2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Informative
  • Late
  • Like
Reactions: George Geef, spiritofamermaid, Literally Murdered and 7 others
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Autistic
Reactions: MrJokerRager, Cristobal’s Colon, Itu aru kamusu tugeza and 1 other person
samuraicrack said:
People pointing to Trump’s own appointed judge saying there’s no evidence of voter fraud as proof there isn’t is funny because even fucking liberals who can’t stand the guy have said it’s entirely possible for judges to be paid off.

Click to expand...
Anything is "possible" that's literally the lowest bar you can set. It's technically possible for Bernie to become president at the end of this but that doesn't mean it's worth seriously entertaining the possibility of that happening. I mean what are you suggesting here, that the DNC paid off judges in 50 different lawsuits to throw out Trump's court cases?
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Agree
Reactions: PepsiVanilla, GenericReviewerDraco, CheezzyMach and 4 others
samuraicrack said:
People pointing to Trump’s own appointed judge saying there’s no evidence of voter fraud as proof there isn’t is funny because even fucking liberals who can’t stand the guy have said it’s entirely possible for judges to be paid off.

Click to expand...
You don't need to pay them off if they just choose to ignore it of their own volition.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Granola Grenadine, spiritofamermaid and Yamma Damma
Pointless Pedant said:
They killed 4 of them from 2010 to 2012 before their original spy ring (using local operatives) got busted and hanged. Now they've made another spy ring and started again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Iranian_nuclear_scientists
Click to expand...
There is also Stuxnet. It was a highly sophisticated computer virus targeted at Iranian nuclear centerfuges that set them back years in their nuclear weapons program. This isn't a great place to discuss it but if that kind of stuff is interesting to you it's worth looking up.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Granola Grenadine, spiritofamermaid, Pointless Pedant and 4 others
Taco said:
Anything is "possible" that's literally the lowest bar you can set. It's technically possible for Bernie to become president at the end of this but that doesn't mean it's worth seriously entertaining the possibility of that happening. I mean what are you suggesting here, that the DNC paid off judges in 50 different lawsuits to throw out Trump's court cases?
Click to expand...
Even if they did somehow you cant prove it so it doesnt matter. The voter fraud is blatant however there is a very serious legal effort that must be taken to establish it. If you go to court about the sky being blue you better be able to prove that too. As i said, either they will fail misserably and become the laughing stock of anything law related if its a humiliating defeat, or they will surprise us all and turn it around. Then we can finally call game set match and go to our regularly scheduled a-logging.
 
All becomes gunt said:
Even if they did somehow you cant prove it so it doesnt matter. The voter fraud is blatant however there is a very serious legal effort that must be taken to establish it. If you go to court about the sky being blue you better be able to prove that too. As i said, either they will fail misserably and become the laughing stock of anything law related if its a humiliating defeat, or they will surprise us all and turn it around. Then we can finally call game set match and go to our regularly scheduled a-logging.
Click to expand...
I'm all for taking this to court if that's what they want to do. My issue with some of the people in this thread is when your court cases go nowhere the next logic step is not get the state to supercede the election results and declare your guy winner anyways. I don't think it's at all unreasonable to ask someone alleging a multistate voter fraud conspiracy to show evidence of it in court if you expect the election to be overturned. That's a huge ask, and saying "well I know it's there but I can't prove anything" isn't going to cut it.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Literally Murdered and CheezzyMach
Taco said:
I mean what are you suggesting here, that the DNC paid off judges in 50 different lawsuits to throw out Trump's court cases?
Click to expand...
Yes.

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-judges-misconduct/

E337CEAF-1D94-41E6-A1B2-F2315C507F9B.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Granola Grenadine, George Geef, spiritofamermaid and 13 others
Taco said:
I'm all for taking this to court if that's what they want to do. My issue with some of the people in this thread is when your court cases go nowhere the next logic step is not get the state to supercede the election results and declare your guy winner anyways. I don't think it's at all unreasonable to ask someone alleging a multistate voter fraud conspiracy to show evidence of it in court if you expect the election to be overturned. That's a huge ask, and saying "well I know it's there but I can't prove anything" isn't going to cut it.
Click to expand...
To be fair i dont know what they are presenting to the judge to say they are presenting no evidence or not enough evidence. Like legit does anyone know what they are coming to the judge with ? Is there a public record or something ?
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: ⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛, George Geef, spiritofamermaid and 9 others
Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
It's ironic how many boomers hate entitlements, yet they collect social security
Click to expand...
1) They paid for it.
2) Meds are expensive.
3) Food and gas and housing ain't cheap either.
4) Good luck finding a job in your 70s and 80s (except for politics, apparently)
5) They paid for it.

It's ironic that any liberal would point out the irony of entitlements since the democratic party is all about the gibs. Then again we all know y'all don't care about old people until its convenient--muh grandmother gonna die of corona if I go outside without muh mask.

As an aside- I'm not against entitlements if they're managed right and applied correctly. SS is a joke, though and needs to be overhauled, like all other government programs. The problem is our politicians on both sides don't want to solve any problems--they just want to create more because more problems = more power and more money for them and the rest of us peons need to suck it up and accept it.

Topic--seems to me the state and lower fed courts are content to kick the can to the SC (the latest PA ruling being the exception since it was a long shot anyway and obviously was going to be dropped). Who wants to the be known as the judge that flips a state for Trump? The SC has the benefit of a group of people saying yay or nay.
 
  • Like
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Agree
Reactions: PepsiVanilla, UselessIdiot, George Geef and 10 others
thyme's up said:
1) They paid for it.
2) Meds are expensive.
3) Food and gas and housing ain't cheap either.
4) Good luck finding a job in your 70s and 80s (except for politics, apparently)
5) They paid for it.

It's ironic that any liberal would point out the irony of entitlements since the democratic party is all about the gibs. Then again we all know y'all don't care about old people until its convenient--muh grandmother gonna die of corona if I go outside without muh mask.

As an aside- I'm not against entitlements if they're managed right and applied correctly. SS is a joke, though and needs to be overhauled, like all other government programs. The problem is our politicians on both sides don't want to solve any problems--they just want to create more because more problems = more power and more money for them and the rest of us peons need to suck it up and accept it.

Topic--seems to me the state and lower fed courts are content to kick the can to the SC (the latest PA ruling being the exception since it was a long shot anyway and obviously was going to be dropped). Who wants to the be known as the judge that flips a state for Trump? The SC has the benefit of a group of people saying yay or nay.
Click to expand...
I don't have a problem with social security at all. I don't have a problem with "Entitlements". But boomers who complain about "entitlements" also collect social security. Yes, they paid into it, but we all pay into taxes. We also pay medicare tax and I'd rather see everyone have access to it than just boomers who hate "entitlements".

verissimus said:
Uh-huh. And I remember a time when the media, the medical "experts", the Surgeon-General, and the politicians were telling us we didn't have to wear a mask and/or masks were ineffective.
Click to expand...
This is going to be a tough concept for you Trumpers, but scientists change recommendations as new data comes in. I know, it's amazing some people can admit they were wrong, but it's true.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: PepsiVanilla, GenericReviewerDraco, cuddle striker and 8 others
Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
I don't have a problem with social security at all. I don't have a problem with "Entitlements". But boomers who complain about "entitlements" also collect social security. Yes, they paid into it, but we all pay into taxes. We also pay medicare tax and I'd rather see everyone have access to it than just boomers who hate "entitlements".


This is going to be a tough concept for you Trumpers, but scientists change recommendations as new data comes in. I know, it's amazing some people can admit they were wrong, but it's true.
Click to expand...
Let me fix america real fast for ya. Kill niggers, kill jews, kill homos trannies etc., force fatties into a treadmill ( except if its some special thyroid case) There instantly a better place.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Agree
  • Autistic
Reactions: Shitpiss Babylord, Pampered Degenerate, Syaoran Li and 10 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back