2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[A_Callow_Youth]

Conservatives just like to assume good faith when no such assumption is warranted. It's partly faith in humanity, but it's also a sad devotion to the status quo that holds them back from striking when they should.

I'm going to grab this one as an example, but everyone who keeps saying that the Right needs to rise up would do well to keep the following in mind:

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.

The American Revolution did not kick off overnight, it was a long buildup of tensions and animosity, damned near a century-long, in fact. They had their faggots who said that nothing was ever going to happen back then, too. They had long discussions in the taverns over wither they should seek independence or simply proper British citizenship in the same way we debate restoring the Constitution or following Daddy Hitler's example. The Right isn't going to rise up and strike simply because it is an advantageous time to do so, they are going to wait until every other option has been taken off the table in the admittedly vain hope that maybe, just maybe, this trainwreck can be averted.

 

[DtoDab]

Yeah, that's what I was referring to. Anyone claiming the election was on the up and up without explaining shit like this either doesn't know what's going on or is trying to mislead you.

At this point they are not even counting votes, the computer is just making shit up basically

 

[EmuWarsVeteran]

Yeah, that's what I was referring to. Anyone claiming the election was on the up and up without explaining shit like this either doesn't know what's going on or is trying to mislead you.

Well we've seen natural ballots, then fractions of ballots, now negative ballots. I think I know where this is going, next up: imaginary ballots.

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

I'm going to grab this one as an example, but everyone who keeps saying that the Right needs to rise up would do well to keep the following in mind:



The American Revolution did not kick off overnight, it was a long buildup of tensions and animosity, damned near a century-long, in fact. They had their faggots who said that nothing was ever going to happen back then, too. They had long discussions in the taverns over wither they should seek independence or simply proper British citizenship in the same way we debate restoring the Constitution or following Daddy Hitler's example. The Right isn't going to rise up and strike simply because it is an advantageous time to do so, they are going to wait until every other option has been taken off the table in the admittedly vain hope that maybe, just maybe, this trainwreck can be averted.

Nothing will happen as in nothing bad will happen and everything will go back to normal? Or that nothing will happen with the lawsuits right now, but put in the terms of 1700's American colonies?

 

[AMHOLIO]

Well we've seen natural ballots, then fractions of ballots, now negative ballots. I think I know where this is going, next up: imaginary ballots.

No, not again. I don't want to divide by 4s on powers of imaginary votes again.

We've technically been here for a bit. Who knew so many number concepts were needed when voting aside from "count by numbers you tard"?

 

[ChikN10der]

No, not again. I don't want to divide by 4s on powers of imaginary votes again.

We've technically been here for a bit. Who knew so many number concepts were needed when voting aside from "count by numbers you tard"?

Integers are raciss

 

[HTTP Error 404]

Your information is a little out of date, that section got rewritten in the 12th Amendment:



That said, yes, the gist of what you are saying is accurate. As it stands, Trump's options are:
1: Get enough votes thrown out to flip enough States to win, Trump Wins.
2: Get States' results thrown out in their entirety on the grounds of the election being compromised beyond salvage, thus leaving the (Republican-leaning) State legislatures to pick electors, Trump Wins.
3: Get States' results thrown out, and an injunction placed against the States sending electors, putting Trump on top, and because the specific wording is by electors appointed, not max possible, Trump Wins
4: The Senate refuses to certify the results, throwing the thing over to the House State Delegation, which leans heavily Republican, Trump Wins

And those are just the options that are 1: legal and 2: have been done before.

5: CROSS THE RUBICON

I wish to remind everyone that Crossing the Rubicon is absolutely 100% legal. President Trump, thanks to the Insurrection Act -- which congress updated, thinking it would Obama and then Clinton having this weapon -- has the power to quash any conspiracy that violates a civilian's rights (that isn't being resolved by local government) by any means necessary. That means he can declare the vote rigging a conspiracy to harm the citizens' right to vote and send in the militia -- which is anyone male in the country who answers his call.

Doing so is absolutely legal. There's a reason they were desperate to get him to invoke it during the Summer; I suspect they wanted a case where they could send it to the SCOTUS and have it limited in some fashion.

Now, I've earned the s I'm gonna get, so let me just say if he does it -- he won't -- then we're

1. Effectively in a civil war
2. In the BEST or WORST timeline.

So we'll see. If you are upset at the idea of Trump Crossing the Rubicon, blame not the madman for putting on his hip waders. Blame the left for flooding the river until the water is at his feet.

 

[babadook]

That implies

Learn how to read

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

Well we've seen natural ballots, then fractions of ballots, now negative ballots. I think I know where this is going, next up: imaginary ballots.

Might as roll some of those into blunts, because you'd have to be high to not see what's going on.

 

[A_Callow_Youth]

Nothing will happen as in nothing bad will happen and everything will go back to normal? Or that nothing will happen with the lawsuits right now, but put in the terms of 1700's American colonies?

Maybe nothing will happen, maybe things will explode into showers of blood, impossible to tell. Probably nothing will happen in the immediate aftermath of the election. The British occupied Boston and effectively disbanded Pennsylvania as a state entity in 1768, which is to say that it took seven more years before the shooting started. I guess what I'm saying is "patience".

 

[Meat Target]

fractions of ballots

You cannot be serious. What kind of mickey mouse bullshit is this?

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

Maybe nothing will happen, maybe things will explode into showers of blood, impossible to tell. Probably nothing will happen in the immediate aftermath of the election. The British occupied Boston and effectively disbanded Pennsylvania as a state entity in 1768, which is to say that it took seven more years before the shooting started. I guess what I'm saying is "patience".

Alright. I'm seeing plenty of both thought processes here and other sites, and it's tiring to see so many people act like the status quo will always continue unabated.

 

[Sekirodiealot]

Because they expected them to just rollover in fear and/or get them afraid enough to join their side. Everyone other then RINO's or already compromised assets siding with Trump wasn't part of the plan.

It tells me they watch way too much movies to think everyone will give in.

 

[DeadFish]

If they do, it gets shut down or gay op'd rapidly. Compare the response times between Waco and CHAZ.

Once again sabotage provides deniability. It can be done by a lone wolf over multiple places over a long period of time.

Make no mistake. Any counter government forces (left or right) must realize to win against the establishment will require destruction of the current hi tech order. Any civil war is going be an event leading america back to the dirt. Im not advocating for it. Im saying that will be the outcome of such a conflict.

Done right and can be used to affect cities to some degree. Already crs firearms of yotube fame is suggesting sabotage to shut cities down.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IYodnrNEpA8&t=498s

Well he is ssuggesting protesters to block roads to disrupt supplies chains and urban ecomonies. For now. Wont be long until people like him consider destroying roads for same effect.

I'm going to grab this one as an example, but everyone who keeps saying that the Right needs to rise up would do well to keep the following in mind:



The American Revolution did not kick off overnight, it was a long buildup of tensions and animosity, damned near a century-long, in fact. They had their faggots who said that nothing was ever going to happen back then, too. They had long discussions in the taverns over wither they should seek independence or simply proper British citizenship in the same way we debate restoring the Constitution or following Daddy Hitler's example. The Right isn't going to rise up and strike simply because it is an advantageous time to do so, they are going to wait until every other option has been taken off the table in the admittedly vain hope that maybe, just maybe, this trainwreck can be averted.

What options do people have if a candidate is elected under dubious circumstances and elected officals are making purge lists on Twitter?

 

[Twitter Hate Mob]

About that...
View attachment 1746774
Is not even a meme anymore

What's the source for this?

Edit: Wait nevermind, I'm retarded - New York Times vote counting live tally, got it

 

[A_Callow_Youth]

I wish to remind everyone that Crossing the Rubicon is absolutely 100% legal. President Trump, thanks to the Insurrection Act -- which congress updated, thinking it would Obama and then Clinton having this weapon -- has the power to quash any conspiracy that violates a civilian's rights (that isn't being resolved by local government) by any means necessary. That means he can declare the vote rigging a conspiracy to harm the citizens' right to vote and send in the militia -- which is anyone male in the country who answers his call.

Doing so is absolutely legal. There's a reason they were desperate to get him to invoke it during the Summer; I suspect they wanted a case where they could send it to the SCOTUS and have it limited in some fashion.

Now, I've earned the s I'm gonna get, so let me just say if he does it -- he won't -- then we're

1. Effectively in a civil war
2. In the BEST or WORST timeline.

So we'll see. If you are upset at the idea of Trump Crossing the Rubicon, blame not the madman for putting on his hip waders. Blame the left for flooding the river until the water is at his feet.

As I've put more thought into the Rubicon Option, I've started to think of it as a less and less terrible option. The primary concern back when the full implications hit us was that Trump could seize power in perpetuity, but I'm starting to consider that option less likely. Despite what Hogan and Friends say, most of the people who would answer such a call are not sycophants for Trump, but rather devoted to the Constitution, and the Constitution says that a man gets only two terms. In the event of a successful Rubicon Crossing, I would expect a loud and clear message of "Okay, you got your two scoops. If you go back for thirds, you will McFucking regret it. We just burned this country to the ground for the sake of the Constitution once, don't think we won't do it again."

 

[soy_king]

Learn how to read

Are you suggesting the 2017 French Presidential Election was rigged, or that the vast majority of the French electorate supported Macron over Le Pen?

 

[soy_king]

EDIT= (did not support Macron over Le Pen)?

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

It tells me they watch way too much movies to think everyone will give in.

No, they just rightfully think the right wing doesn't have it in them to fight back. The right has constantly backed out at every challenge from the left and let them completely take over for one reason or another. And that's not even getting into stuff like a boogaloo which, outside of some people, has a very low chance of going through, since people can say all they want online, but when push comes to shove most don't want to potentially die fighting against a military that would easily flatten their towns. They've managed to actually get some backbone, so let's see how far it can last.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

You cannot be serious. What kind of mickey mouse bullshit is this?

Dominion Vote Machines have a system called RCV. It's for third world shitholes that vote differently than us in the West, where you pick your top X picks of winner and it gives them points values or somesuch crap. If it's enabled, you'll see fractions of a vote going to one candidate or the other.

It's the ONLY WAY you see Fractions of a vote in Dominion voting machines. Because, you know, fractions. Which would be intentional software manipulation of the vote totals, or (best case scenario) them fucking up the configuration and it accidentally fucking the vote totals. The latter of which would be caught by an audit, I believe.