Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Behold the Trump Cultists, a man who forsake his religion and political ties to worship an incontinent cheeto!


Now this should be a lesson, never elect a wash up businessman who did reality TV for a living as president.
He can always sign up for Trump TV™️ after Joe Biden is inaugurated for the low low price of $24.99/month and watch all the based talking heads poached from Newsmax and OANN.
 
Behold the Trump Cultists, a man who forsake his religion and political ties to worship an incontinent cheeto!


Now this should be a lesson, never elect a wash up businessman who did reality TV for a living as president.
@Eris! has legitimate crippling autism and lives with his mom. Give him a break, he doesn't have the capability of seeing things from others perspective
 
I don't think he's going to realize you're trolling no matter how much you signal it.
I am never trolling and am always 100% serious.
I have contempt for trolls. It is far better to anger people with things you actually mean.
Give him a break, he doesn't have the capability of seeing things from others perspective
Why would you ever want to?
 
You’re right. Trump is absolutely finished now and there’s no way he can come back after this epic burn. Trump’s lawyers are all hacks and this YouTuber is the real deal. Even though Trump’s lolsuits won’t go anywhere, this guy should be hired for the defense. I didn’t see the light until you showed me the genius from this YouTube lawyer.
It seems you think that Trump will win. Want to make a wager?
 
Trump will lose, man. He will lose so badly that it will be the lolsuit of the century. I’m not going to make a wager on something inevitable. Biden is the chosen one.
Since you're being sarcastic, which is surprising given your autism, do you want to place a wager?
 
It seems you think that Trump will win. Want to make a wager?
Have you read Dead Souls by Gogol? You're exactly like a character from it, Nozdrev, a compulsive gambler, who also compulsively cheats as he gambles. In one part, his brother in law tells him he's lying about having won a previous wager, and he denies it, then asks him if he wants to put a wager on him having lied.
 
Have you read Dead Souls by Gogol? You're exactly like a character from it, Nozdrev, a compulsive gambler, who also compulsively cheats as he gambles. In one part, his brother in law tells him he's lying about having won a previous wager, and he denies it, then asks him if he wants to put a wager on him having lied.
If the Trump simps are gonna tardrage and say I am stupid and wrong when I say Trump's lawsuits have no chance, then they should at least be willing to put up a wager, wouldn't you agree?

No thanks.
So you are saying I am correct, then. Thank you.
 
I am never trolling and am always 100% serious.
I have contempt for trolls. It is far better to anger people with things you actually mean.

Why would you ever want to?
Super fucking based bro! Watch Styx point out that every last vote of the 2020 presidential election was fraudulent and SCOTUS should give Donald J. Trump the highest office in the land because Styx has studied statistics!
 
Because you didn’t have a sitting president refuting the results, filing lawsuits and claiming voter fraud in the swing states he lost? Pretty sure Hillary Clinton conceded right after the election in 2016, something Trump has refused to do two weeks after losing.
You're not wrong, but Democratic politicians also spent the last four years refuting the results, filing investigations, and claiming voter fraud because Hillary lost. Granted she wasn't the one doing it, but it was still the party at large denying the results of the election, then turning right around and saying elections are impossible to defraud - when they win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: silentprincess
You're not wrong, but Democratic politicians also spent the last four years refuting the results, filing investigations, and claiming voter fraud because Hillary lost. Granted she wasn't the one doing it, but it was still the party at large denying the results of the election, then turning right around and saying elections are impossible to defraud - when they win.
They were doing that before she even lost with the FISA probe.
Edit: Even if the media is 100% making shit up, do you really think the general masses won't just believe it? You think the people who have been stuck at home haven't been reading stuff about how Trump killed grandmas because of covid? Irregardless the actual severity or truth of this claim, people will believe it which creates people that hate Trump because shockingly enough people don't like it when their sitting President makes light of something that has killed thousands of people. That one sentence twists everything irregardless of the validity of the statement.
No lol
 
Last edited:
Reposting from another thread because I'd genuinely like some help figuring this out and this thread is more active:

So the entire point is that "Edison Research does not actually have an Iranian server as the affidavite claims and the evidence that it does is merely a different or false domain".
And this was figured by using a gimped version of a tool the affidavit claims was used for digital forensics.

I assume we're talking about this stuff:
View attachment 1755754

Now like I said, I've got public school potato brain for geek speak and half of this is beyond me, but if someone is using a tool that gets a result I find sketchy and then I use a limited version of that same tool and don't get the same result my brain tells me that either
1. They are lying
2. I'm not using the tool right (which make sense since it's paywalled)

I'd like to know why the Robtex tool is "shitty" otherwise. Also what does anyone think about the other stuff surrounding that supposed Iran domain info and the China information?
What is "unidirectional reference"?
Also what's godaddy doing with dominionvoting?

I have a head for deciphering academic lunacy but not for this.
Got a headache and looked into why Iran of all places would bother with anything like this. I figured Powell chose Iran and China since Dems hate Iran and Reps hate China. I figured it was a tactical thing, but it seems like Iran wasn't chosen at random: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article246498665.html

So as far as "Iran is involved" is concerned, the idea isn't just plucked from thin air to set up a boogeyman. Same goes for China.


But that doesn't prove whatsoever that Iran helped screw with the Dominion voting system. As for that there's this article from the Epoch Times:
View attachment 1755761

From all of this what I'm getting is that, ultimately the Dominion system--which uses tech derived from the Smartmatic system, assets supposedly provably purchased by Dominion previously (article above)--is not a closed network and can be accessed, and thus tampered with, externally, in this instance via the internet. Dominion says that's not the case but the affidavit's "digital forensics" says it is, and then goes further to say it wasn't just potentially accessed but was definitely accessed.
Then it shows tech talk, domain names, "digital forensics" and I get lost. When I hear that all I think of is

Edit: also I saw "honeypots" here
View attachment 1755775
If you read the Epoch Times, a media organ run by a cult that believes that interracial sex is caused by aliens (no, this is not a metaphor for Jews) and that science is an alien plot, and take it seriously, there is no point in engaging with you.
1606678664200.png

(The site referenced is the official Falun Gong site, and 'Teacher' is the leader of the cult)
 
Probably late on this but whatever. Trump's tweet's being corrected with little citations by twitter is stupid. They happily let every major media outlet and blue checkmark spread the conspiracy that Trump was a Russian stooge put in the highest position of power on earth because of a rigged election. Four years of that and nothing was done even when it was clear the court cases and investigations on it went nowhere. Was claiming that our government is compromised and our election system hacked into not a threat to democracy in America? Why was it okay then? Trump lost, he melted down and denied it like we all expected. This is not some shocking collapse of democracy in America.
 
Well the media screaming “concede“ nonstop didn’t help with this election. If they let the audits happen normally I would honestly have thought Biden won flat out. Now I have heavy doubts solely because the media is acting the way they are.

Edit: There is the other stuff as well, but the media are playing the part of the canary in the coal mine.
That is true but at the same time a lot of it comes out of shock because it’s incredibly rare that a president doesn’t concede, hell Bush and Gore both “won” and both “conceded” without issue so I don’t agree with them screeching concede but I am genuinely interested in seeing if and how he concedes this election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: silentprincess
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back