2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Stuff like that makes me worried. You don't give the finger to the SCOTUS unless you know/think for sure they won't do anything.
That could very well be the case.

Or ... These are the corrupt state governments trying their best to cover their tracks. Nobody wants to get caught.

We'll just have to anxiously wait and see what's up.
 
Can I get a source on this? This is too much of a threat to not warrant the military forces in and around D.C. being on high alert before, during, and after the trial if one is held. Also, if so much as one justice comes home to a dead family, that is a death sentence for the group and corresponding political party responsible (or the “idea” responsible, for those ANTIFA pedants). Pelosi and co. would never let that happen, because that would kill their chances of surviving the next public appearance, much less get a Democrat elected ever again.
I would also like a source on this. Also I'm not sold that a ruling against Trump wouldn't create a security risk as well.

So what we’re seeing is the potential to see how far something can be excused with “getting rid of Trump”?
Excuse me sir I believe you are responding to a post asking for a source without providing the source. Where did you hear the SC was briefed that their security could not be assured if they were to weigh in on the election because I'm unable to locate a single article about this happening.

Yeah, I don't like the Stickers simply because a like dislike system causes dumb behavior to get positive ratings. And I just prefer it when people actually talk about things instead of the really distant way online conversations can go.
I like my imaginary sticker collection. How else would I ever know that I'm mad at the internet for saying things people don't want to hear? I would have assumed the party being mad at me, a random person on the internet, for questioning the narrative would make them technically mad at the internet but the stickers say otherwise and who am I to argue?
 
Only one Trumptard this time? Your slipping just like Biden did today.
Biden isn't slipping (and I ain't slippin' either). He's way healthier than president Trump.

Meanwhile, your mentally ill president was mumbling to himself like an insane aslyum patient, reassuring himself of him and his supporters' delusions: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/election-results-trump-king-george-b1763487.html?amp

Deep down, he knows he's wrong, but he has to remind himself anyway that only he is right. The nerve of you guys to support someone who acts like an authoritarian monarch is beyond me.
 
Biden isn't slipping (and I ain't slippin' either). He's way healthier than president Trump.

Meanwhile, your mentally ill president was mumbling to himself like an insane aslyum patient, reassuring himself of him and his supporters' delusions: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/election-results-trump-king-george-b1763487.html?amp

Deep down, he knows he's wrong, but he has to remind himself anyway. The nerve of you guys to support someone who acts like an authoritarian monarch is beyond me.
There's the good bait we all love. Prime, juicy and sizzled to perfection.
 
There's the good bait we all love. Prime, juicy and sizzled to perfection.
A guy who lost a bet is doing bait better than so-called trolls in this thread and they get pissed off at stickers like 5-year olds. Jesus fuck that's hilarious.
 
Sure I'll bite, I've done this a few times already.

I know most people here probably think I'm just spitting out stuff the MSM feeds me or whatever but I take everything with a giant grain of salt and have independently looked into some of these fraud theories because I do actually care a lot if there was some coordinated or wide scale fraud. Even the smaller scale stuff like some guy getting his kid that went to college or dead wife’s ballot and mailing it off without them should be thoroughly prosecuted imo and if anyone has access to the hard records required, which unfortunately cost more money than I care to dump into something with no financial return, I have the math background and technical abilities to follow through on something like that once I get more free time. If anyone is interested and has this data feel free to find my DMs.

Anyways I've looked into some of these theories. So far all I’ve seen is sloppy work from people who are more interested in "finding fraud" than finding the truth if you know what I mean. I've got one more in me though, let's go.

I need to pick one with material evidence I have access to. Let's go with this one.
View attachment 1756687
... of decreased voters in Pennsylvania. BIG IF TRUE.

View attachment 1756704
Okay seems like a pretty straightforward accusation.

View attachment 1756706
Okay 99% accurate. I should have no problem then. I can check online for the ballot status then find the obituary and we've got em. Let's start at the top of the list.

View attachment 1756714
Umm, 🤔. I'm already seeing a problem here. They clearly sourced two different obituaries for different people. Well anyways I can tell which one is correct by DOB time to check the voter records.
View attachment 1756717
🤔 well okay 1% error. Let's keep going.

Next one down.
View attachment 1756722
Oh wow we fucking got a live one!
View attachment 1756729
Dead voter confirmed, oh wait a second.
View attachment 1756731
I guess they still have to count your vote if you die a week after election day.

Okay let's find another one. I'm skipping all the "Bob Smiths" because it's too hard to verify ultra common names and you start to run into the "birthday problem".
View attachment 1756750
View attachment 1756753
Negative. Okay I think you see where this is going. Let me skip ahead, I checked 10 this was the closest I found to """"proof."""

View attachment 1756759
View attachment 1756754
View attachment 1756755
So if tribute.com is to be believed this man is dead yet voted. That said they have no obituary or even date of death listed so it's unclear how this ended up in their database. I looked deeper into this turns out there were 2 John Jarosz in PA who would be roughly the same age range. One died in 1993, his death records is not on tributes.com but does show up on ancestry.com. Here's his obituary from a different search.

View attachment 1756768
I can't find a single record of John W Jarosz from Pennsylvania being dead and multiples of John A so this looks like a bad records match on tributes.com end.

Anyways that's enough wasted time for one day. It's pretty clear this list is not vetted. Despite the 99% accuracy claim I couldn't verify a single dead dead voter from a sample size of ten. It looks like they took an old voter registration list, likely because a new one costs way more money, then just ran a script to find any matching obituary under the sun even though you can clearly see false positives on the first entry and over half the names I checked didn't even show up in the system. Then all of their links to the "source" images that are supposed to show the registrations return 404. If anyone can find a death notice for John W Jarosz of Washington county PA I will be more than happy to look into it further but so far I'm like 0 for 40 on these "verified list of dead voters" claims.


See this is the kind of counter argument i appreciate. makes me wonder what Braynard has if he's so adamant bout dead voters and multistate voters.
 
So these are apparently being sprung up around NYC now.
1606707459473.png
 
So they can anticipate their SC exceeding its authority just as a new associate justice that would have been the tiebreaker is inducted?
They exceeded their authority when they passed the law, over a year ago.

Their entire argument was that the state legislature, controlled by the GOP, didn't have the authority to change absentee voting laws without a constitutional amendment.
 
I see you've given up on making an argument.
The GOP-controlled legislature passed the 2019 law expanding absentee voting.

Over a year later, their now saying that legislature couldn't expand absentee voting without first passing a constitutional amendment. The PASC didn't overrule the GOP state legislature; they actually let the law they passed stand, saying they waited way too long to file their case.
 
Last edited:
Give him MATI stickers then, it drives him insane and its hilarious.
Lol says the guy who tried to get me banned because me not liking Dear Leader upsets you.

Sounds like a regurgitated reason to hate him. Especially when people calling him a manchild acts like it the most. That and I'm curious to where people get the idea that the tax cut only helps the rich beyond its bad because orange man exist
For a party that just 4 years ago was tardraging about the national debt, passing tax cuts so that the wealthy can do stock buybacks is pretty stupid. And yes, tax cuts for the rich do only help the rich.
 
That could very well be the case.

Or ... These are the corrupt state governments trying their best to cover their tracks. Nobody wants to get caught.

We'll just have to anxiously wait and see what's up.
Not only that, but everyone is doing their job in this scheme to take out Trump. It’ll take a miracle for Trump to still be POTUS next 1/21.
So these are apparently being sprung up around NYC now.
View attachment 1757082
It’s starting. The knives are coming out, and the pools are starting on if the Trumps will end up dead or imprisoned with money and assets taken seized once they leave office. Place your bets. Prison? Or death?
 
The GOP-controlled legislature passed the 2019 law expanding absentee voting.

Over a year later, their now saying that legislature couldn't expand absentee voting without first passing a constitutional amendment. The PASC didn't overuse the GOP state legislature; they actually let the law they passed stand, saying they waited way too long to file their case.
No the legislature passed the law which said that mail-votes had to be in by 8pm election day. The democrat SOS then declared that they would accept mail-ins received 3 days after election day and was sued.

The PASC sided with the SOS despite the constitution clearly saying that legislatures have sole control over elections and that judges do not make election law. They are fucked when this reaches the actual SC and they know it.

I have literally no idea what you are talking about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back