Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

[Saint]

Well, yeah, that's your problem. You want simple "truths" and "solutions" to complex problems.

It might make it somewhat better for a while, depending on circumstances.

You don't do well with sarcasm do you boy?

Nope....

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Would you like to know WHY I want you to say hanging chads would make the world a better place?

Not really, as it will be something retarded.

Nope....

Nope, especially when it comes from idiots.

 

[4Macie]

Not really, as it will be something retarded.

You ruin ALL the jokes Holden. ALL OF THEM. YOU RUIN WHATEVER YOU TOUCH!

^ THIS is a "Hanging Chad". I wanted you to say "yeah, hanging chads are the solution" and then BAM! But noooooooooo. You just gotta ruin all the fun.

This is why we can't have nice things.

 

[Saint]

Look, you really have to understand that I am not as stupid as people you usually talk to.

If you think this is how you're gonna "debate" me you're wrong.

You said 1. a complete nonsense about that everybody I blocked pointed out how my views are screwed up but that's obviously not true, since a. most people here try to do that b. you never explain they are screwed up

As for finding friends, if you actually read my posts you'd see why you're an idiot.

How have I not explained why they are screwed up? I've called your BS and pointed out proven facts to why they are wrong, and I have given examples out of my own life. So have others. So you are wrong.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Couldn't modern morality be an example of the handicap principle. Men show that they can afford to have limitations put upon themselves by not engaging in rape

Hmmm... In a really convoluted way, it might be. Seduction is tougher than rape. It requires more skill and only the most evil ones can do it. In that aspect rape is easier. But any society worth its salt cracks down on both.

How have I not explained why they are screwed up? I've called your BS and pointed out proven facts to why they are wrong, and I have given examples out of my own life. So have others. So you are wrong.

I can see you haven't addressed anything else, but ok. Yeah, you've tried to counter some of my arguments and you did so poorly. As for your examples, that's another story. I don't like to comment on the examples of people here, since most are so stupid and delusional that I doubt they know themselves well, let alone their friends/family.

but have you raped anyone yet?
Oh god. Holden.... have you...?

Do you mean the act or what should be actual crime? Because today both are unjustly seen as crimes, when this is insane. So why exactly would I be saying I committed what is currently unjustly a crime online?

Instead of changing the WHOLE WORLD for 1000 people

I don't see what's crazier in this part. The idea that the world has to be changed just to make some people noncel, and not to avoid us becoming feral apes, or the idea that there are 1,000 incels. An average retarded slut rejects 1,000 incels in a month.

no friends irl

Again, to believe this you'd have to simply refuse to believe mountains of my writings and evidence, some of which you mention yourself. Which is typical of your insanity. Same with female members - you know how I treated females who wanted to meet me irl very well (the way women want, and that is to be squashed like bugs) and I respond to both males and females here. These are facts. Anybody can see that and see you're a lunatic.

Rape victims says hello and that your provided her with loads of laughs.

But that's the society you created. Where anybody who doesn't crush skulls with legs is seen as dangerous and must die. When a big trucker smashed her skull mighty king he was.

 

[DrChristianTroy]

Nope....

Straight up dude blocks people he can't "win" against. He claims it's due to stupidity. If that were so a smart guy like Holden would have won the debate.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Also add

• Says men cannot/will not say "No" to a girl offering sex. It's impossible.
• That being said... Holden would have had to have sex with him mom had she said yes.

Typical of you. You make a false conclusion because you start from the wrong premises.

Men can say no if a girl is offering sex. Hell, somebody can say no if somebody is offering them water on a hot day or 200 bucks. They're idiot but they can. It's not impossible. It doesn't mean forcefully giving it to them is a crime. So women can't rape men.

Your initial claim is wrong.

 

[Saint]

I can see you haven't addressed anything else, but ok. Yeah, you've tried to counter some of my arguments and you did so poorly. As for your examples, that's another story. I don't like to comment on the examples of people here, since most are so stupid and delusional that I doubt they know themselves well, let alone their friends/family.

Then if my arguments are so poor, how come you will not address them straight up instead of just claiming they are stupid? If you be would honest, you don't have any ground to stand on in our debate so you have instead of continuing it, you have just resorted to the "Well you are stupid" method instead of actually finding good facts to justify your claims. The only problem is, there are no good facts for you to find. You use outdated sources that were only useful for barbarians and not for the modern world. You are such a loser with women that you can't find one that would actually like to be with you, so you claim rapists are the people in the right.

Straight up dude blocks people he can't "win" against. He claims it's due to stupidity. If that were so a smart guy like Holden would have won the debate.

Then I expect to be blocked in 3.... 2.... 1.....

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Then if my arguments are so poor, how come you will not address them straight up instead of just claiming they are stupid?

I did, many times, like your cretenic bird thing or many others. You either forgot or choose to ignore that. I have no idea what is worse.

Straight up dude blocks people he can't "win" against./QUOTE]
Nobody can "win" against you but to block you. Your goal isn't to argue but troll.

 

[supdup]

So why exactly would I be saying I committed what is currently unjustly a crime online?

This is the guy that threatened a murder-suicide online and was arrested for it.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Secretly? Wow, no she wouldn't secretly screw other men. We're swingers, so she does it right in front of me, usually while I bang the other guy's wife.

And you do know that this is just confirming what I say about you? Swingers are lunatics and no sane society would tolerate them. When somebody fucks your wife in front of you a sane man feels extreme pain, for various strong reasons, like the fact that he subconsciously fears she might remain pregnant (our brains developed before effective contraception) or emotional closeness.

You are not man and a wife. You are animals with wedding certificates.

 

[DrChristianTroy]

@Holden So trolling consists of asking simple, straight forward questions? When did the definition change?

 

[ON 190]

Men can say no if a girl is offering sex. Hell, somebody can say no if somebody is offering them water on a hot day or 200 bucks.

This just in... you're stupid if you don't have sex.

So women can't rape men.

Sigh. Must I, again? If anyone wants to copy/paste it so he can see this, I'd appreciate it.

Latin rapere was used for "sexually violate," but only very rarely; the usual Latin word being stuprare "to defile, ravish, violate," related to stuprum (n.), literally "disgrace." Meaning "to abduct (a woman), ravish;" also "seduce (a man)" is from early 15c. in English.

What Fuckbot fails to see is that "sexually violate" applies when someone is in a sexual situation against their will. No matter the sex or gender.

 

[supdup]

Wait, @DrChristianTroy is no longer blocked?

 

[Saint]

I did, many times, like your cretenic bird thing or many others. You either forgot or choose to ignore that. I have no idea what is worse.

I had two other posts that completely showed you wrong and instead of facing them, you ignored them and only instead resulted to insults about my wife. So because of you ignoring the actual debate, you DID NOT give any actual fact or argument of why you were correct. That just shows that you had no way to defend against what I said.

 

[Chuggernaut]

And you do know that this is just confirming what I say about you? Swingers are lunatics and no sane society would tolerate them. When somebody fucks your wife in front of you a sane man feels extreme pain, for various strong reasons, like the fact that he subconsciously fears she might remain pregnant (our brains developed before effective contraception) or emotional closeness.

You are not man and a wife. You are animals with wedding certificates.

Our brains also evolved before the concept of wives, just in case your made up history degree didn't teach you that.

 

[DrChristianTroy]

Wait, @DrChristianTroy is no longer blocked?

EDIT- But really I have no idea.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

I had two other posts that completely showed you wrong

So show me those posts and I'll explain why they absolutely did not show me wrong.

 

[Frank Rizzo]

I had two other posts that completely showed you wrong and instead of facing them, you ignored them and only instead resulted to insults about my wife. So because of you ignoring the actual debate, you DID NOT give any actual fact or argument of why you were correct. That just shows that you had no way to defend against what I said.

Welcome to debating with Fuckbot...

 

[deductionotaku]

Not if the source they were stolen from is no longer online

So basically, you ran an image search for...whatever and picked something from the dregs of the internet hoping it would disappear soon, but broke this pattern for a single photo. And we're supposed to believe this is more likely than you posting images of yourself and then panicking when you became a person of interest, as well as believe that the only reason these didn't defy the laws of the internet by completely disappearing from the internet is you miraculously chose them to represent you?

You know, keep harassing flossman the way you are. If you keep it up, we can verify the validity of your story without spending a dime.

I know I can't convince you that there basically aren't any people who don't at least see me as neutral irl but how's that my problem?

You're the one who keeps broaching that subject. And you can prove it in a very simple way: admit that you don't talk to these real life people about how rape is acceptable and women like to have their bodies mangled. If you do that, we're significantly more likely to believe you. There will still be skeptics, but at least now you'd be talking sense. You'd also be admitting you're chicken shit, but we knew that already.

Not everybody here makes fun of me

And this further proves you have no social skills.

You don't want to waste your sword hitting a tree. Hence you must never masturbate.

Another failed comparison on your part. In the first place, practicing swordsmanship on inanimate objects (such as a tree) teaches how to apply full body weight into a swing, just as masturbation teaches you to last longer. In the second, dulling your sword and dulling your penis have opposite effects. Of course, you're a selfish lover fucker who is seeking rape, so it's understandable why you think they have the same effect. Third, a sword can be sharpened if it gets dull and replaced if it snaps.

It will be great if he blocks us all just because he can't argue himself out of a corner.

Probably not going to happen. I'm having too much fun playing head games with him. He'd have to wise up and see I've already got him cornered and simply not calling him out on his sennichite. Hell, I can say this, and so long as I don't tag anyone or make alluring text, nothing will change in the approach.

As for friends, c'mon? Even if I didn't have friends

You don't. You acknowledged on open forum that you only hang out with them because you always have. That's not a friend.

you think friends alone... what? Guarantee you a partner? Can replace a partner?

Help develop social skills, give confidence, act as a sound board for practicing how to approach a woman, learn about parties and other gatherings where there will likely be a high female population, and much more.

Also, men who can have consensual sex today are seducers. These are worse than rapists.

So those of us who hooked up in the hospital showers solely to relieve the tension are seducers?

I have respect for modern rapists.

And yet you haven't made a single credible statement on emulating your heroes. Weird.

What Fuckbot fails to see is that "sexually violate" applies when someone is in a sexual situation against their will. No matter the sex or gender.

It's also quite humorous and revealing how he believes women can't take sex.