “appeal” they’re crowing about is begging the Appeals court to allow them to appeal at all, arguing that their case as is has at least some merit by virtue of the evidence they have. The opinion and ruling was the Judge telling them that they’re wasting his time, the states time, their clients time, and the courts time, and should stop because they’re embarrassing themselves.

The problem with this is they haven't submitted any evidence that stands up to strict scrutiny. The Appeals court is like 99% likely to simply say no.

Absolutely no evidence of voter fraud whatsoever, huh?

 

[Very Honest Content]

This thread has better seethe, at least in the highlight posts, the doomsday thread has much more quality cope, which kind of makes sense, if only there could be dimensional merge of the two;

It amuses me that in 2000, Al Gore contested the results in Florida all the way up to SCOTUS and until December 13th, and every political pundit and media outlet praised him every step of the way and demanded that those votes be accounted for because it was clear that something unusual had happened, but 20 years later when something very clearly odd has gone down, Trump is told to shut up and accept the results in under 24 hours.

Recount in Florida in 2000: triggered automatically by the state constitution.

Court case titled: BUSH V. Gore. Gore didn't contest the recount, he wanted it completed like he had a legal right to under the Florida constitution. Bush contested the result of that recount from being finished because he saw he was going to lose it potentially and the electoral college would have swung to making Gore president elect instead. So, this is a factually incorrect statement setting groundwork up for some more of them in the comment following them, but hey, copium futures are through the roof these days so what can you really expect from deep thoughts?

I wouldn't back down....no arguments against confirming that questionable election results be validated. People allowed Gore to contest 2000 results. If Trump isn't allowed the opportunity to do so, we can't call ourselves a democracy anymore.

See why local moderators posting unfounded and outright false claims about a recount 20 years ago helps engender problems in current year yet, anyone, anyone, Bueller?

Well, looking back at my not-so-fond memories of the Obama years I'm scared of going back to:
...
-Going back to the same bleeding-heart policies that repealed Glass-Stegal and directly lead to the 08 collapse.
...

That wasn't an Obama/Biden era action.

It's a white pill for me because I know that we're the majority. No way in fucking hell did Biden get 74 million votes.

No matter what happens from this point on, I will never refer to Biden as a legitimate president.

There's the cope and seethe I came here for. (The pollster who is getting paid regardless of whether you LARP as an 18 year old white male Trump voter or a 64 year old pacific islander female Biden supporter to them, just so long as you finish their poll though in the first place, doesn't care about your lies to them, just so you know.)

I find it really strange that despite allegedly nailing the win, Biden suddenly needs over thirty million dollars to fight Trump's legal challenges. If they were based entirely upon bullshit, as indeed has been claimed by every single major news network for over a week, then they should have zero effort getting those thrown out of court. It's almost like they're fucking terrified of the prospect of getting a colonoscopy from the courts.

When Russel Greer sues prostitutes for not touching him his penis, why do they even need a lawyer right?

Since I'm pretty sure nobody else will do it, I'll just say it here too, if you're one of the apparently fuckin white males who switched top of the ticket votes this time for President/VP, thank you, I'm already preparing to hold the new administration's feet to the fire to keep them on the correct course, hope you'll do the same in an attempt to make them earn your support by doing the right thing four years from now.