Gamergate III: Rise of the Machines

Status
Not open for further replies.
Some as-of-now unknown tryhard has been plastering these posters around the E3 converntion center:
CHyjdlAWEAAOOyn.jpg


CHzLUpEUAAEN7iA-1024x576.jpg

CHzK9ClUwAALwU3-1024x576.jpg

No one has stepped up and claimed responsibility yet. GG camp is saying it's a troll. aGG Camp is saying was GG.

Me... I believe it was a foppish British gentleman who time traveled here from the past because who in FUCK uses "Pwns" anymore?
These ancient memes and mild insults are really convincing and not a possibly a troll or something planned.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Jaimas
Because the SPARTAN process makes your eyes blue. Ergo, Aryan.

I don't think he's ever read Dune.

Have you read his book? The only part I read was the part where he was wearing that ridiculous Mario costume in a video game store where a child realized he was wearing as Mario. Very poor reading.
 
Have you read his book? The only part I read was the part where he was wearing that ridiculous Mario costume in a video game store where a child realized he was wearing as Mario. Very poor reading.

All I remember from Chipper's book are two things:
1) He meticulously named every -- EVERY -- enemy but still managed to leave out the big fish.
2) Reading his story made me legitimately angry.

I stopped around the time he was fellating Hammer Bros in World 2 or whatever.
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Jaimas
All I remember from Chipper's book are two things:
1) He meticulously named every -- EVERY -- enemy but still managed to leave out the big fish.
2) Reading his story made me legitimately angry.

I stopped around the time he was fellating Hammer Bros in World 2 or whatever.

I literally read the part that was put on Encyclopedia Dramatica as reference to his book. One read of that made me go Nope. When the version by ED (the one with Boob wearing wario colors) is more interesting to read, you got problems.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jaimas
Chipman comes from the type of gamer who was and apparently still is butthurt about the fact that gaming had exploded over the last decade. I mean, remember how a lot of us old-school gamers, the ones who found solace in our Nintendos and Segas and Playstations before it was cool? And then when the market begun to become more prevalent and then we got what Chipman would call the "dudebro" players, the ones that really just buy CoD and Madden games? Chipman has made more than a few cringe-inducing comments about them and will take any potshot he can to belittle anyone who didn't grow up with a Super Mario shirt on. He has repeatedly shown abject revulsion towards anything masculine in appearance or function other than ogling da wimmens until Anita and Co. appeared on the scene. From there he shifted gears because he has this innate need to be the gatekeeper, the supervisor, the intellectual. If you can stomach it, go through his old videos on the Escapist or the Game Overthinker. He revels in the idea of being the premier advisor to all things geeky because he wants to think seniority rules and people should just bow down to his infinite knowledge of whatever.... and not the god dmaned males, starting wars and such!

As of now, Chipman now has a weekly video through Screwattack, who has gone on record to outright state he is on contract with them and his viewpoints do not necessarily reflect their own. Your can also tell which ones are his, as his videos consistently gain the least amount of views against anything else out on their channel.
 
Chipman comes from the type of gamer who was and apparently still is butthurt about the fact that gaming had exploded over the last decade. I mean, remember how a lot of us old-school gamers, the ones who found solace in our Nintendos and Segas and Playstations before it was cool? And then when the market begun to become more prevalent and then we got what Chipman would call the "dudebro" players, the ones that really just buy CoD and Madden games? Chipman has made more than a few cringe-inducing comments about them and will take any potshot he can to belittle anyone who didn't grow up with a Super Mario shirt on. He has repeatedly shown abject revulsion towards anything masculine in appearance or function other than ogling da wimmens until Anita and Co. appeared on the scene. From there he shifted gears because he has this innate need to be the gatekeeper, the supervisor, the intellectual. If you can stomach it, go through his old videos on the Escapist or the Game Overthinker. He revels in the idea of being the premier advisor to all things geeky because he wants to think seniority rules and people should just bow down to his infinite knowledge of whatever.... and not the god dmaned males, starting wars and such!

As of now, Chipman now has a weekly video through Screwattack, who has gone on record to outright state he is on contract with them and his viewpoints do not necessarily reflect their own. Your can also tell which ones are his, as his videos consistently gain the least amount of views against anything else out on their channel.

^ This. All of this.

I remember his Mass Effect 3 video where he berated gamers who had to balls to demand quality for a product they spent money on only to finsh a poor ending for a trilogy they had grown to love. "Does baby need a bottle?" are the words Boob said to gamers at the time.

His Game overthinker series reeks of gamer-hate, especially in the latter videos. Bob's attack on Totalbiscuit a few months ago is a clear demonstration of a man who desperately wants attention but his audience won't give it to him. He just doesn't get the fact that he, like the game journalists and rad fem 'friends' (as I refuse to believe that they even like him, especially Anita), is dead to the gamer community.

VERY IMPORTANT EDIT: Dasboschitt has just uploaded a video in which he said that he has gotten a job and thus he is closing his Patreon account. Would someone like Bob or any of the sjws dream to close their accounts if they get a job (an actual job, saying crap on videos doesn't count as job)? No, no they wouldn't.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Jaimas and _blank_
It's worth noting that Chapped Ass has yet to respond to his being called out, presumably because, like most antis, he has no ability to defend himself:


For me, though, the ScrewAttack chapter has the most delightful aspect of the entire Chapman saga, specifically what happened in literally his very first video when working for them again. True to form, he couldn't resist comparing Gamergate to Stormfront, and the blastback was fucking huge. That's where the disclaimer at the front of his videos comes from: ScrewAttack genuinely didn't want Bob back after he got shit-canned from The Escapist (a victory for all mankind), and wanted to make clear that it was Bob who came crawling and begging to them, not the other way around.

But the best part comes from Bob's shameless promotion of Hillary Clinton. Do you know why?

Hillary was one of Team Thompson. Seriously, she's the one who essentially got Thompson's crazy turned up to 11, and her involvement with his ongoing campaign of lunacy is tacitly considered the point at which any rationality Thompson's campaign may have had went down the fucking toilet. Why? Because Clinton is the one who wanted to regulate video games by making the ESRB ratings enforced at proverbial gunpoint.

Just stop and think about that and think about how shameless Chipman's championing of Anita and Hillary has been, going so far as to blatantly deny any similarities between Anita and Thompson and claiming that GG happened because of fear over Hillary becoming president. One must consider what level of mental calisthenics Chipman must perform to possess this level of cognitive dissonance.

VOAT UPDATE: Voat's been Cloud-saved and is migrating. Updates soon.
 
But the best part comes from Bob's shameless promotion of Hillary Clinton. Do you know why?

Hillary was one of Team Thompson. Seriously, she's the one who essentially got Thompson's crazy turned up to 11, and her involvement with his ongoing campaign of lunacy is tacitly considered the point at which any rationality Thompson's campaign may have had went down the fucking toilet. Why? Because Clinton is the one who wanted to regulate video games by making the ESRB ratings enforced at proverbial gunpoint.


 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaimas
It's worth noting that Chapped Ass has yet to respond to his being called out, presumably because, like most antis, he has no ability to defend himself:


For me, though, the ScrewAttack chapter has the most delightful aspect of the entire Chapman saga, specifically what happened in literally his very first video when working for them again. True to form, he couldn't resist comparing Gamergate to Stormfront, and the blastback was fucking huge. That's where the disclaimer at the front of his videos comes from: ScrewAttack genuinely didn't want Bob back after he got shit-canned from The Escapist (a victory for all mankind), and wanted to make clear that it was Bob who came crawling and begging to them, not the other way around.

But the best part comes from Bob's shameless promotion of Hillary Clinton. Do you know why?

Hillary was one of Team Thompson. Seriously, she's the one who essentially got Thompson's crazy turned up to 11, and her involvement with his ongoing campaign of lunacy is tacitly considered the point at which any rationality Thompson's campaign may have had went down the fucking toilet. Why? Because Clinton is the one who wanted to regulate video games by making the ESRB ratings enforced at proverbial gunpoint.

Just stop and think about that and think about how shameless Chipman's championing of Anita and Hillary has been, going so far as to blatantly deny any similarities between Anita and Thompson and claiming that GG happened because of fear over Hillary becoming president. One must consider what level of mental calisthenics Chipman must perform to possess this level of cognitive dissonance.

VOAT UPDATE: Voat's been Cloud-saved and is migrating. Updates soon.

Bob did 'respond' to Sargon. By respond I mean he made a tweet wondering why british people seem to want him to respond to his own bs. Of course Fat overthinker will never respond to Sargon or anyone who calls him out. He has no balls to stand up to an actual debate. Deep down his Nuegle infested hide he knows that if he does, his arguments will be sunk in less than half a minute.

Also have you noticed his Captain N costume? The N stands for neutured.

As for Anita being pretty much Jack Thompson 2.0? Its okay cos she has a vagina, just like Hillary Clinton.
 
I just checked RationalWiki, looks like Ryulong is still there, and from what I saw on the Gamergate talk page, he still has a ton of people supporting his one man mission to declare Gamergate evil incarnate, and Arcane (aka GethN7, the guy who runs All The Tropes) tried to express some polite pro-Gamergate dissension against the tone of the article, and he got dogpiled and shit on.

He made a post about it here:

https://www.voat.co/v/GamerGate/comments/145724

Here's a related post:

https://www.voat.co/v/allthetropes/comments/116521
 
  • Informative
Reactions: NegaCWC and Jaimas
I just checked RationalWiki, looks like Ryulong is still there, and from what I saw on the Gamergate talk page, he still has a ton of people supporting his one man mission to declare Gamergate evil incarnate, and Arcane (aka GethN7, the guy who runs All The Tropes) tried to express some polite pro-Gamergate dissension against the tone of the article, and he got dogpiled and shit on.

He made a post about it here:

https://www.voat.co/v/GamerGate/comments/145724

Here's a related post:

https://www.voat.co/v/allthetropes/comments/116521

That second one is a pretty chilling case of eyes being opened:

All The Tropes said:
In previous posts, I have indicated my sympathy for the pro-Gamergate crowd, if only because I found them much less detestable than the antis as a whole.

Now, thanks to Wikipedia allowing blatant bullshit as opposed to actual fact on the Brianna Wu article because it goes against the narrative of the apparent SJWs, I'm now a proud, open supporter of pro-Gamergate.

For those who don't care to click that link, it's me on Wikipediocracy expressing my misgivings with their policy on Biography of Living Persons, where I noted politely on the talk page that Brianna Wu was born John Walker Flynt, and despite my own bias, which I carefully noted in advance, I felt it would be in the interests of honesty to note Wu was not born female, as the Wikipedia article on Wu would lead one to believe.

My reward for daring to challenge the narrative was my objection removed, then suppressed, and I was also sent a not so subtle threat on my Wikipedia talk page I was treading on sacred ground and I would be purged as a heretic if I continued to push the issue.

I know when the table is tilted and the game is rigged, so I assured the same Wikipedian who followed me to Wikipediocracy (and delivered the not so subtle threat) I had no intention of forcing the issue, and I don't, as the corruption is manifest and those in power have become corrupted regarding their BLP policy, and I would be a fool to think I can reverse the rotting corpse that has become Wikipedia's integrity concerning the biographies of living people.

Instead, I chose to finally cast my lot with the pro-GamerGate side, whom I sympathized with but to this point avoided taking allegiance to, mostly because I hoped the perversion of honesty practiced by the anti-side was not as bad as I thought.

All this incident did was confirm they have sunk their tentacles into Wikipedia, of all places, and as long as they are in power, Wikipedia will have a bias in favor of their ideology, even if that means objective fact must be Orwelled out of existence to suit their narrative.

The above noted, I reiterate what I have said in earlier posts about my position as founder of All The Tropes and as a staff member of Orain: In those capacities, I am a neutral party on the subject of Gamergate or related matters, and I will recuse myself or abstain from any partisanship if those issues are raised in either sphere of influence, but purely from a personal standpoint, I declare myself an open enemy of the anti-Gamergate side and will do whatever I can to oppose their love of censorship, and I leave all anti-Gamergaters with a final message:

Regardless of the merit of your position, and even if you are correct, a position based on obfuscating truth and propagating lies is a greater shame than the harshest truth, and anyone who wishes to flee from that reality deserves no sympathy when they are forced to face their own deceptions.

I'm bringing this to the Brianna thread, as may be obvious. For the uninitiated, Wu writing her own article is well-documented.
 
Last edited:
Thereby proving the need for sites like Voat.

To be fair Voat was run out of Germany, a country with crazy ass hate speech laws (for obvious reasons) so some asshat just made a simple complaint and thats all it takes.

They got like 8K in donations in 3 days and I'm sure they'll move to a more neutral server ASAP.

On the plus side, check out the new AMD ad;

CH45htXVEAAQgtF.png:large
 
To be fair Voat was run out of Germany, a country with crazy ass hate speech laws (for obvious reasons) so some asshat just made a simple complaint and thats all it takes.

If I remember right, it's a crime in Germany to think the holocaust didn't happen. Not just to publish denials. Not just to publicly deny it. Not even to quietly deny it in the privacy of your own home. Simply thinking it is illegal.

Those wacky Nazis.
 
If I remember right, it's a crime in Germany to think the holocaust didn't happen. Not just to publish denials. Not just to publicly deny it. Not even to quietly deny it in the privacy of your own home. Simply thinking it is illegal.

Those wacky Nazis.

Gotta love the Germans. Even when they try something that sounds totally well intentioned, they just have to be a bunch of Nazis about it.
 
If I remember right, it's a crime in Germany to think the holocaust didn't happen. Not just to publish denials. Not just to publicly deny it. Not even to quietly deny it in the privacy of your own home. Simply thinking it is illegal.

Those wacky Nazis.

Ironically the anti-hate speech laws in several European countries has spurred the rise of the far-right in Europe and has caused a rise in anti-semitic and racist hate crimes.

The reason? When you ban anything you're giving it a platform for it to martyr itself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back