2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The High Prophet of Truth said:
Agreed. But another reason I don't agree with taking their votes away is because men vote just as much for that stuff too.
Click to expand...
If they had a "If only dead people voted" map it'd be 100% blue too:
BLM 74 Trump 2016.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, jje100010001, ConfederateIrishman and 8 others
mandatorylurk said:
Fulton County (Atlanta) isn’t in the list of counties for that new order, which is fishy. And Lin Wood retweeted an article that when Brian Kemp was SOS three years ago under his watch election servers were wiped right before a lawsuit was filed.

Kemp is now required to present Wood the dominion contract with the state and a reason against forensic inspections.

Wood should still push for a statewide injunction with scotus just to be safe for those slippery fingers deleting things.
Click to expand...
Are Cobb, Dekalb & Gwinnett (also Atlanta/Atlanta metropolis) on the order?

Also AFAIK, Chatham County (Savannah GA) was one of the counties to show a sudden "pause" in counting.
 
Reisen Storm said:
Nothing. Pretty sure Police in several cities are leaving in droves after the negative media narrative about policing and a vocal activist community that is anti-police. Hell, in Minneapolis violence is surging due to police officers leaving.
Click to expand...
I think we've had something like 7 police chiefs quit in the past few months due to the rioting.
 
  • Agree
  • TMI
  • Lunacy
Reactions: BSC, ConfederateIrishman, verissimus and 2 others
verissimus said:
...wtf is to stop the police from turning on the elite? Seriously? If anyone has the elite by the balls, it's them.
Click to expand...
The High Prophet of Truth said:
The past months should prove it's the opposite.
Click to expand...
The police are in leftist terms, the attack dogs of the rightists and the fascists and the elite designed to protect the system. However they never discuss their solution which is basically to setup a federal police force and it makes sense looking at how they are doing this. I believe they did this in Britain which is why the police literally professional cunts. Many mayors got elected back in so that fact that Rudy Giuliani got elected was a miracle otherwise all of them mayors are in cahoots with the corrupt police forces. They deserve nothing but disdain as many of them were democrats until the democrats decided to throw them under the bus because they knew white people are easily convinced to vote against their interests.

I believe we should swap crossing the Rubicon for crossing the Delaware. Real talk though, how many people here excluding the obvious retards, are okay with Trump saying "fuck it" and take America into a radically different direction if the current situation is beyond help. Because once Trump crosses it, I look forward to it as its time to burn it all down.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, the fall of man, FunPosting101 and 3 others
The High Prophet of Truth said:
The past months should prove it's the opposite.
Click to expand...

No actually it shouldn't especially since there's even less policemen out there able to both enforce the elite's decrees or protect their sorry asses. There's only a few entities that could stop the police from turning on the elite if they decide to quite literally hold them hostage.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: ConfederateIrishman and Cristobal’s Colon
Kane Lives said:
I mean, when you think about it, the American Constitution did not invest any power in the judiciary to enforce its decrees. That's the executive's perogatives. A non-compliant executive can simply ignore the courts, as had happened a few times in history already.

EDIT: To be clear, I meant it in the sense that it cuts both ways. A Dem-friendly executive is free to entirely ignore a Rep-friendly court and vice-versa.
Click to expand...
Just so you know the implicit sword of damocles against this is impeachment. Not following the orders of the USSC is a pretty clear cut charge, and a valid use of impeachment.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, the fall of man and 6 others
verissimus said:
No actually it shouldn't especially since there's even less policemen out there able to both enforce the elite's decrees or protect their sorry asses. There's only a few entities that could stop the police from turning on the elite if they decide to quite literally hold them hostage.
Click to expand...
I was talking about all the governors holding back the police from actually stopping the burning and looting. That's what I meant by the elites having them by the balls.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, jje100010001 and verissimus
murdered meat bag said:
See this is the kind of counter argument i appreciate. makes me wonder what Braynard has if he's so adamant bout dead voters and multistate voters.
Click to expand...
Like I said I've looked into the dead voter multiple times and never found a confirmed one. I mostly concentrated on that because that claim has been floating around since elections before my birth and with online records it's easy to look up for most states. Every vote carries with it a record and who voted and who didn't is publicly available information. If you were doing to manufacture votes you would also need to find X number of registered voters and cast their ballot without their knowledge.

The states check your vote against the social security database and if you die before election day they throw it out, even if you were alive and legally cast your absentee ballot then die a week after it arrived. There are also multiple other issues that could cause a mail in ballot to be thrown out, over 7000 mail ballots were thrown out in PA alone for various issues. If you were going to commit voter fraud in the many 100,000s range as has been accused here it would be a monumental effort. You would need to find a registered voter for each ballot who you were sure was not voting, intercept the mail in ballots sent to them, forge the documents with signatures, and that's not even the end of the logistical hurdles you'd have to jump through. Then forever after the election public records would exist saying these people voted. Political organizations have called me in the past saying they saw I voted in X election and wanted to talk to me about the next one.

The level and complex depth of fraud you'd have to pull off to get away with this a million times over it would be impossible to hide. The fact mobs of people aren't coming forward and saying they didn't vote but were recorded as voting at this point and everyone's complete inability to find any hard evidence of this mastermind mail in voter fraud scheme is inconceivable. Every vote carries with it a record to a real person so where are these armies of people who didn't vote but are on record as voting? Surely someone would have least pulled the first string that starts to unravel this by now.
 
  • Dumb
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Battyann, PepsiVanilla, BSC and 9 others
HumanHive said:
Just so you know the implicit sword of damocles against this is impeachment. Not following the orders of the USSC is a pretty clear cut charge, and a valid use of impeachment.
Click to expand...
Yeah but that implicit sword of Damocles has to be enforced and i think we both know that in this case its not going to happen. These people are above the law and noone will hold em accountable other than the American People if they manage to put 2 and 2 together.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
  • Late
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, ConfederateIrishman, societyguy01 and 2 others
All becomes gunt said:
Yeah but that impliciy sword of Damocles has to be enforced and i think we both know that in this case its not going to happen. These people are above the law and noone to hold em accountable other than the American People if they manage to put 2 and 2 together.
Click to expand...
Democrats are above the law, but Republicans are not.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, the fall of man and 15 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back